Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1961-02-21 . 3103 MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THE 124TH REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LIVONIA IE "On Tuesday, February 21, 1961 the "ity Planning Commission of the City of Livonia held a public hearing and the 124th Regular Meeting at the Livonia City Hall, 33001 Five Mile Road, Livonia, Michigan. Mr. Charles W. Walker, Chairman called the 124th Regular Meeting to order at approximately 8:00 p.m. Members present: James Watson, Jr. , Charles W. Walker, Robert M. Peacock, W . E .0kerstrom, Robert L . Greene, James Cameron and Dennis Anderson Members absent: Robert L. Angevine and Leonard K. Kane Mr. David McCullough, City Planner was present along with approximately 50 interested persons in the audience. Mr. McCullough: The first item on the agenda is Petition Z-481 by City Planning Commission pursuant to City Council's Res. #634-60 asking that the zoning classification on property located on the South and North sides of Five Mile Road between Yale and Eckles Road in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 19, SE 1/4 Section 18, SW 1/4 Section 17, SE 1/4 Section 17 and the NE 1/4 Section 20 be rezoned from C-1, C-2 and PS to R-1A. Public Hearing 12/20/60 item taken under advisement. IL: There is no further correspondence in relation to this pettion. Mr. Walker: We have in our presence the Honorable Mayor of the City of Livonia. At this time I would like to ask his Honor if he would care to address this board at this time. Mayor William W. Brashear informed the Commission that the occasion for him being present tonight was specifically the hearing involving the proposed change of zoning on Five Mile Road. He stated that what he had to say he would like considered as generally applicable to all property within the city, and that it was not his policy to come before this commission or any other with the idea of persuading them in any way. The Mayor continued his remarks by reminding those present that the reason this country was so different from other countries, particularly those behind the iron curtain was the Constitution. Mayor Brashear continued by saying that the Planning Commission had worked on the Zoning Ordinance for two years before it was adopted and that it was submitted to the public in the early part of 1953 after which it was voted upon and accepted by them. Following the adoption of the zoning ordinance there were many, many instances where the Planning Commission was called upon to change the ordinance. These changes were made only after a hearing was held at which time the Commission heard those speak for and against the requested change. That is the due process of law, the right of the American citizen to be heard. All facts are considered before a decision is made. That is the basic principle upon which our government is formed. The zoning ordinance was adopted only as a means to protect the public health, welfare and safety. It is only changed if it is found .I ,that the change is necessary to the public health, welfare and safety. That is the point the Commission has before them. The Mayor further stated that we have to ':think of the constitutional rights of the individual. They are only to be disturbed if it is to protect the public health, welfare and safety, for it is these rights that make our country great. Mayor Brashear concluded by stating he appreciated what the Commission is doing and he was sure the public did also. • 3104 Mr. Walker thanked Mayor Brashear for sharing his time with the Commission and stated- that the Commission appreciated his remarks to them. . Mr. Walker: Gentlemen, if there is no objection from the Commission, the Chair would like to go to the floor and allow any property owners interested in this petition to address this board with any new evidence or remarks. Keep in mind that we have in writing the objections raised at the public hearing. These letters are on file and are a matter of record. Mr. Goldman, representing Paris Home Builders and Mr. Hermanoff representing Harry Slatkin Builders, reiterated their remarks made at the public hearing. They both objected to the proposed rezoning. Mr. Walker: The floor is open for a motion. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Peacock, supported by Mr. Watson, it was #2-35-61 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on Tuesday, December 20, 1960 on Petition Z-481 by City Planning pursuant to City Council's Res. #634-60 for a change of zoning on property located on the South and North sides of Five Mile Road in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 19, Southeast 1/4 of Section 18, Southwest 1/4 of Section 17, Southeast 1/4 of Section 17 and the Northeast 1/4 of Section 20 be rezoned from C-1, C-2 and PS to R-1A, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition Z-481 be denied for the following reasons: (1) that this land was properly zoned by the Planning Commission and .E City Council based on the Master Plan of the entire City; (2) to change the zoning at this time would not be in the best interest of the welfare of the city; (3) that some of the land under consideration has undoubtedly been sold, with the buyer relying upon the commercial classification shown on the zoning map and to change the zoning at this time would work a hardship upon the buyers; (4) that the existence of the large general hospital in this vicinity generates a need for more commercial and professional zoning than ordinarily would be appropriate for this level of population. Numerous physicians have either inquired about or will ultimately seek office clinic space in close proximity to the hospital; (5) that footers for a filling station have already been erected on the Northwest corner of Five Mile and Newburgh which constitutes a physical alteration of the land, FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published in the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of November 26th, 1960 and notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit Edison Co. , Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. , Michigan Bell Telephone Co. , The Consumers Power Co. , City Departments and petitioner as listed in the Proof of Service. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: 11-1 AYES: Peacock, Greene, Watson, Anderson, Okerstrom and Walker NAYS: Cameron Mr. Walker: The motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. 3105 Mr. McCullough: The next item on the agenda is Petition Z-484 by City Planning Commission asking that the zoning classification on certain properties on the South side of Five Mile Road between Farmington and Brookfield in the NW 1/4 of Section 22 be rezoned from CC and C-2 to PS. Public Hearing 12/20/60, item taken under advisement; Special Meeting 1/10/61; Regular Meeting 1/17/61; Special Meeting 2/7/61. It has been suggested that the westerly 60 ft. of the parcel situated immediately east of the City Hall be rezoned to PS, the balance to remain C-2. We have been informed that there is a possibility of a main post office being erected on this parcel. Mr. Walker: I would suggest that we treat this item the same as the previous one. Is there anyone present who would like to make any comments at this time? Mr. Norman Stockmeyer, 38042 Glenwood, Wayne, Michigan reiterated his remarks made at the public hearing, verifying that they have been working on plans for a branch federal building which would house some branch offices of the federal government in addition to the post office. He further stated that it was more difficult to obtain a mortgage under PS than under the commercial zoning and therefore they are requesting that the zoning remain as it is. Mr. Walker: Is there anyone elde in the audience who wishes to speak? If not, the floor is open for a motion. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Watson, supported by Mr. Peacock, it was 2-36-61 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on Tuesday, December 20, 1960 on Petition Z-484 as submitted by City Planning Commission pursuant to City Council's Res. 654-60 for a change of zoning in the NW 1/4 of Section 22 from C-2 to PS, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition Z-484 be denied insofar as it relates to Parcel 22c 369b - 466 for the following reasons: (1) that this land was properly zoned by the Planning Commission and City Council based on the Master Plan of the entire city; (2) that to change the zoning at this time would not be in the best interest of the welfare of the City; (3) that the tract in question has a north and south dimension of 500 feet. To split off 60 ft. in an east/west direction and rezone it to PS might result in an awkward shaped parcel which could be unuseable since professional building would not be suitable to these dimensions; (4) that the property is particularly adaptable for use as a Post Office. To rezone it orany part of it as this time might prevent its being used for that purpose since the total of the area needed for building, parking, loading and site improvements could easily be the entire parcel; IT is also recommended that Petition Z-484 be denied for Lots 306 through 314 since it appears that it was not the intention of the Council to include this land in the original petition; FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published in the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of November 26, 1960 and notice of which hearing was sent to Detroit Edison Co. , Chespaeake & Ohio Railway Co. , Mich- igan Bell Telephone Co. , Consumers Power Co. , City Departments and petitioner as listed in the Proof of Service. roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Cameron, Peacock Greene, Watson, Anderson, Okerstrom and Walker NAYS: None , 3106 Mr. Walker: The motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. It was decided that the remaining part of the Regular Meeting would be held after Ir the Public Hearing. Li Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Okerstrom, supported by Mr. Peacock and unanimously adopted, the 124th Regular Meeting was duly adjourned on Tuesday, February 21, 1961 at approximately 8:35 p.m. Mr. Walker, Chairman, called the Public Hearing to order at approximately 8:36 p.m. with all those present now who were present at the time the Regular Meeting was adjourned. Due to the number of persons in the audience in relation to Petition Z-495, it was determined that this item would be heard first. Mr. McCullough: The first item on the agenda is Petition Z-495 by the City Planning Commission asking that the zoning classifi- cation of property located on the South side of Eight Mile Road approximately 670 ft. East of Farmington Road in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 3 be rezoned from C-2 to M-1. Mr. v. C. We.iev. 19938 Shadyside is present to represent those in the audience who are objecting to the proposed rezoning. Mr. McCullough submitted a petition signed by the property owners surrounding the area in question who objected to the proposed rezoning to Mr. Walker. Mr. Walker: Is there anyone in the audience who wishes to speak? ':Mr. Reddy: The words of the Mayor are particularly applicable in this case. We live in one of the oldest subdivisions in Livonia. Many of the residents have lived there all of their lives. Our streets were dedicated in 1926 and the land was plotted some time before that. I have a map of our area. The shaded area are the property owners who object to the proposed rezoning. Mr. Reddy presented the map to Mr. Walker for the records. Mr. Reddy continued: We feel that it would be a mistake to take a small area of 87' x 221' and zone it M-1. It is physically impossible for the owner of the property to comply with the provisions in the zoning ordinance. There is no room for the set-back provision, for the off-street parking and also no room for the required greenbelt. Our sewers are only a county drain line which is connected to the septic tanks. He has no room for a tile field. This is the third time this request has c^me up in the last three years. We do not think it is fair as citizens of I4N-onia to continually have to before you and the City Council to protect our property rights. Mr. Walker: Do the red shaded areas indicate the signatures of those objecting? ILMr. Reddy: Yes. Mr. Peacock: You refer to no off street parking. Isn't there parking available at the back of this plant? 3107 Mr. Reddy: Yes, however there are cars parked on the street. •The building is only 4 ft. from the property line. There is some parking available at the rear of the building. 1p is used by some of them working there but there is also t least three to six cars parked in the street and they are not even parked parallel to the street but at•right angle to the street. We feel that since the owner has not tried to comply with any of the regulations that we have no assurance that it would be better if it was zoned M-1. Mr. Peacock: You have M-1 across the street. Mr. Reddy: Right, but we do not feel that this is as objectionable. Most of them have landscaped front yards and are not objectionable. The objectionable part is mostly at the rear of the plants in the M-1 zone. Mr. Walker: You fear the encroachment of the M-1 zone more than the Commercial zone, is that right? Mr. Reddy: Yes. Mr. Peacock: Have you read the uses permitted in C-2? Mr. Reddy: Yes, we have and we feel that the buildings in a C-2 zone are less objectionable than the buildings you might get in the M-1 zone. 11[: Mr. Watson: About the parking around the plant. Have you ever met with the owner in regards to this problem? Mr. Reddy: We have notified the police and have talked with them. Mr. Walker: Could we have a show of hands from the audience of those present who object to this petition? There appeared to be about 25 to 30 hands in the audience. Mr. R. Lundquist: I do not feel that this civic association represents the 32205 Eight Mile Road) owners of properly along Eight Mile Road. Our house has lost its value due to the nearby industrial zone. I would like to see Eight Mile Road completely industrial. Maybe I could get what my property and house is worth and move out. Mr.R. Siegmund 20418 Shadyside concurred with Mr. Reddy from the civic association. Mr. Earl Compeau,32345 felt that the petition should be approved. /EightMile Road/ not Mr. Walker informed those present that the Commission did/have too much information in mlation to the widening of Eight Mile Road. The only information available was that the widening would be completed by 1963. An interested person in the audience stated he objected to the proposed M-1 zone due to the proximity of Tyler School in that section. Mr. Walker: If there is no further discussion, the Chair would like to take this under advisement u:.Itil we have prepared a report and submitted it to the City Planning Commission 3108 Mr. Peacock was excused at 9:00 p.m. Mr. Walker called a recess at 9:01 p.m. Ir. , The meeting was called back to order at approximately 9:20 p.m. with all those present now who were present at the time the Chairman called a recess. Mr. McCullough: The next item on the agenda is Petition Z-491 by Mike Sinacola, et al, asking that the zoning classification of property located approximately 300 ft. South of Seven Mile Road and 175 ft. East of Middlebelt Road in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 12 be rezoned from C-2 and R-1B to R-3A and/ or PS. There is no correspondence. There is an existing building on the Sinacola parcel which Mr. Sinacola intends to remove and erect in place of it an office building. They are requesting a rezoning of the commercial area and the residential area included in their property to R-3A for apartments. Only the rezoning is to be acted upon tonight - if he receives approval from the City Planning and the City Council, he will then have to appear for approval of his site plan in relation to apart- ments. Mr. J. Kilgore was present for the petitioners. IriMr. Greene: What would be the ingress and egress roads to the apart- ments? Mr. McCullough: Grimm and Dardanella. Mr. Kilgore explained the details of the proposed apartment buildings. Mr. McCullough: The Claranceville School District has no objection to the proposed apartments. cut It was ascertained that in order to/Dardanella through to Middlebelt, the petitioner is going to exchange property with another owner. Mr. Anderson: We are considering putting a R-3 zone in the center of an area completely surrounded, except for the corner, by RUF and R1B. Mr. Walker: There is some vacant property immediately south of this which would be landlocked by the apartments . Regardless of what this property is zoned, there should be some method of not landlocking this property so it can be developed also. It was determined that Grimm street would be cut through which would solve this problem. Mr. Walker: Is there anyone in the audience who wishes to speak? Mr. R. Davis: My property is adjacent to this at the back. I have no 18921 Maplewood) 3109 objection to R-1 but I do with R-3 and PS. I feel that I[: it is unfair to us as property owners to rezone this property to R-3 after we moved in thinking it was one- family residential. Mr. C. Thompson: The master Plan does not show any R-3 in this area. Isn't 19012 Norwich) this spot zoning? Mr. Walker: Yes, in this particular area I would say it is. Mr. J. Ciako I am wondering about the feasibility of having apartment 29064 Clarita) buildings surrounded on all three sides by a R-lA area. Mr. Walker: This item will be taken under advisement for further study at the next study meeting. Mr. McCullough: The next item on the agenda is Petition Z-490 by Elwood Manns asking that the zoning classification on property located on the East side of Middlebelt approximately 250 feet south of Six Mile Road in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 13 by rezoned from RUFB to C-2. Mr. Manns was present. Mr. McCullough: They are proposing to erect a funeral home if the zoning is approved. There are two small homes on the property. They have been condemned and will be removed. Mr. Manns: Part of the property is zoned C-2. Mr. Walker: Is there anyone in the audience who wishes to speak? Mr. R. McKay: I own property west of this area and I feel this rezoning 29421 W. Six Mile) would be very advantageous to the zoning on this corner. The two homes there are an eye sore. It would help the corner in general. Mr. McCullough: How far back willyou erect the building from the center of the road? Mr. Manns: Sixty f-•.t set back or 120 ft. from the center of the road. The building will be 170 ft. in length, consisting of one- story. There will be parking in rear for 60 cars and also sufficient parking for off-street parking. Mr. McCullough: He has been warned that he is to have sufficient parking to park funeral processions without using Middlebelt Road. I am satisfied that he has a sufficient amount. Mr. Okerstrom: Do we require an eight foot greenbelt? Mr. McCullough: Not in C-2, a wall will be required rather than a greenbelt. In C-2 a wall is required, in PS a greenbelt. This is a PS use in a C-2 zone. Mr. Anderson: I don't feel the wall is really necessary because of the use he . intends to pet co this property. - 3110 Mr. Manns: The N. 100 ft. of this land is now zoned C-2. Would it make any difference whether the 154 ft. is zoned PS,instead of C-2? 11:Mr. McCullough: No greenbelt is required in PS areas. Mr. Walker: This defeats the purpose of the PS ordinance. Mr. Watson: What effect would this have on the new amendment we are proposing in the PS ordinance? Mr. Walker: It wouldn't effect it at all in a C-2 zone. Mr McCullough: Even if the Planning Commission acted upon the proposed amendment to PS tonight, it would still have to go before the Council and then it would take approximately 6 weeks before it is official. Mr. Cameron: Under PS, it would effect 16 ft. on the plot plan. Mr. Anderson: Are you in any particular hurry for this? Could we act upon it next week? Mr. Mains: We were planning to start building within a month. Mr. Walker: I would like to take it under advisement so as to study it further in order to determine what zone should be used. Mr. Watson: If we were to prefer the PS, would you be agreeable to this? Could the building be changed so as to be able to conform to the PS ordinance? Mr. Manns: We have the plans completely finished. It would require a complete revision. Mr. Anderson: The point we are getting at is that in the C-2 district you have to build a protective wall on the property line between the commercial and the residence at the rear and on the south line of your property. If you do not object to this we could go ahead now. Mr. Manns: What is the height of this wall? Mr. McCullough: Six feet, it runs about $12.00 a lineal foot. Mr. Watson: It might be well to think about it. In PS you would not have to put up the wall only a greenbelt. Mr. Manns: Yes, but our building plans would have to be changed. Mr. McCullough: It might be to your advantage to think it over. You can come to see me and we will work it out. EWeMr. Walker: will take this under advisement. We will notify you of the next meeir Mr. McCullough: The next item on the agenda is Petition Z-497 by the City Planning Commission to determine whether or not Section 4.32 of Article 4.00 of Ordinance No. 60 should be amended 3111 by increasing the dwelling size in Zones A and B. Z . Walker: Is there anyone in the audience who wishes to speak? . Irving Levine was present representing the Builders Association. He stated that his proposed amendment had been discussed very thoroughly with a group of builders some of whom were present tonight. They had unanimously agreed that it would be a disadvantage to the city and..to the builders who have a vested interest in the future economy of the city if the Planning Commission increased the house size in the A and B classification. This would increase the sales price of the homes from $1500 to $2000 a piece. He continued by saying that they believe that this would take most of the housing completely out of reach of the market as it exists at the present time. Homes can be built for less if they cheapen them up. They concurred wholeheartedly with the statements of the Mayor and with the zoning book. Mr. Levine further stated that if the Planning Commission took this action to increase the house size it would be beyond the scope of zoning and would be subject to a law suit. We feel that this action will come up with cheaper houses and that this is not what you really intended to d :. We seriously urge that you do not adopt this change. There was a lengthy discussion between the builders who were present and the Planning Commission as to the advisability of increasing the house sizes in certain areas. Mr. Middlewood of the Bureau of Inspection stated as far as 800 ft. square homes were concerned there were very little of these being built today. Mostly these were located in the Northeast part of Livonia. He did not think that it would be wise to force an individual to build a 1700 ft. home where he is surrounded by 1,000 foot homes. Mr. Green asked Mr. Middlewood how many homes were being built con- sisting of 800 sq. ft. He answered by saying not very many, most of them were IC:tween 900 and 1,000. . Josephson, Avon Building, Mr. Hermanoff, Slatkin Builders and Mr. P. Ventura verbally objected to the proposed change. Mr. Walker asked Mr. Levin how many builders were present at their meeting. Mr. Levine stated that the following were present: Mr. George Pastor, Mr. J. Menuck, Mr. J. Bonadeo, Sheldon Land Company, Mr. G. Karabelnick, Mr. H. Alper, Mr. Hermanoff, Mr. D. Lewis, Slavik Builders, himself and a broker who was familiar with the market. It was suggested that it might be wise to have three sizes, 800, 1,000jasg 1,200. Mr. Levine thought that this would be doing more for the community than by gncreasing the A and B classification. Mr. Walker stated that it had been assumed that the Planning Commission were going to change all the areas designated A to require 1200 ft. homes and change the B areas to require 1000 ft. He asked Mr. Levine if this is what they thought also. Mr. Levine stated it was. Mr. Walker stated further that this possibly would not have worked out. Perhaps it would be best to study it further and come up with a plan to recommend a change in the A and B classification and possibly use three classifications and designate the area where each classification will be. Mr. Walker continued by suggesting that a meeting be held between the Planning Commission and the builders and at that time discuss any ideas the group would have. Mr. McCullough stated he would prepare a map showing three different districts to be shown at a study meeting with the building. He suggested that they in turn come up with a method of eliminating the problem of the builder who builds 1600 sq. ft. houses then sells part of his lots to another builder who erects 1000 sq. ft. houses across the street. Mr. Robert L. Greene was excused at approximately 10:35 p.m. Mr. Walker thanked those builders who were present for stating their viewpoints. 3112 Mr. McCullough: The next item on the agenda is Petition Z-493 by the City Planning Commission asking that the zoning classification IL: of property located on the South side of Seven Mile Road on the Southwest corner of Seven Mile Road and Stamford in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 9, be rezoned from C-1 to R-1A. This has been referred to us by the City Council in their Res. #18-61 in which they request us to hold a public hearing to determine whether or not to rezone this property from C-i to PS to assure the Helman Park Civic Association that nothing will be erected on it other than a medical clinic. This was the remt.?n the owner had had it rezoned previously from residential to C-1. It was thought that due to the fact that this lot is so small, 80' x 100' and that in time the west 30 ft. of Stamford will be subtracted from this property, that it might be wiser to rezone it to residential. This lot originally was in a larger parcel which was later platted into 60 ft. lots. This plat is not in effect at this time. Mr. Walker: Is the owner of the property present? It was determined that the owner had been notified of the meeting but he was not present. Mr. Walker: Is there anyone in the audience who wishes to speak? ILMr. W. W. Thrope, 18597 Norwich, President of the Helman Park Civic Association stated their cn.ly reason for suggesting the PS zone to the City Council was to assure the civic association that nothing but a medical clinic would be built upon the property. They did not wish to see a commercial use on it. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Anderson, supported by Mr. Cameron, it was #2-37-61 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on Petition Z-493 as submitted by the City Planning Commission pursuant to City Council's Res. #18-61 for a change of zoning in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 9 from C-1 to R-lA, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition Z-493 be granted for the reasons: (1) that considering the dimensions of the parcel, namely 80' x 100' and the fact that the west thirty (30) feet of Stamford ought to be subtracted therefrom, the R-lA seems more appropriate than the PS recommended in RES. #18-61, and FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published in the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of February 1, 1961 and notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit Edison Co. , Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. , Michigan Bell Telephone Co. , The Consumers Power Co. , City Departments and petitioners as listed in the Proof of Service. 1100 A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Cameron, Watson, Anderson, and Walker NAYS: None NOT VOTING: Okerstrom 3113 Mr. Walker: The motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. 1[ Mr. McCullough: The next item on the agenda is Petition Z-496 by the City Planning Commission to determine whether or not the zoning map shall re amended to change the classification of all those properties situated in Sections 16, 17, 18, 20 and 21 now designated on the Zoning Map as R-1A to RM. Mr. Walker: Is there anyone in the audience who wishes to speak? Mr. McCullough: This relates only to those sections of R-1A which have a minimum lot size of 70 ft. frontage. It is my understanding that any plat that was approved prior to the 70 ft. ordinance will not be included in the R-1A-70. This is for unplatted land. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Anderson, supported by Mr. Cameron, it was #2-38-61 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on Petition Z-496 by the City Planning Commission to determine whether or not the zoning map shall be amended to change the classification of all those properties situated in Sections 4 through 9 inclusive and in Sections 16, 17, 18, 20 and 21 now designated on the Zoning Map as R-1A to RM, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition Z-496 be approved insofar as it effects unplatted land for the reason that this will remove any legal procedural arguments as to the validity of the 70 foot minimum lot areas, and FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published in the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of February 1, 1961 and notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit Edison Co. , Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. , Michigan Bell Telephone Co. , The Consumers Power Co. , CityDepartments and as listed in the Proof of Service. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Cameron, Watson, Anderson and Walker NAYS: Okerstrom Mr. Walker: The motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Mr. McCullough: The next item on the agenda is Petition Z-489 by Kenneth Ockerman asking that the zoning classification of property located on the East side of Farmington Road approximately 400 ft. North of Schoolcraft Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 22 be rezoned from RUFB to P-1. 1[40 Mr. Walker: Is there anyone in the audience who wishes to speak? It was mggested that the vtitioner should first go to the Zoning Board of Appeals in order to get a variance rn the location of his protective wall. The petitioner desires to erect his protective wall on the north line of the P-1 district. The ordinance states the protective wall is to erected between the Commercial and the P-1. 3114 Mr. McCullough stated he would notify the petitioner of this decision. 1r. Walker: This item will be taken under advisement until this has been taken care of. Mr. McCullough: The next item on the agenda is Petition Z-492 by the City Planning Commission to rezone the property located on the North side of Five Mile Road approximately 1050 ft. East of Merriman Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 14 from RUFB to R-lA. These lots are in the Merri-Five Subdivision. Mr. Walker: Is there anyone in the audience who wishes to speak? Mr. McCullough: This petition was initiated in order to correct the zoning map. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Okerstrom, supported by Mr. Cameron, it was #2-39-61 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on Tuesday, February 21, 1961 on Petition Z-492 by the City Planning Commission to rezone the property located on the North side of Five Mile Road approximately 1050 ft. East of Merriman Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 14 from RUFB to R-IA, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition Z-492 be granted for the reason that in doing so this will correct the zoning map, which indicates these lots are zoned commercial when in fact they have new houses erected on them, FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published in the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of February 1, 1961 and notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit Edison Co. , Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. , Michigan Bell Tele- phone Co., The Consumers Power Co. , City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Cameron, Watson, Anderson, Okerstrom and Walker NAYS: None Mr. Walker: The motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Mr. McCullough: The next item on the agenda is Petition Z-494 by the City Planning Commission to determine whether or not to amend sub-section (b) of Section 9.52 of Article 9.00 PS District Regulations so as to require approval of the City Planning Commission for convalescent homes and funeral homes. fIr. Walker: Is there anyone in the audience who wishes to speak? r. McCullough: I would suggest that this item be taken under advisement in order that I may establish some standards in relation to the approval of these two uses. Mr. Walker: This item will be taken under advisement. • 3115 Mr. McCullough: The next item on the agenda is Petition Z-498 by the City Planning Commission to determine whether or not Section 4.45 of Article 4.00 of Ordinance No. 60 should be amended by adding thereto sub-section (b) requiring a cash bond for protective wall or greenbelt. Mr. Walker: Is there anyone in the audience who wishes to speak? Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Okerstrom, supported by Mr. Watson and unanimously adopted, it was #2-40-61 RESOLVED THAT, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on Petition Z-498 submitted by the City Planning Commission to determine whether or not Section 4.45 of Article 4.00 of Ordinance No. 60 should be amended by adding thereto sub-section (b) requiring a cash bond for protective wall or greenbelt, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition Z-498 be granted for the reason that this will provide a method whereby commercial builders can proceed to erect their buildings in spite of the fact that some condition prevents their erecting the protective wall at the same time, and FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was published in the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of February 1, 1961 and notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit Edison Co. , Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. , Michgan Bell Telephone Co. , The Consumers Power Co. , City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. Mr. Walker: The motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Okerstrom, supported by Mr. Anderson, it was #2-41-61 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby adjourn the Public Hearing held on Tuesday, February 21, 1961 at approximately 10:55 p.m. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Cameron, Watson, Anderson, Okerstrom and Walker NAYS: None Mr. Walker: The motion is carried and the public hearing is hereby adjourned. Mr. Walker called the 124th Regular Meeting back to order with all those present now who were present at the time the public hearing was adjourned. Mr. McCullough: The next item on the agenda is a revision of Golfview Meadows Subdivision located in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 17 and the Northwest 1/4 of Section 16, situated on the South side of Six Mile Road approximately 4,000 ft. East of Newburgh between Farmington and Newburgh. Submitted by Donald Gaeke for Frank J. Volk. Preliminary approval granted 5/5/59, extension granted for one year. It was determined by the City Attorney, Mr. C. Forest that because this is a revision of the complete subdivision it would be necessary to hold another public hearing on 3116 it. I: Mr. Walker: This item cannot be acted upon due to the City Attorney's decision. Mr. McCullough: The next item on the agenda is the approval of the minutes for the meeting held on Tuesday, February 7, 1961. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Okerstrom, supported by Mr. Watson and unanimously approved, it was #2-42-61 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby approve the minutes for meeting held on Tuesday, February 7, 1961 except for that member who was not present, he abstain from voting. Mr. Walker: The motion is carried and the foregoing resolution is adopted. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Okerstrom, supported by Mr. Anderson and unanimously adopted, the City Planning Commission does hereby adjourn the 124th Regular Meeting held on Tuesday, February 21, 1961 at approximately 11:05 p.m. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION I[: v-K) ,; J. E. Okerstrom, Secretary ATTESTED: Chari W. Walker, Chairman