HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1974-05-14 5561.
fie ,. L)C__7 lir ,A- • :i',L� R:.C.,.LAR. 1tE.].
ANI) A PUBLIC 11 EliIII:v'G 1-1 ELI) BY THE CITY
PLA:7,N INT COI-T-1 S'SION OF Th E, CITY
LIVONIA •
On Tuesday, May 14, 1974, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia
held its 275th Regular Meeting and Public Hearings at the Livonia City Hall,
33001 Five Mile Road, Livonia, Michigan.
Mr. Daniel R. Andrew, Chairman, called the Public Hearing and Regular Meeting to
order at 8:00 p.m. with approximately 50 interested persons in the audience.
Members ,present: Daniel R. Andrew, Joseph Talbot Charles Pinto
Francis M. Hand Suzanne Taylor Joseph J. Falk
Herman H. Kluver Esther Friedrichs William Scruggs
Messrs. John J. Nagy, Planning Director; H. G. Shane, Planner IV; Ralph Bakewell,
Planner IV; and Robert Feinberg, Assistant City Attorney, were also present.
Mr. Andrew informed the audience that if a petition on the evening's agenda
involved a question of rezoning or vacating then the Planning Commission would
only recommend to the City Council that certain action be taken whereupon the
Council would ultimately decide whether or not to approve or deny the petition.
Further, if a petition involved a waiver of use request that is denied, the
petitioner then has ten days in which to appeal the decision to the council.
Mr. Falk, Secretary announced the first item on the agenda, Re-hearing of
Petition 71-8-1-51 by Robert C. Horvath, as requested by Council
Resolution #213-74, requesting to rezone property located south
of Eight Mile Road between Farmington Road and Gill Road in the
Northeast 1/4 of Section 4, from RUF to R-8 and R-3.
Mr. Andrew: Is there anything in file with reference to this petition.
Mr. Nagy: We have a petition with 20 signatures from residents of Gill Road
opposing the petition.
Consumers Power indicates no objection.
Cornel Peleo:
20295 Westbrook
Detroit
Business Associate
& one of the
general partners
of a limited
partnership. I feel this is an excellent spot for multiple dwelling. It will
keep residents in an area that has a need for multiple dwelling.
illiWMr. Andrew: You are in favor of keeping the R-3 zoning?
Mr. Peleo: We want the whole 60 acres rezoned R-8.
Mr. Andrew: Can the Commission take action on petitioner's request, Mr. Feinberg.
53x2
Mr. Feinberg: No, for the reason you are expanding not diminishing petitioned
area-
Mr. Andrew: Do you still feel there is a market for R-8?
Mr. Peleo: I think ther , is a market for R-8 anywhere in this area.
There is a dire need for apartments in Livonia. You have
only 1,600 units. Southfield has 18,000. Westland has
12,000. I think you people think the apartment dwellers are
another type of persons. I do not think they are. The
last time Mr. Nagy made a statement that we do not agree with.
That area will never support residential. You are going to
have to face up to the fact that you are going to have to have
multiple dwellings. You are not fighting Binder-Lark, or
Kaufman Broad, you are fighting one individual investment group.
Mrs. Taylor: You talked about development of Gill Road. What would your
plans be now?
Mr. Peleo: If we could obtain an excess of 500 units it would make it
economically sound. With 500 units we would make some off
street improvements.
Mr. Kluver: We can only act on this petition as it presently stands before us.
ILO Mr. Feinberg, City Attorney has indicated that we cannot alter
the petition to expand the R-8 zoning.
Mr. Horvath: Our original petition called for R-8. As a concession they
suggested we use a buffer zone for R-3. This was a condition
of the City to give us the rezoning.
Mr. Andrew: You may withdraw this petition if you wish.
Mr. Horvath: No, we will go through with it like it is.
Mr. Hand: With the fifty R-3 lots going in, would you pave Gill Road?
Mr. Horvath: We would pave half the road on Gill to Eight Mile. We would
have to bring in the water and sewer.
Mr. Falk: I believe that if you are going to get the R-8 and R-3 you would
be back next week trying to get R-3 rezoned to R-8.
Mr. Horvath: We do not know what will happen until after we obtain the
rezoning.
Mr. Falk: I feel that as soon as you get there, you will be back for R-8.
You don't need to answer if you do not want to.
Mr. Horvath: I really cannot answer because I do not know.
Mr. Falk: I think you are interested in high rise and commercial not
residential. I feel the single family neighborhood was there
before you people purchased this investment property.
Mr. Peleo: We have conceded to yauand we do not get anything by way of
rezoning.
5561:: ;
Mrs. 'Taylor: I am opposer': to both rezoaings in this area. I went along lith
it initially considering the total development and the R-3 as
a buffer to the w -st. As far. as I am concerned I feel R-8
and R-3 are both inappropriate fol' an area that is RUF.
Mr. Hand: I offer to differ from that, I feel that R-8 is a good buffer
for that arca.
Mr. Talbot: Something is going to go in thele some day. That property is
not going to set there idle with people paying taxes on it.
With the R-3 and R-8 as a buffer I think it is logical.
Mrs. Spencer: I am against the rezoning.
Susan Clark: I do not feel that they can really provide housing for old
34600 Norfolk: people or young people at their projected rental rates.
Who can afford $250.00 a month?
Mike Luziak: I moved from Westland because of the many apartments.
20301 Gill With this apartment development I may have to move again.
James Clark: I am against the rezoning.
James Reynolds: Because they lost the C-4 zoning what good is this rezoning
V.P.Urban going to do them?
IL, Farms
Mr. Andrew: I do not want to get into that question.
Mr. Hand: R-8 is attractive to me because it locates density in an
open space and it would not be detrimental to RUF. I am
again suggesting that this might not be all bad. The area,
the natural buffers and the Schostak apartments to the south
should be considered and we should take a positive position
and I am taking an affirmative position.
Mr. Pinto: The R-3 section would require platting. Would the R-8 have
to be platted?
Mr. Nagy: Platting is necessary for single family subdivision but not
for multiple family.
Mr. Pinto: Can conditions be attached to site plan?
Mr. Nagy: Reasonable conditions can be attached.
Mrs. Taylor: Is there an updated report from Engineering Department?
Mr. Nagy: No, the letter of November, 1971 still is valid about quantity
and types of improvements ; ie. three lanes minimum; extension
of sanitary sewer. Water mains would have to be improved.
Tarabusi Flood plain would be sufficient to cope with storm
water runoff.
Mrs. Friedrichs: I still feel an overall plan for the area has to be considered.
556/,
Mr. Horvath : r'e wa.. no tbling.
Mr. Pinto: Is it your _,,,m , on Lo develop the R-3 shown on the map as R-3?
Mr. Horvath: It is our intension to go through with the plan as shown here.
Mr. Pinto: The 7 c 'd 1.; approximately 50 at a minimum width of
80 ft. That is your intention? To develop the R-3 portion into
a single family residential subdivision?
Mr. Peleo: Yes, it is.
There was no one else present wishing to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing on this item.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Falk, seconded by Mr. Scruggs and adopted it was,
#5-101-74 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Re-Hearing as requested by
Council Resolution #213-74 having been held on May 14, 1974 on
Petition 71-8-1-51 as submitted by Robert C. Horvath, and as
amended by Robert C. Horvath, pursuant to a letter dated March 7,
1974, requesting to rezone property located south of Eight Mile
Road between Farmington Road and Gill Road in the Northeast 1/4
of Section 4, from RUF to R-8 and R-3, the City Planning Commission
does hereby recoumiend to the City Council that Petition 71-8-1-51
1[0 be denied for the following reasons:
(1) The intrusion of high-intensity, multi•-family development
in this area would adversely affect the stability of the
nearby existing single-family residential development.
(2) The proposed rezoning allowing for high-intensity, multi-
family uses on the property subject to this rezoning petition
would not be of such size, location and character as to be
in harmony with the orderly and appropriate development of
the surrounding area.
(3) The location and size of the area proposed to be rezoned to
the intensity of use as permitted under the high-rise
. multi-family zoning district regulations as well as its
relationship to the street, Gill Road, which street provides
access to the property, shall be such that the traffic to and
from the site would be hazardous, inconvenient to the neigh-
borhood and unduly conflict with the normal traffic of the
neighborhood as Gill Road is unimproved and thereby unable
to cope with the increased traffic as would be generated by
this rezoning request.
(4) The demands of the public utilities and public facilities
in this sector of the City would be over-burdened by the
intrusion of high-intensity, multi-family development as
their present capacities are only sufficient to cope with
single family development as permitted under the RUF category.
5565
(5) The rezoni _ r ;s% is ply, 4_.ure in chat a petition of this
magnitude requesting to change 23 acres of land presently zoned
RUF to an R-d, t _ _se, multi--family category should, more
appropriately, be considered after the updated Master Land
Use Plan of the City of Livonia has first been reviewed and
approved by the City Planning Commission and City Council.
FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above public hearing was
published in the official newspaper, the Observer-Eccentric,
under date April 29, 1974 and a notice of such hearing was sent
to the Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company,
Michigan Bell Telephone Company, Consumers Power Company and
City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service.
A roll call vote resulted in the following:
AYES: Kluver, Scruggs, Taylor, Falk, Andrew
NAYS: Friedrichs, Pinto, Talbot, Hand
ABSENT: None
The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted.
Mr. Falk announced the next item on the agenda, Petition 74-3-7-3 by the City
Planning Commission to amend Part V of the Master Plan of the City
of Livonia, the Master School and Park Plan, so as to incorporate
1[00 property located on the north side of Seven Mile Road, east of
Fitzgerald, in the South 1/2 of Section 5.
Mr. Andrew: Is there any correspondence on this petition?
Mr. Nagy: We have a letter from the Parks and Recreation Department
recommending approval of this petition.
There was no one present wishing to be heard and the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing on this item.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Hand, seconded by Mrs. Friedrichs and unanimously
adopted it was,
#5-102-74 RESOLVED that, pursuant to the provisions of Act 285 of the
Public Acts of Michigan, 1931, as amended, the City Planning
Commission of the City of Livonia having duly held a public
hearing on May 14, 1974 for the purpose of amending Part V of
the Master Plan of the City of Livonia, the Master School and
Park Plan, the same is hereby amended so as to incorporate
property located on the north side of Seven Mile Road, east of
Fitzgerald, in the South 1/2 of Section 5 .
(Refer, to Petition 74-3-7-3)
for legal description
AND, having given proper notice of such hearing as required by
Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan, 1931, as amended, the
City Planning Commission does hereby adopt said amendment as
5 566
Li part of the ?.-1[J,tL,i Plan of the City of Livonia, which is
incorporated herein hy reference, the same having been adopted
by resolution of the City elann_Lng Commission, with all
amendments thereto, and further that this amendment shall be
filed with the City Council, City Clerk, and the City Planning
Commission; and a certified copy shall also be forwarded to the
Register of Deeds for the County of Wayne for recording.
The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted.
Mr. Falk announced the next item on the agenda, Petition 74-3--1-8 by Bra-Con
Industries, Inc. to rezone property located on the west side of
Globe Road, north of Plymouth Road in the Southwest 1/4 of
Section 29, from RUF to P.
Mr. Andrew: Is there any correspondence pertinent to this petition?
Mr. Nagy: There is a letter from Consumers Power stating they have no
objection to the petition.
The City Engineering Division reports no engineering problems.
A letter from Dan Gilmartin, Industrial Coordinator suggest that
the matter be tabled for a meeting of Planning Staff, Bra-Con
representatives and himself.
Mrs. Howell: We have lived on Newburgh 27 years and it has always been
11970 Newburgh zoned residential. We do not want a factory parking lot
Livonia behind our house. It is supposed to be light industry. They
(421-2084) have very loud hawmering all night long. There is junk
there all the time. They said they would be quiet, neat
neighborhoods. They were not. Now they want a parking lot.
We do not want it. When the petition for the addition went
in they said there would be no back door but they have put
in a back door and big trucks go in there all day long.
Mr. Andrew: Do they work around the clock?
Mrs. Howell: That's right. I wish you could see how close that factory
is to our house. I hope you will be understanding.
Mr. Scruggs: Do they park there now?
Mrs. Howell: Yes, they park there and there is a lot of junk behind there.
There was no one else present wishing to be heard and the Chairman closed the
public hearing on this item.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Talbot, seconded by Mrs. Taylor and unanimously
adopted it was ,
5367.
IL •5__103-74 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a puri _r. heR.ring having been meld on
May 14, 1974, on Petition 74-3-1-8 as submitted by Bra-Con
Industries , Inc. , to rezone property located on the west side of
Globe Road, north of Plymouth Road in the Southwest 1/4 of
Section 29, from RUF to P. , the City Planning Commission does
hereby determine to table this item to the Study Meeting of June 18,
1974.
The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted.
Mr. Falk announced the next item on the agenda, Petition 74-4-1-9 by
Bell Creek Development Company to rezone property located south
of Five Mile Road between Santa Anita and Cavell in the Northeast
1/4 of Section 24, from RUF to R-7 and C-2.
Mr. Andrew: Is there any correspondence in file relative to the petition?
Mr. Nagy: Consumers Power letter stating there is no objection. The
Engineering Division reports that the legal description should
be revised. There are no engineering problems.
A letter is also on file from Mr. and Mrs. Kutula stating they
are opposed to the rezoning.
Edward Orr: We want to build a little shopping here.
23475 Oakland
IL Southfield
Mr. Andrew: Why do you want C-2 zoning when C-1 local commercial is sufficient
for retail shopping?
Mr. Orr: We thought that C-2 would be very useful for residents of this
area.
Mr. Pinto: Does any property include property owned by Rosedale Presbyterian
Church.
Mr. Orr: I do not believe so.
Mrs. Friedrichs: Why do you feel that C-1 would not be adequate?
Mr. Orr: It restricts you to some extent.
Mrs. Friedrichs: I am a little bit bothered by C-2 rezoning. There are several
shopping centers in that area already. I would like to see
the residential area kept there. I think 60 units would be
attractive in that area but I am against C-2.
Carl Riegal: We had a 7-11 in mind or something similar.
Mrs. Friedrichs: That kind of store would be included in C-1 and there already
is a part store nearby.
Mr. Falk: You must have something in mind for C-2 that you are not telling us of.
Mr. Riegal: We are the silent partners so I really do not know what the other
partners had in mind.
•
5566
Mr. Falx: Then, you won [I LF_' 1t until such Lilac as all the
partners can get togetner to discuss the need for C-2 commercial.
Mr. Riegal: We would rather have a vote and then perhaps come down to C-1.
Mr. Pinto: I do not know whether we even want to consider any commercial.
There alreaC'y i., too -auch strung out commercial development in the
mile road area.
Mr. Scruggs: Is there a house on the property now?
Mr. Orr: Yes, there are renters living there. We will be removing the
building.
Mr. Lowery: I am opposed to the rezoning.
15035 Cavell
Resident I am property owner of R1A and I would like it rezoned.
36714 Bennett
Resident I am against the rezoning.
14901 Cavell
Mr. Lowery: They are going to have stores up and down that street.
Mr. Orr: We would like the petition considered as C-1 and not C-2.
Mr. Andrew: We will consider it an oral amendment at this time and would
request that you send a letter to the City Clerk's office
advising them of your decision.
Mr. Pinto: I am dismayed by proliferation of commerical zoning and uses
along Five Mile Road. I feel that Five Mile can still be
developed residentially in the broad sense. I consider
multiple as residential but not spasmodic proliferation of
commercial on Five Mile Road. There are shopping centers
along Five Mile already that are not occupied.
Mr. Orr: We are talking about developing a $2 Million project and we are
going to do it right.
Mr. Pinto: I am sure it would be attractive but the question is whether that
would be the proper place for commercial.
Mr. Falk: I would like you to consider taking that commercial out.
There was no one else present wishing to be heard and the Chairman closed the
Public Hearing at this time.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Kluver, seconded by Mrs. Taylor and unanimously
adopted it was,
5569
#5-104-74 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a PL'_b1. n hearing having been held on
1:' May 14, 1974, on Petition 74-4-1-9 as submitted by Bell Creek
Development. Company to rezone property located south of Five
Mile Road between Santa Anita and Cavell in the Northeast 1/4
of Section 24, from RUF to R-7 and C-1 (as amended by the petitioner
verbally) the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia
does hereby determine to table this item to the May 21, 1974
study meeting.
The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted.
The Chairman declared a ten minute recess.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Chairman called the meeting to order with the same members present as
were present for the initial roll call.
Mr. Falk announced the next item on the agenda Petition 74-10-6-14 by the City
Planning Commission pursuant to Council REsolution #637-73 to amend
#637-73 to amend Section 2.08 (7) of Ordinance #543, the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Livonia, by amending the definition of Kennel.
On a motion duly made by Mrs. Taylor, seconded by Mr. Kluver and unanimously
adopted it was,
1rIbif #5-105-74 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a public hearing having been held on
November 13, 1973 on Petition 73-10-6-14 by the City Planning
Commission pursuant to Council Resolution #637-73 to amend
Section 2.08 (7) of Ordinance #543 the Zoning Ordinance of the
City of Livonia, by amending the definition of Kennel, the City
Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council
that action with respect to this matter be deferred until such a
time as the model legislation as drafted by the American Dog Owner's
Association, P.O. Box 35176, Detroit, Michigan 48235, has been pursued
at the State level, which legislation will more appropriately assess
on a more reasonable basis the regulation of animal controls, licensing
and related standards,
The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted.
Mr. Falk announced the next item on the agenda Petition 73-12-2-26 by Paul F.
Ternes, Jr. , requesting to be granted a waiver of use approval to use
vacant property located on the south side of Amrhein Road, east of
Newburgh Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 29, for parking and
storage of trucks and other motor vehicles in connection with garage
repair shop.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Hand, seconded by Mr. Kluver and unanimously adopted
it was,
#5-106-74 RESOLVED that, pursuant to request dated May 13, 1974 from the
petitioners , the City Planning Commission does hereby approve the
withdrawal of Petition 73-12-2-26 as submitted by Paul F. Ternes, Jr. ,
requesting to be granted a waiver of use approval to use vacant
property located on the south side of Amrhein Road, east of Newburgh
Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 29, for parking and storage of
5570
trucks and other icotor vehicles in connection with garace repair shons
' Li
for the following reason
(1) The petitioner has iniormed. the Com nasion by letter dated
May 13, 1974 that he is desirous of locating a new site that
will more appropriately accommodate his luse.
The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted.
Mr. Falk announced the next item on the agenda, motion by the City Planning
Commission pursuant to Section 23.01 of Ordinance #543, t.s amended,
to hold a public hearing to determine whether or not to vacate a
portion of Blackburn Avenue located south of Plymouth Road between
Ingram and Cranston in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 34.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Kluver, seconded by Mr. Talbot and unanimously
adopted it was,
#5-107-74 RESOLVED, that pursuant to Section 23.01 of Ordinance #543, the
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, as amended, the City
Planning Commission does hereby establish and order that a public
hearing be held in the Livonia City Hall to determine whether or
not to vacate a portion of Blackburn Avenue located south of
Plymouth Road between Ingram and Cranston in the Northeast 1/4
of Section 34.
ILFURTHER RESOLVED, notice of time and place of said public hearing
shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City
of Livonia and a notice by registered United States mail shall be
sent to each public utility or railroad within the City of Livonia
in accordance with the provisions of Act 285 of the Public Acts of
Michigan of 1931, as amended.
The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted.
M,r. Falk announced the next item on the agenda, motion by the City Planning
Commission pursuant to Section 23.01 of Ordinance #543, as amended,
to hold a public hearing to determine whether or not to vacate a
portion of Melrose Avenue located south of Plymouth Road between
Auburndale and Arden in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 34.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Hand, seconded by Mr. Kluver and unanimously adopted
it was,
#5-108-74 RESOLVED, that pursuant to Section 23.01 of Ordinance #543, the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Livonia, as amended, the City Planning
Commission does hereby establish and order that a public hearing be
held in the Livonia City Hall to determine whether or not to vacate
a portion of Melrose Avenue located south of Plymouth Road between
Auburndale and Arden in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 34.
FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of time and place of said public hearing
shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City
of Livonia and notice by registered United States mail shall be sent
to each public utility or railroad within the City of Livonia in
accordance with the provisions of Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan
1931, as amended.
5571
1:t
The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted.
Mr. Falk announced the next itorl on the agenda, approval of the minutes of the
272nd Regular Meeting held by the City Planning Commission on April 2,
1974.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Kluver, seconded by Mr. Hand, it was ,
9P5--109--74 RESOLVED that, the minutes of the 272nd Regular Meeting held by
the City Planning Commission on April 2, 1974 are hereby approved.
A roll call vote resulted in the following:
AYES: Kluver, Friedrichs, Pinto, Talbot, Taylor, Hand, Falk, Andrew.
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Scruggs
The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted.
Mr. Falk announced the next item on the agenda, approval of the minutes of
the 273rd Regular Meeting held by the City Planning Commission on
April 16, 1974.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Kluver, seconded by Mr. Scruggs, it was
#5-110-74 RESOLVED that, the minutes of the 273rd Regular Meeting held by
the City Planning Commission on April 16, 1974 are hereby approved.
IL; A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Kluver, Friedrichs, Scruggs, Pinto, Talbot, Taylor, Falk, Andrew
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Hand
The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted.
Mr. Falk announced the next item on the agenda Petition 74-4-8-16 by United
Sporting Goods requesting approval of all plans required by Section 18.47
of Ordinance #543, as amended by Ordinance #990, submitted in connection
with a proposal to modify the front elevation of the existing building
located on the north side of Seven Mile Road between Middlebelt and
Purlingb rook.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Hand, seconded by Mr. Pinto and unanimously adopted
it was,
#5-111-74 RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 18.47 of Ordinance #543, as amended,
by Ordinance #990, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Council that Petition 74-4-8-16 by United Sporting Goods
requesting approval of all plans required by Section 18.47 submitted
in connection with a proposal to modify the front elevation of the
existing building located on the north side of Seven Mile Road between
Middlebelt and Purlingbrook, be approved subject to the following
conditions :
5572
(i) That Arci;it ;tur_.1 1, S,,e t _t-2, prep,',red
by Louis Radstone Associates, Architects, revised 5/3/74
which is hereby :pp cvad, shall be adhered to.
(2) That Sign Plan #2408, dated 4/23/74, prepared by Interstate
Neon Corporation of Van Nuys, California which is hereby
approved, be ac.iered to.
(3) That when the east half of the old Farmer Jack Building is
occupied it will be architecturally remodeled in conformance
with the above approved plan as stated in a letter .5/3/74,
addressed to the Planning Commission from George R. Klein,
proprietor of the Livonia Mall Shopping Center.
(4) That the approved front building elevation shall include
a neutral wood panel at the east end of the new building
facade to be .used as a buffer between the proposed remodeling
and the future continuation of same for the balance of the
front building elevation.
The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted.
Mr. Falk announced the next item on the agenda, Petition 74-4-8-18P by Lindhout
Associates requesting approval of all plans required by Section
18.58 of Ordinance #543, as amended by Ordinance #988, submitted
1[0 in connection with a proposal to erect two one-story office buildings
on property located on the west side of Farmington Road between
Orangelawn and Plymouth Road.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Hand, seconded by Mr. Kluver, it was
#5-112-74 RESOLVED that, pursuant to Section 18.58 of Ordinance #543, as
amended by Ordinance #988, the City Planning Commission does hereby
approve Petition 74-4-8-18P by Lindhout Associates requesting approval
of all plans required by Section 18.58 submitted in connection with
a proposal to erect two one-story office buildings on property located
on the west side of Farmington Road between Orangelawn and Plymouth
Road, subject to the following conditions:
(1) That Site Plan #7411, Sheet, P-1, dated 4/25/74, prepared by
Lindhout Associates, Architects, which is hereby approved shall
be adhered to.
(2) That building elevations as shown on the approved site plan
which are hereby approved, shall be adhered to.
(3) That the landscaping plan as shown on the approved site plan
shall be installed before the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy.
(4) That all landscaping shall be permanently maintained and kept
in a healthy condition.
to
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Friedrichs, Scruggs, Pinto, Taylor, Kluver, Hand, Falk, Andrew
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Talbot
•
557=
The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted.
Mr. Falk announced the rie:_:_ item on the agenda, landscape plan submitted in
connection with Petition 73-10-8-39P by David H. Josephson and
L. Jack Akey requesting approval of all plans required by Section 18.58
of Ordinance 45!,2 , a arerrled by Ordinance #988, in connection with
a proposal to build. healun studio on property located on the east
side of Middlebelt Road between Terrence and Sunnydale in Section 13.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Hand, seconded by Mr. Kluver and unanimously adopted
it was
#5-113-74 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby approve the
Landscape Plan submitted in connection with Petition 73-10-8-39P
by David H. Josephson and L. Jack Akey requesting approval of all
plans required by Section 18.58 of Ordinance #543, as amended by
Ordinance #988, in connection with a proposal to build a health
studio on property located on the east side of Middlebelt Road
between Terrence and Sunnydale in Section 13, except for that area
along the south property line as it abuts the Kramer Carpet Company
parking lot; the landscaping of that area being left to the approval
of the City Planning Department, subject to the following conditions:
(1) That Landscape Plan dated 4/29/74, prepared by Anderson/Lesniak
(PO & Associates, Inc. , as modified, which is hereby approved, shall
be adhered to, thereby superseding the approved landscape plan
as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution #10-274-73.
(2) That all landscaping as shown on the approved Landscape Plan
shall be installed before issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy.
(3) That all landscaping shall be permanently maintained and kept
in a healthy condition.
The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted.
On a motion duly made, seconded and unanimously adopted, the 275th Regular
Meeting of the City Planning Commission was adjourned at 10:45 p.m.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
AMMO
Jo• eph J.; F.4 4, Sec etary
ATTEST:
Daniel R. Andrew, Chairman