Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1986-01-21 • 9536 • r MINUTES OF THE 509th REGULAR MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LIVONIA On Tuesday, January 21 , 1986, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia held its 509th Regular Meeting and Public Hearings in the Livonia City Hall , 33000 Civic Center Drive, Livonia, Michigan. Mr. C. Russ Smith, Vice Chairman, called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. , with approximately 40 interested persons in the audience. Members present: C. Russ Smith Donald Vyhnalek Jeanne Hildebrandt Donna J. Naidow Sue Sobolewski Michael Soranno Michael Duggan Members absent: R. Lee Morrow Herman Kluver Messrs. John J. Nagy, Planning Director; H. G. Shane, Assistant Planning Director; and Ralph H. Bakewell , Planner IV, were also present. Mr. Smith informed the audience that if a petition on tonight 's agenda involves a rezoning request, this Commission only makes a recommendation to the City Council who, in turn, will hold its own public hearing and decide the question. Only the Planning Commission holds a public hearing on a preliminary subdivision plat. If a petition involves a waiver of use request and the request is denied, the petitioner has ten days in which to appeal the decision to the City Council ; otherwise the petition is to terminated. 4 Mrs. Naidow, Secretary, announced the first item on the agenda is Petition 85-12-1-36 by Greenfield Construction Company, Inc. , to rezone property located on the south side of Five Mile Road, east of Levan in Section 20 from R-2 to P.S. Mr. Nagy: There is a letter in the file dated December 12, 1985 from the Engineering Division which states they have no objection to this proposal . Mr. Paul Riggio, Greenfield Construction Company, Inc. , was present. Mr. Vyhnalek: There is a drainage ditch there; will that be covered? Mr. Riggio: It will only be covered where we have access to the subdivision on Five Mile Road. We will have a culvert or bridge going over the drain. Mr. Vyhnalek: Where does it end going south? Mr. Riggio: Under Levan at St. Mary's upstream, and downstream it goes through Idyl Wyld Golf Course. Mr. Vyhnalek: It does get flooded up once in a while. Mr. Nagy: It rises but it doesn't flood over the banks. Engineering has established the high water level within the flood plain. Michael Saunders, 14929 Fairway: Is there a height restriction to the buildings? • 9537 Mr. Nagy: Two floors and not to exceed 35' in height. Mr. Saunders: Is there a limit as to how close to Five Mile they can go? 0 Mr. Nagy: No closer to the right-of-way than 40' . 15% of the site must be landscaped. Mr. Saunders: Where will the road be that he mentioned? Mr. Nagy: The road he is talking about will serve only the subdivision area. The ingress and egress to serve the development will come from Five Mile. The street serving the subdivision will be an extension of Golfview. Thomas Clark, 15125 Country Club: Will this development tie into the present sewers and water? Are they adequate to take this load? Mr. Smith: As the Engineering Department has stated, it meets all the requirements and they say there is no problem. Mr. Clark: Will this add to the taxation of the present residents? Mr. Smith: It will not. There was no one else present wishing to be heard regarding this item and Mr. Smith, Vice Chairman, declared the public hearing on Petition 85-12-1-36 closed. tIOn a motion duly made by Mr. Soranno, seconded by Mrs. Hildebrandt and unanimously adopted, it was s #1-11-86 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on January 21 , 1986 on Petition 85-12-1-36 by Greenfield Construction Company, Inc. , to rezone property located on the south side of Five Mile Road, east of Levan in Section 20 from R-2 to P.S. , the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 85-12-1-36 be approved for the following reasons: (1) The proposed zoning will provide a transition or buffer area between a major thoroughfare and commercial and the adjacent residential area. (2) The subject property is separated from the balance of the land area currently zoned single family residential by the Bell Creek which therefore serves as a natural separation. (3) The subject property is the least desirable portion of the entire parcel insofar as its desirability for development for residential purposes is concerned. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above hearing was given in accordance with the provisions of Section 23.05 of Zoning Ordinance #543, as amended. tMr. Smith, Vice Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mrs. Naidow announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 85-12-1-37 by Quaker- town Ltd. Partnership to rezone property located on the south side of Six Mile Road between Haggerty and Quakertown Lane in Section 18 from P.S. to C-2. • • 9538 Since the petitioner was not present at this time, the Commission by resolution deferred Petition 85-12-1-37 until a later time in the meeting. 4 Mrs. Naidow, Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 85-12-1-38 by Southwood Construction Company to rezone property located north of Seven Mile Road, east of Farmington Road in Section 3 from R-2A to R-7. Mr. Nagy: There is a letter in the file from the Engineering Division stating they have no objection to this proposal . Michael Priest, 12550 Farmington Road, Engineer for the petitioner, was present. There was no one else present wishing to be heard regarding this item and Mr. Smith, Vice Chairman, declared the public hearing on Petition 85-12-1-38 closed. On a motion duly made by Mr. Vyhnalek, seconded by Mrs. Sobolewski and unanimously adopted, it was #1-12-86 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on January 21 , 1986 on Petition 85-12-1-38 by Southwood Construction Company to rezone property located north of Seven Mile Road, east of Farmington Road in Section 3 from R-2A to R-7, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 85-12-1-38 be approved for the following reasons: (1) The subject property more logically should be developed for R-7 uses because of its location and attachment to a larger parcel currently zoned R-7. (2) The proposed rezoning represents only a minor extension of the R-7 Zoning District in the area. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above hearing was given in accordance with the provisions of Section 23.05 of Zoning Ordinance #543, as amended. Mr. Smith, Vice Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mrs. Naidow, Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 85-12-1-39 by Kapila Contracting Company to rezone property located on the north side of Clarita, west of Middlebelt Road in Section 11 from R-5 to R-7. Mr. Nagy: There is a letter in the file dated January 14, 1986 from the Engineering Division noting that there appears to be no problems connected with this proposal and stating that the proposed development may accelerate the need for paving of Clarita Avenue between Middlebelt and Melvin Avenue. There is also a letter in the file from Robert H. and Betty L. Detter stating their opposition to the petition because there is a traffic problem at this location at the present time and this will only add to the congestion and they believe it is poor planning to have R-5 and R-7 on the same street. Mr. Kapila, 31333 Thirteen Mile Road, Farmington Hills, petitioner, was present. Mr. Duggan: What are you going to put on this property? Mr. Kapila: One and two bedroom units which are apartments but could be 9539 condos. They are all separate units. Mrs. Sobolewski : Do you own this property? to Mr. Kapila: Yes. Mrs. Sobolewski : Conditioned upon the rezoning? Mr. Kapila: No. Raymond Gawel , 29725 Clarita: How many units will there be? Mr. Kapila: 57 units. Mr. Gawel : You can't turn left or right from Clarita onto Middlebelt now because of the traffic. You will be adding 114 cars going down Clarita to go to Middlebelt and to Seven Mile Road. The jam-up is bad now and at about 4:30 you can't get out because of the development that is there now including the fire station. There will be an increase in property taxes by the paving of the road. On the same side of the street you would have R-5 and R-7. It should be all R-5 or R-7. Ms. Kim Green, 29724 Clarita: This will be right up to my property line. I object to it too,because of the traffic it will create. Mr. Vyhnalek: How many buildings will there be? ti Mr. Kapila: There will be five buildings. Mr. Vyhnalek: I gather that the people here object to the traffic more than the buildings. Ms. Green: We really object to the whole thing. Mrs. Sobolewski : Do you own that property? Ms. Green: Yes. Mrs. Sobolewski : Are all the homes owned by the residents that live in them? Ms. Green: All but the one that is in the rezoning area. There was no one else present wishing to be heard regarding this item and Mr. Smith, Vice Chairman, declared the public hearing on Petition 85-12-1-39 closed. On a motion duly made by Mrs. Sobolewski and seconded by Mr. Duggan, it was #1-13-86 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on January 21 , 1986 on Petition 85-12-1-39 by Kapila Contracting Company to rezone property located on the north side of Clarita, west of Middlebelt Road in Section 11 from R-5 to R-7, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 85-12-1-39 be approved for the following reasons: (1) The proposed zoning district provides for uses that are compatible with the recommendation of the Future Land Use Plan. 9540 (2) The proposed zoning would provide a buffer or transition between the residential uses to the south and the commercial uses to the north. 4 (3) The proposed zoning would provide for a particular housing type needed to serve the community. (4) The location of multiple family projects adjacent to commercial uses is consistent with good planning practice since it is a location generally less desirable for single family residential uses. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above hearing was given in accordance with the provisions of Section 23.05 of Zoning Ordinance #543, as amended. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Sobolewski , Duggan, Hildebrandt, Soranno, Naidow, Smith NAYS: Vyhnalek ABSENT: Morrow, Kluver Mr. Smith, Vice Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mrs. Naidow, Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 82-8-2-20 by Bea Wright requesting waiver use approval to expand an open air retail sales business located on the south side of Eight Mile Road, east of Farmington Road in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 3. Bea Wright, the petitioner, was not present, nor was a representative. Robert Wyman, 20321 Shadyside: I am opposed because I don't know what they plan on putting in here. Theycame before for a rezoning and they drive their trucks in and out of there. They are supposed to have a wall but they haven't started it yet. Mr. Smith: I think the wall will be put up. James Muir, President of the North Central Civic Association, 20200 Shadyside: We have had problems all along but there has been a improvement over the last 15-17 years in this area. I had some suspicions about this but I have found them to be very cooperative people and I think they will accept their part in developing the City. Robert Nash, 20245 Shadyside: Can you tell us what the petitioner has said in dis- cussions concerning this petition what they intend to do? Mr. Smith: They intend to increase the outside sales. Mr. Nash: Have they supplied a site plan? Mr. Bakewell displayed the submitted site plan for those interested in this petition. Mr. Nash: I would be opposed to this. Our neighbors have stated that they have had a problem with them sticking to their plans. 9541 Mr. Vyhnalek: I feel that they are not in compliance with our Field Inspec- tors findings and they don't show at up the meeting. I think we should flatly deny it and if she wants to go to Council , she can. I don't want to table it. Mrs. Hildebrandt: They haven't complied with previous requests of this Commission and I also would like to deny it. There was no one else-present wishing to be heard regarding this item and Mr. Smith, Vice Chairman, declared the public hearing on Petition 85-8-2-20 closed. On a motion duly made by Mr. Vyhnalek and seconded by Mrs. Hildebrandt, it was #1-14-86 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on January 21 , 1986 on Petition 82-8-2-20 by Bea Wright requesting waiver use approval to expand an open air retail sales business located on the south side of Eight Mile Road, east of Farmington Road in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 3, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 82-8-2-20 be denied for the following reasons: (1) The petitioner has failed to affirmatively show that the use complies with the waiver use standards set forth in Section 11 .03 and 19.06 of Zoning Ordinance #543. (2) The proposed use would be detrimental to and incompatible with the surrounding uses of the area. (3) The subject site does not have the capacity to support the proposed use. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above hearing was given in accordance with the provisions of Section 19.05 of Zoning Ordi- nance #543, as amended. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Vyhnalek, Hildebrandt, Duggan, Sobolewski , Soranno, Naidow NAYS: Smith ABSENT: Morrow, Kluver Mr. Smith, Vice Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mrs. Naidow, Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is the Preliminary Plat approval for Rennolds Ravine Subdivision proposed to be located on the south side of Five Mile Road, east of Levan in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 20. 9542 Mr. Nagy: There is a letter in the file from the Traffic Bureau stating that with an access at Golfview where it intersects at Five Mile the proposed site plan would appear to be compatible with traffic conditions currently existing in the vicinity of the site. A letter from the Fire Division indicates they have no objections to this development. A letter from the Engineering Division states they object to the two dead end streets that would be created at Golfview and Jamison Drives and the open- ing of these streets would allow a secondary means of servicing the subdivision with water mains. It also states that the Engineering Division will recommend upon submission of engineer- ing plans that the Bakewell Drain traversing the northerly limits of the site be enclosed. The Engineering Division is assuming that the proprietor has a commitment from the Wayne County Road Commission to make available the necessary 60 foot right-of-way requirement. We have a letter from Ronald Reinke, Superintendent of the Parks & Recreation Department stating that there may be a problem with additional drainage from the sub- division into the Bell Drain and that on two occasions in 1985 the drain overflowed in the Idyl Wyld Golf Course area and caused damage and the closing of the Golf Course. Paul Riggio, representing the petitioner, was present. Mr. Duggan: Do you have a commitment from the County that they can get out to Five Mile Road. Michael Priest, 12550 Farmington Road: There is a jog there and the County acquired additional right-of-way when they widened Five Mile. We have submitted a Preliminary Plat to Wayne County. Mr. Duggan: The Engineering Division would like Jamison and Golfview to link into a road for snow removal and garbage pick-up purposes. Mr. Riggio: We do not plan to go through with those plans. Discussion was held concerning the water drain going through Jamison and Mr. Priest showed a plan to the Commission outlining where the water line comes down and joins Jamison. Mr. Smith: Are you satisfied that all questions have been answered? Mr. Nagy: From a planning standpoint, we are satisfied there is an engineering solution to put in all the improvements. Engineering would not like to see dead end streets but would like to see all streets go through. The residents here have been using the roads and in their opinion additional traffic caused by opening these streets will interfere with their privacy and endanger their safety Thomas Clark, 15125 Country Club: I think the question was answered about the water. Does the same apply to the drains. Are you going to alter the width of that whole drain? Mr. Nagy: We are not going to alter it; we are going to protect it with an 80' easement. John Landis, 36374 Jamison: I have met with the developers. I have no problem with 9543 the subdivision but our street would be an open street for the subdivision behind it and I would not like to see that. Mr. Soranno: What will happen on Fairway Drive with that stub street? Mr. Nagy: It could be abandoned or it could remain as is. It has been that way for 15 - 20 years and could continue to exist just as it is. Michael Saunders, 14929 Fairway: Do you have another development where you have built houses. Mr. Riggio: We have a housing development that we completed at the corner of Six Mile and Newburgh. Mr. Saunders: What are your plans for the power lines? Mr. Riggio: All underground in Livonia. Mr. Saunders: In this area, we have water settling. It is quite high at one point and our basements are flooding. When you scrape this land, will you concern yourself with leveling this land? Mr. Priest: In general , one of the requirements of engineering is to provide a site grading plan for the entire subdivision. Typically, there will be a rear yard swale that would intercept any water that would run off from that property which is high property. 11,0 Mr. Saunders: We are low and during wet times we end up with water in the basements. Mr. Priest: There will be catch basins and an intercepting swale. Resident on Golfview: We have lived there for twenty years. St. Mary has a parking lot there and I think the exit could be a problem. I would like to see a sidewalk between the subdivisions. Ronald Leonetti , 36346 Jamison: There is some concern that we are experiencing some speeding by teenagers. If the street is opened up, it will be reinforced. They say lines will be underground. Will that include the existing lines? Mr. Nagy: No, it will not. Just the leads from those poles. Existing lines on the back of your lots will stay overhead. Edward Wolvertone, 15153 Country Club: The creek area that will be expanded - will it go farther east down to Five Mile? Mr. Nagy: The goal is to leave the water course as it is and protect it with an easement. Mr. Leonetti : How wide will the open area be that the water will go through? Mr. Nagy: Nine feet. Sandra Carr, 36172 Jamison: I am pleased that these streets will not go through. What is the distance from the back of my lot to the street in the subdivision behind me? • 9544 • Mr. Nagy: 120' to the sidewalk. Ms. Carr: I have enjoyed the vacant field behind me and I am disappointed to lose that. Will any of the trees be saved? Mr. Smith: Generally, the developers in Livonia have been encouraged to save every possible tree and we have received excellent cooperation Mr. Riggio: We have directed our engineering firm to stakeout the roads so we can keep as many trees as possible and not take down a tree unless it is in the road. Mr. Duggan: Do you own the property on the west? Mr. Riggio: No. Resident owner of Lot 80: Every spring we get a pond about the size of this room. The creek gets really high. And, there are many wild animals in there. What will happen to them? Is there any protection for them? Mr. Smith: The Engineering Division has addressed the water problem and the animals will be protected because they will move. They will not die. Mr. Leonetti : Is there a back-up plan for the drainage in case this doesn't work? Mr. Nagy: There are many agencies that will review these planned improve- ments and they will ensure that they will be adequate. There was no one else present wishing to be heard regarding this item and Mr. Smith, Vice Chairman, declared the public hearing on this item closed. On a motion duly made by Mr. Vyhnalek, seconded by Mr. Soranno and unanimously adopted, it was #1-15-86 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on January 21 , 1986 the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that the Preliminary Plat for Rennolds Ravine Subdivision pro- posed to be located on the south side of Five Mile Road, east of Levan in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 20 be approved subject to submittal of an subdivision entrance marker plan for the following reasons: (1) The proposed Preliminary Plat is drawn in compliance with the Subdivision Rules and Regulations and Zoning Ordinance #543. (2) The proposed Preliminary Plat is well designed with lot sizes substantially exceeding the requirements of the R-2 District regulations. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above hearing was sent to abutting property owners, proprietor, City departments as lited in the Proof of Service and copies of the plat together with notice have been sent to the Building Department, Superintendetn of Schools, Fire Department, Police Department and Parks and Recreation Department. Mr. Smith, Vice Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. 9545 Petition 85-12-1-37 by Quakertown Ltd. Partnership was removed from the table by resolution and the public hearing was resumed at this time. 4 Mr. Nagy: There is a letter in the file indicating that the Engineering Division has no objections to this proposal . Petitioner: We have two pieces presently zoned C-2 and P.S. We are request- ing to change the three acre parcel to C-2. The other will be used for P.S. Mr. Vyhnalek: Have you submitted a petition for the P.S. ? Petitioner: Yes, I submitted both at the same time but only one went through. Mr. Nagy: Apparently, the petitioner had intended to file both petitions at the same time. They filed two but paid a fee for only one. The City Clerk only forwarded to our office the one petition. The other is scheduled at the Commission's meeting in February. There was no one else wishing to be heard regarding this item and Mr. Smith, Vice Chairman, declared the public hearing on Petition 85-12-1-37 closed. On a motion by Mrs. Sobolewski and seconded by Mr. Hildebrandt, it was #1-16-86 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on January 21 , 1986 on Petition 85-12-1-37 by Quakertown Ltd. Partnership to rezone property located on the south side of Six Mile Road between Haggerty and Quakertown Lane in Section 18 from P.S. to C-2, the City Planning Commission does hereby determine to table Petition 85-12-1-37 until the Planning Commission Regular Meeting of February 18, 1986. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above hearing was given in accordance with the provisions of Section 23.05 of Zoning Ordinance #543, as amended. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Hildebrandt, Soranno, Sobolewski , Duggan, Naidow, Smith NAYS: Vyhnalek ABSENT: Morrow, Kluver Mr. Smith, Vice Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made by Mrs. Hildebrandt, seconded by Mr. Soranno and unanimously adopted, it was #1-17-86 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby approve the Final Plat for Windridge Village Subdivision No. 4 proposed to be located south of Eight Mile Road, west of Gill Road in the West 1/2 of Section 4 for the following reasons: (1) All of the financial obligations imposed upon the proprietor by the City have been complied with. (2) The Department of Engineering and Building recommends approval . (3) The Final Plat is drawn in compliance with the previously approved Preliminary Plat. 9546 Mr. Smith, Vice Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made by Mr. Duggan, seconded by Mrs. Hildebrandt and unanimously adopted, it was #1-18-86 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on December 10, 1985 on Petition 85-10-1-31 by Suad Shatata to rezone property located on the east side of Newburgh Road, south of•Ann Arbor Trail in Section 32 from RUF to R-7, the City Planning Commission does hereby determine to table Petition 85-10-1-31 . FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above hearing was given in accordance with the provisions of Section 23.05 of Zoning Ordinance #543, as amended. Mr. Smith, Vice Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made by Mr. Vyhnalek, seconded by Mrs. Sobolewski and unanimously adopted, it was #1-19-86 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on October 29, 1985 on Petition 85-9-2-39 by Baigrie Service requesting waiver use approval to operate an auto repair service within an existing building located on the north side of Plymouth Road, west of Mayfield in the South- west 1/4 of Section 27, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 85-9-2-39 be approved subject to the following conditions: (1) that the Site and Building Elevation Plan marked Sheet #1 , dated 1/14/86, prepared by Harley Faxon, Architect, which is hereby approved shall be adhered to; (2) that the landscaping shown on the approved Site Plan shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and thereafter permanently maintained in a healthy condition; (3) that the Building Elevation Plan dated 1/14/86, prepared by William P. Young Co. , which is hereby approved shall be adhered to; and (4) that there shall be no outdoor storage of equipment or miscellaneous auto parts on the premises; for the following reasons: (1) The subject site has the capacity to accommodate the proposed use. (2) The proposed use is compatible to and in harmony with the surround- ing uses in the area. (3) The proposal provides for substantial upgrading of a site seriously in need of maintenance, landscaping and additional offstreet parking. • 9547 FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above hearing was given in accordance with the provisions of Section 19.05 of Zoning Ordinance #543, as amended. $ On a motion duly made by Mr. Duggan, seconded by Mrs. Hildebrandt and unanimously adopted, it was #1-20-86 RESOLVED that, the Minutes of the 508th Regular Meeting & Public Hearings held by the City Planning Commission on January 7, 1986 are approved. Mr. Smith, Vice Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made by Mrs. Naidow and seconded by Mrs. Hildebrandt, it was #1-21-86 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission pursuant to Section 23.01 of Zoning Ordinance #543 does hereby establish and order that a Public Hearing be held to determine whether or not Section 18.47 of Zoning Ordinance #543 should be amended to include property along the 1-275 corridor area between Six and Eight Mile Roads, and Haggerty and Newburgh Roads. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice be given in accordance with the provisions of Section 23.05 of Zoning Ordinance #543, as amended. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Naidow, Hildebrandt, Soranno, Vyhnalek, Sobolewski , Smith NAYS: Duggan ABSENT: Morrow, Kluver Mr. Smith, Vice Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. No motion was offered to reconsider Petition 85-11-8-26 by Ron Parz Associates request- ing approval of all plans in connection with a proposal to construct a shopping center on the east side of Middlebelt between Terrence and Sunnydale in Section 13, therefore, no action was taken on this matter. On a motion by Mr. Vyhnalek, seconded by Mrs. Naidow and unanimously adopted, it was 1 #1-22-86 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 86-1-8-1 by Louis G. Redstone requesting approval of all plans required in connection with a proposal to con- struct an office building on the northeast corner of Six Mile and Haggerty Roads in Section 7 be approved subject to the following conditions: (1) that Phase I Site Plan 2541-00 as shown on Sheet SK-2, dated 1/9/86, prepared by Louis G. Redstone Associates, Inc. , which is hereby approved shall be adhered to; (2) that Building Elevations shown on Plan 2541-00, Sheet SK-8, dated 1/9/86, prepared by Louis G. Redstone Associates, Inc. , which is hereby approved shall be adhered to; 9548 (3) that Landscape Plan 2541-00, Sheet SK-11 , dated 1/15/86, prepared by Beckett-Raeder, Inc. , which is hereby approved shall be adhered to and all landscape materials shown on the plan installed on the site prior to building occupancy; and (4) that an underground sprinkling system shall be installed on the site prior to building occupancy. Mr. Smith, Vice Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made by Mr. Soranno, seconded by Mrs. Hildebrandt and unanimously adopted, it was #1-23-86 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 86-1-8-2 by St. Mary Hospital requesting approval of all plans required in connection with a proposal to con- struct an addition to the existing hospital located on the southwest corner of Five Mile and Levan Roads in Section 29 be approved subject to the following conditions: (1) that Site Plan 9504-01A, prepared by Daverman Associates which is hereby approved shall be adhered to; (2) that Building Elevation Plan 8504-01A, Sheets E-1 and E-2, prepared by Daverman Awsociates, which are hereby approved shall be adhered to; and (3) that the Landscape Plan 8504-01A, prepared by Daverman Associates, IIII, which is hereby approved shall be adhered to. Mr. Smith, Vice Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made by Mr. Duggan and seconded by Mr. Soranno, it was #1-24-86 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby approve Permit Application 2428 by Edward Markarian for a satellite disc antenna on property located at 34653 Grove in Section 16, subject to the following conditions: (1 ) that the height of the satellite disc antenna not exceed the height of the roof line of the residence located on the property. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Soranno, Sobolewski , Duggan, Hildebrandt, Naidow, Smith NAYS: Vyhnalek ABSENT: Morrow, Kluver Mr. Smith, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made by Mrs. Hildebrandt, seconded by Mr. Duggan and unanimously adopted, it was #1-25-86 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby approve • 9549 Permit Application 2431 by Marshall Hall for a satellite disc antenna on property located at 17625 Loveland in Section 10 subject to the following condition: (1) that the Site Plan and specifications submitted with Permit 2431 by Marshall Hall which are hereby approved shall be adhered to. On a motion duly made, seconded and unanimously adopted, the 509th Regular Meeting and Public Hearings held by the City Planning Commission on January 21 , 1986 was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. CITY 'LANNING COMMISSION W1 / Luir Donna J. Naidow, ecretary ATTEST: 'QCT / V c:svitivmk-,^ R. Lee Morrow, Chairman ac