HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1970-01-20 5786
MINUTES CF THE 213th REGULAR MEETING AND
A PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE CITY PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LIVONIA
t*
On Tuesday, January 20, 1970, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia
held its 213th Regular Meeting and a Public Hearing at the Livonia City Hall.
Mr. Raymond Tent, Chairman, called the Public Hearing to order at approximately
8:15 p.m. with approximately 10 interested persons in the audience.
Members Present: Raymond W. Tent Donald Heusted
Harry Wrightman Marvin Moser
Robert Colomina H. Dow Tunis
Joel LaBo
Messrs. Don Hull, Planning Director; John J. Nagy, Assistant Planning Director,
were also present.
Mr. Wrightman announced the first item on the agenda is Petition 69-11-2-27 by
Thaddeus J. Alberts requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to
use existing building located on parcel 350LAb2.
The petitioner, Thaddeus J. Alberts, was present, He explained the present use of
the building and the fact that he was leasing a portion of it for a third purpose -
there would be one-third occupied by real estate, one-third by insurance and the
center for utility or service portion. He stated he mus -da this as taxes are up
75% in the last four years.
Mr. Tent asked how long had the real estate and insurance businesses been there.
Mr. Alberts stated since May 1969, adding that he did not know a waiver use was
needed.
Mr. Tent referred to a letter in the file dated November 28, 1969 from where
reference is made to a resolution stating that the insurance business is PS but
for the r..a1 estate portion a waiver use would be required.
Mr. Wrightman asked if Mr. Alberts was the owner of the property.
Mr. Alberts answered, yes.
Mr. Wrightman asked if when the building was originally designed sufficient parking
was allowed.
Mr. Alberts answered, yes.
Mr, Wrigh .L._.. ^'end if the waiver use is permitted would this effect the parking
requirements or is thcre sufficient.
Mr. Alberts stated there is less insurance activity in there now - there is
actually more parking than required.
Mr, Hull stated that for the size of the building he needs only 12 spaces, which
the plan shows; that Mr. Alberts is not in violation of the ordinance.
I
5787
Mr. LaBo stated that having lived in that neighborhood and remarking about the
cleanliness and neat manner in which this property is kept he asked if it would
be kept the same.
Mr. Alberts stated that the real estate people had requested permission for a
sign in front of the building and that this will be up to the City to determine:
Mr. LaBo stated he liked the decorum as it now is and would hate to see it with
neon signs which would spoil it completely.
Mr. Tent stated that there are restrictions for signs in the city ordinances and
if larger signs are desired persons have to go before the Zoning Board of Appeals.
He stated he agreed with Mr. LaBo.
Mr. Tent asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to be heard on the
petition - there was no one.
Mr. Moser asked if this petition is approved is there anything to prevent him
from using the entire building for real estate.
Mr. Hull stated they can limit the space at the Commission desires.
Mr. Tent stated that according to the resolution it is the southerly half of the
building involved here.
Mr. Moser asked if this would be the H. J. Marshall Company or would petitioner
sell it to another real estate outfit, i.e. one that advertises "Cash for Your
Homes" etc. He expressed fear of this type of business in that area.
11110 Mr. Hull stated it could change ownership, and be a valid use.
Mr. Wrightman asked what portion of the building is being used for real estate.
Mr. Nagy stated on the plan it would be one-half of the building.
There was a short discussion as to the persons in the building, etc. and Mr.
Alberts stated that there are only two at one time in the real estate portion -
that it works more or less in shifts. He added that the conference room is not
used by anyone but it could be used.
Mr. Wrightman asked if they could petition to put two more offices in there.
Mr. Alberts stated it could be done but the operation has never used the area
of the building inasmuch as there are never more than 2 persons there.
Mr. Wrightman stated he felt this should be tied down to a maximum amount of
square footage for use to control some of the other practices which go along with
real estate activities.
Mr. Tent stated that a condition could be made when the motion is made.
Mr. Tent, Chairman, stated that the matter would be taken under advisement.
r
• 5788
Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 69-12-2-28
by St. Mary Hospital requesting to be granted a waiver use permit
to use property located on the southwest corner of Five Mile Road
and Levan in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 20 for the expansion of
existing hospital facilities.
Mr. Tent asked if petitioner's representative was present.
Sister Mary Columbine was present and explained the plans of St. Mary's Hospital
for expansion. She explained their plans for the present building but stated that
this petition is for the property east of the building, to erect a seven story
building - five stories to be used now - the other two for future completion.
She stated they would have approximately 175 beds, new X-ray department, library,
20 beds for mental health and 30 for continued care. It would also house a
clinic. She stated they had applied to the State for a grant - they want to open
a clinic for the use of the people of Livonia which would be for mental health.
Mr. Tent asked how long before the work would start.
Sister Mary Colombine stated that they had already started and their progress
would depend upon such things as the strike of the trades which is anticipated
shortly. She stated that they anticipated completion in 1972.
Mr. Tent stated that t'he City is very interested in the proposed building be-
coming a reality with a capacity of 360 beds and if the two additional floors
are added reaching a capacity of 480 beds.
There was a short discussion as to the comparison of this future hospital with
surrounding hospitals; the fact that St. Mary's has to transfer about 20 patients
per week because of the lack of adequate rooms; she advised the Commission that
St. Mary's had been designated by the County for this expansion.
Mr. Tent asked if they would take care of out-patient, convalescent care - this
type of service.
Sister Colombine replied, no - they would have sub-acute units for persons who
are no longer critical but cannot leave, i.e. persons in traction. She stated
they would have 20 such beds. She stated that the mental unit would be day or
night care but not out-patients.
The Commission expressed the City's appreciation for the work the Sisters are
doing.
Mr. Tent, Chairman, declared this matter would be taken under advisement.
Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 69-11-3-10 by
Ronald White requesting to vacate and extinguish an 18 foot wide
easement located along the north property line of Lot 298 and 311
of Botsford Park Subdivision in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 1.
Mr. Tent stated there is a letter dated November 28, 1969 in the file from Mr.
Strasser, the City Engineer, stated there is no objection to vacating the easement
because City maintained facilities would not be effected. He stated there is
also a letter from the Detroit Edison Company dated January 15, 1970 expressing
their objection as their equipment involved here are pole lines.
I
• 8789
Mr. White, 19684 Antago, petitioner, was present and discussed the petition with
the Commissioners. He stated he would only need the southerly one half of the
easement and wondered if the utility company could move the poles to the north
4 side of the easement.
Mr. Tent stated that a certain portion has to be retained to permit the utility
trucks to enter.
Mr. White advised the Commission that the building permit issued stated "vacated
easement" for this area. He stated he wants to put in a garage and needs at
least the southerly 9 feet.
Mr. Hull stated he felt the Department could contact Detroit Edison and get
the answers on this petition, suggesting that the matter be held over.
Mr. Moser asked Petitioner if he is trying to have the 18' vacated.
Mr. Hull answered he would see what Edison would agree to.
Mr. Tent, Chairman, stated the matter would be taken under advisement.
Mr. Urightman, announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 69-11-3-11 by
Rodney C. Kropf, attorney for Joseph V. Grande, requesting to vacate
a 20 foot wide public alley located south of Seven Mile 'toad between
Irving and Filmore Avenue in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 9.
Mr. Tent stated there is a letter in the file from Mr. Strasser dated January 14,
1970, stating that a 7' right-of-way along Seven Mile Road is needed and since
there are two ownerships involved, two deeds are needed. There was a letter
from Detroit Edison Company expressing objection to the petition. There was
L
also a letter from a resident objecting to the petition.
Mr. Tent asked if petitioner was present.
Mr. Kropf, attorney for petitioner, was present. He explained that petitioner
wants to put up a store but found he had insufficient depth for parking and set
back and at the suggestion of the Zoning Board he is asking Planning Commission
to vacate the alley. He stated he knows that Detroit Edison has an easement
there but petitioner is prepared to work this out. He said they are only
interested in vacating behind lots 27 through 33 abutting Lot 291 and if the
adjoining owner objects to this petition petitioner will just ask for this portion
'to be vacated.
Mr. Colomina stated he would not like the entire alley vacated as the Commission
would lose its control in the area.
Mr. Tent added he would like to see a site plan of the proposed use.
There was a short discussion regarding the number of ownerships involved in lots
33 through 39 and what might happen to the remainder of the area should the alley
be vacated; the alleys in the area already vacated, etc.
Mr. Colomina again expressed his fear of the Commission's losing control of the
growth of the area in question. He stated if the alley is vacated petitioner
d could build on the side street; as it is now he has to come before the Commission.
• 8790
Mr. Tent stated the quit claim deed for the Seven Mile Road right-of-way would
have to be signed.
Mr. Kropf stated that is no problem, just give it to him and he would have it
signed.
Mr. Moser raised the question of adjoining buildings on Seven Mile Road and there
was a short discussion of the old stores which are now there. He also questioned
if it would be strip stores to be erected by petitioner.
Mr. Kropf replied it would not be big enough for anything else.
Mr. Tent asked if there was anyone in the audience wishing to be heard on the
matter. There was no one.
Mr. Tent, Chairman, declared the matter would be taken under advisement.
Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 69-11-1-41
by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Council Resolution
#991-69, requesting to rezone property located on the northeast
corner of Lyndon Ave. and Farmington Road in the Northwest 1/4
of Section 22 from RUF to R-3 and P.S.
Mr. Nagy explained the purpose of the petition; the splitting of the property to
request both R-3 and P.S. zoning.
Mr. Tent stated there is a long history to this petition; there have been
several site plans. He stated that the City Council has directed the Commission
to hold the public hearing in a letter dated October 28, 1969. He also stated
that there is a letter in the file from Mr. Monaco.
Mr. Clarence Charest, attorney, was present to represent the owner of the property
Mr. Joseph Monaco.
Mr. Charest discussed the surrounding subdivisions such as Kimberly Oaks in
which the lots are 60' wide and compared this to Mr. Hull's recommendation that
a tier of lots on the easterly side of the parcel be 70' x 120' which far exceeds
the requirements made of the subdivision. He stated that he understands that
this is meant to act as a buffer zone and this is understandable, but the require-
ments here should be no more stringent than those used for the subdivision. He
proceeded to discuss the plans which had been considered to date on this property,
the high density and the need to control it.
Mr. Tent referred to the building originally proposed and the fact that it
would require so much parking area; that the Commission has to control the
density which means the size of lots must increase - not decrease; the depth
in the last sketch shows 96' for the lots where the ordinance requires 120' in
depth for R-3, the requested zoning, and in such cases hardship must be proven
before another City body. He stated that the Commission's plan was best for the
City's needs.
Mr. Tent stated the Commission cannot act on a petition which is in violation
of the existing ordinance; can only approve deficiency in lot size if the
boundaries cannot be moved.
8791
Mr. Charest reminded the Commission they were only here to approve a zoning
change that petitioner would have to worry about the variance.
go
There was a short discussion; Mr. LaBo wondered if the parcel could/P.S. with
petitioner coming in later for the R-3; Mr. Hull stating that even though the
lot number is decreased the petitioner is intensifying the use of the P.S.
property; there is no way petitioner can use it for residential property; there
is no way the Commission can approve preliminary or final plat; Mr. Hull felt to
give him the use he wants Commission would be prostituting their own ordinance
and put themselves in a bad position.
Mr. LaBo stated he felt the property would not accommodate what the Commission
wants it to do.
Mr. Charest discussed the schemes brought in to date, including one which put
two buildings on the property which is completely against economic factors.
He stated he cannot understand what is wrong with the building proposed for
that property, with large parking area. He said consideration should be given
to what the land can be used for; they are living within the ordinance with P.S.
whether or not they ever plat the remainder of the property and suggested that
if the Commission so desires they should just deny the residential and grant
the P.S.
Mr. Harold Nielson, 33125 Barkley, asked if notices would again be sent out if
this matter comes up again.
Mr. Nagy advised him that if the matter goes before Council, the notices of
Public Hearing would be sent out again.
Mr. Charest reminded the Commission that the big problem here is the fact that
the City of Livonia took so much of the property from this parcel for Farmington
Road - he admitted that the City did a wonderful job of widening Farmington
Road, however, the problem here is a direct result of it.
Mr. LaBo asked if the building now proposed is a 2 story with a basement level.
Mr. Nagy advised that it is 2 1/2; two stories above grade - 1/2 below grade.
Mr. Wrightman asked if the civic association was aware of this proposed building.
Mr. Monaco stated it was presented to the executive board of the Civic Association
of Kimberly Oaks and they gave their approval.
Mr. Nagy stated the petitioner's proposal was also presented to the Kimberly Oaks
Civic Association general meeting and the people were not aware of the deficiency
in the lot depth and on that basis they said they would object to it.
Mr. Charest stated that the fact that there was no appearance of objectors nor
letters in the file objecting and that should mean something.
Mr. Tent, Chairman, declared the matter would be taken under advisement.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Moser, seconded by Mr. Tunis and unanimously carried,
it was
• 8792
#1-1-70 RESOLVED, that the City Planning Commission does hereby adjourn
the public hearing held on Tuesday, January 20, 1970 at approxi-
mately 9:45 p.m.
Mr. Tent, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution
adopted.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mr. Tent, Chairman, called the 213th Regular Meeting to order at approximately
10 p.m. with approximately 10 interested persons in the audience.
Mr. Wrightman announced the first item on the agenda is Petition 69-11-2-27
by Thaddeus J. Alberts requesting to be granted a waiver use permit
to use existing building located on parcel 350LAb2 on the northeast
corner of Hathaway and Middlebelt Road in the Southwest 1/4 of
Section 36, as a real estate office.
Mr. Tent stated that only the northerly one-third portion of the building would
be considered under this waiver - one third of the usable square footage.
Motion was duly made by Mr. Colomina, seconded by Mr. Wrightman to approve the
petition, limiting the footage involved to one-third of the building..
Mr. Wrightman stated they are talking about approximately 1/3 of the total
square footage and he felt they should be tied down to the square footage of
the offices.
There was a short discussion about the conference room.
Mr. Alberts stated the north one-third was leased but tenant has access to the
storage room even though the lease reads the north 1/3 of the building.
Mr. Moser stated it should be one-half of the building as he will need conference
room, storage room, etc. This was followed by a short discussion.
Mr. Moser made a motion to amend the motion on the floor to one-half the building
as a real estate office as tenant will need it.
Mr. Wrightman stated he did not want to extend it any further.
Mr. LaBo seconded Mr. Moser's motion.
A roll call vote to amend the motion to one-half the building resulted in the
following:
AYES: Tent, Heusted, Moser, LaBo
NAYS: Wrightman, Colomina, Tunis
Mr. Tent declared the amended motion approved, and stated the motion on the
floor is as amended to one-half the building area.
A roll call vote on the amended motion resulted in the following:
AYES: Tent, Heusted, Moser, Colomina, LaBo, Tunis
NAYS: Wrightman
8793
Mr. Tent declared the motion carried and the following resolution adopted:
#1-2-70 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a public hearing having been held on
January 20, 1970 on Petition 69-11-2-27 by Thaddeus J. Alberts
requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to use existing
building located on parcel 350LAb2 on the northeast corner of
l-'athaway and Middlcbelt Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 36,
as a real estate office, the City Planning Commission does hereby
recommend to the City Council that Petition 69-11-2-27, as amended,
to include one-half the square footage of the building, be approved
for the following reasons:
(1) It is a logical use at this location and will not conflict
adversely with other uses in the area or in the same structure;
(2) The incorporation of this use into this facility will not
violate any ordinance requirements;
FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above public hearing was sent to
property owners within five hundred feet, petitioner and City
Departments as listed in the Proof of Service.
: 7= ht n announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 69-12-2-28
by St. Mary Hospital requesting to be granted a waiver use permit
to use property located on the southwest corner of Five Mile Road
and Levan in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 20, for the expansion of
existing hospital facilities.
On a notion duly made by Mr. Tunis, who stated this was in the best interest
of the City, and seconded by Mr. Colomina, and unanimously carried, it was
toy
#1-3-70 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a public hearing having been held on
January 20, 1970 on Petition 69-12-2-28 submitted by St. Mary
Hospital requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to use
property located on the southwest corner of Five Mile Road and
Levan in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 20, for the expansion of
existing hospital facilities, the City Planning Commission does
hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 69-12-2-28 be
approved for the following reason:
(1) It is in the best interest of the City to accommodate this
additional facility because there is a great need for additional
hospital space; this need is based upon Livonia's ever-in-
creasing population and upon the need to adequately provide
facilities for the numerous people employed within our City;
FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above public hearing was sent
to property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Depart-
ments as listed in the Proof of Service.
Mr. Tent, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution
adopted.
r'
8794
Mr. Tent, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution
adopted.
tipMr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 69-11-3-10
by Ronald White requesting to vacate and extinguish an 18 foot
wide easement located along the north property line of Lot 298
and 311 of Botsford Park Subdivision, in the Southeast 1/4 of
Section 1.
Mr. Tent, Chairman, declared this matter would be taken under advisement.
Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 69-11-3-11
by Rodney C. Kropf, attorney for Joseph V. Grande, requesting
to vacate a 20 foot wide public alley located south of Seven
Mile Road between Irving and Filmore Avenue in the Northeast 1/4
of Section 9.
Upon a motion duly made by Mr. LaBo, seconded by Mr. Wrightman, and unanimously
carried, it was
#1-4-70 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a public hearing having been held on
January 20, 1970 on Petition 69-11-3-11 as submitted by Rodney
C. Kropf, attorney for Joseph V. Grande, requesting to vacate
a 20 foot wide public alley located south of Seven Mile Road
between Irving and Filmore Avenue in the Northeast 1/4 of Section
9, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City
Council that Petition 69-11-3-11, amended to vacate the westerly
one-half of the alley, abutting lots 27 through 33, be approved
subject to the following conditions;
111, (1) Receipt of additional seven foot right-of-way for Seven
Mile Road; and
(2) Easement be maintained over the property for Detroit Edison
Company;
for the following reasons:
(1) There is no need for a public alley in this location
and the existing alley only bisects the zoning pattern
of the area;
(2) There is no physical construction within the alley right-
or-way and it is questionable as to whether construction
will ever take place within the alley right-of-way so the
right-of-way is not needed;
FURTHER RESOLVED, that notice of the above public hearing was
published in the official newspaper, the Livonia Observer, under
data of December 31, 1969, and notice of such hearing was sent
to the Detroit Edison Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company,
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company and Consumers Power Company,
City Departments and Petitioner as listed in the Proof of Service.
Mr. Tent, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the foreging resolution
adopted.
8795
Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 69-11-1-41 by
the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Council Resolution #991-69
requesting to rezone property located on the northeast corner of
Lyndon Avenue and Farmington Road in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 22
from RUF to R-3 and P.S.
Mr. Wrightman made a motion that this matter be taken under advisement to
consider possibility of taking entire parcel into P.S. and the fact that a good
portion of this property was taken for right-of-way, which motion was seconded
by Mr. Moser and unanimously carried.
Mr. Tent asked Mr. Charest if the petitioner is in favor of this.
Mr. Charest replied, yes.
It was
RESOLVED, that Petition 69-11-1-41 by the City Planning Commission,
pursuant to Council Resolution #991-69, requesting to redone property
located on the northeast corner of Lyndon Avenue and Farmington Road
in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 22 from RUF to R-3 and P.S. be taken
under advisement and referred back to a study session for further
consideration.
Mr. Tent, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution
adopted.
Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 69-10-2-25
by Donald C. Deremo, attorney for Rafic A. Jordan, requesting to
be granted a waiver use permit to construct an auto wash on property
located on the south side of Plymouth Road between Farmington and
Stark Road in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 33.
Mr. Hull stated that the petitioner is desirous of withdrawing this petition.
It was also noted that his desire to withdraw was in the last set of minutes.
Mr. Moser stated that subsequent to Council's approval of the other petition
he asked that this be withdrawn.
On a motion duly made by Mr. LaBo, seconded by Mr. Tunis and unanimously carried,
it was
#1-5-70 RESOLVED that Rafic A. Jordan, petitioner, be allowed to withdraw
Petition 69-10-2-25 which requested a waiver use permit to construct
an auto wash on property located on the south side of Plymouth Road
between Farmington and Stark Roads in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 33.
Mr. Tent, Chairman, declared the motion carried and the foregoing resolution
adopted.
Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 69-5-8-2a by
Harold Kaufman requesting approval of revised site plan for pro-
posed addition to shopping center located at Five Mile and Levan
Road.
IL
Mr. Tent advised that Mr. Nagy had prepared the revised site plan and thanked
the Planning Commission and staff.
8796
Mr. Nagy gave a presentation of the revised plan, the stores, landscaping, etc.
and there was a short discussion regarding the shopping center.
a On a motion duly made by Mr. Colomina, seconded by Mr. G)rightman and unanimously
carried, it was
#1-6-70 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Section
9.03 of Ordinance No. 543, the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, having
reviewed Site Plan #6912, presented in connection with Petition
69-5-9-2a approved by City Planning Commission Resolution #6-93-69
adopted on June 10, 1969, does hereby recommend to the City Council
that Petition 69-5-9-2a requesting site plan approval for the pro-
posed addition to shopping center located at Five Mile and Levan
Road, in Section 17, be approved subject to the following conditions:
(1) that Site Plan #6912 and Landscape Plan dated November 4, 1969
be adhered to;
(2) that the landscape material be installed within one and
one-half years after the petition is approved;
(3) that the architectural details conveyed by plans prepared
by the architectural firm of Levine, Alpern and Associates
and transmitted to the Planning Department by Mr. Edward
Mesch on January 8, 1970 be adhered to;
for the following reason:
(1) it is of sufficient calibre and quality to justify Planning
Commission approval;
Mr. Tent, Chairman, declared the foregoing motion carried and resolution adopted.
Mr. Glrightman announced the next item on the agenda is the approval of plan
developed by John E. Hiltz and Associates, Inc. for the separation
of storm and sanitary sewer within the southeast sector of our
City as it relates to the comprehensive planning for water and
sewer systems being developed by the regional metropolitan agency
known as SEMCOG.
Mr. Tent stepped down as Chairman.
On motion duly made by Mr. Colomina and seconded by Mr. Tent, and unanimously
carried, it was
#1-7-70 RESOLVED that, the City of Livonia Planning Commission, having
reviewed the various elements of the Livonia Plan as developed ,. .
by John E. Hiltz & Associates, Inc. , for the separation of storm
and sanitary sewer facilities within the southeast sector of the
City, does hereby concur that said plan will dovetail with the
area-wide comprehensive planning for water and sewer systems being
developed by the regional metropolitan agency known in this area
as SEMCOG; and
ILi
that said plan will meet the short term and long term sanitary
sewer and storm drainage master plans cf the community; and
8797
that the water and sewer system is being planned jointly to fit in
with the master plan for the entire metropolitan service area;
II
and
that the City of Livonia Planning Commission does hereby approve
of said plan including the financing of the facilities and the
Planning Director is hereby requested to forward the foregoing
information to the Chicago Office of HUD.
Mr. Urightman, acting Chairman, declared the motion carried and the foregoing
resolution adopted.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Tunis, seconded by Mr. Wrightman, and unanimously
adopted, the City Planning Commission adjourned their 213th Regular Meeting held
on January 20, 1970 at approximately 10:45 p.m.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
41110,52A.t 4 i ,„,6)
Harry f•]ri /than, Se i7 tary
ATTEST:
4-,10,,c*-)4.7.42/71ke.71--
Raym d U. Tent, Chairman
LI