HomeMy WebLinkAbout1,234 - August 19, 2025 signedMINUTES OF THE 1,234th PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REGULAR MEETING
HELD BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LIVONIA
On Tuesday, August 19, 2025, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia
held its 1,234th Public Hearing and Regular Meetings in the Livonia City Hall, 33000
Civic Center Drive, Livonia, Michigan.
Mr. Ian Wilshaw, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 7 p.m.
Members present: Patrick Droze David Bongero Sam Caramagno
Glen Long Peter Ventura Ian Wilshaw
Members absent: Wafa Dinaro
Mr. Jacob Uhazie, Planning Director, and Stephanie Reece, Program Supervisor,
were also present.
Chairman Wilshaw informed the audience that if a petition on tonight's agenda
involves a rezoning request, this Commission makes a recommendation to the City
Council who, in turn, will hold its own public hearing and make the final
determination as to whether a petition is approved or denied. The Planning
Commission holds the only public hearing on a request for preliminary plat and/or
vacating petition. The Commission's recommendation is forwarded to the City
Council for the final determination as to whether a plat is accepted or rejected. If a
petition requesting a waiver of use or site plan approval is denied tonight, the
petitioner has ten days in which to appeal the decision, in writing, to the City
Council. Resolutions adopted by the City Planning Commission become effective
seven (7) days after the date of adoption. The Planning Commission and the
professional staff have reviewed each of these petitions upon their filing. The staff
has furnished the Commission with both approving and denying resolutions, which
the Commission may, or may not, use depending on the outcome of the
proceedings tonight.
ITEM #1 PETITION 2025-07-02-15 Clean Express Car Wash
Mr. Caramagno, Secretary, announced the first item on the agenda, Petition 2025-
07-02-15 submitted by Mannik & Smith Group, on behalf of Clean
Express Car Wash, requesting waiver use approval under
Sections 3.11 and Section 6.07 of the Livonia Zoning Ordinance,
as amended, to operate an Auto -Wash Establishment, at 38888
Six Mile Road, located at the N.E. corner of Fox Drive and Six.
Mile Road in the S.W.' of Section 7.
Mr. Wilshaw: Mr. Ventura.
Mr. Ventura:
Mr. Wilshaw:
Mr. Wilshaw:
Mr. Uhazie:
August 19, 2025
31962
My company represents the owner of this land, but not the
petitioner. But for that reason, I'm going to recuse myself from the
proceedings this evening.
Okay, we'll let you step away from the dais. Thank you, Mr.
Ventura.
Now we'll go to Mr. Uhazie for background information on this
petition.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman, good evening. This is a request to
operate an auto wash establishment located on the northeast
corner of Fox Drive and Six Mile Road. The petition parcel is L
shaped with approximately 207 feet of frontage on Six Mile Road
and 311 feet along Fox Drive. The site is the former Buca de
Beppo restaurant, which is currently vacant. The parcel size is
1.61 acres. The existing zoning of the subject site is C-2. Adjacent
properties are zoned, RUF to the east, which is the cemetery with
the parking in front, zoned P. To the north and west is C-1 as part
of the Assisted Living Center, and across Six Mile is commercial,
zoned C-4. Operating auto wash establishments are allowed as
a waiver -use under Section 6.07 of the zoning ordinance. Auto
wash establishments cannot be located nearer than 150 feet, as
measured from any point on the property to any point of a church,
public or parochial school or playground. There are neither of
those within 150 feet of this property. The proposal includes
removing the existing building, including the basement foundation
and utilities. The existing Six Mile Road driveway would be
removed and moved to from the southwest corner to the
southeast corner of the property, and a second drive is shown in
the northwest corner to access Fox Drive. A new 14,229 square
foot auto wash building that measures 23 feet in height at its
tallest and about 17 1/2 feet along the rest of the building would
be constructed. The proposed building's dimensions would
measure 93 feet by 153 feet. The building location will meet both
the 15-foot and eight -foot minimum setback requirements.
Section 6.07 requires that a building be situated no closer than
35 feet on one side of the property and eight feet to the other. The
building will be approximately 60 feet from the west property line
and approximately 45 feet from the east property line. The
building complies with all minimum required setback regulations.
Plans show three service lanes providing access to the car wash.
The lanes commence along the east side of the property
maneuvering in a northerly direction and then looping back south
to the entrance on the north side of the building. The plan shows
stacking for 21 vehicles. Each lane would have a pay station
adjacent to the east side of the building, just before turning and
entering into the building. Beyond the pay stations, the service
lanes tapered to a single 12-foot drive aisle to manage vehicles
August 19, 2025
31963
as they enter the facility. A 12-foot bypass lane is provided after
the pay stations, allowing vehicles to exit the site via 24-foot drive
onto Fox drive. Vehicles will exit the car wash at the south end of
the building and can either turn left to exit the site or make a right
onto the two way drive. This would provide access to 13 outdoor
parking spaces, nine of which would have proposed outdoor
vacuums. There is a second 20-foot entrance to the building on
the south end. This allows access to 14 indoor vacuum spaces.
There's also a drive to the east that connects to the Trinity House
theater. The site plan shows single striped parking. The zoning
ordinance requires at least 20 spaces for auto wash
establishments. The site plan shows 13 outdoor parking stalls
located on the eastern side of the building, and the floor plan
shows an additional 14 parking spaces with vacuums, which are
located within the building. There is a dumpster enclosure shown
in the northwest corner of the building. Details of the enclosed
closure are not provided. A single dumpster would need to be
consistent with the city's policy of requiring durable, long, lasting,
solid panel material and enclosed on three sides by masonry
walls that would be at least six feet in height. Additional details
are required to determine compliance with the city's sign
regulations. The maximum height for a monument sign in the C-
2 business district is six feet. The maximum area for a sign in the
C-2 business district is 30 square feet. According to section
11.04, no sign shall be permitted at any location that creates any
type of safety hazard or visual impairment to pedestrian or
vehicular traffic. The submitted floor plan shows three separate
portions of the building. There is the car wash bay area, the
indoor vacuum section, and then the office, bathrooms and
equipment rooms. Elevations show the building with quick brick
finish, there would be light finish along the top three quarters, and
a dark finish across the bottom quarter. Fiber cement with
horizontal siding for the wall with the car wash logo over here.
They also have some renderings that will be shown here in a
second. The landscape plan shows 37 frontage trees, 30 which
are evergreens and seven that are deciduous. There are eight
existing trees remaining in the parking lot, and there will be
evergreen and deciduous screening plants along Fox drive. No
changes would be provided to the eastern property line. Along
the C-2 to RUF, there is an existing wall and fencing. There are
eight existing trees along the west property line, the C-2 to C-1
border. The required amount of green belt buffering along the
west property line is 10 trees. The site plan provides three more
trees along the west property line, satisfying the requirement. The
south property line trees are already provided as the south
property line is in the Six Mile Road frontage, five trees are.
required. Seven of the frontage trees are provided, satisfying the
requirement. There will be stone mulch planting beds, as well as
lawn area with sod. The photometric plan submitted for the site
August 19, 2025
31964
shows foot light candles at or below 0.5. at the property line with
adjacent properties. Two existing light poles are scheduled to
remain on the property. Three proposed 18-foot lighting fixtures
are shown. There is another fixture over the west side of the
parking lot. The double lighting fixture is over the 12 foot drive
north of the building, providing illumination to the exit of the indoor
vacuums and the entrance to the car wash. The average
illumination levels on the car wash property appear consistent
with the pre-existing ones. As I mentioned, here are some of the
renderings that have been provided since our study session. As
you can see, there's the light coloring along the top three quarters
and then the dark finish along the bottom. The petitioner also
submitted a stormwater management plan that shows
underground water storage in the southwest corner of the
property by Six Mile drive. As part of the petition, they have
worked with neighboring property owners, and in the past, there
was a traffic study done. The petitioner did submit an example of
what was provided from that traffic study, showing a proposed
signal layout that they were working with the county to get
approval on showing how traffic would be managed at the site. I
addition to that, we they also provided a draft letter showing to
the neighbors to secure access to Fox Drive. And they're
reviewing their ability to shut off the interior lighting after hours.
That was shown to be a concern at our study session as well.
And that with that, Mr. Chairman, I have some correspondence
Mr. Wilshaw: Sure, if you'd like to read out the correspondence
Mr. Uhazie:
The first item is from the Engineering Division, dated July 23,
2025, which reads as follows: "In accordance with your request,
the Engineering Division has reviewed the above referenced
petition. We have no objections to the proposed waiver use at this
time, but would like to note the following items: 1. The subject
parcel is assigned the address of #38888 Six Mile Road. Should
additional addresses be needed, the Owner will need to contact
this Department once approvals have been obtained. 2. The
existing parcel is currently serviced by public sanitary sewer,
storm sewer and water main. Based on the submitted drawings,
we have the following comments: i) Sanitary Sewer: The
drawings do not include a basis of design for the proposed
sanitary sewer outlet, but we do not believe the change in use will
negatively impact the existing system. The developer will be
required to clean and televise the existing sanitary sewer lead if
it is to be re -used. If the condition is not sufficient for re -use, a
new service will need to be installed to the parcel. ii) Water Main:
The drawings do not indicate that the existing water service will
be re -used for the proposed business, but if that is the intention,
the owner will need to determine if the existing service is correctly
sized for the proposed use. HD Storm Sewer: The drawings do not
August 19, 2025
31965
indicate any storm sewer information. Storm sewer design and
detention will be required per the Wayne County Storm Water
Ordinance. This department will do a full review of the proposed
improvements when drawings are submitted for permitting. 3..
Any improvements within the Six Mile Road right-of-way will
require approval and permitting from the Wayne County
Department of Public Service. Turning movements onto Six Mile
Road from the site may be restricted based on comments from
Wayne County traffic reviews. 4. We would recommend that the
proposed business be required to place sidewalk along the west
side of the property (along the Fox Drive frontage) to facilitate
pedestrian traffic into the existing (and proposed) businesses
through that corridor." The letter is signed by David W. Lear, P.E.,
Assistant City Engineer. The next letter is from the Livonia Fire &
Rescue Division, dated August 6, 2025, which reads as follows:
"This office has reviewed the site plan submitted in connection
with a request to construct a commercial building on property
located at the above referenced address. We have no objections
to this proposal. A further detailed plan review will take place
when this division receives an official plan set." The letter is
signed by Brian Kukla, Fire Marshal. The next letter is from the
Division of Police, dated July 25, 2025, which reads as follows: "1
have reviewed the plans in connection with the petition. 1 have no
objections to the proposal." The letter is signed by Paul Walters,
Sergeant, Traffic Bureau. The next letter is from the Inspection
Department, dated July 31, 2025, which reads as follows:
"Pursuant to your request, the above -referenced Petition has
been reviewed. 1. Signage shall conform to the city's sign
ordinance, or a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals would
be required. 2. An enclosure of sufficient height to completely
screen the dumpster is required on three (3) sides of the waste
receptacle, with a solid gate on the fourth side. The height of the
enclosure must be not less than six (6) feet or at least one (1) foot
above the height of the dumpster, whichever is greater. The
enclosure gates shall be of solid panel steel construction or
durable, long-lasting solid panel fiberglass and, when not in use,
closed at all times. The enclosure must be constructed of the
same or compatible material and colors as the principal building
in terms of texture and quality. This Department has no further
objections to this Petition" The letter is signed by Jerome Hanna,
Director of Inspection. The next letter is from the Treasurer's
Department, dated July 23, 2025, which reads as follows: "All
taxes have been paid on this property' The letter is signed by
Susie Nash, Treasurer. We also did receive a number of public
comments that have been provided to you for review ahead of
time to be considered.
Mr. Wilshaw: We did receive many emails regarding this petition, so instead of
reading those all out individually, just note that they are part of
Mr. Bongero:
Mr. Uhazie:
Mr. Bongero:
Mr. Uhazie:
Mr. Bongero:
Mr. Uhazie:
Mr. Bongero:
Mr. Wilshaw:
Mr. Droze:
Mr. Uhazie:
Mr. Droze:
Mr. Wilshaw:
Mr. Uhazie:
August 19, 2025
31966
our record, and we have had a chance to review them. So, thank
you. Is there any questions for the planning staff from any of the
commissioners?
So, there's no new traffic study done?
No. They provided one that was done, I believe in 2023.
That was done by Schoolcraft College?
I don't know in what capacity, but yeah, they were the one that's
provided it.
Okay, they are going to put a new traffic light in?
I believe there are talks with Wayne County, but that would
probably be better question for the petitioner to see where that is
actually at in the process.
Okay, thank you.
Thank you. Mr. Bongero, any other questions for staff?
Thank you, Mr. Chair. Mr. Uhazie, there were several renderings
included in the packet, and I guess a couple of them appeared to
differ from the site plan. Are those provided as more of a
reference for some of the, you know, the material choices, or, I
guess, particularly the differences between the elevation and, I
believe design, the architectural site plan and then the rendering?
So I believe they were as examples more for the covering to give
the elevations where the what the petitioner was using, and then
the renderings were more for the color palettes.
Okay.
Thank you. Mr. Droze. Any other questions for staff? Mr. Uhazie,
just one question. You mentioned the agreement between this
petitioner and the neighbor who owns this strip of property along
Fox Drive to get cross access to that road. Is that agreement in
place? Or is that just proposed at this time?
I believe it has been sent to the neighbor, as far as I know, but I
do not know the status since then.
Mr. Wilshaw: Okay.
Mr. Uhazie:
Mr. Wilshaw:
August 19, 2025
31967
They seemed confident that it would be something that they could
come to work together on, but I've not seen anything that's been
finally signed.
Okay, all right, thank you. I appreciate you clarifying that for me.
If there's no other questions for staff, then the petitioner is in our
audience. Feel free to come forward to our podium. I'll ask that
you start with your name and address for our record. Good
evening.
My name is Jacob Rilett, Mannick Smith Group or the design engineer on this
project. Thanks for your presentation, Jacob. I mean, they
covered most of the basics of the site plan itself. Little background
on Express wash. It's about 125 locations throughout the
Midwest, starting in Ohio. They're moving gradually north into
Michigan. This will be the third Livonia site that we've done. So
you guys are a little familiar with what we do. They're really proud
of themselves on, you know, the visual look of their sites, the over
exceeding the requirements on landscaping and really working
with neighbors and helping improve the whole area, not just their
own site. There's a pretty advanced water reclamation system
that recycles about 80% of the water used from each wash, so it
really minimizes the impact on utilities and all those related
things. As far as stacking, we don't have any concerns about the
ability of this site to spilling out into the road or impacting that with
backups or anything along those lines. They're capable of cycling
through about 100 cars an hour, if need be. So the long backups
that you see on some other car wash models just don't happen
on this because of the more advanced blower technology. They
don't need hand dryers out at the end, slowing things down. It's
90 seconds you're in and you're out. The vacuums are free to the
public and open at all times. Well, open during business hours,
but that's just a free amenity that's added with the service. As far
as the traffic signal proposed, that's something that's been in the
works for as I understand it, about two years. Schoolcraft College
and HRC have been working on that with the county. The main
reason to my knowledge, that it hasn't happened yet is because
the existing curb cut of the Buca to pepper site is on the
southwest corner, which would really make the signal unviable.
And then by going forward with the layout that we provide here, it
allows that curb cut on Six Mile to move over to the southeast
corner of the site and really allows that traffic signal to go into
place. And we believe that it's going to really offset a lot of the
traffic concerns that might be had about a car wash coming in
here, because car washes are an automated heavy use. As far
as a new traffic study, I mean, we didn't have time since the study
meeting last week to get a full new traffic study done for this site,
but I can provide you some useful numbers and sell you the ITE
manual for traffic. For a car wash site, it recommends that you
Mr. Wilshaw:
Mr. Rilett:
August 19, 2025
31968
use about 70 trips generated for a peak hour traffic. So that's your
peak hour, your most vehicles you're ever going to see is about
70. But for a car wash site, they recommend about a 75% factor
of that to be passed by traffic. Car washes are an impulse
purchase that you get when you're already out. People aren't
leaving their houses to go get a car wash and go back home. So
that impact that you're going to see of new trips generated by this
site is really only 17-18, at the peak hours of business. And we
believe, you know, with the traffic signal going in there, that's
going to be an improvement upon the existing condition, and it's
going to finally allow for that left turn off of Fox drive on to Six
Mile, so we believe that the traffic impact is going to be improved
from the current state.
Okay, anything else you'd like to tell us about the business and
the layout of this business, I think you mentioned that you have
sort of a unique design in the sense of compared to the other
ones that we've seen in the city with indoor vacuum model.
Yes, the indoor vaccum building is a sort of new prototype
concept that they've been working for. We've got three or four
sites in development with this, but especially in Michigan, you
know, with our lovely winters, you don't want to be outside
vacuuming your cars walking around in the freezing cold. This
allows for an indoor vacuum bay. After you've gone through the
car wash, you are free to, at any point to come into the sort of a
hanger bay here and use the vacuums inside. It's heated. The
floors are all heated, so you won't have any freezing issues,
anything like that. And it's really more of a luxury model of a car
wash. Ifs kind of like the crown jewel of what you would ask for a
car wash to be and it kind of is a good...a common concern we
see with cities, with these new sites we bring in, is everybody
says there's so many car washes. Why do we need more
generally, the thought processes, so Express's 120 sites, mostly
in Columbus, Detroit area is just underserved as far as car
washes. The number of washes per vehicle in this area is
significantly lower than you would see in Columbus, and they
believe it's kind of created by, you know, when you have these
subscription model washes somebody that maybe only washed
their car once a month. They come, they like it, they get a
subscription. All of a sudden, they're doing it two, three times a
week. You can really increase the demand by having these nice
systems. The subscription at this location is good at any of our
other locations as well. So, people really they'll put these, you
know, only a mile away from each other back in Columbus, and
they don't see an impact on a loss on the business. They really
do support themselves.
Mr. Wilshaw:
Mr. Rilett:
Mr. Wilshaw:
Mr. Droze:
Mr. Rilett:
Mr. Droze:
Mr. Rilett:
August 19, 2025
31969
Okay, is there anything else you'd like to tell us before we get
some questions for you?
Fire away.
All right, let's see if there's some questions. Any commissioners
with questions for the petitioner?
Mr. Rilett, at our study session, we talked briefly about some of
the adjacent property owners, and I think coordination with them
is, you know, seems like that would be an important item for this.
Sounds like the Fox Drive is well underway with getting an
easement and that access, which I think will help with traffic, but
to the property to the east, I think at our initial rapid response
meeting several months ago, we talked about how, although it's
maybe not documented, it seems like there was some kind of
reciprocal parking agreement written down, or maybe not, with
the Trinity house to the east. Has there been any discussion
between the property owners about if there's an option for
providing some that parking? Because right now, it's, I think it's
about 127 spaces. And you know, I think you're taking it down to
13, with multiples being vacuum sites. So, has there been any
discussion with the adjacent property owner about how that might
be accommodated?
I believe Express has reached out to them. We did dig through
sort of the titles and easements, and there's a cross access
agreement in place, but there's no written formal shared parking
agreement. I know, speaking with the Express representatives,
they've got no issue with any of these spaces being used after
business hours. We close at 8pm every night. I don't know what
time most of their shows are at, but I know they have reached out,
or intend to, at least, to them to come up with some sort of formal
agreement as far as sharing any of our, you know, we have a lot
of open spaces along there. I don't think we'd be able to keep the
indoor vacuum bay open all night, but I don't think Express has
any issue sharing those outside spaces after business hours.
Okay, and then I guess expanding on that, there is a fair amount
of open space on the north side of the property. Would that be
some sort of arrangement that would be possible to maybe
repurpose that for cross access parking, because, really, I mean,
they're located between the daycare center and the cemetery,
which certainly the later will not be able to move. I guess, if there's
any opportunity, is that something that's on the table?
Essentially, so the northern portion of this property had been
hauled off in the design, in case the property owner to the north
wanted to expand his own parking lot is part of the agreement to
Mr. Droze:
Mr. Rilett:
Mr. Wilshaw:
Leah Michaels,
Mr. Droze:
August 19, 2025
31970
get that Fox Drive access. It doesn't seem like that is one of his
requests at this time. So there's a chance we could provide extra
parking up there. I don't know that would be something that I
would have to discuss with Express ownership if we were to
create extra parking just for someone else to use, it's... I can't say,
I promise you that for them so, but as of right now, that's the
reason that north area has been withheld, is just in case it was
needed as part of negotiation for the Fox Drive access, because
that was a major priority for the traffic signal as well.
Okay, and I guess I have one question on the traffic study itself.
So, it looks like it was done roughly 2022 2023 is that reflective
of current traffic volumes. I know we had kind of a dip in traffic
after COVID, and that rebounded. Is that, I guess, are the findings
of that study still valid. And, you know, with obviously, the
restaurant has been deducted, but now were adding this back in,
I guess, maybe talk to the validity of the study, and if there could
be any additional work needed, what that might look like.
So, we have a traffic engineer from HRC that I believe, worked
on the traffic study here, and she could probably speak to that
question a lot better than I can. I'm no traffic expert.
Thank you. That'd be excellent.
HRC. The traffic study you saw was something that HRC had
worked with Schoolcraft College on a couple of years ago. So, I
do want to make it clear that it does not have the projected traffic
volumes from the car wash in there. This study was completed to
look at the potential for a new traffic signal at Fox Drive and Six
Mile. So, we have been working with Schoolcraft College for the
past couple years, as well as some of the engineers from the city
and Wayne County to try to get this traffic signal installed. One of
the major reasons it hasn't yet is because of the location of the
current driveway to the Buca de Pepo property. One of the
stipulations from Wayne County roads is that that driveway not
be there because it conflicts with some of the turning movements,
specifically from Quakertown on the south side. So that's the
reason the signal has not gone in yet. This is a signal that is being
funded by Schoolcraft College. So, I'm here tonight just to point
to if this land were to get redeveloped, we really want that
driveway location to be pushed towards the east, so that
Schoolcraft College and others can get the traffic signal there. So
long answer to that question, but yes, it was done a couple years
ago for purposes of the traffic signal.
And I guess with that...
Ms. Michaels:
Mr. Droze:
Ms. Michaels:
Mr. Droze:
Ms. Michaels:
Mr. Droze:
Mr. Wilshaw:
Mr. Bongero:
Ms. Michaels:
Mr. Bongero:
August 19, 2025
31971
Sorry. So, John from Schoolcraft College wanted me to point out
that a couple years ago, a signal was warranted there without any
additional traffic from some of these developments that have
occurred over the past couple of years.
Okay. And I guess maybe my last question on that is, if this
driveway were to be moved as part of this project, is there
anything holding back the signal project at that point? So, if this
gets approved, the signal could get started. Kind of where I'm
looking at it is, the signal is in place before the development
opens? Is that realistic?
Yeah, so we have it fully designed. We don't have permits yet.
We were kind of waiting on that because we knew a permit
wouldn't be issued until the driveway was closed, so we have
plans ready to go. It'd just be a matter of getting permits from the
county and bidding the project.
And fundings in place?
Yep, Schoolcraft College and their group of people have all
agreed to fund it.
Okay, thank you. I'm good.
Ms. Michaels, while you're up here, is there any other questions
for our traffic engineer?
Yes. Thank you for coming up tonight. So I know the study that
its two and a half years old. It could never factor in a car wash.
Would you even be able to speak to...with this Tight you think,
help manage that traffic adequately with the car wash being there,
or you couldn't even answer that? You'd have to do a new study?
It'd be tough to answer. But I do know that the putting a traffic
signal at Fox drive there was room for additional traffic, because
I know Schoolcraft College had some other developments kind of
planned in the area that we knew this traffic signal could absorb
some additional traffic in the area. I think anything from this
parcel, at least having the driveway go out to Fox drive is a
definite improvement. People using the fox drive and then a
signal to turn on a six mile is a lot safer than I think the current
driveway that's there now.
But you couldn't,without them doing a separate study, there's just
no way you could...
Yeah, I can't speak to that. I'm sorry.
Ms. Michaels:
August 19, 2025
31972
Mr. Bongero: Okay. Thank you.
Mr. Wilshaw: Thank you. Mr. Bongero, any other questions for our traffic
engineer?
Mr. Long:
Can you speak to the configuration of a signal, I mean, Fox drive,
and then the entrance to the subdivision are not aligned. So how
does that work? Is there more than one light there? And do they
allow them to turn into a green? Do you know how that would
work?
Ms. Michaels: Yep. So, it'd be like a split phase. So when Quaker town received
a green light, it would be the only one that had a green light. So
everybody exiting Quaker town, and then Fox drive would be a
separate phase. So would have a green light at a separate time,
and then your Six Mile traffic would go together. So, they would
each have separate signals and separate phasing. And quick, I
guess I should add Quakertown, and working with the City of
Livonia, will be adding a northbound left turn lane, so taking out
that median that's there to help improve some of the flow coming
off of Quaker town onto Six Mile that was something we've been
working with the city engineers on as well.
Mr. Wilshaw: Thank you. My question was actually very similar. It's just in
explaining that this is essentially an offset signal, and both the
traffic coming out of Fox drive and Quaker town will both be
protected with a dedicated phase as they use their respective
directions. Okay, that way there's no conflicts or cars hitting each
other. Excellent. Okay, that's the only question I had. Is there any
other questions for a traffic engineer? We're gonna let her sit back
down. Everyone's good. Mr. Droze?
Mr. Droze:
Maybe one more. Ms. Michaels, I guess your the engineer record
for the signal. But has there been any discussion with maybe
Wayne County offered it in terms of the operation of the car wash
driveway. Would that Six Mile access be right in, right out, or
would it permit, like a left turn out of there? Just curious.
Ms. Michaels: So, I don't know about the car wash specifically. About a year
ago, when we were talking about Buca de Pepo, they were
requesting that it be right in, right out.
Mr. Droze:
Mr. Wilshaw:
Mr. Bongero:
Okay. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Bongero: Go ahead,
How crucial to this traffic management, in your opinion, is that
additional access onto Fox Drive. You know what I am saying?
That's needed, right? To pull this off. They're going to need that
August 19, 2025
31973
if they don't, because that's not a guarantee. Yet, they don't have
it. They've been talking to them, but they don't have it yet.
Ms. Michaels: For a car wash, yes, I think you definitely need a second
Mr. Bongero: They need that additional. Okay, okay. Thank you.
Mr. Wilshaw: Anyone else? All right, I think for all set, thank you. Ms. Michaels,
for coming up. Any other questions for our petitioner?
Mr. Bongero: Just following up on that Fox Street access. What is the holdup
of like not having a...
Mr. Rilett: So, the property owner of the north, he was at the study meeting
that we had last week. I know the agreement was sent over the
day after that meeting. I know it's been signed by the Express
side. I don't think there's any hold up, really, at this point, it may
have already been signed. Express is handling that. I'm not the
engineer, but it's, I mean, we would expect that within the next
week to be signed, yeah. I mean, there's been no, there's no
resistance to it at this point.
Mr. Bongero:
Mr. Wilshaw:
Mr. Long:
Mr. Rilett:
Mr. Long:
Mr. Rilett:
Okay. Thank you
Thank you, Mr. Long.
Thank you. Could you talk about the proposed traffic flow on the
site and would exit traffic then...would traffic be forced to exit onto
Fox Road? Because that would certainly provide...
Tey would have choices to...so if you've got this like plan up here,
I don't know if the audience can see it, but you'd enter in from
either Fox or Six mile, and you'd come around the west and south
side of the building. You enter into the stacking lanes along the
southeast corner. Here you go up. You got three pay station
kiosks. There you come around to make the U turn into the tunnel
at that north east corner of the building. Come all the way through
the wash tunnel. At that point, you're free to leave if you choose
to, if you want to wash your car, you're able to make the U turn
back into the wash bay on the west side of the building and come
out the north side. Or you can use the outdoor vacuums to swing
around the south end there. And at that point, it's fully a' two way
drive around both ends. So you can you're free to either way you
come in, you're free to use either exit.
I understand, and people are going to do what they do, just like
people turn left on Fox. Drive right now, even though...
But with this they would be allowed to do, right?
Mr. Long:
Mr. Rilett:
Mr. Long:
Mr. Rilett:
Mr. Long:
Mr. Rilett:
Mr. Uhazie:
Mr. Rilett:
August 19, 2025
31974
Would the petitioner be opposed to encouraging people to exit
Fox Drive and again, I guess we, we probably would want to see
that driveway as a right turn only anyway,
Yeah. I mean, if no left turn is allowed out of Six Mile, I mean that
alone would encourage anybody wanting to go left, to exit Fox
drive side.
And then there's been discussion, and understandably, you can't
speak to the to the ability of the proposed parking to the north to
help the theater. But would they be able to get access to that site,
or is it all gated out? Does the does the bailout lane get them back
there?
So, the bailout lanes not gated or anything. I'm not sure at night,
what would happen with the kiosks, as they be able to access
through there, if we were to put something up in that, that
northeast sort of square that's kind of isolated from the rest of the
project. But, yeah, I mean, I'm sure there'd be some sort of
signage in place saying, you know, after hours, you can go
through the bailout lanes here and access that area. If we were
to add some sort of parking up in that section, we had also initially
discussed a cross -access connection with the property the north
if they were going to access that, but that, and they ended up just
allowing the cut straight to Fox Drive.
And then my, my last, hopefully, my last comment or question is,
can you talk a little bit more about the water saving technologies
that you use now compared to some of the older car washes, and
speak to that.
If you can then get to the utility plan here, it'd be a c400. I believe
I'll have to bring it up.
But in the meantime, I can kind of walk you through it. So, along
that underneath the pavement of the vacuum spaces on the west
side of the building, you'd have your sanitary leads that lead out
from the wash tunnel bay. There's a grease interceptor that
captures any, you know, chemical items that get caught up in that
and then It goes through three separate water reclamation tanks
that recycle as much water as they can get, about 80% per wash.
So each wash uses, I believe it's 30 gallons, so almost all that
ends up coming back in.
Adam Meyer, Regional Manager for Express wash. So, on the typical car wash, if
you wash it at your house, you use 125 gallons. Our wash is used
just over 20.
August 19, 2025
31975
Mr. Rilett: That's after the recycle. Yep.
Mr. Long: Thank you.
Mr. Wilshaw: Thank you. Mr. Long. Any other questions for our petitioner? Mr.
Droze.
Mr. Droze:
Yes, the engineering letter mentioned a sidewalk along Fox drive
is that within your ability, as part of the agreement to install that
or that need to be on your property in a way that might affect your
landscaping?
Mr. Rilett: I mean, if its in the right of way, does Fox drive have a public right
of way?
Mr. Droze: Private it looks like? But there's probably some sort of...
Mr. Rilett:
Mr. Droze:
Mr. Rilett:
Mr. Droze:
That would have to be brought up with the agreement with the
neighbor then, I mean, we'd have no problem doing it, but we
can't promise that on his behalf. If not, yeah, I mean, we'd be
willing to kick it back to our property line. It would just be quite a
bit off the road at that point.
And then the last question, Jake, if you go to the A2-1
elevation...there you go. So kind of the...by my judgment, the
eastern and southern facades are, I guess, a little less inviting
than the Western facade. Is there any embellishments or
architectural details or windows or what have you that can be
added to kind of break up the you know, it's basically just brick
and the siding facade. Some of the examples you shared from, I
think it was a shaker Ohio rendering had a little more street front
character to it. Is that something that could be added to this?
Yeah, I mean, they're able to add sort of the facade over the top,
that makes it look nice, or even clean up, sort of with, I'm an
architect, to forget all the terms. But yeah, they can. They can
spice things up, as far as visuals with, you know, accents on over
doorways or windows. So, a lot of that, that eastern side that
you're talking about is the mechanical rooms. So, I don't know, I
think they're pretty limited as far as windows is what they can put
there.
Less so the east side it is more of the southern side. This is the
side that people are going to see as they come into Livonia, off
the expressway. For the first time. It's again, it's one of these
gateway properties that, you know, prefer to have a little more
character to it. The one on Plymouth Road. It's narrower, but it
feels a little more, you know, with the glass, it just feels a little
Mr. Rilett:
August 19, 2025
31976
more consistent with that commercial corridor is this, you know,
it's just a lot of brick and two garage doors. So, I guess I just offer,
you know, maybe working with planning staff to explore that a
little bit.
Yeah. I mean, see that, if that was attached as a condition, I know
we could accommodate something there. Yep, I don't know as far
as windows, just because I'm not sure. I don't know the structural
bones of the building, but I know they can, they can do some stuff
with it. Yeah, okay.
Mr. Wilshaw: Is that all, Mr. Droze?
Mr. Droze: That is it.
Mr. Wilshaw: Thank you. All right. Thank you. Any other questions for the
petitioner?
Mr. Caramagno: Good evening. I happen to like this rendering of the building
compared to the three renderings that you brought to us at the
study session. I think this is more tasteful, for sure. Is this
proposal a fair rendering of what your what your what this building
will look like at the end of the day?
Mr. Rilett: Yes.
Mr. Caramagno: With the enhancements Mr. Droze is talking about, okay. One of
my concerns after the meeting last week was the car wash on
Farmington Road, just south of Eight Mile road. I drive by there
sometimes late at night, and I know we've talked about LED
lighting being turned off or not visible, but all the windows that are
naturally on a car wash when the lights are on, it looks absolutely
terrible. And I see we've got a provision in here to turn them off,
and I seen some other language in here that the car wash will
look and see what they can do about it. But to me, that's a big
deal those, those green, purple, orange, red lights,
Mr. Meyer:
Yeah, so this was brought to my attention on Saturday. On
Monday, yesterday, I had switches installed on those lighting
systems. As of tonight, it's part of the closing task for those to be
shut off.
Mr. Caramagno: They'll be shut right off?
Mr. Meyer: Completely off, and no color.
Mr. Caramagno: And so no colors, they'll be white, like we've got here, or red and
purple. No, we're gonna, shut them right down. Beautiful. Good,
good.
August 19, 2025
31977
Mr. Caramagno: My next question for you is, on the on the east side of the
property, we talked about the parking for the neighbor, well, that's
not your responsibility. They have some sort of a ability to park
on the property in the past, and now I see a fence, maybe a
concrete fence, on that east side along the cemetery. Are you
putting a wall up there? Is that just what it looks like here?
Mr. Rilett: That's just what it looks like. No, that's the existing Yep. No, no
screening changes to that side.
Mr. Caramagno: Let's go back to that for a minute. So, the cemetery fence that's
all run down there. You're not putting anything up along there.
Well, you're just gonna properly run right up to that cemetery
fence that's dilapidated, and there'd be nothing there. Thought I
saw a rendering here of a fence.
Mr. Rilett: I think there's a small brick wall and a fence, if I'm...
Mr. Uhazie: Currently, there is a brick wall and with like a iron fence above it.
Yeah, there's like, a grade change right there.
Mr. Caramagno: Okay, so there's no enhancements to that side of the property?
Mr. Rilett: Not at this time, no.
Mr. Caramagno: So, if you're gonna allow some parking at the back of that property
for the theater? Is there a way to pour a sidewalk on that side of
the property where they're not walking through your lanes to get
to a theater event?
Mr. Rilett:
I think that might be contingent on what the grading in that area
looks like. I haven't done a full deep dive on that yet. If there was
any way to create some sort of pedestrian access path on that
side? Yeah, that's something we could accommodate.
Mr. Caramagno: Of course, the problems come with it winter time. Who's going to
shovel the snow, but it would... if you allowed parking in the back
for them. It would allow them to walk down a sidewalk, or
someone down a sidewalk, as opposed to walking through your
lanes if they had an afternoon show. So, maybe something to look
at. That's all I've got.
Mr. Wilshaw:
All right, thank you, Mr. Caramagno. Any other questions for the
petitioner. I just have a couple...the write up that we have says
that there's going to be nine outdoor vacuums, and I think 14
interior ones. The renderings of course, show many more than
that we've already established. I believe that the renderings are
not necessarily an accurate representation.
Mr. Rilett:
Mr. Wilshaw:
Mr. Rilett:
Mr. Wilshaw:
Mr. Rilett:
August 19, 2025
31978
The renderings are just to show kind of the feel and colors of the
site.
Okay. So, my question is, I like the idea of indoor vacuums. That's
kind of a game changer. It's new. It's different. It's also takes a lot
of the noise that's generated by those and puts it interior to the
interior of your building, which is not a bad thing. My question to
you then is, do you need the outdoor vacuums?
So, Express's model, they try to get to 20 on each site. And that's
also, it's a nice, you know, sort of eye grabbing, almost
advertisement for the fact that you have, hey, there's free
vacuums here. It's a nice addition there, as well as, yeah, I mean,
if you have a nice day, you don't necessarily need to do it indoors.
They're able to cycle through so many cars through so quickly.
So that means they do want to have enough vacuum spaces to
accommodate those. And if, in case, there was a need for that
many at once.
Okay, because it sort of negates the benefit of having that sound
moved inside, if you still have them outdoors. But, and I
understand the reason why. Well, so to that point, I'm going to
ask, how is the noise of the vacuums mitigated? How is that
managed?
So, actually, I have a sound study here for both the blower at the
end of the tunnel and the vacuums themselves. So, the way the
vacuum system works is there's a correlator box, if you can see,
that will essentially...all the noise is going to come out of that. The
vacuums themselves are nearly silent. So those are located on
the end of the vacuum rows, I believe on the northwest corner of
the building. There, maybe southwest Yep, southwest corner.
There that item number five on the southwest corner. So that's
your correlator box. And we have those, usually fenced with
landscaping, which does dim some of the noise. But I have a
sound study here at a distance of 30 feet, you're down to 23
decibels, which is lower than the traffic volume you're going to
see on Six Mile road. Anyway, I can pass these around if you
want to see them. Okay, but, yeah, I mean, noise concern is
relatively low, and especially when you're far away from
residential like this site is.
Mr. Wilshaw: So, you're not going to have nine individual vacuum units out
there just whirring away there. So, this is a different, more modern
version of a vacuum. Okay, that was, that was my one concern I
wanted to raise. The other thing is the exterior materials for the
most part. We do have two of your locations in this city already.
August 19, 2025
31979
Is it safe to assume that as we look at those two locations that
we're looking at similar building materials?
Mr. Rilett: Yes.
Mr. Wilshaw: Do you use the quick brick at these other sites as well?
Mr. Rilett: Yep.
Mr. Wilshaw: Okay, and that's a system that you've had good luck with in terms
of...
Mr. Rilett: Yeah, I believe nearly all of the Express projects like that
Mr. Wilshaw: They're all using quick brick, okay. We've had problems in the
past with thin brick, you know, systems, but I know they're getting
much better. And if you're if you've had experience with them, I'm
going to trust that you're... they're going to be good for you,
because obviously you don't want your building looking rattier.
Mr. Rilett: Oh yeah, no. I mean, there's 10-year-old buildings in the
Columbus area that still look brand new.
Mr. Wilshaw: Okay, great, excellent. That's it for me, for now, is there any other
questions from any of my fellow Commissioners?
Mr. Long: Just following up on the vacuums. So, did yout call it a correlator
box for the outdoor one?
Mr. Rilett: Yeah.
Mr. Long: Is that the same thing? How does the indoor one work? If I go into
the indoor am I going to go deaf trying to vacuum my car with it?
Mr. Rilett:
Mr. Long:
Mr. Wilshaw:
They do have correlators that run those to. I believe they're
located back in the mechanical room, so they're not out in the
room.
So they're not out in the room. But they're in a mechanical room
of the thing. Okay, all right, thank you. Just curiosity thing. Thank
you.
Thank you. Mr. Long. If there's no other questions from any of our
commissioners, no other questions...we've covered that, I'm
going to go to our audience. So, we're going to have you sit down
for just a few moments. Is there anyone in our audience wishing
to speak for or against this item? I'm sure there are. Feel free to
come forward to one of our podiums.
August 19, 2025
31980
Christopher Waterman, 20336 Meadowview, Livonia, MI That's at Eight Mile and
1-275, and I am the board Vice President of Trinity House Theater.
I've been with the board a little over 10 years. Thank you for
hearing us out tonight. We're an all volunteer arts and culture
nonprofit, and certainly there are some very pragmatic concerns
that we have. Thank you to the Commission for bringing a few of
those up tonight, specifically Mr. Droze and Mr. Caramagno, the
the parking, the traffic, environmental impact, noise, but we
realize that we can't necessarily choose our neighbors. We're a
little nonprofit. That being said, I want you to consider that this is
the place that you're looking to put a car wash next to. And I'm
not, I don't think car washes are the enemy. I don't think these
people are the enemy. We realize that, you know, at the end of
the day, you need to work with your neighbors. But once again,
this is the place that you're considering putting a car wash next
to, a place built in 1850 before Livonia was even a city. A place
where, in 1856 the third annual Michigan anti -slavery society held
their meeting, and the abolitionist and civil rights icon Sojourner
Truth was not only in attendance at that meeting, she also spoke
and sang a song. This is the place that in 1981 Paul Patton and
Trinity Church members formed together to form a community
theater, and for the better part of 20 years, they were a part of
offering brave, truthful, necessary works of art for the community.
And then over the last 25 years, we've transitioned mostly to live
music, and we're known as one of the state's best listening
rooms, and we seat about 78 people, so it's a very intimate
setting. This is a place where this very night on a Tuesday night,
middle of the week, there are approximately 12 to 15 people with
guitars for an open mic night to brave the stage and people right
from our very community having that opportunity in this building.
Car washes aren't the enemy, however, really ask you to consider
what you are putting around such a cultural gem, especially in
light of things like the Livonia Built proposal not going through and
you have something in Livonia that does bring culture. We realize
that we're small. We realize that we're hidden, in a sense,
sometimes. But we just ask you to really consider is there may be
something better, more of a fit, more in concert with Trinity house
as a neighbor.
Mr. Wilshaw: Thank you. Thank you for your comments. Mr. Waterman,
anyone else wishing to speak on this item? I
Bill Dolunt, resident of Quakertown, 16215 Quakertown, Livonia, MI. I agree with
Trinity House as well. I mean, certainly something, maybe other
than a car wash. And again, to his point, I'm not against them
either, but where that is, again, it just doesn't make a lot of sense
to me and a lot of my neighbors who aren't here. But at any rate,
that and the traffic, even though you're going to put out that light
there, if you guys have seen that, it's just off 1-275 and Six Mile
Mr. Wilshaw:
William Hurley,
August 19, 2025
31981
exit. So if you actually...you can't see it there, but what is it,
maybe 100 yards tops, and we're going to put a driveway even
closer to that exit. So those are my concerns. I think you know,
especially with Comerica go down and all of that development
that could very well spawn something else as well, though, his, to
his point, may be a restaurant as well, but whatever that is, I have
a hard time with a car wash there. Again, it just doesn't seem to
fit.
Thank you. Thank you. Mr. Dolunt. Anyone else wishing to
speak? There's a gentleman coming forward. Good evening, sir.
16112 Penn Drive, Livonia, MI. It's kind of cool to be speaking here
on this auspicious occasion, the 1,234th 1234 meeting notice.
Made that joke. I'm not nearly as eloquent or cogent as the last
two speakers, so this will be a bit disjointed, but please bear with
me.. I first take a little bit offense to the statement that we in the
Motor City are underserved with car washes, we keep clean
automobiles. I can count three within one mile of this proposed
location. Seven and Haggerty, Five and Haggerty and Six and
Haggerty. Excuse me, I'm not, a great public speaker. Traffic is
already a great issue, and well, I do appreciate what the
Schoolcraft representative was talking about. If we need that
driveway, move like me, my buddies will just go do it so you can
get your light without putting a car wash there. A car wash is
suburban blight. I don't mean to be rude, serious. You know,
Detroit is known like the land of liquor stores. It's not a great vibe.
We don't need another car wash. It is esthetically unpleasing. I
understand that those gentlemen, they did a great job of trying to
make their car wash look good. It still looks like a car wash. I don't
see any great driving economic value from it. It's not going to
promote a bunch of good jobs for Livonia residents. You know, if
the car wash goes in, I guess I hope this is a success. But should
it not be? What the hell else are we going to put there after we
got to remediate the property, another car wash, at least with the
present, you know, building multiple different kind of restaurants
go in there. Another business could take it over. It's got options.
A car wash is a car wash, and it seems like damn forever. It's not
quite a dry cleaner. But and I can appreciate the environmental
safeguards that the gentleman were speaking about, it still
pollutes. And then, as the gentleman from Trinity House stated,
there's a beautiful little cemetery right there. Let's not pollute that.
Sorry, I was writing down a lot, as you guys were speaking, I just
find it disingenuous to discuss a traffic study saying that a car
wash won't increase traffic. I'm sorry I only just learned about this
meeting. I would have gotten my own traffic study done. Okay?
By its very nature. It needs more traffic to be successful. And then
the young lady from Schoolcraft was discussing that when they
did their study, that Schoolcraft had expected some
Mr. Wilshaw:
Mr. Hurley:
August 19, 2025
31982
developments of its own that it could take on the traffic of Well, I
mean, that study doesn't seem to hold any water anymore. If
Schoolcraft expected to take on that extra traffic, or assume that
extra traffic at this light, which, again, me and my buddies will put
in, if you keep out the car wash., If you're going to put the car
wash there, this traffic study, I mean, I haven't read it, I'll be
honest, doesn't seem to hold much water. I can appreciate the
discussion about the noise. I walk my dog past that daily, it would
be scared of this car wash. Have you ever driven past a car wash
with your windows on and not heard it? I can appreciate the
decibel counts quoted. I know nothing about acoustics. Car
washes are noisy. I mean, let's put a small airport in why not
Livonia airport? There's great potential for this property beyond a
car wash on that corner of Six mile and Haggerty the northeast
side, it's of such great value. It seems like a short sale to sell to a
car wash. And I could be mistaken. I was talking to my brother
about it today, and he said something about a Whole Foods. I
have no idea. You put a Whole Foods in there. Let's get a nice
ass...let's get a nice restaurant in there to make organic meals.
Let's support that little gem of a corner that the gentleman from
Trinity house was talking about, this area is about to become. And
I say this area because I wrote this down when I was at home on
that intersection. That area is becoming more attractive. And I'm
sorry, despite the best efforts of Frank Lloyd Wright, you couldn't
make a car wash, an attractive place in that area.
Mr. Hurley, I'm going to ask if you can try to summarize at this
point.
No, that's the end of my points. Sorry, I was writing down a lot as
you guys...lastly, I just want to say that the petitioner, or the
petitioner's representative, on several occasions, was asked
questions. He stated, I'm sure, and there's no resistance without
evidence, of these speculative statements, discussion about the
Fox Drive driveway, et cetera, I would ask that if these statements
are going to be taken as true, that they be in writing before this
body, before they be taken at face value. Thank you for letting me
ramble.
Mr. Wilshaw: Thank you for your comments. Mr. Hurley,
Lloyd Vandenbrink, involved with Trinity house theater since 1985. As you know
or heard, Trinity house is a volunteer run arts organization, and
one of Livonia is cultural treasures. For nearly 40 years, it has
given residents a place to gather to celebrate the arts in the field,
connected as a community. I'm here tonight to respectfully object
to the request for a variance of Section 3.0 of the zoning
ordinance that would allow a car wash. This code exists to protect
the character of our neighborhoods, to ensure appropriate land
Mr. Wilshaw:
August 19, 2025
31983
use and safeguard residents from negative impacts. Car washes
bring noise, traffic, chemical runoff and harsh lighting that don't
belong next to a cultural landmark or in an already congested
corridor. Trinity house already faces challenges with access and
adding a high intensity business would only make things worse.
A variance should only be granted in cases of true hardship.
Business convenience is not a hardship, it's a preference. If
granted, this sets a precedence that weakens your zoning
commissions or zoning protections and chips away at the kind of
city Livonia wants to be. Trinity House, as I understand it, has
faithfully maintained its building, which is owned by the city and
enriches our community for decades. Please consider what is at
stake for our cultural life and quote and quality of life. I urge you
to deny this variance. If Trinity House goes under, the city will be
needing to take care of that that property as well. Thank you for
your time and your service to the city.
Thank you, Mr. Vandenbrink. Anyone else wishing to speak? We
have one lady coming forward. As this young lady is coming
forward, I just want to explain too, for folks in our audience that
haven't been through this process before, just so you understand
a little bit better, the planning commission is going to is reviewing
this to make a recommendation to City Council. We're going to
make an approving or denying recommendation that would then
go to City Council. They would hold their own...actually, excuse
me, if we make an approving recommendation, it would go to City
Council. If we make a denying motion, then the petitioner has a
right to appeal to City Council, in which the City Council will
ultimately make the final decision on this. So just so you
understand, this is a sort of a multi -step process. This is the first
step. We're kind of doing the heavy lifting and homework on the
site plan, and then the council will see this as well in the future.
So, good evening, ma'am.
Eileen McDonnell, 36099 Brookview, Livonia, MI. I agree with all the other
speakers that this should be denied. I don't think it's an
appropriate thing to have a car wash at the location next to Trinity
House and next to the souls that are buried in the cemetery. You
also have to take in consideration the people that live in the
assisted living facility. I just think it's just too much. And the
gentleman that just spoke previously stated about the upcoming
developments and the apartments that are going to be put in at
Six and Haggerty, you've got all kinds of opportunities to bring in
different businesses, restaurants, coffee shops, something but
something that's more acceptable for the community. Thank you.
Mr. Wilshaw: Good evening, sir.
August 19, 2025
31984
Bill Keith, 25131 Midland, Redford, MI. I live in Redford, but volunteer at Trinity
House theater. And first, I just want to thank the representatives
that have mentioned the concerns of parking at the theater,
because it would be easy to miss that. It's a very small building.
It's nice to see that there is possibly some space at the north end
of the property where there might be able to be some parking.
That's encouraging. I would agree with everybody about car
washes. I love car washes. I love when I get my car washed. I
love the higher quality car washes that I've been able to use, but
Livonia has plenty of them. I was just looking at the All Things
Livonia Facebook page, and they put up a new graphic at the top
of their page that says, All things Livonia, home of chicken
restaurants and car washes. And I know they were kind of poking
at this, because there was a lot of comments about this
development and the impact on the area, and I just think
everybody else has highlighted a lot of the concerns. I would
especially be concerned during the construction phase, because
we are limited to about 13 spaces right out in front of the theater
and the cemetery. And right now, we're fortunate that the
children's center that is on the other side is vacant at the moment,
so there is some additional parking over there. But if, if ever there
were both under construction at the same time, we would be in a
world of hurt. We used to have people who would park on the
other side of Six Mile in that office building property, right next to,
I guess, Quakertown. But that is a risky prospect in and of itself.
Trying to cross Six Mile Road to get to the theater. And people
used to park down at Comerica property, and would walk down.
Not a bad walk, but once that goes under construction, that's
going to make that cemetery and that theater property very
challenged. But I appreciate you thinking about the theater as
you've considered these questions and providing this opportunity
to provide input.
Mr. Wilshaw:
Mr. Rilett:
Thank you, Mr. Keith. Anyone else wishing to speak? I don't see
anyone else wishing to speak. Is the petitioner...would you like to
come forward and address any particular issues that were raised
that you would like to address? Again, we not we don't want to
get into a back and forth debate, but if there's any specific
concerns that were mentioned that you wanted to address, I'm
going to give you that opportunity.
Yeah, I mean specifically the quantity of car washes in the area
and the location. I mean, Express doesn't just pick a property and
throw something on there willy nilly. I mean, this is a 5 million plus
dollar development here. They do quite a bit of market study
research about, you know, they don't want to put one right on top
of another car wash. That's not a good business model for either
party involved. And we feel really confident that this location, as
far as demand for car washes, is not overpopulated in the area,
August 19, 2025
31985
especially...quite a few of the car washes that are nearby are the
sorts that are attached to like a mechanic or not quite up to the
same business model as this one, and are not always seen as
direct competition. So, the amount of washes in the nearby
vicinity is not the major concern as far as the viability of this
development. And I mean, I do appreciate the concerns of all the
Trinity house speakers. I mean, we do not have any intention of
being bad neighbors. And I think if you look at either the other two
Express car washes that have already opened up in Livonia,
they've even done some work, not only on their own property, but
cleaning up and esthetic improvements to the neighboring
properties as well. I mean, we know it's a car wash, it can only
look so nice. But as far as landscaping, and in any way they can,
they really go for like, a Disney World level visual aspect, as far
as the landscape presentation of the site goes. I mean, as far as
environmental concern issues. I mean, they do a very good job
collecting and dealing with all that and anything that would be the
case that we it all goes out into the sanitary system. They're not,
you know, out washing onto any neighboring properties, polluting
anything other than just into the sanitary system itself. And then,
like the sound study that we passed out indicated especially at
the distance away from the neighboring property. We try to keep
everything that's loud as far west as possible. Once you get to
those distances, the sound impact on the neighboring properties
is going to be negligible:
Mr. Wilshaw: Okay. Thank you, Mr. Rilett.
Mr. Meyer:
Mr. Wilshaw:
Mr. Meyer:
I'd like to add a couple of things on that.
Of course, go ahead, sir.
So as far as, like with Trinity, you know, God bless them for what
they're doing. I mean, I absolutely great, great cause. But we are
a great company for nonprofits in the area. The other two Livonia
sites. The first 10 days for both we raised money for cares. Next
week, I'll be presenting a check for over $17,000 to that charity.
Us, as a company, we gave away just under $500,000 last year
to local nonprofit companies. This year will be over $700 and our
owner is very big on not going with major charities. We go with
small local charities that we can make an impact on. With, Mr.
Caramagno, you had brought up the adjacent properties in
Livonia. Right when I got there the first day I stopped there. I was
not happy with the landscaping with the adjacent properties on
both sides, I didn't make that property owner come in and clean
it up. We took the cost. We cleaned up those property lines to
make sure it met our standards. I go to these sites twice a week.
On my inspections if there is so much as a straw wrapper on the
Mr. Wilshaw:
Mr. Caramagno:
August 19, 2025
31986
adjacent property, they lose their points for their parking lot.
Because we train our staff to clean up that property. We want to
be great neighbors. You know, in the Livonia on the Farmington
Road, I got there the fence in the back that went around the
residential area there, it was dilapidated. We paid to have it fixed.
The retaining wall at the Plymouth Road location. It wasn't ever
required for it to be painted or have anything done to it. We went
in there, we cleaned it up, we painted it, and we made sure it was
right. As far as the noise, right off one of our vac producers at our
Plymouth Road location, going into Dunkin Donuts. Dunkin
Donuts drive through. Is right there. They have no problem using
their drive through with our vac producer. So, I mean, we really
want to be great neighbors. We do have extremely, extremely
high standards. If you go buy one of our facilities, go by our
Livonia locations, they are spotless. Now, I know people have a
bad image of car washes, but we elevate that to a different level,
and you can end up with something far worse if this was turned
down. Thank you.
Thank you, sir. Appreciate your comments. If there's no other
questions.
Chairman, I did. I did find that picture that I was talking about with
that brick wall or concrete wall looking toward the cemetery. You
might want to look at that on your renderings here, because it
does illustrate just what you talked about, a very clear and good
looking eastern front of your property. It doesn't look like that
today, and hearing that the wall isn't going to be there, I'II say it
doesn't sit well with me, but what you're showing in this picture
sits very well with me, so I think you need to look at that and see
what you can do with that eastern side that talks right back to your
story you just told us. Okay. Thank you.
Mr. Wilshaw: Thank you. Mr. Caramagno, if there's no other questions or
comments, I'm going to close the public hearing and a motion is
in order.
On a motion by Caramagno, seconded by Long, and unanimously adopted, it was
#08-37-2025 RESOLVED, That the City Planning Commission does hereby
recommend to the City Council that Petition 2025-07-02-15
submitted by Mannik & Smith Group, on behalf of Clean Express
Car Wash, requesting waiver use approval under Sections 3.11
and Section 6.07 of the Livonia Zoning Ordinance, as amended,
to operate an Auto -Wash Establishment, at 38888 Six Mile Road,
located at the N.E. corner of Fox Drive and Six Mile Road in the
S.W. '% of Section 7, be approved subject to the following
conditions:
August 19, 2025
31987
1. That the Site Plan marked Sheet C200 dated July 9, 2025,
as revised, prepared by Mannick Smith Group is hereby
approved and shall be adhered to, except as may be
modified below.
2. That the Demolition Plan marked Sheet C101 dated July
9, 2025 as revised, prepared by Mannick Smith Group is
hereby approved and shall be adhered to.
That the Landscape Plan marked Sheets L100 and L101
dated July 9, 2025, as revised, prepared by Mannick Smith
Group is hereby approved and shall be adhered to, except
as may be modified below.
4. That the Photometric Plan marked Sheets C600 dated
July 9, 2025, as revised, prepared by Mannick Smith
Group is hereby approved and shall be adhered to, except
as may be modified below.
5. The Exterior Elevations Plan, identified as A2-1, dated July
10, 2025, prepared by SBA Studios, is approved and shall
be adhered to except the south elevation, which shall be
enhanced to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
6. The hours of operation shall be limited to the following:
Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. and
Sunday from 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
7. All light fixtures shall not exceed a height of twenty feet
(20') and shall be aimed and shielded to minimize stray
light trespassing across property lines and glaring onto
adjacent roadways. All exterior lights shall be turned off or
dimmed between 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
8. Underground sprinklers shall be installed for all
landscaped and sodded areas. All planted materials shall
be installed to the satisfaction of the Inspection
Department and permanently maintained in a healthy
condition.
9. All disturbed lawn areas, including road rights -of -way,
shall be sodded instead of hydroseeding.
10. The three walls of the trash dumpster area shall be
constructed out of building materials that complement the
building, and the enclosure gates shall consist of opaque
and durable steel or composite panels.
August 19, 2025
31988
11. That a detailed Stormwater Detention plans are submitted
to the Engineering Department before construction.
12. Only conforming signage is approved with this petition,
and any additional signage shall be separately submitted
for review and approval by the Zoning Board of Appeals.
13. No exposed LED light band or neon shall be permitted on
this site, including, but not limited to, the building or around
the windows.
14. The car wash bay lights shall be shut off when closed.
15. Unless approved by the Inspection Department, any type
of exterior advertising, such as promotional flags,
streamers, or sponsor vehicles designed to attract the
attention of passing motorists, shall be prohibited.
16. That sidewalks be added to the site to the satisfaction of
the Planning Director.
17. The petitioner shall provide an updated traffic study to City
Council to affirm the proposed use would not have a
significant negative impact on the area.
18. Approval is contingent upon the Petitioner entering into an
agreement with the owners of the adjacent commercial
property to the west, allowing the Petitioner access to Fox
Drive.
19. The petitioner shall work with Trinity House to mitigate
parking issues to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
20. All parking spaces, except the required handicapped
spaces, shall be doubled striped at ten feet (10') wide by
twenty feet (20') in length as required.
21. Egress onto Six Mile Road shall be restricted to right -in
and right -out configuration.
22. The plans referenced in this approving resolution shall be
submitted to the Inspection Department with the building
permit application(s); and
23. Per Section 13.13 of the Livonia Zoning Ordinance, this
approval is valid for one (1) year from the date of approval
by the City Council. Unless a building permit is obtained,
this approval shall be null and void after the one (1) year
period.
August 19, 2025
31989
FURTHER RESOLVED, That notice of the above hearing was
given in accordance with the provisions of Section 13.13 of the
Livonia Zoning Ordinance, as amended.
Mr. Wilshaw: Is there any discussion?
Mr. Long:
Mr. Chair, I'll offer support, but I would like to offer an amendment
to number seven and Mr. Caramagno's, or in the approving
resolution, we're all exterior lights shall be turned off or dim
between 8pm and. 7:30am I think we need to change that to 7am
to be consistent with the hours that we're setting out in in number
six, where they're allowed to be open Monday through Saturday,
from 7am to 8pm.
Mr. Caramagno: Nice catch. I'm good with it. Okay, thank you so support.
Mr. Wilshaw: All right. Any other comments or questions on the motion. Mr.
Droze.
Mr. Droze:
Mr. Caramagno, a couple suggested amendments for your
consideration. One that a signed and sealed statement from a
professional traffic engineer validating that the development
essentially will not have adverse impacts under the proposed
condition within the traffic study, so essentially loading the
proposed use into that traffic study, updating it and providing
information to planning and or council. I have a couple more, so I
don't know if you want to go one by one.
Mr. Caramagno: That makes sense.
Mr. Droze:
The next one is...it feels like having signed approvals from the,
first and foremost the Fox Drive, having that in place before it
goes to council, because it's, as noted by several, that access is
pretty important from a traffic standpoint, I think addresses a lot
of the concerns of the community.
Mr. Caramagno: Well discussed and agreed.
Mr. Droze:
Okay, the third one. I'm not sure exactly how to say this, but these
are not...the traffic signal is a different project from what we're
considering tonight, but I know a lot of my concerns would be put
at ease if there was assurance traffic signal is in an operational
as a condition of the certificate of occupancy. So, I'm not sure if
that's something that we can do, but it feels to me like it's
important for the project to have that traffic signal up and running.
So it's a little complicated from a legal perspective, but...
August 19, 2025
31990
Mr. Caramagno: It is because the car wash is not putting the signal in. Schoolcraft
College is putting the signal in. It sounds like it's well on its way,
but I don't know how you tie that back to the car wash.
Mr. Droze: Okay, I can pull that one if necessary.
Mr. Long: I have the same problem. I have that's right there in my notes,
yeah, but I don't know how you...
Mr. Wilshaw: Yeah, how do you obligate this petitioner?
Mr. Long:
Mr. Droze:
Mr. Droze:
I guess you know what I would rely upon, or what I would... how I
resolved it, in my mind was that that's going to be up to council.
And by the time it gets to council, hopefully they're far enough
along, but I would think that council would take that into
consideration as they ultimately approve or deny. So that's how I
got past it.
Okay, good.
And then maybe just the last concern is, you know, this is...as
was noted, this is a...it's not a natural resource, but we have a
community and resource that's potentially being impacted by this.
And you know, it seems to me, before this goes to council, maybe
this isn't an item of the approving motion, but I think certainly
having done some homework with actual sit down meetings to
talk about this and what can be done, because I think, you know,
much like we might see, if a project impacts a portion of a wetland,
it has an impact on, you know, the greater natural resource.
Cutting off the parking and other access for this existing use, I
think it needs to be mitigated, and so some consideration that the
applicant engage in a documented way with the Trinity house
prior to the council would be my last condition.
Mr. Caramagno: That gives them time to discuss that with them in greater detail.
Yeah, I think that's a good, good suggestion.
Mr. Wilshaw:
Okay, any other comments on this petition? I do have a number
of notes as well. I wanted to make sure everything is covered. I'm
going to go through things I'm hearing might be missing. Double
stripes parking. I didn't see in the approving resolution, and I
believe they're showing single stripe.
Mr. Uhazie: Yes, that should be in there.
Mr. Wilshaw: So if we can get double stripe.
Mr. Caramagno: Sure.
Mr. Wilshaw:
Mr. Long:
Mr. Wilshaw:
Mr. Long:
Mr. Caramagno
Mr. Wilshaw:
Mr. Bongero:
Mr. Long:
Mr. Wilshaw:
August 19, 2025
31991
Okay, that's just one of our standard things. I have the sidewalks
along Fox Drive that were already mentioned, and also working
with the Trinity theater property in access or potential parking
abatement for them. That's going to be more of a...as noted by
Mr. Droze, it's going to have to be a coordinated effort. We can't
obligate them to do something, but if they can try their best effort
on that the... Is there any feeling about mandating a right turn only
on the Six Mile for that exit drive? There was some discussion on
that.
I'm not the maker of the motion. I would be fine with that, though.
Also, I even want to see maybe some way finding signs again,
pushing everybody, as many people, as possible, out Fox Drive.
Encouraging to Fox.
Encouraging. Again, its not enforceable, but
: They're nice in theory. Whether or not people listen, is a total,
different animal. I'm okay with the right turn coming out of the
driveway, the extra driveway on Six Mile Road. I think that's good.
I mean, the alternative would be, you could make the entrance off
Six Mile an entrance only, and say no exit, no exiting allowed. So
all traffic coming out of those tunnels would have to turn to Fox
drive.
We don't even have an agreement with Fox yet, correct?
But again, council would have the ability to, this is our
recommendation to them, so council would be able to rectify that,
should they not come to an agreement,
Just a thought. I'm throwing it out there.
Mr. Caramagno: I got you. Yeah, so right turn out of the car wash, I'm okay with,
although, when the light goes in, its probably not going to be
necessary.
Mr. Wilshaw: Right, because that'd be alleviated.
Mr. Caramagno: Yes.
Mr. Wilshaw: Okay.
Mr. Long: Well, the light won't alleviate left turns out of the car wash. That'll
be, still be a problem.
August 19, 2025
31992
Mr. Caramagno: But you'll slow them down. You'll slow them down as they're
coming up to the light. And you probably can make that left.
Mr. Long: You can crawl across. I understand what you're saying, but I still
would want that to be right turn only.
Mr. Caramagno: Right turn only. Okay, let's put that in there.
Mr. Wilshaw: It's gonna be right turn only off Six Mile is a recommendation. And
then the improvements to the south facing facade of the building.
Mr. Droves brought that topic up, seeing that there's some
changes to the rendering. I don't know that we really hammered
out exactly what those are at this point.
Mr. Caramagno: I would agree with that, and I would say cautiously, adding
something to that south side, because I know what I saw at the
study session last week was a little wild, and I didn't care for any
of that, so cautiously, adding some features to the south side that
make it look a little better.
Mr. Wilshaw: So, to work with the planning staff.
Mr. Caramagno: Yes.
Mr. Wilshaw:
there's options, spandrel, glass, other things that could break up
that facade. Sound reasonable? Okay, supporters, all right, with
that.
Mr. Long: Supporter is, okay with that.
Mr. Wilshaw: I think that covers all of mine. Mr. Uhazie, have you been able to
capture?
Mr. Uhazie: Sorry, I think I've got a good record of it.
Mr. Wilshaw:
Okay, very good, because there's a number of items suggested.
So, I appreciate all that from my colleagues. Is there any other
questions on the motion to approve
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Droze, Long, Caramagno, Wilshaw
NAYS: Bongero
ABSENT: Dinaro
ABSTAIN: Ventura
Mr. Wilshaw, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution
adopted. It will go on to the City Council with an approving
resolution.
August 19, 2025
31993
ITEM #5 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1,233rd Public Hearings and
Regular Meeting
Mr. Caramagno, Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda, Approval of
the Minutes of the 1,233rd Public Hearing and Regular Meeting
held on July 22, 2025.
On a motion by Long, seconded by Bongero, and unanimously adopted, it was
#08-38-2025 RESOLVED, That the Minutes of 1,233rd Public Hearings and
Regular Meeting held by the Planning Commission on July 22,
2025, are hereby approved.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Droze, Bongero, Long, Ventura, Caramagno,
Wilshaw
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Dinaro
ABSTAIN: None
Mr. Wilshaw, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution
adopted.
On a motion duly made, seconded and unanimously adopted, the 1,233rd Public
Hearings and Regular Meeting held on July 22, 2025, w- ".djourned at 8:30 p.m.
ATTEST:
Ian Wilshaw, Chairman
CITY P NING COMMISSION
Sam ramagno, Secretary