Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1958-12-16 • 2316 t: P INUT2S OF THE 98TH REGULAR MEETING AhD A PUBLIC HEARING OF THE CITY PLANNING COi.iMISSION OF THE CITY OF LIVONIA. On December 16, 1958 the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia held a Public Hearing and the 98th Regular Meeting at the Livonia City Hall, 33001 Five Mile Road, Livonia, Michigan. Mr. Robert L. Angevine, Chairman called the public hearing to order at approximately 8:15p.m. Members Present : Dennis Anderson, 1":ilfred Okerstrom, Tilliam R. Robinson, Robert L. Angevine, Charles 'calker, Leonard Kane, Robert Peacock, Robert Greene and . H. Paul Harsha. Mr. David R. Mc Cullough, City Planner, and Mr. Rodney Kropf, Assist- ant City Attorney, were present along with approximately 350 inter- ested persons. Mr. Angevine informed those present that the proposed master pattern had been compiled by a planning consultant during the past two years. A public hearing is being held on certain sections tonight in accord- ance with the re-evaluation of the zoning study in order that the opinions of the property owners could be obtained before any action ir, is taken. For purposes of clarity, he stated further that the proposed parks along the drains as designated on the proposed master pattern was not meant to become public parks but only to designate them so that the flood plain areas of the drain could be controlled. Mr. Angevine stated that the first secticn to be discussed is Section 12 which is bounded by Inkster on the East, Middlebelt on the West, Seven Mile Road on the North and Six Mile Road on the South, and that the major part of this section is proposed to bo R1 presently zoned RUFB. The Southwest j./4 is proposed for R-4 which is Large Area Uses. Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak. Mr. Clarence Goforth, 28221 t' . Seven tile Road objected to any change from C-1 on his property. Mr. Paul Spens, 28515 W. Seven Mile Road, requested the specific change for his property. It was ascertained it would be changed from RUFB to Rl. Mr. Chris Gerges, 10023 mark Twain, Detroit, 27, requested zoning of property on Middlebelt and Clarita, fronting on Middlebelt, and the minimum lots size for said property. It was ascertained this property wa s zoned RUF, minimum lot size, one-half acre. i • 2317 Mr. James T. ''alker, 18615 Foch asked what was the difference be- tween RUF and R1. Mr. Ange vine stated that the lot requirements [ for R1 were small and that in his case, his lot could be split into two lots under the R1 zoning but not the RUF. Hr. Clifford E. Mickelson, 18400 Brentwood, objected to rezoning, felt that it would increase his taxes . Mr. Angevine stated he did not feel the rezoning would have any effect on the taxes. The question was asked what uses are a llowed in the Ri zoning in comparison to RUF. Mr. Angevine stated that in Rl there was no provision for keeping a nimals or truck gardens unless at the time the zoning is changed they are already in effect. After the zoning change to H1 they would be considered as non-conforming. If the RUF uses are discontinued for a year, they would not be allowed thereafter. Mr. Hopper, Pure Oil Company, 3307 29th Street, Detroit, 10, objected to rezoning to C-1 at Middlebelt and Seven Mile Road. Mr. Angevine sta ted that Section 13 which is bounded by Six Mile Road on the north, Five :.tile on the south, Inkster on the east and Middlebelt on the west is the next Section to be discussed. The eastern half of the section is now zoned R1 and will remain. There I: is a small section of H1 in the western half which will remain Hl. The balance of the western half is noir RUF. It is proposed to change this to 111. Mr. Richard Pospeshie, 15906 Oak Drive, objected to rezoning to R1; preferred RUF. Mr. A. Chartrand, 15500 Foch, submitted a letter from the president of the Madison Civic Association, Mr. Frank Mayes, stating their objection to the rezoning and their recommendations as to what changes should be made. Mr. Edward Besemer, 924 Ford Building, Detroit 26, Attorney for Mrs . Leila M. Hosback, Ass Jean H. Hosback a nd Miss Alice Hosback, stated they object to any change from the present zoning, other than C-1 and C-2. Stated further that their property is located on a main thoroughfare, approximately 500 feet from an interesection which lends this property to arcdevelopment. developedCommercial as has been permitted on this particularparcel such. Also felt that to croximatel e the z60fnbased onto r ithetial use forwould devaluate the property app y commercial purposes and that R1T would not fit in with the surround- ing area. Mr. Carl Hall, 28282 Five vIile Road, objected to the removal of the C-1 zoning on his property. Mr. Herman Giovanni, 18613 Patton, objected to change from C-1 to R1. Mrs . Dorothy Bruce, 29218 Broadmoor Avenue, objected to change from • 2318 RUP to R1. Mr. H. Henderson, 16710 Harrison, Park 1“nods Subdivision asked if it was zoned R1 would that mean all lots would be cut down to 60 ft. frontage . Mr. Angevine stated Ri meant that the minimum lot size would be 7200 sq. ft. per lot but that lots could be larger. Mr. Joha L. Frank, 1618 Davis Street, !';yandotte, Michigan,owner of property on Middlebelt and Broadmoor objected to rezoning to R1; recommended C-2 or PS. Mr. Richard Pospeshie, 15906 Oak Drive, restated his objections to the proposed R1 zoning. Mr. Burrell Nelson, 16873 Stanmoor, asked if a property owner owned two or more acres, which makes it a small farm, would the existing uses of RUF be allowed as long as the ownership is not changed? It was ascertained that this was correct. Mr. Angevine stated that the next section opal for discussion was Section 22 which is bounded by Five idle on the north, Farmington on the west, Schoolcraft on the south and Merriman on the east. Stated further that the large a rea of R-3 shown on the master pattern is incorrect, that a subdivision is proposed for that area making it R1. The northwest 1/4 of Section is proposed for CC. I: The eastern half is proposed for Ri. In the southeast 1/4 there is a small area of RUF which is proposed to be rezoned to R1 al- though most of this area will be taken up by the new school. There is also a small area of R-3 South of Five Mile Road and west of Hubbard which exists presently on the present zoning map. Mr. Carl Teicher, 32241 Barkley questioned the R-3 on Hubbard and Five Mile Road. Mr. Angevine stated that the R-3 in this area, as stated before, is on the present zoning map and is not a proposed rezoning. Mr. D. C. Mc Farland, representing Ray m. Petersime, 30627 Shia- wassee Road, Farmington, i,iichigan stated that a portion of the property recently rezoned to CC was not included in the purchase agreement, and asked what would be the proposed zoning for this small section. Requested tha t it remain as it was C-2 or rezone the entire portion to R-3 to conform with the property immediately to the north. Mr. "arren F. Boos, 32153 Meadowbrook objected to any R-3. Several property owners on Meadowbrook voiced their objection also to any R-3 on Hubbard. The question was raised as to how this present R- 3 zoning could be eliminated. Mr. Angevine stated that the property owners of the R-3 were the only ones who could submit their petition to have this property rezoned. He also pointed out two additional methods by which the zoning might be changed. i 2319 Mr. Mayo E. Peterson, 14089 Brookfield, objected to the top soil being stockpiled on Farmington South of Lyndon stating there had been no permit issued for this. Mr. Angevine stated that no permit was necessary unless the topsoil is removed from the land. Mr. Robert Davidson, 14025 Brookfield objected to the R1 zoning proposed. Ivir. Robert Muichi, 15030 Fairfield objected to the present R-3 zoning. The question was raised whether or not there would he another public hearing before any 'definite changes were made. Mr. Angevine stated that action clan be taken without another public hearing based on the proposed master pattern but that the Council would have a public hearing before they take action. Mr. Gordon L. Bassett, 14111 Brookfield, suggested that the Plan- ning Commission restudy the R-3 zoning on Hubbard. Mr. Wade, 31587 Five Mile Road, objected to any R-3 in Section 22; suggested R1 where the present R-3 is designated. Mrs . Dorothy Bruce asked if any of the master pattern had been pass- ed based on any of the previous public hearings for other sections. Mr. Angevine stated that a number of recommendations had been for- warded to the Council from t. e first public hearing. Mr. Bill Carter, 32230 Barkley, stated he was speaking for himself, in relation to the R-3 to his property. Stated that there was a need for R-3 in Livonia especially when the new hospitals and schools are opened.Suggested that the zoning ordinance for R-3 requirements be revised so that they are the best possible multiple dwellings, and that this can be accomplished by writing into the ordinance the amount of set back, the density of the apartments, proper sewage, etc. Mr. Angevine stated that the planning commission has revised the zoning ordinance in relation to R-3 requirements. Mr . George W. Harris, 31531 Summers, stated he objected to R-3 in relation to the added burden on the present sewers a nd schools. Mr. Angevine stated that if the sewers are not available, the de- velopers of the R-3 cannot receive a building permit. Mr. Angevine stated that the next section to be discussed was Section 23 bounded on the north by Five Mile Road, on the West by Merriman Road, on the South by Schoolcraft and on the East by Middlebelt Road. Mr. Jack Spanich, 30865 Five Mile Road objected to the proposed rezoning from M-1 to R-1. Asked how the existing businesses will • 2320 be taken care of in the event that the proposed rezoning is ap- proved. Mr. Angevine stated if the Commission decided to rezone as shown on the ma ster pattern, the existing business will remain as non- conforming uses but wanted to state now that there is nothing official about the proposed rezoning at this time. If it is rezones to R-1, the property owner would not be permitted to enlarge his business. Mr. Stanley Bare, 12084 Gallagher, Hamtramck, Michigan stated his objection to rezoning his property from C-2 to 111. Mr. Glenn Gianes , 15034 Bainbridge, objected to R1 rezoning, suggest- ed C-1 or C-2. Mr. R. J. Peterson, 30226 Hoy, representing Green Acres Subdivision stated that 90% of the subdivision was in complete agreement and objected violently to the R1 rezoning proposed in their area and stated further they wish it to remain RUF. These objections will be submitted to the Planning Commission. Mr. James P. Hose y, 14954 Flamingo, objected to the propsed R1 zoning. Mr. Samuel Peterson, 30952 Schoolcraft, objected to proposed rezoning. Mr. Arnold Nielsen, 14768 Bainbridge, objected to the proposed R1 I: rezoning. Mr. John Lauerman, Jr., 14860 Bainbridge, objected to the proposed rezoning. Mr. J. Mc Leisch, 31660 Myrna, stated he objected to any rezoning from the present RUF zoning. Mr. Angevine stated that the next section for discussion was Section 24 bounded on the North of Five Mile Road, on the South by School- craft Road, on the ast by Inkster Road and on the Vvest by Middle- belt Road. Mr. Leonard Kane, w as excused from the remainder of the meeting at approximately 10 :30 p.m. Mr. Chas. Brown, 29239 Oriole Dr. , objected to the street Brentwood running north from Schoolcraft because of the traffic caused by the Race track south of Schoolcraft. It was ascertained that the Fire Department had insisted upon this street because of the fire hazard which would exist if it was not located where it is. The question was asked if the land is already platted what effect would this rezoning have on it. It was determined that it would not have any effect on the platted land but that the owners of said property could petition to Ifrave it replatted. Mrs. Lois Smith, 27601 Five Mile Road asked what would happen to 'liar 2321 property 165' x 6001 if it was rezoned to Rl. Mr. Angevine stated that she could divide her property if she wanted to but that she did not have to reduce it to the minimum of 7200 sq. ft. The re- zoning to R1 meant that the 7200 sq.ft. was the minimum of the future lot sizes. Mr. Lester Rausseau, 29131 Jacquelyn Dr. , objected to the rezoning of C-2 to R-3 on the Northeast corner of Middlebelt and Schoolcraft, stating that the R-3 would not enhance the value of the property. Mr. Angevine stated that the next section to be discussed was the South half of Section 15, the north half having had a public hearing on October 7, 1958. This half was bounded by Five Mile Road on the South, Merriman on the East a nd Farmington on the West. It w as proposed to change this to R1 zoning other than half of the Southwest 1/4 which is to remain RUF. Dr . G. %vin, 32320 Five Mile Road, IJIr. Chas. Michaels, 15436 Ingram Mr. Wallace Davis, 13544 Turner, Detroit 38, Mr. H. Klei, 19206 Littlefield, Detroit, objected to any rezoning from the commercial to the residential. Mr. J. Mc Leisch, objected the rezoning from RUF to R1. Mr. J. Ran- dall, 32032 Myrna, objected to any change in the section. Mr. Fred Kemp, 15531 Westmore, questioned the zoning on Westmore and Farmington Road. Mrs. L. LaBar, 15315 Shadyside suggested that the PS be continued from Farmington to Hubbard instead of stopping at Fairfield and that Shadyside is not a dead end street as shown on master pattern. Mr. Angevine stated that the next section to be discussed is the south half of Section 14 which is bounded by Merriman on the 1i°est, Middlebelt on the East and Five t.lile Road on the South. The question was raised if the proposed master pattern means that the C-2 area will be removed from Five Mile Road. Mr. Angevine stated as it is proposed on the master pattern that was correct. Mr. H. Stram, 31110 Wentworth, objected to the rezoning in the South half of Section 14. There were no other comments from the audience at which time Mr. Angevine stated that item would be taken under advisement for further study. Mr. Mc Cullough announced that the next item on the agenda was the proposed Kimberly Oaks Estates Subdivision submitted by G. H. Pastor of the G. H. Pastor Development Company, located on the East side of Farmington Road on the North and South sides of Lyndon Avenue in the Northwest and Southwest 1/4 of Section 22. This is part of the Delta-Livonia Subdivision. . 2322 t3Mr. H. Pastor and Mr. J. Canham were present. Mr. Mc Cullough sub- mitted a letter dated December 12, 1958 from the Police Department a letter dated December 12, 1958 from the Bureau of Inspection, a letter dated December 16, 1958 from the Fire Department and a letter dated December 15, 1958 from the County Road Commissioners, and letter dated October 14, 1958 from the Parks & Recreation de- partment. Mr. Harsha, Chairman of the Plat Committee, objected to the plat not showing the surrounding property, stated that the cul-desacs shown on the plat were really eye-brows also that 55' frontage was allowed only on cul-de-sacs . Mr. Robinson concurred with Mr . Harsha. Mr. Harsha further stated that the Master Thoroughfare Plan would have to be amended because of the curve in Lyndon Road as shown on plat . Mr. Angevine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak either in favor oropposed to proposed subdivision. A question was raised a bout a number of lots having 55 ' frontage. It wa s ascertained that they would be all increased to 60' frontage. A property owner whose property fronts on Brookfield objected to the proposed subdivision with homes backing onto their property. C Mr. Pastor stated that the property backing the subdivision and fronting on Brookfield was now owned by the Archdiocese of Detroit and tha t a Catholic Church is contemplated for this area. It was determined that there would be only one lot fronting on Brook- field and backingto the proposed subdivision, which lot was owned by Mrs. Gentry, }251 Brookfield. It was pointed out by Mr. Robinson and Mr. Okerstrom that Loveland should be straightened out as much as possible at its beginning. Mr. 7a iker stated he felt that if the petitioner complies with the suggestions of the Planning Commission that action could be taken tonight. Mr. Canham asked that the recommendations of the Planning Commission be listed in order tha t they could follow them. 1. Frontage on eye-brows should be 6O' and not 55 ' 2. Straighten out Loveland Drive where it intersects with Grennada Avenue. 3. Have the Post Office designate the end and beginning of Barkley as it curves into ' estmore Drive. 4. Continue Loveland Drive to the proposed Civic Center Park 5. That all lots be of 60' frontage. [I 6. That the Master Thoroughfare Plan of the City of Livonia be subsequently amended so as to relocate the centerline of Lyndon Avenue in accordance with a description pre- viously supplied by the petitioner. 2323 7. That the plat shall indicate pedestrian crosswalks in those blocks which are in excess of 800 feet in length until such time as the Subdivision Rules and Regulations are amended to modify this requirement. 8.. That certain streets be changed to conform to the alignment of existing streets and subject to approval by the City Planner 9. That the plat as presented be amended to show the size of wa ter mains and gate wells . Mr. Anderson stated he felt that this item should be taken under advisement until the foregoing recommendations were followed. Mr. Robinson stated he could like to poll the Commission whether or not to amend our Subdivision Rules and Regulations to allow 55' lots on Cul-de-sacs. AYES : Peacock, Walker, Greene, Harsha, Robinson and Angevine NAYS : Anderson Okerstrom Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Walker, supported by Mr. Robinson, it was #12- -58 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on Tuesday, December 16, 1958, the City Planning Commission does hereby give approval to the preliminary plat of Kimberly Oaks Estates Subdivision located in the Northwest and Southwest 1/4 of Section 22 subject however to the following conditions : (1) That the Master Thoroughfare Plan of the City of Livonia be subsequently amended so as to relocate the centerline of Lyndon Avenue in accordance with a discription previously supplied by the petitioner: (2) That the plat shall indicate pedestriancrosswalks in ' those blocks which are in excess of 800 feet in length until such time as the Subdivision Rules and Regulations are amended to modify this requirement. (3) That certain street names be changed to conform to the alignment of existing streets and subject to the approv- al of the City Planner. (L}) That the plat as presented be amended to show the size of water mains and gote wells (5) That the frontage on eye-brows should be 60' and not 55' (6) That Loveland Drive should be straightened out where it intersects with Grennada Avenue. (7) That the Post Office should designate the end and beginning of Barkely Avenue a s it curves into West- more Drive. (8) That Loveland Drive should continue to the proposed Civic Center Park. (9) That all lots have 60 ' frontage 2324 FURTH"-R RESOLVED, notice of the a bove hearing was sent to the abutting property owners, proprietor, City Depart- ments as listed in the Proof of Service and copies of the plat together with notice having been sent to the Building Department, Superintendent of Schools, Fire De- partments, Police Department, Parks & Recreations Depart- ment and Members of the Plat Committee . There was a brief discussion on the foregoing resolution, a s to what the width of the service drives should be on the eyebrows . Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Walker, it was, #12-383-58 RLSOLVED that, the foregoing proposed resolution be amended to set a prevailing width of 30 ' right-of-way with 25t pavement for the service drives . A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the follow- ing: AYES: Peacock, ' alker, Greene, Harsha, Anderson, Okerstrom, Robinson, and Angevine NAYS: None The Chairman declared that the a mendment to the proposed resolu- tion is adopted. Mr. Anderson asked if an amendment should be made on whether or not the Commission is going to allow 551 frontage on eyebrows. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. ''calker, and supported by Mr. Robinson and unanimously adopted, it was #12-384-58 RESOLVED that, the foregoing proposed resolution be again amended to waive the 60' lot width on the eyebrows in the eastern section of the proposed plat of the Kimber- ly Oaks estate s ubdivision In view of the foregoing resolutions #12-383-58 and ##12-384-58 amending Mr. "a iker 's previous motion, ;Yir. 11'alker revised his original motion, which was supported by ivir. Robinson, and was #12-385-58 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on Tuesday, December 16, 1958, the City Planning Commission does hereby give approval to the prelimin- ary plat of Kimberly Oaks Estates Subdivision located in the Northwest and Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, be- cause the preliminary plat meets ' ith all City require- ments as w ell as the proposed Master Pattern of land use for the a rea, subject, however, to the following conditions : (l)that the Master Thoroughfare Plan of the City of Livonia be subsequently amended so as to relocate the center line of Lyndon Avenue in accordance with a description previously supplied by the Petitioner; • 2325 (2) that the plat shall indicate pedestrian crosswalks in those blocks which are in excess of 800 feet in length until such time as the Subdivision Rules a nd Regulations are amended to modify this requirement; (3) that certain street names be changed to conform to the alignment of existing streets and subject to the approval of the City Planner; (4) that the plat as presented be amended to show the size of water mains and gate valves; (5) that the frontage of 60 ft. required on Lot #203 • be waived in the eastern section of the proposed plat; (6) that Loveland Drive should be straightened out where it intersects with Grannada Avenue; (7) that the Post Office designate the end and begin- ning of Barkley avenue as it curvss into Westmore Drive; (8) that Loveland Drive continue to the proposed Civic Center Park north of the Subdivision; (9) that all other lots have a minimum frontage of 6o feet. (10) that service drives have a prevailing width of 30 feet right-of-way with 25 ft. pavement. FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was sent 1[ to the abutting property owners, proprietor, City De- partments as listed in the Proof of Service, and copies of the plat toGether with notice having been sent to the Building Department, Superintendent of Schools, Fire Department, Parks & Recreation Department and Members of the Plat Committee. A roll call vote on the foregoing amended resolution resulted in the following: AYES : Peacock, "7alker, Greene, Harsha, Okerstrom, Robinson and Angevine NAYS: Anderson The Chairman declared the foregoing resolution is adopted and the preliminary plat of Kimberly Oaks Estates Subdivision is hereby approved subject to conditions as listed. Mr. Mc Cullough announced the next item on the agenda was proposed Idyl Wyld Estates Subdivision submitted by John F. Uznis Builders Inc. , located on the South side of Five Mile Road Approximately 1300 ft. East of Levan in the Northeast 1/LE of Section 20. Mr. John Uznis was present . Mr. Harsha stated that no action could be taken on ppoposed plat because the rezoning had not become official as yet, but that the plat appeared to be satisfactory. Mr. Mc Cullough stated that the S chool Board had informed him . 2326 that they refuse to pave any portion of streets adjacent to School 4 Board property. Mr. Greene and Mr. Harsha were excused at 12:35 a.m.. There was no one in the audience who wished to speak either in favor or opposed to proposed subdivision. The Chairman declared that this item would oe taken under advise- ment until the rezoning is official . Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Peacock, supported by Lir. Anderson and unanimously adopted, it was #12-386-58 RESOLVED that this Public Hearing is hereby adjourned at 12:40 a.m. Wednesda y, December 17, 1958 Mr. Angevine called the 98th Regular Meeting to order with all those present w ho were present at the close of the Public Hearing. Mr. Mc Cullough announced the next item on the agenda was the pro- posed Pearson's Industrial Subdivision located west of Stark Road approximately 250 feet north of the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway in the Northea st and Northwest 1/4 of Section 28, submitted by Fred P. Pearson, Public Hearing November 11, 19589 taken 'under. advise. meat; study meeting November 25, 1958. Expiration date, December 28, 1958. Mr. Pearson was present. It was stated that the plat could not be approved for less than 100 ' frontage lots. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Walker, supported by Mr. Peacock, it was #12-387-58 RESOLVED, that pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on Tuesday, November 11, 1958 the City Plan- ning Commission does hereby deny approval to the pre- liminary plat of the proposed Pearson' s Industrial Sub- division located in the Northeast and Northwest 1/4 of Section 28 for the reason that it would further land- lock the adjoining property, property does not have proper drainage and further, that it does not comply with Section 3.02 and 4.02 (g) of the Subdivision Rules and Regulations of the City of Livonia. FURTHER RESOLVLD, notice of the above hearing was sent to the abutting property owhers, proprietor, City Depart- ments as listed in the Proof of Service and copies of the plat together with notice having been sent to the Build- ing Department, Superintendent of Schools, Fire Department, EPolice Department and Members of the Plat Committee. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: r , 2327 AYES: Peacock, walker, Robinson, Angevine, Okerstrom, and 1: Anderson NAYS: None The Chairman declared the motion is carried and that the proposed Pearson's Industrial Subdivision is denied. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Peacock and unanimously adopted, it was #12_388-58 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby give approval to Mr. Albe Munson's statement in the amount of 'c39.50 and that it be forwarded to the proper department for payment. A roll callvote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Peacock, Walker, Robinson, Angevine, Okerstro:ii and Anderson NAYS: None The Chairman declared the motion is carried and resolution is adopted. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Walker, s upp orted by Mr. Anderson, and unanimously adopted, it was #12-389-58 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby give approval to The Livonian's Statement in the amount of X34.00 and that it be forwarded to the proper depart- ment for payment . The Chairman declared the foregoing resolution is adopted. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Peacock, supported by Mr. Robinson and unanimously adopted, the 98th Regular Meeting of the City Planning Commission is hereby duly adjourned at approximately 12:55 a.m. Wednesday, December 17, 1958. William R. Robinson, Sec. Robert L. Ang ine, Chairman I: 1