HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1980-05-20 7298
MINUTES OF THE 392nd REGULAR MEETING
AND PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD BY THE CITY
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
t;;
LIVONIA
On Tuesday, May 20, 1980, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia,
held its 392nd Regular Meeting and Public Hearings in the Livonia City Hall,
33000 Civic Center Drive, Livonia, Michigan.
Mr. Daniel R. Andrew, Chairman, called the Regular Meeting and Public Hearings
to order at 8:00 p.m., with approximately 35 interested people in the audience.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Jerome Zimmer Judith Scurto* C. Russell Smith
Daniel R. Andrew Joseph Falk Donald Vyhnalek
R. Lee Morrow Esther Friedrichs
MEMBERS ABSENT: Herman Kluver* Judith Scurto*
Messrs. John J. Nagy, City Planning Director; H G Shane, Assistant City Planning
Director; and Robert M. Feinberg, Assistant City Attorney, were also present.
Mr. Andrew informed the audience that if a petition on tonight's agenda involves
a question of rezoning or vacating, this Commission only makes recommendations to
the City Council and the City Council after holding a public hearing makes the
final determination as to whether a petition is approved or denied, and if a petition
for a waiver of use is denied, the petitioner has tendays in which to appeal the
decision to the Council.
ILMr. Joseph Falk, Secretary, announced the first item on the agenda is Petition 80-4-1-13
by Parkside Livonia Credit Union to rezone property located south of
Plymouth Road on the east side of Raleigh in the Northwest 1/4 of Section
32, from RUF to P.
Mr. Nagy: There is a letter in the file from the Building Department indicating
that site plan and protective wall would be required. Also there is
a letter from Engineering Department stating there are no engineering
problems.
Jim Borders: We would like the rezoning for additional parking. We have been in
Credit Union existence for thirty years. About 1 1/2 years ago, our charter was
Manager expanded. ' We now have 25 companies including St. Mary's, Ford Motor,
advanced Technology. We are running out of space. In a year or two
we would like to add on to the building. We would like to double the
size of the building. All our clients are across the street. We
would rather build than move. With additional parking spaces it would
enable us to build next year. We have spent approximately $130,000 in
building improvements in the last year.
Mr. Andrew: Does the credit union own lots 16 and 17?
Mr. Borders: Yes.
Ilw Mr. Andrew: Are there any questions?
Mr. Vyhnalek: How many parking spaces will you add?
Mr. Borders: 22 spaces. We will have 90 feet of parking with 65 to 70 feet for
parking the cars.
7299
Mr. Morrow: What about the balance of those lots?
4 Mr. Borders: If we are able to build we will have enough room for 20 years.
. Most probably the lots will be sold for a residential home site.
It would be 145 feet deep and 150 feet wide. We have talked with
the neighbors and the church. All are not opposed. They are quite
pleased with what we have done there in the last year.
Mr. Andrew: Anyone in the audience wishing to be heard on this petition?
There was no one present wishing to be heard regarding this petition.
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the public hearing on this item closed.
On a motion duly made by Mrs. Friedrichs, seconded by Mr. Morrow, it was
#5-127-80 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on May 20,
1980 on Petition 80-4-1-13 as submitted by Parkside Livonia Credit
Union requesting to rezone property located south of Plymouth Road on
the east side of Raleigh in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 32, from RUF
to P, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City
Council that Petition 80-4-1-13 be approved for the following reasons:
(1) The proposed change in zoning will provide a buffer or transition
district between residential and commercial uses.
(2) The proposed change in zoning complies, in general, with the
recommendation of the Future Land Use Plan for this area.
(3) The proposed change in zoning will provide for additional offstreet
parking to accommodate expansion of the commercial facilities adjacent
thereto while, at the same time, leaving ample lot depth for residential
building purposes to the south.
(4) The severe limitation on the uses permitted by the proposed zoning
district will ensure its compatibility with the adjacent residential
district.
FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above Public Hearing was published
in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer, under date of 5/5/80
and a notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company,
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company,
Consumers Power Company and City Departments as listed in the Proof of
Service.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Friedrichs, Smith, Zimmer, Falk, Morrow, Vyhnalek, Andrew
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Scurto, Kluver
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution
II,
adopted.
Mr. Falk, Secretary announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 80-4-1-14 by
the City Planning Commission to rezone property located on the north side
of Plymouth Road, west of Merriman Road in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 27,
from, C-2 to C-1.
7300
Mr. Nagy: We have a letter dated May 19, 1980 from William Ponder, Attorney for
the property owner Bonanza protesting this change of zoning.
4
Mr. Andrew: Over the past several years we have denied restaurants proposed for
this particular. parcel. We are' seeking:a less intense land use for
this parcel.
Mr. Jas. Rossman: Ms. McKinney owned property immediately north of the subject
Exec. of the Estate property. It is zoned M-1. I would like to register our
of Irene McKinney, objections to the rezoning of the property to C-1. There is
Deceased C-2 on both sides. Possibly you will have plan to rezone
these four parcels that are zoned,M-1 next. M-1 is a much
more intense use than C-2. I have a letter of protest I would
like to submit.
Mr. Falk: Why do you object to C-1?
Mr. Rossman: You have C-2 on both sides. To rezone this to C-1 would be spot
zoning. Just a few years ago the City Council approved the Taco
Bell here.
Mr. Andrew: As one commissioner I would have no interest whatsoever in attempting
to effectuate a zoning change north of this property. This is the
industrial belt of the City of Livonia since 1961. I would not
anticipate any type of zoning of property with frontage along Merriman
Road. The property in question is very narrow. In the past it has
been used as professional offices and no other uses.
° Mr. Rossman: This has been C-2 for a long time.
Mr. Andrew: The zoning has but not the land use.
Mr. Ponder: My letter sets forth our position.
Attorney
Budd Grace: We are next door to the property. We have opposed restaurants mainly
Daly Restaurant because the property is not the right size for a restaurant. I
support the change.
Mr. Zimmer: I have been involved with this part of Plymouth Road for a long time.
I do not think Daly's belongs there either but it has been there for
a long time. We felt with the expressway there would be less intensive
traffic flow. With all the exits the traffic is more severe. We have
an enormous amount of restaurants along Plymouth Road. There is an
overbundance of C-2 in this area. I am deeply concerned with traffic
mainly. There are vacant restaurants along Plymouth Road now.
Mr. Andrew: Any further comments?
There was no one else present wishing to be heard regarding this petition.
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the public hearing on this item closed.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Zimmer, seconded by Mr. Smith, it was
#5-128-80 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on May 20, 1980
on Petition 80-4-1-14 as submitted by the City Planning Commission to rezone
property located on the north side of Plymouth Road, west of Merriman Road
in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 27, from C-2 to C-1, the City' Planning
.;on does hereby
7301
recommend to the City Council that Petition 80-4-1-14 be approved for
the following reasons:
(1) There is an over-abundance of C-2, General Commercial, zoning
presently existing in the area which has adequately provided for
a variety of commercial facilities as are permitted by said zoning
district.
(2) The C-1 Zoning District would encourage and allow uses which tend
to be less intensive in nature.
(3) The C-1 zoning district would restrict the use of the subject
property to uses that tend to minimize additional traffic congestion.
(4) The location of the land area proposed to be rezoned and the uses
permitted by the proposed zoning district are such that its size
and character will be in harmony with the appropriate and orderly
development of the surrounding neighborhood and will provide for
and encourage uses not generally found in the immediate area.
FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above Public Hearing was published
in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer, under date of 5/5/80
and a notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company,
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company,
Consumers Power Company and City Departments as listed in the Proof of
Service.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Friedrichs, Smith, Zimmer, Falk, Morrow, Vyhnalek, Andrew
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Scurto, Kluver
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted.
Mr. Falk announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 80-4-1-15 by Ford Motor
Leasing Development Company to rezone property located north of Schoolcraft
Road, east of Eckles Road in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 19, from R-1 to
C-2.
Mr. Nagy: We have a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Milton Vingsness, 14050 Eckles,
opposing the petition. We also have a letter from Mr. Hoiby, Attorney
representing Mr. and Mrs. Small objecting. We have a letter from
Engineering indicating there are no engineering problems.
Mr. Andrew: We do not want to discuss signs, landscaping on this petition.
We would like to touch only on whether or not C-2 is appropriate.
Ford could sell this parcel after the rezoning and another user could
use it.
Ken Hale: FORD Motor Leasing Development Company and Floyd Rice dealership would
1r Ford Motor be operating this facility. The first 210 feet is currently zoned
Company commercial. The Master Plan shows the entire area be commercial. Much
LW
Counsel of the surrounding area is commercial. The aerial photos will show
high industrial use is also there. We could not use the property for
residential. The Knights of Columbus is currently zoned C-2.
• 7302
ILMr. Andrew: What will be the movement of truck traffic?
Mr. Hale: We have no proposal of ingress and egress on Eckles. There will be
only one ingress and egress onto Schoolcraft. There are no walk-in
cUstomers. ,Individuals who will come in will be looking for trucks
in the price range of $78,000.000. Approximately 40 to 50 trucks a
day will come for repairs. The hours of operation are 7 a.m. until
6 p.m.. only five days a week. These will be trucks without trailers.
*Mrs. Scurto arrived at 8:45 p.m.
Mrs. Friedrichs: You will not be open after 6 p.m.?
Mr. Hale: Mr. Riggs, proposed dealer, never opened on Saturday or Sunday.
Currently he is in operation on Livernois and he does not stay
open after 6 p.m. The property adjacent to Eckles would be left
in the natural state.
Mr. Vyhnalek: Traffic would be coming down Newburgh, about how far?
Mr. Nagy: Essentially one mile.
Mr. Zimmer: Is there a water problem?
Mr. Nagy: All service is available to support the project.
Mr. Zimmer: Is the current condition of Schoolcraft and Eckles in its permanent
state? There are no contemplated changes in road width.
Mr. Nagy: No.
Mr. Zimmer: What alternatives might there be? Would it be possible for various
tenants to be located on this parcel and use Eckles as a drive?
Mr. Nagy: There is an active water drain that traverses the property. It would
be very expensive to develop access to the property off Eckles.
Mr. Zimmer: Is there any possibility that we could set that west chunk aside
guaranteeing it to almost be left in its present state?
Mr. Hale: That would give us no flexibility.
•
Mr. Andrew: I believe the mortgage financing would be a problem. Is Eckles Road
a class A road to Schoolcraft?
Mr. Nagy: No.
Mr. Andrew: We could stipulate in the waiver use that Eckles never be used for
ingress and egress.
Mrs. Scurto: The front part of the land south of the fence is going to be used
as heavy truck parking as indicated.
Mr. Hale: The front part of the property will be used for employee cars. We will
fence from the front building and all trucks we are selling will be
back of the fence.
Mr. Vyhnalek: Does Eckles go through to Plymouth?
7303
d Mr. Nagy: Yes. Traffic could come down Plymouth.
r
Eugene Hoiby: The Smalls have lived here for 28 years. They have given 1 1/2 acres
Attorney for of their property for the expressway already. They operate dog kennels.
10
Mr.&Mrs small We realize no one is interested in normal C-1 establishment. There is
nobody out there. Right now it is used as residential. The car wash
is not prospering. There is no practical need for the change now.
There is no benefit.
Mrs. Scurto: The Smalls property is zoned R-1 and they operate a dog kennel.
Mr. Hoiby: It was originally zoned RUF before you decided to make the
change to R-l. They are a valid nonconforming use.
Mr. Morrow: What classification is there for a kennel?
Mr. Hoiby: RUF:
Mr. Short: At the foot of Eckles where it intersects with the expressway there
is a turnaround. It is an unimproved gravel turnaround but trucks
could go down there.
Mrs. Friedrichs: Does Ford Motor own the property?
Mr. Hale: We have an option to buy.
Mrs. Friedrichs: How long was the property for sale?
1[:
Mr. Prunty: The property was on the market for one year. The other piece was
not on the market but the people were interested in selling.
Mr. E. Small: There is no sewer past Knights of Columbus.
Mr. Nagy: Sewer comes from the other side from Eckles Road.
Milt Vingsness: If there is ingress and egress from Eckles Road does approval
14050 Eckles come from the City of Livonia?
Mr. Andrew: Technically Wayne County has the say as Eckles is a County Road.
Ralph Phillips: The car wash is an eyesore. The abandoned house is an eyesore.
This is something to improve that section of Livonia.
Mr. Hale: I talked with the Grand Knight of K. of C. , Mr. Biga. He has no
objection to our petition whatsoever. We have met with the Smalls
and Vingsness and we can appreciate their concerns. We would like
to work constructively with them.
Mr. Small: Isn't the Grand Knight employed by Ford?
10, Mr. Hale: I believe he is retired. Possibly he worked for Ford.
Mr. Small: I went down to see one of your service centers and it was terrible.
It was noisy. I don't see how it will improve Livonia. It was
the Wolverine place in Dearborn. It was just terrible.
Mr. Andrew: Any further comments?
7304
There was no one else present wishing to be heard regarding this petition.
4
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the public hearing on this item closed.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Smith, seconded by Mr. Morrow, it was
#5-130-80 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on May 20, 1980
on Petition 80-4-1-15 as submitted by Ford Motor Leasing Development
Company requesting to rezone property located north of Schoolcraft Road,
east of Eckles Road in the northeast 1/4 of Section 19, from R-1 to C-2,
the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council
that Petition 80-4-1-15 be approved for the following reasons:
(1) This proposed change in zoning will provide for land uses which
are in accord with the recommendation of the Future Land Use Plan.
(2) This change in zoning represents an extension of commercial zoning
already occurring in the area as well as on a portion of the subject
property.
(3) The area proposed for the subject change in zoning is adjacent to and
severly impacted by the I-96 Freeway on the north and adjacent
to industrial uses on the south.
(4) The proposed zoning is in accord with the City Planning Commission's
adopted goals and policies for commercial land use.
I: (5) The subject area is no longer suitable for good residential development
given the heaviliy used traffic arteries adjacent thereto and the
commercial uses which have heretofore penetrated this general use.
FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above Public Hearing was published
in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer, under date of 5/5/80,
and a notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company,
Chesapeake &Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company,
Consumers Power Company and City Departments as listed in the Proof of
Service.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Friedrichs, Smith, Zimmer, Scurto, Morrow, Vyhnalek, Falk, Andrew
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Scurto
ABSENT: I:1uvcr
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motionis carried and the foregoing resolution adopted.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Falk, seconded by Mr. Vyhnalek, and adopted it was
#5-131-80 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby determine to waive
1: the provisions of Section 10 of Article VI of the Planning Commission Rules
of Procedure requesting the seven day period concerning effectiveness of
Planning Commission resolutions in connection with Petition 80-4-1-15 by
Ford Motor Leasing Development Company to rezone property located north of
Schoolcraft Road, east of Eckles Road in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 19,
from R-1 to C-2.
A roll call vote. on the foregoing resolution resulted in:.the. .foldowing:
7305
AYES: Smith, Zimmer, Falk, Morrow, Vyhnalek, Andrew
NAYS: Friedrichs
ABSTAIN: Scurto
,ASSENT: Kl,uver,
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution
adopted.
Mr. Falk announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 80-4-2-11 by Ford Motor
Leasing Development Company requesting waiver use approval to construct
and operate a truck sales and repair facility on property located north
of Schoolcraft Road, east of Eckles Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 19.
Mr, Nagy: The protest letters from the Smalls and Vingsnesses apply to this petition
also.
*Mr. Kluver arrived at 9:05 p.m.
Mr. Hale: This operation is proposed to be located on about five acres of land.
It will be a heavy duty new and used truck sales center as well as a
repair operation. There will be no. body work. It will be in operation
for 11 hours a day and not 18 hours. There will be approximately 30 new
trucks lined up along the expressway portion of the property and approxi-
mately 15 used trucks. These are very large rigs without trailers. It is
not fair to compare the Wolverine operation in Dearbornyith this facility.
That is quite an old place and Ford Motor Company does not control it:
Ford Motor Company will have an interest in this new facility. Howard
Riggs has been located on Livernois at Floyd Rice since 1963. The
Livernois facility is located near a residential area and we have had no
complaints from the residents. A similar operation to compare the proposed
facility with is in Grand Rapids and Toledo. It is not fair to compare
this operation with the one on Wyoming. We would hope to get started on
the new facility as soon as possible. They would anticipate beginning
construction as soon as possible in August or September. The truckers
needs are changing. I have met with the neighbors. Mr. and Mrs. Vingsness
are a substantial distance from this facility. There will be a wall and
there is a lot of shrubbery existing. There is already a lot of noise in
this area. The expressway noise is terrific. There is a large factory
across the street which generates a tremendous amount of noise. We will
be paying $31,000 in taxes not to mention personal property taxes. We have
with us tonight the architect, Howard Hudell.
Mr. Hudell: The facility will be a 26,600 square foot truck service facility.
The reason for the total number of parking spaces is that we wish to utilize
all of the property. The site creates that many spaces. These parking
spaces will not be filled spaces, The display area will be primarily along
the expressway. Trucks will not be lined up bumper to bumper. We are
adding trees and shrubs along the I-96 property line. There will be a 20-foot
greenbelt along the east property line. We are far in excess from all
property lines including the front. The landscaping in the front will
include a 2 foot high berm, shrubs, trees, and all existing trees that are full
growth trees on the front will remain. Obviously the trees on either side
will not be disturbed. There will be a chain link fence on the west.
Where we abut R-1 we will have a masonry wall in accordance with the
ordinance. We will be continuing the chain link fence at the north end
for security. We will tie into the existing highway fence.
Mrs. Scurto: Are you planning to go to the Zoning Board of Appeals to waive the
masonry wall so it would be a uniform chain link fence?
7306
11 Mr. Hudell: At the present time we are proposing the wall for only a portion
of the property on the west. Otherwise we are proposing a greenbelt.
Mrs. Scurto: How far is the facility from the Small's home?
Mr. Hudell: Over 300 feet.
Mrs. Scurto: In your discussion with the neighbors did they not request landscaping
along the area of the wall?
Mr. Hale: We had no specific discussion about that. They have a natural
barrier there already of evergreens.
Mrs. Scurto: I can understand this is perhaps a proper place for this establishment.
My heart though goes out to the neighbors who are concerned with
the growing noise level. I don't know what could be done about it.
Mr. Zimmer: The trucks will enter, park at the front, be written up and moved
back into the security area. There will be no parking of trucks
in the front area.
Mr. Hale: There will be only a few trucks parked in front during the day for
display purposes. All trucks will be locked in the security area
at night.
an
Mrs. Scurto: My concern is so much asphalt. There is/overwhelming amount of
parking and asphalt.
Mr. Hudell: When the trucks come in and due to their size we need to have a lot
of paved area otherwise they will run over the grass creating ugly
ruts.
Mrs. Scurto: What is the nature of the 20 feet of landscaping on the east and
nothing on the west?
Mr. Hudell: We originally had 10 feet on either side.
Mr. Zimmer: Will you be going to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a waiver of a
wall on the south or east?
Mr. Hudell: Yes.
Mr. Andrew: A 5 to 7 foot masonry wall is required where the property adjoins
anything other than commercial.
Mr. Vyhnalek: In the work area you have how many bays?
Mr. Hudell: 20 bays.
Mr. Vyhnalek: There will be no outside work, no bump work.
11 Mr. Hudell: There will be no bump work. The work is done inside the stalls.
Mr. Vyhnalek: How many units a day will be repaired?
IOW
Mr. Hudell: The maximum of 20. We don't have the facilities for more.
tie
Mrs. Friedrichs: How is the trash to be enclosed?
7307
Mr. Hudell: The one side will be enclosed by the side of the building, two sides
by a masonry wall. The trash will be enclosed on the north, south
and east.
# Mrs. Friedrichs: Can we restrict at least the hours of operations?
4
Mr. Feinberg: I do not legally think so, as that would be a restraint of trade.
Mr. Andrew: I have some problems with it. The chair rules we cannot do it.
Would you like to challenge that Mr. Feinberg?
Mr. Feinberg: No, I believe you are correct.
Mr. Hudell: The building itself meets the requirements for the physically
handicapped. The second floor of the building will be a parts
mezzanine. We will have an overhead door to the west. There will
be a concrete apron all around the facility.
Mr. Zimmer: Will you have over the counter purchase of parts?
Mr. Riggs: Yes, some traffic will be generated for purchase of truck parts.
Our parts sales will be 50% of the business.
Mr. Zimmer: The parts that are sold are synonymous to large trucks or will you
have parts for a Ford Van?
IL Mr. Riggs: Two ton and up are our plans.
Mr. Hudell: The outside of the building will be as maintenance free as possible
and still be aesthetic. The outside construction will be pre-cast
concrete T's. They don't peel and they don't rust. We will have
no fancy logos and the sign will be in accordance with the ordinance.
There will be a covered roof over the outside wash area. The front
of the building will be quite shielded by the trees already existing.
We plan four trees on one side and two along the side. The overhead
door is a metal insulated door. The building will also have some
metal siding in dark brown. We looking into staining the T's on
the site to coordinate with the metal dark brown siding. The Floyd
Rice sign either will be individually lit or not lit at all, but
probably may not be lit at all. The lighted sign will be the product
sign.
Mr. Andrew: Plastic?
Mr. Hudell: Yes.
Mr. Eugene Hoiby: What is the exact acreage of the parcel?
Attorney for Mr.
& Mrs. Small
Mr. Hudell: 5.8 acres.
ILMr. Hoiby: I brought with me some photographs taken at the Wolverine site which
is south of Michigan on Wyoming in Dearborn, Michigan. It is across
from the Rouge factory. I am required to read to you the position
of Mr. and Mrs. Small. They are against the request for rezoning and
then for the waiver use. To have a waiver use to a truck facility
is not defined in our ordinance. Once a waiver is granted nothing
can prevent them to do bumping and painting. You can't te11 them they
7308
can only be opened 11 hours and five days. You can't tell them how they
can use the property afterwards. This is not a gas station but if they
are going to have a number of vehicles they will have to store gasoline.
You cannot do it within 400 feet of a residential home. You must comply
with Section 19.06 when granting waiver uses. The shielded lights on this
narrow piece will still reflect toward by clients. There is a noise level
within this waiver use. From my observation of the Wolvering plat they
cannot comply with the noise level unless they air condition the facility.
If the trucks get off at the Jeffries at Newburgh and come right up the north
side they will have to past residents. If they come up from Plymouth Road
I am sure no one will care. I do know that the water at the Smalls is a
problem. They barely have adequate water. If they are attaching from
some other direction they can make it. The property has not been sold.
There are other places within the City that would better suit this facility.
Probably they are not as economically reasonable as this. The gentleman
stated the K. of C. are not concerned. Let them have one of their outdoor
barbecues on a Saturday morning. The beer and wine has a heavy taffic
flow all day long. The traffic problem is going to be terrible. My clients
have never heard any noise from the M-2. I am concerned about the gas
storage.
Mr. Andrew: They will have to comply with the requirements of the Fire Marshall.
Mr. Small: They are going to have to cut down trees in front or you won't be
able to see a sign. My parents house is not 300 feet from the
facility.
Mr. Hudell: I am sorry but it is 200 feet.
Mr. Small: If the doors were closed the noise wouldn't be bad. Those doors will
39200 School- be opened when it is warm. Those impact wrenches, with 6 or 8 mechanics,
craft the noise would be terrible. Wrenches going all day. That would
force us to move, just the noise alone. What about the pollution?
The wind would blow it all my way.
Mr. Short: I would like to read Section 19.06(e) of the ordinance.
Mrs. Erma Will guard dogs like german shepherd and dobermens be used on this site?
Small:
Mr. Riggs: I would hope not. Livonia is a safe community which I am sure is not
faced with the problems we have at our present location.
Mr. Small: Are you going to put the dogs to sleep or sell them?
Mr. Andrew: Possibly he leases them.
Mr. Zimmer: Are you planning to air condition the facility?
Mr. Hale: No.
Mrs. Scurto: Will the doors be opened when it is hot?
Mr. Hale: Yes.
Mr. Smith: I am concerned about the parking of display vehicles facing Schoolcraft
and looking at this site plan I would like to see the trucks removed
from Schoolcraft. Maybe one access would be acceptable. I feel
employees only should park there and all large trucks be put behind
the security fence. Mrs. Scurto mentioned that Armstrong Buick's
•
7309
display of one vehicle raised up and landscaped and bermed out front is
IL attractive. I haven't heard anything in the presentation about controlling
the noise. What about the speaker system. Certainly the reving up of
trucks would create noise. I don't think the pollution is a problem. i
don't think the liquor store is a problem. It seems to me that everyone
of your neighbors somehow have not been convinced that this is a good thing
for them. However, when I see your renderings i think it is a good thing
for Livonia. I don't know if all the answers are here. I am concerned
with the product sign that is 37 feet high. What about truckers sleeping
overnight in their vehicles in the lot?
Mr. Hale: If you walk the site there is clearly the same type of noise already
existing. We will work constructively with the neighbors. Sleeping in the
vehicles will not be allowed. We did decide on the masonry wall because
of the neighbors. There is not a great deal of paging. These mechanics
are not allowed to drink on the job.
Mr. Smith: Is an exhaust cover used on the trucks when they are in for repair?
Mr. Riggs: . Yes.
Mr. Andrew: Do you intend to have a loud speaker system outside?
Mr. Riggs: I would like to have it. We could do without it.
Mr. Zimmer: I would like to see the sign.
1[00 Mr. Bunty: It is 243 sq. ft. and 37 ft. high.
} Mr. Zimmer: The landscaping as shown in front, along Schoolcraft, and interspersed
° with the truck display along the freeway, the 20 foot greenbelt will
consist of sod, junipers, locust. I would like to see some kind
of similar treatment close to the building landscaping.
Mr. Small: The noise of the impact wrenches will be terrible.
Jerry Brown: We can over-emphasize the use of the impact wrench. This is not a
continuous thing going on 8 hours a day. If it was a tire store
that used impact wrenches all the time that would be different.
Various repairs will be done without impact wrenches.
Mr. Small: The K. of C. has lots of parties. Some of those people come
out of there very drunk. The come out fast and those trucks will
be dangerous.
Mr. Hoiby: Do you have bumping and painting at the present establishment?
Mr. Riggs: Yes.
Mr. Andrew: Counsel has indicated there would not be bumping and painting at
this facility. We could condition approval on that.
110 Mr. Hale: Mrs. Vingsness was happy about the lighting. Again if the lighting
is a problem we can sit down again.
Mr. Hudell: The lights are not going to be on all night. Two poles with a single
° light is not designed to light up this whole lot.
Mr. Vyhnalek: The lights in the front and back will be on a timer.
. ,‘1 !, ..,1;iCi I , 1. , i 1._.:
7310
Mr. Hudell: Yes.
Mr. Andrew: Have you reviewed in detail the landscape plan?
IL
Mr. Nagy: They do not have a detailed landscape plan.
Mr. Hale: The presentation we gave the Commissioners details that.
Mr. Nagy: I have not seen it.
Mrs. Friedrichs: Although I voted in favor of the rezoning, after listening to
the comments I would like to offer a denying resolution for the
reasons that this is too intense of a use.
The denying motion failed for lack of support.
Mr. Zimmer: I am not personally satisfied with my knowledge of the basic problem
of noise. I would like to examine some operation of an establishment
like this.
Mr. Andrew: Any further comments?
There was no one else present wishing to be heard regarding this petition.
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the public hearing on this item closed.
IL On a motion duly made by Mr. Zimmer, seconded by Mr. Smith, it was
#5-132-80 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on May 20, 1980
on Petition 80-4-1-11 as submitted by Ford Motor Leasing Development
Company requesting waiver use approval to construct and operate a truck
sales and repair facility on property located north of Schoolcraft Road,
east of Eckles Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 19, the City Planning
Commission does hereby determine to table Petition 80-4-2-11 until the
Study Meeting to be conducted on June 3, 1980.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Smith, Zimmer, Scurto, Morrow, Andrew
NAYS: Kluver, Friedrichs, Falk, Vyhnalek
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution
adopted.
Mr. Falk announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 80-4-2-9 by Nino's Pizza
requesting waiver use approval to locate a restaurant within an existing
building located in Wonderland Shopping Center on the southwest corner of
Plymouth and Middlebelt Roads in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 35.
There was no one else present wishing to be heard on this item, Mr. Andrew, Chairman,
declared the Public Hearing closed.
ILOn a motion duly made by Mr. Vyhnalek, seconded by Mr. Kluver, it was
#5-133-80 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on May 20, 1980
on Petition 80-4-2-9 by Nino's Pizza requesting waiver use approval to
locate a restaurant within an existing building located in Wonderland
Shopping Center on the Southwest corner of Plymouth And Middlebelt Roads in
the Northeast 1/4 of Section 35, the City Planning Commission does hereby
recommend to the City Council that Petition 80-4-2-9 be approved for the
following reasons:
7311
(1) This proposal complies with all of the special and general
I: requirements of Section 11.03 and Section 19.06 of the Zoning
Ordinance.
(2) The surrounding shopping center area has the capacity to support the
additional parking demand.
(3) The Marketplace building has the capacity to support the proposed
restaurant expansion.
FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above Public Hearing was sent to
property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Departments as
listed in the Proof of Service.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Kluver, Friedrichs, Smith, Zimmer, Scurto, Morrow, Vyhnalek
NAYS: Andrew
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution
adopted.
Mr. Falk announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 80-4-6-6 by the City
Planning Commission to amend Section 21.08, Limitations on the Powers
of the Zoning Board of Appeals, and Section 21.09, Appeal Procedure
of Zoning Ordinance #543, to incorporate language pursuant to a recent
amendment to the City/County Zoning Act.
a There was no one else present wishing to be heard regarding this petition.
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the public hearing closed.
On a motion made by Mr. Kluver, seconded by Mr. Zimmer, and unanimously adopted,
it was
#5-134-80 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on May 20, 1980
on Petition 80-4-6-6 as submitted by the City Planning Commission to amend
Section 21.09(e) , Determination of Appeal, of Zoning Ordinance #543, to
incorporate language pursuant to a recent amendment to the City/County
Zoning Act and also Section 21.08, the City Planning Commission does hereby
recommend to the City Council that Petition 80-4-6-6 be approved for the
following reasons:
(1) This proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment is required to comply
with Section 5 of Act No. 207 of the Public Acts of 1921, as amended.
(2) This proposed amendment is recommended by the Department of Law.
FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above Public Hearing was published
in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer, under date of 5/1/80, and
notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake
•
& Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, Consumers Power
Company and City Departments as listed in the Proof of service.
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted.
• 7312
Mr. Falk announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 80-4-2-12 by Alex V.
Fedrigo requesting waiver use approval to operate a trailer repair and
service business on property located north of Industrial Road, south of
the 1-96 Freeway in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 29.
Mr. Fedrigo: This is a trailer repair business and it is a quiet operation.
My son and I will operate it. We do not want a sign on Industrial
Road. There will be no exit off Schoolcraft.
Mr. Andrew: This will be a block building. You will use the extreme driveway
from the east line of the property. Do you have any elevation drawings.
Mr. Fedrigo: I don't have them but I can get them.
Mr. Andrew: Would you have any objection if we condition this approval so that
you will be prohibited to access from Schoolcraft.
Mr. Fedrigo: No problem.
Mrs. Scurto: This is a separate business, separate parcel and no landscaping.
I don't think our industrial area deserves that. I have no objection
to a business. I would like to see some landscaping and building
elevations.
Mr. Vyhnalek: Will the building conform to the other in any way?
liMr. Fedrigo: No. The other two face Industrial Road. This will simply be a garage
building. I will park about 4 or 5 trailers there.
J Mrs. Scurto: The southern most building of the adjoining easterly property is
that a separate building, separate business. Is there any landscaping.
Mr. Fedrigo: I don't think so.
Mr. Andrew: That building has been there a long time. Further comments.
There was no one else present wishing to be heard regarding this petition.
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the public hearing on this itdm closed.
On a motion duly made by Mrs. Scurto, seconded by Mr. Kluver, it was
#5-135-80 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on May 20, 1980
on Petition 80-4-2-12 submitted by Alex V. Fedrigo requesting waiver use
approval to operate a trailer repair and service business on property
located north of Industrial Road, south of the I-96 Freeway in the Northeast
1/4 of Section 29, the City Planning Commission does hereby determine to
table Petition 80-4-2-12 until the Study Meeting to be conducted on June 3,
1980.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
ILAYES: Kluver, Friedrichs, Zimmer, Scurto, Falk, Morrow, Vyhnalek, Andrew
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Smith
ABSENT: None
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution
adopted.
7313
Mr. Falk announced the next item on the agenda is Preliminary Plat approval for
Trerice-Observer Project Industrial Subdivision proposed to be located
on the northeast corner of Levan and Industrial Roads in the Northeast
1/4 of Section 29.
4
There was no one present wishing to be heard regarding this item.
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the Public Hearing on this item closed.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Kluver, seconded by Mr. Zimmer, it was
#5-136-80 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on May 20,
1980, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City
Council that the Preliminary Plat for Trerice-Observer Project Industrial
Subdivision proposed to be located on the northeast corner of Levan and
Industrial Roads in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 29, be approved for the
following reasons:
(1) The Preliminary Plat is drawn in full compliance with the M-1
District Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance and the Subdivision
Rules and Regulations.
(2) All reporting City Departments recommend approval.
(3) The Preliminary Plat is drawn in such a way as to provide a variety
of lot sizes in keeping with good subdivision platting concepts
(10and to provide maximum land usability.
o
FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above hearing was sent to abutting
property owners, proprietor, City departments as listed in the Proof of
Service and copies of the plat together with notice have been sent to
the Building Department, Superintendent of Schools, Fire Department,
Police Department and Parks and Recreation Department.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Kluver, Friedrichs, Zimmer, Scurto, Falk, Morrow, Vyhnalek, Andrew
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Smith
ABSENT: None
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution
adopted.
Mr. Falk announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 80-5-2-13 by Brown & Deyo
Associates for Jacobson's Stores requesting waiver use approval to
construct a retail sales building on the northwest corner of Newburgh
and Six Mile Roads in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 7.
Mr. Nagy: There are no engineering problems in connection with this proposal.
10 Mr. Brown: We are proposing a building with two stories of brick construction.
We are trying to break up a large store so that it does not look like a
fortress.
Mr. Doyle: The building will be 82,500 sq. ft. usable with 663 parking spaces of
which 13 are for the physically handicapped.
7314
Mr. Andrew: Are the parking spaces 9 x 20?
4
Mr. Doyle: Yes.
Mr. Andrew: All trash handled internally.
Mr. Doyle: Correct.
Mr. Zimmer: Do you have ownership of the piece of property on the corner?
Mr. Doyle: That will be landscaped. it is 2.03 acres. We are in joint ownership
of the entire 54 acres. We plan to build on 12.669 acres as soon
as possible.
Larry Shore: Who is responsible for landscaping the property between the street and
37282 Vargo the sidewalk?
Mr. Andrew: You could write a letter to the Mayor or City Council on that matter.
Ron Rowe: What is the purpose of this waiver? To give permission to start
37020 Vargo building. I thought the whole project was supposed to be developed
at one time. If only 12 acres are developed, I would like to see
the rest of the property seeded. It will probably take ten years to
finish and I can see this parcel from my home.
Mr. Doyle: Jacobson's will be built first. We are preparing to start construction
Las soon as possible, possibly this fall or later than that.
Mr. Rowe: The Spring of 1981 opening date is unlikely.
Mr. Doyle: It is unlikely.
Mr. Rowe: Is this store slightly larger than originally planned?
Mr. Doyle: Yes, the total square footage of the total project will be the same.
Jacobson's is taking a little more. We feel it is important to a
restaurant if we build first without the Mall.
Mr. Andrew: Any further comments?
There was no one else present wishing to be heard regarding this petition.
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the public hearing on this item closed.
On a motion duly made by Mrs. Scurto, seconded by Mr. Falk, and unanimously adopted,
it was
#5-137-80 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on May 20, 1980
on Petition 80-5-2-13 as submitted by Brown & Deyo Associates for Jacobson's
Stores requesting waiver use approval to construct a retail sales building
on the northwest corner of Newburgh and Six Mile Roads in the Southeast 1/4
of Section 7, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City
Council that Petition 80-5-2-13 be approved subject to the following
conditions:
IL (1) That Site Plan dated May 20, 1980, prepared by Brown & Deyo & Associates
Architects, Inc. , which is hereby approved shall be adhered to.
7315
(2) That Building Elevations Plans dated May 20, 1980, Sheets 1 thru
4, which are hereby approved shall be adhered to;
(3) That a detailed landscape plan showing all landscape. materials
proposed to be installed on the site and providing for landscaping
of the corner parcel located immediately adjacent to the northwest
intersection area of Newburgh and Six Mile Road shall be submitted
for Planning review and Council approval within forty-five (45) days
of this approval; ,and
(4) That Jacobson's obtain a variance from the Zoning Ordinance
requirement regarding the parking bay sizes.
for the following reasons:
(1) The proposal complies with all of the special and general conditions
of the Zoning Ordinance as listed in Sections 11.03 and 19.06 thereof.
(2) The subject site has the capacity to support the proposed use.
(3) The proposed use is fully compatible with the existing and proposed
uses in the general area by way of hours of operation, traffic flow,
site amenities, location size and character.
FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above Public Hearing was sent
IL to property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Departments
as listed in the Proof of Service.
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution
adopted.
Mr. Falk, announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 80-5-2-14 by Fred J.
Armour requesting waiver use approval to construct a Knights Inn Motel
on the north side of I-96 Freeway, east of Middlebelt Road in the South-
west 1/4 of Section 24.
Mr. Nagy: We have a letter from Engineering dated May 7, 1980 indicating there
are no city maintained storm sewers readily available. We have a
letter from Department of Public Safety, Division of Police, dated
May 20, 1980, from Lt. Widmaier. We have a letter from Department
of Public Safety, Division of Fire, dated May 20, 1980, from Ted
Kovarik. We have a letter from the Bureau, of Inspection dated May 20,
1980 from Frank Kerby.
a
Ms. Kathleen McCann, Attorney: The Knights Innis a family oriented
Rep. owner Claude Howard It is a tutor style very beautiful and very well
Knights Inn Motel kept up. It was designed by Cardinal Industries.
Their structures can withstand 130 mph hurricane
winds. They assure us they can meet the city's
building requirements. The price range is $20 to $28 per night.
We have 10 variations of rooms. There are conference rooms for
businessmen that are travelling. There are not enough accommodations
along the expressway like this.
7316
Jim Schmidt: We have been in business for eight years. We are very successful.
Knights Inn
Ms, McCann:I:
This is a low traffic, low density motel. There would be less than
200 cars per day that would be entering or leaving. The units are
modules. There will be 2 x 10 beams from the ground. The units
are 12 x 24. They will have tongue and groove floors. The walls
are 8 1/2 ft. from the interior to the interior of the other. They
have been fire tested. It took one wall one hour before it burned
through. There are separate smoke detectors. These are ground floor
units. We have 21 types of shrubbery and 325 bushes and trees. There
will be at least 30 to 35 new jobs. It will bring the City $40,000
in taxes. It is adjacent to the Cloverdale Bowling Alley. There is
no application for any liquor license. They are looking away from
any type of liquor establishments for our locations. This is an
appropriate use for this zoning.
Mr. Andrew: Does the legal description include Bob Evans and the other property
or just the motel?
Mr. Nagy: Just the motel.
Mr. Andrew: What is going to be next door?
Fred Armour: The property is 250 x 360, about 2 acres. We don't know.
Mr. Vyhnalek: Do you anticipate the race track will draw much business?
Mr. Armour: No.
IL
Mr. Andrew: In order to meet the building code is it necessary to change the site
plan?
Mr. Armour: No.
Mr. Andrew: - When would you get Mr. Kerby's final ruling?
Mr. Armour: As soon as we can.
Mr. Andrew: I would like to table this until we get Mr. Kerby's opinion.
Mr. Kluver: You own the entire side west to Middlebelt.
Mr. Armour: It is the same owner.
Mr. Kluver: I would like to see a total development of that site, at least to
some reasonable conceptual plan.
Mr. Vyhnalek: Will more space be needed to turn around for the fire engines?
Mr. Nagy: Just the radius to some extent changes.
Mr. Smith: There are no extra spaces for each unit yet there are 10 extra in
front of the office. What about people pulling a boat?
IL Mr. Schmidt: This layout of parking is the best plan from an operational and
security standpoint. If we expect to be full then we try to find
other accommodations for them elsewhere.
7317
1[4; Mr. Smith: Do you own the parcel adjacent to the west?
Mr. Ari our: No.
Mr. Smith: Somebody going south can turn here and go directly into the Knight's
Inn. The easement is part of the proposal.
Mr. Nagy: Yes.
Mr. Andrew: What is the property zoned immediately to the north?
Mr. Nagy: R-7, multiple family.
Mr. Armour: We have a similar motel completed in January at I-275 and Ford
Road on the northwest corner in Canton.
Mr. Andrew: Is there any affiliation with you and Bob Evans?
Mr. Schmidt: No. We are next door to Bob Evans at 7 or 8 of our locations out of
20. We are next door to Denny's in Toledo.
Mr. Andrew: What about the sewer connection?
Mr. Armour: We have 3 or 4 ways to go. We are thinking of north on Middlebelt
about 1200 feet from Schoolcraft there is a 48" storm sewer.
Ms. McCann: Rather thantttable this item we would like you to deny this and then
it could go/8ouncil on appeal.
Mr. Andrew: Anyone else present wishing to be heard on this matter?
There was no one else present wishing to be heard regarding this petition.
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the public hearing on this item closed.
On a motion duly made by Mrs. Scurto, seconded by Mr. Falk, it was
#5-138-80 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on May 20, 1980
on Petition 80-5-2-14 as submitted by Fred J. Armour requesting waiver use
approval to construct a Knights Inn Motel on the north side of I-96 Freeway
east of Middlebelt Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 24, the City Planning
Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 80-5-2-14
be tabled until the Study Meeting to be conducted on June 3, 1980.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Kluver, Friedrichs, Smith, Scurto, Falk, Morrow, Vyhnalek, Andrew
NAYS: Zimmer,
ABSENT: None
teMr. Andrew, Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Kluver, seconded by Mr. Morrow, and unanimously adopted,
it was
,(. 1,.1.:-.;tlWI CuI.%'ZIint.: pP<,i. `,. 1 y iLcutu__cl r,., ln, _t :f
•
7318
#5-139-80 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a letter dated May 2, 1980 from L.Gary Wright
IL requesting an extension of approval of Petition 79-3-2-6 by Win Schuler's
Inc. requesting waiver use approval to construct a restaurant on the
south side of Six Mile Road, west of Newburgh Road in the Northwest 1/4 of
Section 18, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City
Council that an extension be granted for a period of one year from the date
of this resolution subject to the following conditions:
(1) That all conditions attached to the previous approval in Planning
Commission Resolution #4-58-79, adopted April 10, 1979, be adhered to.
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution
adopted.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Vyhjialek, seconded by Mrs. Scurto, and unanimously
adopted, it was
#5-140-80 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a letter dated May 2, 1980 from L. Gary Wright
requesting an extension of approval of Petition 79-3-2-7 by Win Schuler's
Inc. , requesting waiver use approval to utilize a Class C Liquor License
in connection with a restaurant proposed to be constructed on the south
side of Six Mile Road, west of Newburgh in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 18,
the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council
that an extension be granted for a period of one year from the date of
this resolution subject to the following conditions:
(1) That all conditions attached to the previous approval in Planning
Commission Resolution#4-59-79, adopted on April 10, 1980, be
adhered to.
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution
adopted.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Kluver, seconded by Mr. Zimmer, and unanimously adopted,
it was
#5-141-80 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby approve the
Final Plat for Pembroke Commons Subdivision proposed to be located
on the east side of Angling Road, south of Pembroke in the Southeast 1/4
of Section 1, for the following reasons:
(1) The Final Plat is in full compliance with the previously approved
Preliminary Plat.
(2) The Engineering Division recommends approval of the Final Plat.
(3) All of the financial obligations imposed upon the proprietor by
the City have been complied with.
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution
adopted.
ILOn a motion duly made by Mrs. Scurto, seconded by Mrs. Friedrichs, and unanimously
adopted, it was
#5-142-80 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on
May 20, 1980 on Petition 80-2-1-8, and pursuant to a request by Dr.
Evangelista dated 5/20/80, the City Planning Commission does hereby
approve the withdrawal of Petition 80-2-1-8 by Dr. Jose Evangelista
rer?uegt.i_nq to roznnc property locatPH -„ "-IP rn„1_1. ,r s'..._ •• ,
7318
ILeast of Middlebelt in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 12, from R-9-II
to C-2.
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution
adopted.
On a motion duly made by Mrs. Scurto, seconded by Mr. Vyhnalek, it was
#5-143-80 RESOLVED that, the minutes of the 390th Regular Meeting and Public
Hearings held by the City Planning Commission on April 22, 1980,
be approved.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Kluver, Friedrichs, Smith, Scurto, Falk, Morrow, Vyhnalek, Andrew
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Zimmer
ABSENT: None
Mr. Andrew, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution
adopted.
On a motion duly made, seconded and unanimously adopted, the 392nd Regular Meeting
and Public Hearings held by the City Planning Commission on May 20, 1980 were
adjourned at 12:00 p.m. midnight.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
IL
Jos- • J. j, k, -cretar
•
ATTEST: L/C--- '''1,1)7Z7€0e1-(i.
Daniel R. Andrew, Chairman
•
s
•
IL