Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1971-11-09 9313 MINUTES OF THE 235th REGULAR MEETING AND A PUBLIC HEARING tf,‘ HELD BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LIVONIA On Tuesday, November 9, 1971, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia held its 235th Regular Meeting and a Public Hearing at the Livonia City Hall, 33001 Five Mile Road, Livonia, Michigan. Mr. Daniel R. Andrew called the Public Hearing to order at approximately 8:05 p.m. with approximately 35 interested persons in the audience. Members present; Charles Pinto Suzanne Taylor Herman Kluver Joseph J. Falk H. Dow Tunis Daniel R. Andrew Joseph. R. Talbot David Merrion Members absent: Francis M. Hand, (out of town) Messrs. John Nagy, Planning Director; Ralph Bakewell, Planner IV; H. G. Shane, Planner IV; and Robert M. Feinberg, Assistant City Attorney were also present. Mr. Tunis, acting secretary read the first item on the agenda, Petition 71-10-1-61 by the City Planning Commission, initiated by Council Resolution #783-70, to rezone property located on the north side of Five Mile Rd. between Hubbard Road and Ingram Avenue in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 15, from P, C-2 and RUF to P.S. and P. Mr. Andrew announced that due to an error in advertising for the public hearing, this item will be removed from tonight's agenda and be rescheduled for the December Public Hearing. Mr. Tunis read the next item on the agenda, preliminary plat approval for Blue Grass Estates Subdivision proposed to be located on the west side of Newburgh Road between Five Mile and Six Mile Roads in Section 18. Mr. Shane announced that there were letters on file from the Fire Marshall, Streets and Safety, and Building Inspector. Mr. Vern Schrader was present and was representing Harold E. Edwards. He advised the Commission that they will conform to the Ordinance of Livonia which is 31 ft. on streets. (The police chief would like to have 36 ft. on streets) . Mr. Shane advised that 31 was the normal usual street width. Mr. Andrew advised Mr. Schrader that the City has an application for federal funds to purchase a park site which is part of this plat. (Park Site EE2 Mr. Schrader advised that he was under the understanding there will be a site further west than this spot for a park site. Mr. Schrader stated that they had gotten together with individual property owners and they had promised that they would buy a proportionate portion of the land for a park site. 9 314 It Mr. Andrew asked Mr. Feinberg about a change in the request in front of the Federal Government. Mr. Feinberg stated that he was unaware of that procedure. 160 Mr. Pinto asked whether this parcel of land was a part of the Master Park Plan. Mr. Andrew stated it was. There was no one else present wishing to be heard and the Chairman declared the public hearing closed. On a motion duly made by Mr. Kluver, seconded by Mr. Tunis and unanimously adopted it was, #11-298-71 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on November 9, 1971 on the Preliminary Plat approval for Blue Grass Estates Subdivision proposed to be located on the west side of Newburgh Road between Five Mile and Six Mile Roads in Section 18, the City Planning Commission does hereby determine to table this item until a final determination is made with respect to the acquisition of park lands identified as Park Site EE. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Tunis read the next item on the agenda, Petition 71-9-1-59 by Rodney C. 116; Kropf, Attorney for Rocco and Adelia Corsi, requesting to rezone property located north of Seven Mile Road, west of Angling Road in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 1, from RUF to P. Correspondence from the Engineering Department advised that the condition for approval was that the owner be required to submit a new parking area because of flood plain. Mr. Kropf advised that the Planning Commission is the one that suggested parking in that part of the property. There was no one else wishing to be heard and the Chairman declared the public hearing closed. On a motion duly made by Mr. Talbot, seconded by Mr. Pinto and unanimously adopted it was, #11-299-71 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on November 9, 1971 on Petition 71-9-1-59 as submitted by Rodney C. Kropf, Attorney for Rocco and Adelia Corsi, requesting to rezone property located north of Seven Mile Road, west of Angling Road in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 1, from RUF to P, the City Planning Commission does hereby /LIc recommend to the City Council that Petition 71-9-1-59 be ' approved for the following reasons: - (1) The proposed zoning classification is consistent with the intended use of the land and the parking classification will reflect the land use. 9 315 (2) There is a need for additional parking in this location I!: so that the parking of cars within the Seven Mile Road right-of:way can be eliminated. (3) Provisions for parking when well-screened will not adversely affect the stability of the adjacent area. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above public hearing was published in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer, under date of October 20, 1971 and a notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, Consumers Power Company, and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Tunis read the next item on the agenda, Petition 71-9-1-60 by the City Planning Commission on its own motion to rezone the property located on the south side of Plymouth Road, east of Blackburn in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 34, from C-1 and P to P.S. and P. Dr. George Marston, 32478 Washington, was present and advised the Commission that he had given 25 feet of this property of the City several years back and that the City has now returned it to him. He further stated that he Ikewould pleaselike this land returned to him in the way that he gave it as C-1. Mr. Andrew asked Dr. Marston if he had protested his taxes to the Board of Review when his property was zoned P. Dr. Marston stated he had not. 1 Mr. Andrew stated that it was his personal feeling that off-street parking was very necessary on Plymouth Road. Dr. Marston wondered what a P.S. zoning would encompass. Mr. Andrew instructed Mr. Shane to disclose to Dr. Marston the P.S. and waiver uses and also the C-1 limits. Dr. Marston asked whether it was the intent of the Commission to limit further 'establishments from coming into this area. Mr. Andrew stated that it was the intent of the Commission to allow Dr. Marston to expand his building or for him to do whatever he wanted just as long as they fall within the P.S. uses. Mr. Pinto stated that he intended to vote for this because of the parking situation. A C-1 use is a high traffic generator. 1,4 Dr. Marston stated he would be happy to accept a P. S. zoning. There was no one else wishing to be heard on this item and the Chairman declared the public hearing closed. 9 316 #11-300-71 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on November 9, 1971 on Petition 71-9-1-60 as submitted 416: by the City Planning Commission on its own motion to rezone property located on the south side of Plymouth Road, east of Blackburn in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 34, from C-1 and P to P.S. and P, the City Planning Commission does hereby re- commend to the City Council that Petition 71-9-1-60 be approved for the following reasons: (1) This zoning would allow the use of Lot 228 for expansion purposes. (2) The P.S. classification is logical since the present use of two of the three lots is for office purposes. (3) The proposed zoning for the property in question will substantially contribute to the overall development and stability of the general area and is not in con- flict with the spirit of the Plymouth Road parking Program. FURTHER RESOLVED, that notice of the above public hearing was published in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer, under date of October 20, 1971 and a notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, Consumers Power Company and City Departments as listed in the Proof Ile of Service. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the above resolution adopted. Mr. Tunis announced the next item on the agenda, Petition 71-9-1-62 by the City Planning Commission on its own motion to rezone property located at the northeast corner of Terrence and Middlebelt in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 13, from RUF to R-7. The Engineering Division reports that it appears that there is no sewer outlet readily available and it appears that a sewer would have to be constructed northerly of the site. A letter of objection from the Madison Civic Association was read by Mr. Shane. The letter was signed by Judith M. Wall, Director. Mr. Andrew advised the audience that several months ago the Commission was approached by two Livonia businessmen to rezone this property to a commercial use. Our staff was directed to do a Land Use Studybetween Five and Six Mile Road. This study was done and the staff made recommendation to this Commission which we have adopted for this area. The best use for this property is R-7 therefore we passed a resolution to hold this public hearing. Everyone is urged to speak. Mr. Opolinski, 29100 Terrence Drive was present and asked about the 1,000 ft. I ordinance. Mr. Andrew advised that the 1,000 ft. ordinance only applies to issuance of te building permits. Mr. Opolinski asked who the people were that petitioned the Commission. 9317 Mr. Andrew stated William Abney filed the petition. Mr. Opolinski asked if Mr. Abney wanted multiple dwellings. Mr. Andrew stated he requested a R-7 zoning. Mr. Opolinski asked whether this would go before Common Council. Mr. Andrew stated that it would. Mrs. Bernadine Opolinski, 29100 Terrence asked what multiple dwelling was. Mr. Shane stated what multiple dwelling was and also pointed out that you can place a one family dwelling on zoning of R-7. Mrs. Opolinski stated that she felt that if a one family dwelling were put on this land it would be a low income house. Mr. Andrew stated that he really felt they will be putting in apartments. Mrs. Opolinski stated that they allowed children to play because they do not have a park site at school. They object to having strangers coming into their area and disturbing the children. Mr. Victor Wall, 29153 Grove wanted to know where they go next. Mr. Andrew stated that the Commission was interested in finding out the feelings of the residents of this area. Judith Wall, 29153 Grove asked whether the Commission had considered zoning this P.S. Mr. Andrew stated that you could have good P.S or bad P.S. If the person requesting it doesn't want to keep it a good P.S. then you are just as far behind as with a C-1. Mrs. Wall stated that the school system was all split up now. Mr. Andrew stated that they can get 2 acres net out of this land. They can get 28 units on that and that each unit would nnly generate a .2% child per unit. Mr. Tunis stated that the apartments would generate less than a nne family dwelling. Mrs. Wall stated that the Commission still did not understand their situation with the school situation and overcrowding. Mr. Tunis stated that it was still an actment and not a house. Mrs. Wall asked about the hippie house. tie Mr. Tunis stated the Commission has no control over it. Mrs. Wall stated that this will be the same age in the apartments. Mr. Tunis stated that he did not think they will have the same situation. 9318 Mr. Pinto stated that the hippie house looks to be on a 1/2 acre lot. If apartment dwelling became used by hippies then everyone would move out there- 4110 fore the landowner would make hippies move or lose all his tenants. IL Mr. Tunis stated that it was unfortunate that people in the area did not speak up about the hippie house a long time ago. Mr. Tunis stated that the Commission is very concerned about Middldbelt Road, and that the Commission meets every week trying to decide questions about the City. He stated further that the City needs good family quality residents, and he suggested that the interested persons in the audience follow the Commission's studies and that they follow them all the way through to when the petition goes before the Council because the Commission is here_ to advise only. The City Council has the final vote. Mrs. Wall stated that the Civic Association did not protest the hamburger restaurant. Mr. Tunis stated that they did not protest strong enough. Mrs. Jean Nettle, 15942 Harrison stated that she felt P.S. would have less traffic than apartments. She further stated that she believed apartment houses "swing" all night. Mr. Abney was in the audience and Mr. Andrew asked him the name of the other business partner. ti4 Mr. Abney introduced Mr. Roy Johnson. Illivi Mr. Talbot stated that if the Commission granted a C-1 to Abney and Johnson then they would have to open Middlebelt to commercial so in order to stop commercial buildings this is why the Commission chose R-7 zoning. Mrs. Nettle stated that they like Hammel's building and would like more like it. There was no one else wishing to be heard and the Chairman declared the public hearing closed. On a motion duly made by Mr. Talbot, seconded by Mr. Pinto and unanimously adopted it was, #11-301-71 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on November 9, 1971, on Petition 71-9-1-62 as submitted by the City Planning Commission on its own motion to rezone property located at the northeast corner of Terrence and Middlebelt in the northwest 1/4 of Section 13, from RUF to R-7, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 71-9-1-62 be approved for the following reasons: IL (1) The proposed zoning is consistent with the Planning Commission's suggested land use plan for the area. (2) A modest increase in density in this sector of the City would not adversely affect the stability of the adjacent residential neighborhood. Amy 9 319 (3) The proposed development is adjacent to a major thoroughfare that is capable of handling any increase in traffic that might be generated by this project. (4) The site area under petition has good natural qualities of topography, the openness of the flood plain and existing tree cover to lend itself to good quality multi-family use. FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above public hearing was published in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer under date of Ocotber 20, 1971 and a notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Consumers Power Company and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Tunis announced the next item on the agenda, Petition 71-10-1-63 by the City Planning Commission, initiated by Council Resolution #903-71, to rezone property located south of Six Mile Road, west of Middle- belt Road in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 14, from RUF to P. Mr. Gregory Stempien was present representing the property owners. Mr. Andrew asked Mr. Stempien what the building was to be used for. Mr. Stempien advised that the third level would be occupied by the VFW who have leased the entire building from his clients. Commander Zawicki, 28942 Grandon was present and was representing the VFW. Mr. Andrew asked Mr. Zawicki how many meetings will be held. Mr. Zawicki stated two meetings per month. Mr. Andrew asked whether they would be catering. Mr. Zawicki stated that the catering would go with the rental of the hall. Mr. Andrew stated that he saw a sign up in front of the building and wondered whether Mr. Zawicki had placed it there. Mr. Zawicki advised that they did not put the sign up. Mr. Stempien advised that when he first appeared on the rezoning, he raised the question with the Commission. He appealed to the Zoning Board of Appeals and they were granted a permit to go into business right now. If there is a sign up, it is legal to put that sign there. Mr. Pinto asked whether the VFW has leased the entire building. Mr. Zawicki advised that they had a five year lease with option of five year renewal on a one year basis. Mr. Pinto asked whether the VFW intended to sublet first or second floor to another tenant. 9320 Mr. Zawicki stated that this would never happen. Mr. Tunis asked what about the catering people. Mr. Zawicki stated that the owners were in the catering business. Mr. Pinto clarified that the owners would be the caterers for banquets etc. Mr. Stempien stated that his clients are in the catering business. They could not use the third floor so that is why they rented the upstairs. Mr. Talbot asked where they were moving from. Mr. Falk left the podium at 9:20 p.m. Mr. Zawicki stated it was not a move this was a new post that was started in March. Mrs. Taylor asked if there would be any outside catering from that building. Mr. Stempien stated there would not be any outside caterers and that they would only cater on week-ends. Mrs. Taylor asked whether it would be empty the rest of the time. Mr. Stempien stated that the VFW will use it for meetings during the week. Mr. Tunis asked whether the VFW had applied for their "C" license. I to Mr. Zawicki stated they had not. Mr. Tunis asked how many members . Mr. Zawicki stated 60. Mr. Tunis stated there was no way 60 members would support that lease. Mr. Stempien stated that they were getting the rental for $30.00 per month. Mr. Andrew asked whether it would be used 7 days a week. Mr. Zawicki stated he had promised it would not. Mr. Pinto asked whether the VFW picked up the taxes. Mr. Zawicki stated they did not. Mrs. Taylor asked about the parking facilities. Mr. Zawicki stated at the side of the building and at the rear and the front of the building will be a greenbelt. Mr. Stempien stated they wanted to improve the property and that they are going to blacktop the back for parking. Mr. Zawicki wondered whether the Commission felt that the VFW was downgrading this area. 9321 Mr. Andrew stated that that was not the Commission's feelings but rather they were concerned about the meeting hall aspect that will be available for weddings and banquets. Mr. Tunis stated that the Commission was in no way making disparaging comments about the VFW. Mr. Tunis stated further that he felt the VFW was run by commendable people but that he felt that the VFW was a disguise for another operation. He went on to say that the Commission was not in agreement with a catering service. Mr. Stempien stated there was no question that they are going to use this for catering but it is not a subterfuge. He went on to say that he had been very open about this right from the first. He went on that a church cannot support it so there will be an empty building. Mr. Tunis stated that the last two churches outgrew the premises and that it was not a question of whether they could support it. Mr. Stempien conceded that he might be right. Mr. Andrew clarified that there was no reflection on Mr. Stempien or the intensions of the VFW. There was no one else wishing to be heard and the Chairman declared the public hearing closed. On a motion duly made by Mr. Pinto, seconded by Mr. Merrion, it was 110 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on November 9, 1971, on Petition 71-10-1-63 as submitted by the City Planning Commission initiated by Council Resolution #903-71, to rezone property located south of Six Mile Road, west of Middlebelt Road in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 14, from RUF to P, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 71-10-1-63 be approved for the following reasons: (1) The proposed zoning is a logical solution for the property in question in that it allows, first, a use that is in substantial compliance with the Planning Commission's general development plan for the area and secondly, a use which compliments the present use of the building existing on subject property. (2) The proposed zoning is a logical extension of the adjacent zoning. FURTHER RESOLVED, that notice of the above public hearing was published in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer, under date of October 20, 1971 and anotice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Consumers Power Company and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. 1LVA roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Merrion, Pinto, Talbot NAYS; Kluver, Taylor, Tunis, Andrew ABSENT: Falk, Hand 9322 10 The Chairman declared the resolution failed for lack of support. 9 On a motion duly made by Mrs. Taylor, seconded by Mr. Kluver, it was #11-302-71 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on November 9, 1971, on Petition 71-10-1-63 as submitted by the City Planning Commission initiated by Council Resolution #903-71, to rezone property located south of Six Mile Road, west of Middlebelt Road in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 14, from RUF to P, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 71-10-1-63 be denied for the following reasons: (1) The proposed zoning is in conflict with the Planning Commission's suggested development plan for the general area. (2) The proposed zoning will be detrimental to the stability and orderly development of the entire area. (3) The Commission believes the parking classification and uses located to the rear will only aid and abet the use of the front portion of the property for a non-compatible commercial uses which they are opposed to. FURTHER RESOLVED, that notice of the above public hearing was published in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer, under date of October 20, 1971 and a notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Consumers Power Company and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Kluver, Talbot, Taylor, Tunis, Andrew NAYS: Merrios, Pinto ABSENT: Falk, Hand The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Falk returned to the podium at 9:40 p.m. Mr. Tunis announced the next item on the agenda, Petition 71-10-6-7 by the City Planning Commission, initiated by Council Resolution #620-71, to amend Section 25.04 and Section 26.04 of the Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance #543, so as to provide for designation of minimum and maximum height and story limitations for buildings located in the C-4 and P.0 Zoning Districts. There was no one in the audience wishing to be heard and the Chairman declared J the public hearing closed. 9323 On a motion duly made by Mr. Tunis, seconded by Mr. Talbot and unanimously adopted it was #11-303-71 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a public hearing having been held on November 9, 1971, on Petition 71-10-6-7 submitted' 1 by the City Planning Commission, initiated by Council Resolution #620-71, to amend Section 25.04 and Section 26.04 of the Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance #543, so as to provide for designation of minimum and maximum height and story limitations for buildings located in the C-4 and P.0 Zoning Districts , the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 71-10-6-7 be approved for the following reasons : (1) This ordinance would place maximum control of the location and height of high-rise structures within the C-4 and P-0 Zoning District regulations within the control of the City of Livonia. (2) This is a needed tool for implementation of the Master Plan and control of the placement of certain buildings exhibiting high intensity of use characteristics. (3) This is a needed tool to provide for the orderly growth and development of the City of Livonia. FURTHER RESOLVED, that notice of the above public hearing was published in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer, under date of October 20, 1971 and notice of such hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, Consumers Power Company and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Tunis read the next item on the agenda, Petition 71-10-7-10 by the City Planning Commission on its own motion to amend Section 6.02 of the Subdivision Rules & Regulations, Part III of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia, by adding subsection (8) so as to provide for entrance markers at appropriate locations leading into sub- divisions. There was no one present wishing to be heard and the Chairman declared the public hearing closed. On a motion duly made by Mr. Tunis seconded by Mr. Kluver and unanimously adopted it was #11-304-71 RESOLVED that, pursuant to the provisions of Act 285 of the Public Acts ' of Michigan, 1931, as amended, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia having duly held a public hearing on November 9, 1971 for the purpose of amending Part III of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia, Subdivision Rules & Regulations, the same is hereby amended by adding sub- section 6.02 so as to provide for entrance markers at appropriate locations leading into subdivision for the following reasons: (1) This will provide for the planning and installation of entrance markers to .:subdivisions at the appropriate time of preliminary plat preparation. (2) This will provide for a more equitable means to the implementation of entrance markers to subdivisions. (3) This is a needed tool for the orderly and appropriate regulation and development of land. AND, having given proper notice of such hearing as required by Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan, 1931, as amended, the City Planning Commission does hereby adopt said amend- ment as part of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia, which is incorporated herein by reference, the same having been adopted by resolution of the City Planning Commission, with all amendments thereto, and further that this amendment shall be filed with the City Council, City Clerk, and the City Planning Commission. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Tunis announced the next item on the agenda, motion by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to recommendation from the Parks & Recreation Commission, to amend Part V of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia, the Master School & Park Plan, by incorporating Tax Item Llb located in Section 18. On a motion duly made by Mr. Kluver, seconded by Mr. Tunis and unanimously adopted it was #11-305-71 RESOLVED that, pursuant to the provisions of Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan, 1931, as amended, and pursuant to a recommendation from the Parks & Recreation Commission, the City Planning Commission does hereby establish and order that a public hearing be held in the City Hall of the City of Livonia, to determine whether or not to amend Part V of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia, the Master School and Park Plan, so as to provide for the incorporation on Tax Parcel 18L1b located in Section 18. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Tunis announced the next item on the agenda, Landscape Plan submitted by Lindhout Associates in connection with Petition 71-10-8-16 by Lindhout Associates for Pritchard Heating requesting Site Plan approval for building proposed to be constructed on property located on the north side of Five Mile Road between Mayfield and Brookfield in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 15. On a motion duly made by Mr. Kluver, seconded by Mr. Pinto and unanimously adopted it was #11-306-71 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby approve Landscape Plan #7123, dated 10/29/71, submitted s by Lindhout Associates in connection with Petition 71-10-8-16 by Lindhout Associates for Pritchard Heating requesting Site Plan approval for building proposed to be 9325 constructed on property located on the north side of Five Mile Road between Mayfield and Brookfield in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 15 subject to the following conditions: (1) That all landscape materials as shown on the approved plan shall be installed before issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. (2) That all landscape material shall be permanently main- tained and in a healthy condition. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Tunis announced the next item on the agenda, motion by the City Planning Commission, on its own motion to hold a public hearing to determine whether or not to rezone certain properties located within Sections 25 through 30 so as to make the zoning compatible with the existing and/or proposed land use within the industrial belt. On a motion duly made by Mrs. Taylor, seconded by Mr. Talbot and unanimously adopted it was, #11-307-71 RESOLVED that, pursuant to Section 23.01 of Ordinance #543, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, the City Planning Commission does hereby establish and order that a public hearing be held in the City Hall of the City of Livonia to determine whether or not to rezone certain properties located within Sections 25 through 30 so as to make the zoning compatible with the existing and/or proposed land use within the industrial belt. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Tunis announced the next item on the agenda, motion by the City Planning Commission approving the Capital Improvement Program 1972-77 for transmittal to the Mayor and City Council. . On a motion duly made by Mr. Tunis, seconded by Mr. Falk and unanimously adopted it'was #11-308-71 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission hav ing reviewed the Capital Improvement Program 1972-1977, as prepared by the City Planning Department does hereby approve the Capital Improvement Program 1972-77 and authorizes its transmittal to the Mayor and City Council. The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Tunis announced the next item on the agenda, approval of the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting held on October 19, 1971. On a motion duly made by Mr. Kluver, seconded by Mr. Tunis and adopted it was 9 326 #11-309-71 RESOLVED that, the minutes of the meeting held by the City Planning Commission October 19, 1971 are approved. A roll call vote resulted in the following: 1111 AYES: Falk, Kluver, Pinto, Talbot, Taylor, Tunis, Andrew NAYS: None ABSENT: Hand ABSTAIN: Marriott The Chairman declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made seconded and unanimously adopted it was RESOLVED that, the 235th Regular Meeting held by the City Planning Commission on November 9, 1971 was adjourned at approximately 10:15 p.m. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION c;"7"7,) H. Dow Tunis, Acting Secretary ATTESTED: Daniel R. Andrew, Chairman