Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1966-01-05 • 4648 MINUTES OF THE 215th SPECIAL MEETING AND A PUBLIC HEARING OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OP THE CITY OF LIVONIA On Tuesday, January 5, 1966, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia, held the 215th Special Meeting and a Public Hearing at the Livonia City Hall, 33001 Five Mile Road, Livonia, Michigan. Mr. Charles Walker, Chairman, called the Public Hearing to order at approximately 8:45 p.m. with approximately 70 people in the audience. Members present: Myra Chandler Donald Heusted Marvin Moser Raymond W. Tent Harry Wrightman Charles W. Walker John J. Ward Donald Pollock Members absent: Bob R. Whitehead Messrs. Don Hull, Planning Director; John J. Nagy, Assistant Planning Director; Harry Tatigian, City Attorney, were present. Mr. Wrightman announced the first item on the agenda is Petition 65-11-2-13 by Marvin A. Canvasser requesting to be granted a waiver use permit, to erect a Class C liquor licensed establishment on parcel 240LBa1 located in the Buckingham Plaza Shopping Center at the northwest corner of Schoolcraft Road and Inkster Road in Section 24. Mr. Rodney Rropf, representing the petitioner, was present and stated that the new Zoning Ordinance makes it necessary to obtain approval of a waiver use from the Planning Commission and that the requirements of the Ordinance have been met in that the property is zone C-2 and there is no other Class C liquor licensed establishment within 1,000 feet. Prior to adoption of new Zoning Ordinance a building permit had been approved-and issued, and the site has been approved by the Michigan State Liquor Control Commission. Mr. Tent questioned what the seating capacity of the establishment is and if there is provision for ample parking facilities. Mr. Rropf stated the seating capacity is 120 and parking facilities for 120 cars has been approved by the Building Department and that the petitioner has submitted a site plan showing the building and the parking. Mr. Tent questioned where the egress and ingress is. Mr. Kropf stated that there are two locations of egress and ingress, one on School- craft and one on Inkster Road. Mr. Walker stated that there were no problems regarding this petition according to the Engineering Department and read a letter dated November 12, 465 from Mr. Kerby regarding the necessity for Planning Commission approval. Mr, Eric Evans, 27541 Buckingham, requested to know what a Class C liquor licensed establishment is. tI Mr. Kropf replied that it is an establishment licensed to serve liquor by the glass. Mr, Evans asked if the residents of the area are free to voice an objection to this petition or is it too late. 4649 Mr. Walker advised that this assembly is a public hearing for the purpose of approving a location as required by the Ordinance and at this and any public hearing it is usual to hear from spectators. Mr. Evans stated that the nearby residents have had a number of problems with establishments of this type, for example the pool hall which degenerated into a hangout for hoodlums. He stated the Police Department had received many complaints on the noise and drag racing resulting from its operation. Mr. Evans stated that in view of the problems that would be created he is opposed to this petition. Mr. Lewis Bohling, 27529 Buckingham, stated he is an objector to the petition. Mrs. Chandler questioned if food would be served in this establishment. Mr. Kropf stated, yes, dinners will be served. Mr. Walker asked Mr. Kropf if he knew if the people in the area were contacted at the time the Council heard this petition. Mr. Kropf stated that the question of location is usually controlled by the State and they will not approve a location site unless people within 500 feet of the prcposed location have no objection. Mr. Walker stated his assumption that the site was also approved tithe Police Department. Mr. Evans stated his disbelief that this petition has been approved or that the people in the area were in favor of it. Mr, Walker stated that this point is uncertain but that the use permit for the building must be decided on and how it ties in with the location will be clarified at a later date after consulting with the City Attorney. Mr. Wrightman questioned Mr. Kropf if this is considered a restaurant with a Class C license. Mr. Kropf stated they had requested a license for a high calibre establishment and hoped to have a chef and certainly good food. Mr. Tent questioned if the establishment will have any type of entertainment; Mr. Kropf replied that there will be limited entertainment. Mr. Walker stated that this item will be taken under advisement. Mr. Wrightman announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 65-11-2-14 by William N. Ponder, Attorney for Thomas J. Seros and Nick J. Seros requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to erect a restaurant and Class C liquor licensed establishment on parcel 36A4, located on the south side of Plymouth Road between Harrison and Deering in Section 36. Mr, Ponder, representing the petitioners, stated that the Seros Brothers have been recommended by the Council to the Liquor Control Commission to be approved for a Class C license on this property. This will be basically a food operation, • 4650 that the Seros Brothers have been in the business for years and that a Class C liquor license along with a restaurant assures a more successful business. 1[1; The property was acquired about five years ago for $28,000.00 with this intent. Mr. Ponder outlined the history of the case by stating that the Council's recommen- dation was obtained in February of 1965 before the adoption of the new Zoning Ordinance, and that the Liquor Control Commission does not begin their investigation until after receipt of the Council's recommendation and does not allow building to begin until investigation by the Liquor Control Commission is completed and the license approved. Mr. Ponder stated that the matter of the 1,000 feet was discussed with the City's attorney and they were advised to go before the Zoning Board of Appeals for a waiver of this requirement. The Zoning Board of Appeals waived the requirement and advised us that the Planning Commission's approval of the license was now needed. Mr. Tent questioned how close this will be the the Redwood Bar. Mr. Ponder replied, 100 feet. Mr. Hull questioned if there is a bar at the intersection of Deering and Plymouth Road. Mr. Ponder replied, yes, but they do not serve food. Mr. Tent questioned how close this will be to Mama Mia. Mr. Ponder stated it will be more than 1,000 feet. Discussion was held regarding the action of the Zoning Board of Appeals in waiving the 1,000 foot requirement and the primary reason for the matter being before the Planning Commission after this action. Mr. Tatigian, Assistant City Attorney, stated the Zoning Board's action in removing the obstacle of the 1,000 foot provision of the Ordinance made it possible for the Commission to act on this matter. Without a variance the Planning Commission could not grant a waiver of use. The Planning Commission, Mr. Tatigian stated, does not have to disregard the 1,000 foot requirement, but is also not bound in any way to grant a waiver of use by its removal. Mr. Don Irving, 28128 Clements Circle, objected to this petition because he feels there are enough bars in this neighborhood already and protective walls have not been erected. Mr. Alan Jones, 28122 Clements Circle, was present and objected. Mr. John Beltran, 24505 Green Valley, Southfield, Michigan, representing himself and two brothers who own the property on which the Redwood Bar is built and other adjacent property, was present and objected to the petition and stated his feelings that it would cause deterioration of the neighborhood. Mr. Frank Rakos, 205 Longwood West, Detroit, 3, Michigan, owner of the Crestwood Lounge, was present and objected to the petition because he didn't know how the petitioner could profit from a bar that served food. Mr. Ponder stated that the Seros Brothers have been inthe business for 50 years; that they will have a dining room here and will serve good food and will erect a wall at the rear of the property. • 4651 Mr. Beltman questioned what would stop the petitioner from utilizing the use for a bar only or selling to someone having only that intent. Mr. Walker questioned if Mr. Rakos and Mr. Beltman had appeared before the Council to protest when the license was granted. Mr. Beltman stated he was never notified by the Liquor Control Commission or the Police Department. Mr. Pollock questioned if this meant there would be three Class C liquor licensed establishments within 1,000 feet of each other and all on the same side of the street. Mr. Walker clarified that the Zoning Board of Appeals has granted the waiver of the 1,000 foot requirement so that isn't the question now. Mr. Don Hull referred the Commissioners to Section 19.06 (f) of the Zoning Ordinance. Mrs. Dorothy Irving 28 28 Clements Circle, was present and stated her objection to the petition. Mrs. Chandler question if liquor is served also at Mama Mia's. Mr. Walker replied, yes, they have a Class C license. Mr. Tent questioned if it is true that by the Zoning Board's waiver of the 1,000 foot requirement that fact does not enter the matter at all. Mr. Tatigian stated that the Zoning Board of Appeals had a right to act on this matter, but that the waiver of use is entirely a matter of the Planning Commission's discretion. Mr. Walker stated that this petition would be taken under advisement. Mr. Wrightman announced that the next item on the agenda is Petition 65-12-2•.16 by Berg Associates Corporation requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to construct and operate a 60 unit motel and health club on part of parcel 24AA, located on the northeast corner of Schoolcraft Road and Middlebelt Road in Section 24. Mr. Joseph Berg, President of Berg Associates, was present and stated that the entire parcel (24AA) is involved and expected to be developed, but tonight he is requesting approval of a 60 unit motel, sauna and enclosed swimming pool. Mr. Berg outlined future plans for a muti-family project, a shopping center, and office building and perhaps a restaurant. The motel will be a two story building with parking to the front and two driveways, one for Middlebelt and one from Schoolcraft. Everything possible will be done to create something that will be an asset to the City. Mr. Walker questioned if the health club will be opened to the public or only to the people in the motel. Mr. Berg stated primarily to the people in the motel but also to the public. Mr. Walker questioned if there would also be a restaurant with the motel. Mr. Berg stated there might be a restaurant on the corner, but will have no hearing on the motel. 4652 1!r. Walker questioned if Mr. Berg had a particular motel in mind, such as a IL national chain. Mr. Berg replied it will be operated by himself in conjunction with the Shirberg Motel in Warren, Michigan, which he operates at the present time at Nine Mile and Dequindre, which is a high class motel with high class people. Mr. Wrightman questioned if a restaurant is planned for the southwest corner. Mr. Berg stated he didn't know, that they would have liked a gas station but that has been eliminated and if they request a resta-:rant it may be Howard Johnson's or S.chuler's. Mr. Tent questioned if Mr. Berg is the sole owner of this enterprize. Mr. Berg replied, no, there will be six from Detroit involved in the partnership in the entire complex including Mr. Coghill who sells salt for streets to the City, County and State; a bank president and an accountant; strictly six individuals going into business. NL. Walker stated that Mr. Berg mentioned a relationship between his business and the race track and questioned if the Commission is to assume that rooms in the motel will be rented for a long time. Mr. Berg answered, no, it will be strictly an accommodating motel and that the majority of rooms will be rented on a daily basis, but some weekly, Mr. Wrightman questioned Mr. Berg regarding the proposed buildings on the north of the immediate project. Imo. Barg indicated that these are one and two bedroom apartments. Mr. Harrison Mercer, 29339 Meadowlark, questioned what type of material the motel is to be constructed of. Mr. Berg stated it would be strictly brick construction all the way arourr . Nr. Mercer questioned the effect of the proposed 1-96 freeway on this development and who the tenant of the proposed shopping center will be; the length of leases and if a bank is proposed in the development. Yr. Berg indicated that everything is set back as far as possible, as much as 275 feet and that the freeway will take property from the race track because it is going on the south side of Schoolcraft. Mr. Berg stated that the development of a large parcel such as this will take as least a year and the tenants who lease will bid on the privilege of leasing. M.:. Mercer stated that the people in Compton Village are very interested in the :';cvelopment plans for this parcel and since they will be effected by it asked if it would be possible for them to be included in the plans and studies regarding it. v;_. Bcrg stated that anything meant to be public would no doubt be made so by the City, and that he will abide by any request of the City. 3 Hr. Walker stated that this proposed development is before the Commission at the Commission's insistance, that a piece-meal development is not desired and that the people of the area have agreed to this. 4653 Mr. Lee Romano, 29323 Meadowlark, stated the people in the area are aware of this proposed development and want to be sure as to what is going in it and if apartments are planned that they are not sub-standard. Mr. Berg stated that Mr. Hull, with whom he had met several times, will not allow anything to go in here unless it is a beautiful complex. Mr. Walker stated that tt ,Commission members have faith in the recommendations made by Mr. Hull after has reviewed development plans and any apartment design reviewed and recommended for a vote by Mr. Hull is guaranteed to be the absolute best that the City can have. Mr. Mercer requested to know if he could have a blue print of the proposed develop- ment to submit to the executive board of the Compton Village Civic Association. Mr. Berg stated, yes, and that he had one here. Mr. Wrightman questioned how long Mr. Berg anticipated it would take to complete this development. Mr. Berg stated he would guarantee conpletion of the entire project within two years. Mr. Walker stated that this item would be taken under advisement. Mr. Wrightman stated the next item on the agenda is Petition 65-12-2-17 by Rosedale Gardens Corporation requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to construct a club swimming pool and bathhouse addition to the present building on lot 1596a1, located on the west side of Hubbard Road between West Chicago and Orangelawn in Section 34. Mr. James Mies, representing Rosedale Gardens Corporation, was present and outlined plans for constructing a swimming pool on this property and an addition to the existing clubhouse which would serve as a bathhouse and render additional facil- ities such as office space. The proposed pool is 82.6' running north and south and 75' in width at the widest part; underground filtering equipment between the existing clubhouse and the pool is proposed and 300 members will be accommodated. Mr. Mies outlined the following facts relating to this petition: The property was purchased by the Rosedale Gardens Civic Association a few years ago from the Shelden Land Company. In May, 1959, the Rosedale Gardens Corporation was formed and purchased the property with the thought that a swimming pool would event- ually be built. When the property was purchased there was no ordinance covering the erection of swimming pools and until February of 1961 no provision in the zoning ordinance. In 1964 the Corporation decided to endeavor to build a pool, contacted people in the immediate area on Fairfield and Hubbard and all but one person agreed to it. 70% of the property owners within 500 feet consented. An application was filed with the City Council and since it did not conform to Ordinance 505, the Council was asked to waive certain sections of the Ordinance. Notice vas sent to each home owner (86) within 500' and at a meeting two weeks later not one objector appeared. The Zoning Board of Appeals has granted a waiver of certain requirements to which we cannot conform. An architect was engaged and plans made. Building permits were filed for. Ordinance 543 was adopted before approval of various City Departments and building permits would be obtained. Under the new Zoning Ordinance a swimming pool is a waiver use, 7 but it was not under Ordinance #60. Section 4.03 (d) sets forth requirements to which we cannot conform but which the Zoning Board of Appeals has waived. Mr. Mies stated that they are now requesting approval of this particular site for 4654 this particular use for the following reasons: (1) There is a hardship in that $3,000.00 has been invested in plans; (2) The zoning ordinance is adopted for the entire City; this is a congested area where there is no open space which makes conformance to the Zoning Ordinance impossible; (3) There are 2200 families in this area and the property is in the center which means no main streets will be crossed in reaching the pool; (4) There is no other propertyavailable for this use in this area; (5) This particular lot is restricted for recreational purposes; (6) Ordinance No. 60 required a two acre site and Ordinance No. 543 re- quires 4 acres; this site has one acre but the school property on the north is 3 to 4 acres and vacant; (7) A parking variance was granted because there is vacant area nearby that could be used for parking and the school board has granted us a portion of the School property for parking purposes; (8) It is necessary that we follow through with the landscaping plans as required if we are granted the use of this property for this purpose; (9) The bathhouse will act as a buffer to the church; (10) This use will add more to City's tax base than if it is developed residentially; (11) Rosedale Gardens Corporation owns the property and leases it to the Rosedale Gardens Civic Association who takes care of the property; (12) This is a svmmsr use only. Mr. Walker questioned Mr. Mies regarding the feelings of the people in the area. 1L. Mies stated that when the matter was first before the Council there were virtually t no objectors, not even the Church, and the majority of the people in the area did not indicate objection to the pool. Somebody has talked with the people and now some are opposed. Er. Walker questioned if an attempt has been made to obtain the 60% of the signatures required. Mr. Mies replied that signatures in that amount are on file with the Building Depart meat. Mr. Tent questioned if there was adequate parking proposed without reducing the recreation area for the children in the area who do not swim. Mr. Mies stated that the Parks & Recreation Commission does not think this will be problem. Er. Tent asked if no-parkingsigns will be erected on the streets and would people object to cars parking in front of their homes. Mr. Mies stated that the 1/3 parking requirement was waived by the Council and that most users will be able to walk; also the Zoning Board of Appeals does not feel this :7.11 be a problem. Mrs. Chandler questioned if the school board's agreement regarding parking is in ,aritinsr. to Mr. Mies stated that it is on file and approvals of these parking arrangements from the Police and Fire Departments are alio on file. 4655 Mr. Walker questioned their non-compliance with the 25 foot front yard and 50 foot setback requir ement. ___. Mr. Mies stated that so far as he knew all of the things that could not be complies, with have been waived. Mr. Wrightman questioned that since the requirement is for 1/3 of the membership what is planned if the school board decides their space cannot be used. Mr. Mies indicated property on the north, east and perhaps the south that might be used, but stated that the school board sees no reason why some of their property can't be used. Mr. Wrightman questioned the intended use of public facilities by a private corp- oration for private purposes. Mr. Clarence Charest, representing the Rosedale Gardens Presbyterian Church, stated that he had directed a letter to the Chairman of the Commission which sets forth objections of individuals to this petition and that it contains names of individuals who are immediate neighbors of this swimming pool. In the beginning, he stated, some people had no objection, that the church did not actively solicit signatures from anyone at any time, The Parks & Recreation Department felt at one time that if parking for 50 cars was allowed on the area north of this property the Little League activity would be curtailed. The church has 1700 members who have vested interests in this area. Mr. Charest stated his belief that this will have a detri- mental effect on the community and that it is not a community activity. The new Zoning Ordinance was adopted because the old ordinance was inadequate and makes four acres a requirement. Mr. Charest referred to Section 4.03 which enumerates all the requirements regulating swimming pools, and contended that it is mandatory that the Ordinance be complied with. He stated that it is the obligation of the Planning Commission to plan this City and waiving of the Zoning Ordinance require- ments is not within the province of the Zoning Board of Appeals. He stated that the people in the area feel this use will create a nuisance and more traffic problems; the activities of the Church will be seriously impaired; it will be detrimental to the property values and the Church has title to the property on the north. Mr. Bob Duravage, 11036 Blackburn, stated that the parking lot was deeded to the Church by Shelden Land Company and the Civic Association agreed to the deeding of t'_?.;: land provided they would still have use of it. Dr. Richard C. Dunkelberger, Pastor of Rosedale Gardens Presbyterian Church, stated his belief that this use will be a hindrance in the operation of the Church since the offices and choir rooms are located along the north side of the property and the programs of the Church run through the entire summer. He stated that the deed is clear according to Mr. Shelden and the title is in the name of the Church. This use will add to the already existing traffic problem. Dr. Dunkelberger stated that it is true that the Church board gave its approval to this use but they did not think the City Council would ever approve this pool, and the only official meeting held with the Zoning Board of Appeals was for them to ask how they could make it more palatable. Dr. Dunkelberger stated further that it was the opinion of the Board that this will hamper the programs of the Church in which they have an investment. / 4 Cecil Christensen (lot 701-702) 9918 Hubbard, stated that the area that would be paved for parking is not used by the Little League and that he does not believe there will be a traffic problem. The parking facility of the Church does not conform to the Ordinance either. v 4656 Mr. Ward questioned if a legal opinion from Mr. Tatigian should be requested because if all the requirements set forth in Section 19.06 were not met this could preclude the Commission's approval of this petition. °� Mr. Tatigian stated it is his feeling that Section 19.06 would support that in the evert the requirements are not complied with the Commission would have no other_ recourse than to deny the case before them. Merely because these requirements were waived by the Zoning Board of Appeals does not mean they have to be disregarded and the Zoning Board's action is not the final action. The question of whether or not the Zoning Board acted properly, and reasons have to be had for their action, is a Court's case and our office is planning to defend any suit brought about. Mr. Walker stated his concurrence with Mr. Tatigian's explanation that the reasons given here and the waivers granted by the Zoning Board has no effect on the Planning Commission; the door is open for judgement as to whether or not we approve this use, the question being whether this is an essential use and need for the City and will it benefit. Mr. Walker further stated that this is a highly developed area with very little open space for recreation purposes. Non-compliance with the Ordinance must be weighed and also the question of whethercur not the people want it. Determination has to be made as to whether this is a good and reasonable use for this land and if it will serve a use to the City. Mr. Floyd Lippert, 32505 West Chicago, was present and objected. Mrs. Corrine M. Thomas, 9837 Fairfield, was present and objected. Mr. Walker requested a show of hands from those present objecting to the petition. There were 16. II: Mr. Walker requested a show of hands from those present not objecting to the :etition. There were 11. Mr. Walker then stated that this item would be taken under advisement. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Wrightman and seconded by Mr. Ward, and unanimously adopted, it was #1-1-66 RESOLVED that the City Planning Commission does hereby adjourn the Public Hearing held on Tuesday, January 4, 1966, at approximately 11:55 p.m. * ** ** ** * Mr. Walker, Chairman, called the 215th Special Meeting to order at approximately 12:10 a.m. with approximately 25 interested persons in the audience. Mr. Wrightman announced the first item on the agenda is Petition 65-11-2-13 by Marvin A. Canvasser requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to erect a Class C liquor licensed establishment on parcel 24OLBa1, located in the Buckingham Plaza Shopping Center at the northwest corner of Schoolcraft Road and Inkster Road in Section 24. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Wrightman and seconded by Mr. Tent, it was il: #1-2-66 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on January 4, 1966, on Petition 65-11-2-13 as submitted by Marvin A. Canvasser requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to erect a Class C liquor licensed establishment on parcel 240LBa1, located in the Buckingham Plaza Shopping Center at the northwest corner of 4657 Schoolcraft Head and Inkster Road in Section 24, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 65-11-2-13 be approved for the following reasons: (1) It conforms to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, and (2) It will not be detrimental to the adjacent development, and FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of the above hearing was sent to prop- erty owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. A roll call vicee on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Ward, Pollock, Tent, Moser, Heusted, Chandler, Wrightman, Walker NAYS: None ABSENT: Whitehead Mr. Walker, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Mr. Wrightman announced that the next item on the agenda is Petition 65-11-2-14 by William N. Ponder, Attorney for Thomas J. Seros and Nick J. Seros, requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to erect a restaurant and Class C liquor licensed establishment on parcel 36A4, located on the south side of Plymouth Road between Harrison and Deering in Section 36. Ute. Walker advised that this petition would be taken under advisement for one week per the petitioner's request. Mr. Wrightman announced that the next item on the agenda is Petition 65-12-2-16 by Berg Associates Corporation requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to construct and operate a 60 unit motel and health club on part of parcel 24AA, located on the northeast corner of School- craft Road and Middlebelt Road in Section 24. Mr. Walker advised that this petition will be taken under advisement. Mr. Wrightman announced that the next item on the agenda is Petition 65-12-2-17 by Rosedale Gardens Corporation requesting to be granted a waiver use permit to construct a club swimming pool and bathhouse addition to present building on lot 1596al, located on the west side of Hubbard Road between West Chicago and Orangelawn in Section 34. Mr. Walker announced that this item is to be taken under advisement until such time 4s Mr. Mies has supplied the Commission with certified copies of all documents , mentioned during the public hearing including the signatures of people in the area agreeing to this use; agreement with the School Board; approval of the Police & Fire Departments, etc., inaemuch as these documents are necessary and vital because this use is invalid according to the Zoning Ordinance even in view of the waivers by the Zoning Board of Appeals. Ur. Wrightman announced the the next item on the agenda is consideration of an cmer.dment to Petition 65-11-1-38 to read RUF to PS instead of RUF to 4.1. 4 T 4658 ILUpon a motion duly made by Mr. Tent and seconded by Mr. Ward, it was #1-3-66 RESOLVED that Petition 65-11-1-38 byThomas G. and Viola R. Bosco requesting the rezoning of lots 447 and 448 of Supervisor's Livonia Plat #7 from RUF to C-1 located at the northeast corner of Middlebelt Road and Bretton Road in Section 1, be Amended to reflect a request for rezoning of lots 447 and 448 of Supervisor's Livonia Plat #7 from RUF to P.S. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Pollock, Tent, Heusted, Chandler, Walker, Ward, Wrightman NAYS: None ABSENT: Whitehouse ABSTAINING: Moser Mr. Walker declared the foregoing motion is carried and the resolution adopted, and that Petition 65-11-1-38 is now amended and will appear on the next agenda as RUF to P.S. Mr. Hull requested that Mr. Bosco submit a site plan prior to this item's appearance on a future agenda. Mr. Wrightman announced that this next item on the agenda is the revised preliminary plat for Stark Gardens Subdivision and transmittal letter to council. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Wrightman and seconded by Mr. Tent it was #1-4-66 RESOLVED that the revised preliminary plat for Stark Gardens Subdivision and letter of transmittal be transmitted to Council. A roll call vote on the foregoing resoultion resulted in the following: AYES: Tent, Heusted, Chandler, Walker, Pollock, Wrightman NAYS: Ward ABSENT: Whitehead ABSTAININGL.Mbser Mr. Walker, Chairman declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. ed Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Wrightman, second/by Mr. Ward, and unanimously adopted, the City Planning Commission does hereby adjourn the 215th Special Meeting held on Tuesday, January 4, 1966 at approximately 12:30 a.m. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION .C:---- / .21( ' / i Harry Wt tman, S-00-etary 10: A ' )400, %MK 1 /1 66/1 Wee-fill.) Charles W. Walker, Chairman