Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1982-05-18 7677 MINUTES OF THE 433rd REGULAR MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LIVONIA On Tuesday, May 18, 1982, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia, held ' its 433rd Regular Meeting and Public Hearings in the Livonia City Hall , 33000 Civic Center Drive, Livonia, Michigan. Mr. Daniel R. Andrew, Chairman, called the Regular Meeting and Public Hearings to order at 8:05 p.m. , with approximately 22 interested persons in the audience. Members present: Daniel R. Andrew Jerome Zimmer Donna Naidow Joseph J. Falk Donald Vyhnalek Herman Kluver Judith Scurto -;Herman Kluver Members absent: Sue Sobolewski Messrs. John J. Nagy, City Planning Director; H. G. Shane, Assistant Planning Director; and Ralph Bakewell , Planner IV, were also present. Mr. Andrew: If a petition on tonight 's agenda involves a rezoning request, this Commission only makes a recommendation to the City Council who, in turn, will hold a public hearing and decide the question. If a petition involves a waiver use request and the petition is denied by the Planning Commission, the petitioner has ten days in which to appeal to the City Council ; otherwise the petition is terminated. IllOW Mr. Joseph J. Falk, Secretary, announced the first item on the agenda is Petition lij 82-4-1-6 by Keith E. Mino to rezone property located on the southwest corner of Farmington and Pickford in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 9, from R-3 to P.S. Mr. Nagy: We have a letter in the file from Gary Clark, Division of Egnineering, dated April 23, 1982 indicating there are no engineering problems connected with this petition. Mr. Keith E. Mino, 18493 Farmington Road, Livonia: I would be interested in construct- ing a professional structure on this site. I own Lots 185, 186 and 187 behind the site. These are vacant lots. I live on the site presently. I will remove the home when I build the building . Mr. Zimmer: How long have you owned the property in question? Mr. Mino: Nine years. The house was on it when I bought it . Mr. Zimmer: You have not built anything on the property since you bought it? Mr. Mino: No, the house was there when we got there. Mrs. Scurto: Do you foresee changing the zoning on those back lots to parking later on? . tMr. Mino: I will have all the parking I need right on the present site. I do not intend to use those for parking. 7678 Mrs. Scurto: Do you anticipate a medical facility or office? Mr. Mino: I figure a small medical facility. ILIMrs. Scurto: Is there sufficient land for medical parking? Mr. Nagy: A small medical office could be constructed with supporting off- street parking. There was no one else present wishing to be heard regarding this item and Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the public hearing on Petition 82-4-1-6 closed. On a motion duly made by Mrs. Scurto, seconded by Mr. Zimmer and unanimously adopted, it was #5-82-82 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on May 18, 1982 on Petition 82-4-1-6 as submitted by Keith E. Mino requesting to rezone property located on the southwest corner of Farmington Road and Pickford in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 9, from R-3 to P.S. , the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 82-4-1-6 be approved for the following reasons: (1) The proposed zoning district will provide for uses recommended by the Future Land Use Plan. (2) The proposed zoning will provide for uses that will be compatible to the abutting residential neighborhood. (3) The proposed zoning is consistent with the Planning Commission 's adopted goals and policies regarding the location of office uses along major thoroughfares to act as buffer uses between heavily travelled major thoroughfares and residential uses. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above public hearing was given in accordance with the provisions of Section 23.06 of Zoning Ordinance #543, as amended. Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Andrew, Chairman, announced that Petition 82-4-1-7 has been withdrawn as requested by Mr. Robert Serota in a letter dated May 13, 1982. Mr. Falk, Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 82-4-2-10 by Tony Piccirilli and John Morano requesting waiver use approval to operate an auto repair and body shop within an existing building located on the east side of Merriman Road between Schoolcraft and Plymouth Roads in Section 26. Ms. Kathleen McCann, 15195 Farmington Road, Livonia, was present representing the petitioners. Mr. Nagy: There is a letter in the file from Gary Clark, Division of Engineering, and a letter from Mr. Kerby, Bureau of Inspection, dated May 16, 1982. 4 Mr. Andrew: The freezer storage building is which building? Mr. Nagy: The 39' x 60' building. 7679 Ms. McCann: I am not aware of the storm sewer problem, however, I feel we can work Ito something out with the pre° ent landlord. We are requesting a waiver for an auto repair and body shop. The building is structurally sound. The landscaping and parking lot are in poor condition. We plan on up- grading that. Mr. Bernard Remer, Remer & Weber, Architects, Berkley, Michigan: You have before you the thoughts on landscaping. The building that Mr. Kerby refers to has a rigid steel structure although the exterior panels are not properly attached to the frame. We propose to attach those panels properly. *Mr. Kluver entered the meeting at 8:23 p.m. Mr. Andrew: Is that part of this development? Ms. McCann: Yes, however, we plan to reattach the panels and repaint the entire exterior. In the future, we propose concrete block around it . Mrs. Scurto: Part of Mr. Kerby's letter states that the building should be demolished and removed. I hear two entirely different opinions. Mr. Nagy: Mr. Kerby was not inside the building. He made a "windshield observa- tion!' bserva- tion:' Mr. Andrew: Have you talked to Mr. Kerby? Mr. Remer: No, although I know Mr. Kerby has not been in the building . Mr. Andrew: The asphalt needs to be resurfaced. Ms. McCann: We can take care of that. Mr. Andrew: Are you satisfied with the landscaping? Mr. Nagy: We are satisfied that the site plan provides for good landscaping. Mr. Andrew: Is the sign in conformity? Mr. Nagy: Yes. Mrs. Scurto: What about the "junk" that was left? Mr. Remer: That will be taken care of prior to occupancy. Mrs. Scurto: The distance between the little building and the big building, I thought, was about 10 feet. Mr. Remer: 16 feet. Mrs. Scurto: I was concerned about a tow truck with car attached getting in there and turning around. 16' would be adequate. Mr. Vyhnalek: Can we expect a shape-up of this site within six months? Mr. Piccirilli : Yes, sir. 11: 7680 • Mr. Andrew: It is understood that the existing asphalt parking area and driveway shall be resurfaced within two weeks from the date of approval of this petition and reflected on the site plan. Ms. McCann: Yes sir. IL Mr. Piccirilli : Yes. There was no one else wishing to be heard regarding this item and Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the public hearing on Petition 82-4-2-10 closed. On a motion duly made by Mr. Falk, seconded by Mr. Morrow and unanimously adopted, it was #5-83-82 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on May 18, 1982 on Petition 82-4-2-10 as submitted by Tony Piccirilli and John Morano requesting waiver use approval to operate an auto repair and body shop within an existing building located on the east side of Merriman Road between Schoolcraft Road and Plymouth Road in Section 26, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 82-4-2-10 be approved subject to the following conditions: (1) that the Site Plan dated 5/18/82, as revised, prepared by Remer & Weber, Architects, which is hereby approved shall be adhered to; (2) that the landscaping as shown on the approved Site Plan, which is hereby approved shall be installed prior to the issuance of r a Certificate of Occupancy and thereafter permanently maintained in a healthy condition; (3) that the auto storage yard shall be hard surfaced within two (2) years from the date of the final approval of this waiver use request as required by Section 13.06 and 18.37 of Zoning Ordi- nance #543; (4) that the easterly existing storage building shall be immediately improved by painting and refastening the existing siding to the steel frame and shall be further improved in six months from the date of this approval by the removal of the existing exterior surface and replacement of same with an appropriate surface in compliance with applicable City building codes and fire regula- tions; (5) that all three buildings shall be painted, in whole or in part, so as to be harmonious in appearance within six (6) months of the date of the approval of this petition; (6) that only one (1) tow truck shall be parked in the customer parking area; all others to be stored or parked behind the buildings; and (7) that all existing scrap material , debris, junk and other non- essential items shall be removed immediately following the approval of this petition and prior to the issuance of any ' necessary permits or Certificate of Occupancy; iudl for the following reasons: Co (1) The site has the capacity to accommodate the proposed use. (2) The proposal represents a substantial upgrading of the site. IL (3) The proposal complies with all of the requirements and standards found in Section 16. 11 and 19.06 of Zoning Ordinance #543. Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Falk, Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 82-4-3-1 by the City Planning Commission pursuant to Council Resolution #231-82 requesting the vacating of an alley located north of Joy Road between Middlebelt and Fremont Avenue in the Southeast l/4 of Section 35. Mr. Nagy: We have a letter dated April 28, 1982 from Gary Clark, a letter from the Superintendent of Public Services, Mr. Gronevelt, a letter dated May 10, 1982 from Mr. Dujsik of the Detroit Edison Company, and a letter from Mr. Turner of Consumers Power Company. Mr. Ptasnik, Attorney for Joseph Sergi : In response to the several questions, primarily as far as access for municipal service to the north/south alley between Fremont and Middlebelt running parallel to Middlebelt, that alley has not seen much maintenance. There is an access from Dover, an east/west road north of Joy. As far as turn-around, there is a parking lot behind the larger commercial structure on the corner of Middlebelt and Joy as that parking lot is unblocked. There is no barricade; there would be an open I: access to the west/south alley and at any time provide a turn-around. The alley is nothing more than a dustpan. It is a health hazard and it is not maintained properly. The alley has no benefit to the commercial properties to the south. One commercial property may be served by it and that is the bike store. As we have tried to demonstrate, there is a parking facility. It will not be affected by the vacating. The City will be relieved of the responsibility of maintaining it. Taxpayers ' money is used to clear it. That will not be the case any longer. Mr. Andrew: What are your client 's lot numbers? Mr. Ptasnik: My client owns Lot 64 which is zoned as parking and the commercial lots which I believe are Lots 53-58. Mr. Andrew: Your client does not own anything fronting on Middlebelt north? Mr. Ptasnik: No. Mrs. Scurto: Who owns Lot 52? Mr. Ptasnik: Mr. Schwartz. Mrs. Scurto: The Rent-It-Shop Lots 59-63 -- are any of these owned by the petitioner? Mr. Ptasnik: No. The adjacent parking and storage area for the Rent-It-Shop is fenced off from the alley being vacated. They have other accesses. Mr. Zimmer: Does Mr. Sergi own the entire block? 4 4 Mr. Ptasnik: He is the fee title holder. 7682 Mr. Andrew: Essentially all of the property between Fremont and Middlebelt from Joy and at least one lot north to the proposed alley is owned or controlled by your client. Mr. Ptasnik: Correct. Mr. Zimmer: Many times I use that alley when I leave the Rent-It-Shop. It is more convenient to turn when I have something on the back of my car. I can 't turn around within the lot . It is not true that you can exit onto Joy Road with something hooked on the car. Is the property north of the Rent- It-Shop yard owned by one of the petitioners? Mr. Ptasnik: They have fee title. They are not interested in decreasing the value of the leasehold of the tenants. Mr. Andrew: If that is an established fact, our primary concern should be what effect, if any, the vacating of that alley will have on Fremont or Middlebelt users that may have to take access off that north side of the alley. Mrs. Scurto: I note Lots 66 through 69 are the most vulnerable. What about fire pro- tection? Mr. Andrew: The lots are only 124 feet deep and access would come from the street side. Mr. Ptasnik: There is access to the parking lots. These parking lots are the life's blood of the commercial . There are at least four curb cuts to the park- ing. There are two existing on Joy and one or two possibly on the corner. This is not to destroy the public's access. The alley is an eyesore and there is continued dust. Mr. Vyhnalek: How do you intend to improve it? a Mr. Ptasnik: We plan, in the future, to add on to the commercial building and provide paved parking. Mr. Morrow: You plan to improve the alley and yet apparently it would be treated as a public thoroughfare. Mr. Ptasnik: The western section would be used and improved. The eastern section is already paved. It is not in an unreasonable state. That character would not be altered. The public will have use of that alley. The Fremont residents would like to see that north/south alley vacated. You may be faced with a petition to vacate that. The light commercial needs the parking. They have nowhere else to go. A semi could use either the southern or northern portion. Mr. Zimmer: Lot 64 on Fremont is owned by one of the petitioners? Mr. Ptasnik: That is correct. Mr. Zimmer: What is it zoned right now? Mr. Ptasnik: Parking. 7683 Mr. Gillelan, 8861 Middlebelt, Livonia: We own the business and Lots 52 through 64. Apparently this gentlemen hasn't been down to see the area. The alley was just road graded. Trucks use it all the time. People park in our parking lot all the time. They park and walk to the ice cream store. They park along side of building. If they close it off there won 't be any parking at all . I don't understand why he wants to close it off. If ib, it is too dusty, let them pavethe other part . We are in opposition. We utilize this alley and it would be detrimental to close it. Mr. Vyhnalek: How wide is the alley? Mr. Gillelan: Pretty wide - 20 feet. A road grader goes down and turns around. The bike shop unloads. The beauty shop people use the alley. Mrs. Scurto: Counsellor told us earlier that the petitioner owns the property both to the north and south of the alley. Mr. Gillelan: We own the land north of the alley for the distance of the first lot facing Middlebelt. Mr. Nagy: The Proof of Service shows the Gillelans own the property. Mr. Ptasnik: I am sorry for that error. My client would be interested in withdrawal . There was no one else present wishing to be heard regarding this item and Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the public hearing on Petition 82-4-3-1 closed . On a motion duly made by Mr. Morrow, seconded by Mrs. Scurto, and unanimously adopted, it was #5-84-82 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a request from Edward R. Ptasnik, Attorney for 1: the petitioners, the City Planning Commission having held a public hearing on Petition 82-4-3-1 pursuant to Council Resolution #231-82, does hereby approve the withdrawal of Petition 82-4-3-1 by the City Planning Commission requesting the vacating of an alley located north of Joy Road between Middlebelt Road and Fremont Avenue in the South- east 1/4 of Section 35, and determines that no further action by the City is necessary. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above public hearing was given in accordance with Ordinance #29 of the City of Livonia, as amended by Ordinance #50. Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Falk, Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 82-4-7-2 by the City Planning Commission pursuant to Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan of 1931 , as amended, to amend Part VII of the Master Plan, the Future Land Use Plan, by changing the designation of property bounded by Camden, Haller and Hartel , north of Plymouth Road in Section 25, from industrial to residential . There was no one present wishing to be heard regarding this item and Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the public hearing on Petition 82-4-7-2 closed. 100 . 4 On a motion duly made by Mr. Zimmer, seconded by Mr. Falk, it was /t)) #5-85-82 RESOLVED that, pursuant to the provisions of Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan, 1931 , as amended, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia, having duly held a public hearing on May 18, 1982 for the purpose of amending Part VII of the Master Plan, the Future Land Use Plan, the same is hereby amended by changing the designation IL of property bounded by Camden, Haller and Hartel , north of Plymouth Road in Section 25, from Industrial to Residential , for the following reasons: (1) The subject area is an established residential neighborhood containing 99 homes. (2) There is a need in the community to provide and maintain reasonably priced housing. (3) The likelihood of the area converting, in its entirety, to industrial use in the foreseeable future is remote. (4) Street paving, positive storm drainage and other imrpovements such as housing rehabilitation and maintenance will further sustain the subject area as a residential neighborhood. FURTHER RESOLVED that notice of the above Public Hearing was given in accordance with the provisions of Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan of 1931 , as amended. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Kluver, Morrow, Naidow, Vyhnalek, Falk, Zimmer NAYS: Scurto, Andrew 1: ABSENT: Sobolewski Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Falk, Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 82-4-7-3 by the City Planning Commission pursuant to Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan of 1931 , as amended, to amend Part VII of the Master Plan, the Future Land Use Plan, by deleting the special collector road around the Livonia Mall Shopping Center area. There was no one present wishing to be heard regarding this item and Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the public hearing on Petition 82-4-7-3 closed. On a motion duly made by Mr. Zimmer and seconded by Mr. Morrow, it was #5-86-82 RESOLVED that, pursuant to the provisions of Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan, 1931 , as amended, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia, having duly held a public hearing on May 18, 1982 for the purpose of amending Part VII of the Master Plan, the Future Land Use Plan, the same is hereby amended by deleting the special collector road around the Livonia Mall Shopping Center area for the following reasons: It (1 ) The "ring road" concept was conceived based on projected traffic volumes, origin/destination trends, and adjacent future land uses which have not materialized to the extent that such alterna- tive vehicular routes are justified. /685 (2) There is little public or private support for implementation of the "ring road" concept. 1[00FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above Public Hearing was given in accordance with the provisions of Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan of 1931 , as amended. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Kluver, Morrow, Naidow, Vyhnalek, Falk, Zimmer, Andrew NAYS: Scurto ABSENT: Sobolewski Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Falk, Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 82-4-7-4 by the City Planning Commission pursuant to Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan of 1931 , as amended, to amend Part I of the Master Plan, the Master Thoroughfare Plan, by deleting the special collector road around the Livonia Mall Shopping Center area. There was no one present wishing to be heard regarding this item and Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the public hearing on Petition 82-4-7-4 closed. On a motion duly made by Mr. Vyhnalek and seconded by Mrs. Naidow, it was #5-87-82 RESOLVED that, pursuant to the provisions of Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan, 1931 , as amended, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia, having duly held a public hearing on May 18, 1982 for the purpose of amending Part 1 of the Master Plan, the Master Thoroughfare Plan, the same is hereby amended by deleting the special collector road around the Livonia Mall Shopping Center area for the following reasons: (1 ) The designated special collector road is not required to promote alternative access to abutting or area land uses. (2) The necessary public and private expenditures are not justified in light of a lack of evidence of any real need for the special collector road. FURTHER RESOLVED, that notice of the above Public Hearing was given in accordance with the provisions of Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan of 1931 , as amended. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Kluver, Morrow, Naidow, Vyhnalek, Falk, Zimmer, Andrew NAYS: Scurto ABSENT: Sobolewski Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Falk, Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 82-2-1-2 by Farley Building Company, Inc. , to rezone property located on the 4 4 i /686 northeast corner of Middlebelt Road and Pickford Avenue in the lcNorthwest 1/4 of Section 12, from RUF to P.S. Mr. Andrew: There was a solution worked out with the two property owners as far as drainage. Unless there are some other problems, we are ready to vote on this. Ms. McCann: We have resolved the issue of drainage with two proposed storm sewer outlets. On a motion duly made by Mr. Morrow and seconded by Mr. Vyhnalek, it was #5-88-82 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on April 13, 1982 on Petition 82-2-1-2 as submitted by Farley Building Company, Inc. , requesting to rezone property located on the northeast corner of Middlebelt Road and Pickford Avenue in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 12, from RUF to P.S. , the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 82-2-1-2 be approved for the following reasons : (1) The proposed change of zoning will provide for a transition or buffer zone between residential uses and commercial zoning as well as between residential uses and the heavily travelled Middlebelt Road thoroughfare. (2) The proposed zoning district will act as a stopping point for non-residential zoning and will be a deterrent to further requests for commercial zoning along this section of Middle- belt Road. 1: (3) The proposed zoning district will provide for uses that are in harmony with and compatible to the surrounding uses in the area. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above Public Hearing was given in accordance with the provisions of Section 23.06 of Zoning Ordi- nance #543, as amended. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Kluver, Morrow, Scurto, Naidow, Vyhnalek, Falk, Andrew NAYS: Zimmer ABSENT: Sobolewski Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made by Mr. Morrow, seconded by Mr. Vyhnalek and unanimously adopted , it was #5-89-82 RESOLVED that, the Planning Commission does hereby determine to waive the provisions of Section 10 of Article VI of the Planning Commission Rules of Procedure regarding the seven-day period concerning effective- ness of Planning Commission resolutions in connection with Petition 82-2-1-2 as submitted by Farley Building Company, Inc. , to rezone 1 7687 property located on the northea' t corner of Middlebelt Road and Pickford Avenue in the Northwes . 1/4 of Section 12, from RUF to P.S. IL Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made by Mr. Zimmer, seconded by Mr. Falk and unanimously adopted, it was #5-90-82 RESOLVED that , pursuant to a letter dated May 14, 1982 from Peter M. Denja, Attorney, the City Planning Commission does hereby approve the withdrawal of Petition 79-9-2-23 by Edward S. Hesano requesting waiver use approval to establish an SDD Licensed operation on property located on the north side of Six Mile Road, east of Haggerty Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 7. Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made by Mrs. Naidow and seconded by Mr. Zimmer, it was #5-91-82 RESOLVED that, the minutes of the 432nd Regular Meeting and Public Hearings held by the City Planning Commission on April 27, 1982 are approved. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Morrow, Scurto, Naidow, Vyhnalek, Falk, Zimmer, Andrew tifNAYS: None ABSTAIN: Kluver ABSENT: Sobolewski Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made by Mr. Morrow, seconded by Mrs. Scurto and unanimously adopted, it was #5-92-82 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a letter dated May 14, 1982 from Peter M. Denja, Attorney, the City Planning Commission does hereby approve the withdrawal of Petition 79-7-8-22P by Edward S. Hesano requesting approval of all plans required by Section 18.58 of Zoning Ordinance #543, as amended by Ordinance #1306, submitted in connection with a proposal to construct a retail store on the north side of Six Mile Road, east of Haggerty Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 7. Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Falk, Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 82-4-8-10 by James B. Sutherland requesting approval of all plans required by Section 18.47 of Zoning Ordinance #543, as amended by Ordinance #1567, submitted in connection with a proposal to utilize property located on the north side of Seven Mile Road between Middlebelt Road and Parkville for parking purposes. Scurto: I feel this is a dangerous and hazardous situation. I think we are encouraging jay walking if this is approved. [ Mrs. 7688 It Mr. Sutherland: There is a light at Sev'n Mile and Middlebelt about one block away. Mrs. Scurto: That light is about one-quarter mile. I cannot visualize young girls 1: walking down to the light and back up to the restaurant at any time especially in the winter. Mr. Sutherland: That is what the police are for. Mrs. Scurto: I don 't feel it should be the responsibility of the police. It is your responsibility to provide parking for your employees that is not unhealthy, dangerous and hazardous. It is very dark on Parkville. On a motion duly made by Mr. Kluver and seconded by Mr. Vyhnalek, it was RESOLVED that, pursuant to Section 18.47 of Zoning Ordinance #543, as amended by Ordinance #1567, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 82-4-8-10 by James B. Sutherland requesting approval of all plans required by Section 18.47 submitted in connection with a proposal to utilize property located on the north side of Seven Mile Road between Middlebelt Road and Parkville for parking purposes, be approved subject to the following conditions: (1 ) that the Site Plan dated 5/17/82, signed by James Sutherland, which is hereby approved shall be adhered to; (2) that the surface of the approved parking lot shall be paved 1: within two years from the date of this resolution; and (3) that all site landscaping as shown on the approved plan shall be installed within one year from the date of approval and thereafter permanently maintained in a healthy condition. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Kluver, Morrow, Vyhnalek NAYS: Scurto, Naidow, Falk, Zimmer, Andrew ABSENT: Sobolewski Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the resolution failed. On a motion duly made by Mrs. Scurto and seconded by Mrs. Naidow, it was #5-93-82 RESOLVED that, pursuant to Section 18.47 of Zoning Ordinance #543, as amended by Ordinance #1567, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 82-4-8-10 by James B. Sutherland requesting approval of all plans required by Section 18.47 submitted in connection with a proposal to utilize property located on the north side of Seven Mile Road between Middlebelt Road and Parkville for parking purposes, be denied for the following reasons: (1 ) Parking facilities at this location would constitute a health and safety hazard to employees. 7689 (2) The proposed parking lot layout as planned would not promote the public health, safety rnd welfare as required by the provisions of Zoning Ordinance #543, as amended. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Scurto, Naidow, Falk, Zimmer, Andrew NAYS: Kluver, Morrow, Vyhnalek ABSENT: Sobolewski Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made by Mr. Vyhnalek, seconded by Mrs. Scurto and unanimously adopted, it was #5-94-82 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that the Revised Building Elevation submitted in connection with the construction of a court house within the Civic Center area located at the southeast corner of Five Mile and Farmington Roads in Section 22 be approved subject to adherence to the Building Elevation Plans depicting thereon that the new facia material is Kawneer Shadow Form 4-1/2" o.c. as used on the new City Hall building. Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made, seconded and unanimously adopted, the 433rd Regular Meeting and Public Hearings held by the City Planning Commission on May 18, 1982, were adjourned at 10:20 p.m. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION J. s_ph J F. Secretary ATTEST: ✓ - _ Daniel R. Andrew, Chairman sz t