Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1958-11-11 r F A 2256 OF T;IL 98TH >PT. CIr.L i-ir� �TIPdG .ND : PUSIIC H2,f1:LINC OF THE CITY PLANNING IG COi'14iI,MON OF TH ; CITY OF LIVOFIt On November 11, 1958, the City Planninr Commission of the City of Livonia held a Public Hearing and the 9th Special Meeting at the Livonia City Hall, 33001 Five file Road, Livonia, iiichigan. Mr. H. Paul Harsha, Vice-Chairman called the meeting to order at approximately $:10 p.m. in the absence of lir. Angevine, Chairman. Members Present: H. Paul Marsha, Tilliam R. Robinson, Charles T:alker, Robert Peacock and Leonard Kane and Dennis Anderson Members absent : Robert L. Angevine, Robert L. Greens, 'ilfred Okerstrom Mr. David Tic Cullough, City Planner and ix. Rodney Kroff, Asst City Attorney were present along with 75 interested persons. Mr. Harsha informed t ose present that Item J., Petition M-137 by Howard J. Echrlichman requesting permission to erect an over- size sign, moving it from another location in order to be able to make use of the sign to 27416 ': . Mc Nichols on the northwest corner of i!lc Nichols Road between Inkster and Dolores Drive in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 12 , had been withdrawn. Mr. Mc Cullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition M-133 by 'lilliam Haftka reouesting permission to operate a dry cleaning plant using noninflammable fluids at 27466 Schoolcraft on the Forth side of Schoolcraft between Inkster and Cardwell in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 24. Mr. Mc Cullough stated that the signatures recuired under the ordinance had been submitted too late for verification. Mr. Cheng C. Li, 27501 Buckingham Road, stated he owned property adjoining the proposed dry cleaning plant and did not sign a letter approving of it because he wasn't sure what type of cle'ninq plant this would be, and what specific kind of solvent would be used. Understood that a twenty horsepower boiler would be used which he felt would constitute a chemical plant rather than a cleaning p1 nt. Unless this information can be had, felt he could not approve of this establishment . Mr. Haftka stated that he had spoken to i•Ir. Li previously and that the solvent to be used will be noninflammable and is called perc-ethylene. This particular type of solvent is used in every synthetic dry cleaning plant in the country. It has to pass the State laws. There is no odor. The health department has approved it. Stated further that the boiler will be 10 horsepower and not 20. There was no danger in connection with the boiler as it is 2256 completely automatic with an electronic eye in the event that the boiler should fail, it would automatically disconnect. It was determined that this would not be a central plant for other stores. Mr. ',Talker stated that he understands that the ordinance hasn't been complied with in relating to accuiring the necessary signatures of property owners. Mr. Robinson stated that approval could be granted subject to petitioner complying with the re- quirements of the ordinance. Upon a motion duly made by Er. Kane, supported by 1Ir. Robinson, it was 11-332-5$ R1_;3 L,D that , pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on Tuesday, November 11, 1958, the City Planning Commission does hereby grant petition M-138 of ',Mien Haftka, reruesting permission to operate a dry cleaning plant using noninflammable fluids subject to petitioner complying with the requirements of the ordinance and acquiring the necessary signatures of the property owners , and FURTi; R R:,SOLVED, notice of the above hearing was sent to property owners within 500 feet, petitioner and City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. A roll call vote on the f oreroing resolution resulted in the follow- ing: AYLS : Peacock, Kane, Valker, Ro'Anson and Harsha NAY3 : None The Chairman declared the motion is carried and petition is granted subject to complying with ordinance. Iir. Cullough announced the next item on the agenda was the proposed Lillian Hocking Subdivision located on the Southeast oorner of Middlebelt and Bretton Roads in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 1, submitted by Aaron L. Karabelnick, Carey Homes Inc . , Mr. Karabel- nick, pr-sent. Mr. Mc Cullough submitted letters from Bureau of Inspection dated November 7, 195$ the Claranceville Public schools dated November 6, 195$ anfrom the Livonia Fire Department dated November 6, 1958. Mr. Harsha stated the Plat Committee did not have any objections to the proposed plat. Mr. Mc Cullough asked about the Lots 2 and 3 backing up to Lot No. 1. Mr. Robinson stated that most of the homes on Middlebelt were facing 1'°:iddlebelt rather than the side 2257 streets but felt that the proposed plat was more desirable as is. Mr. Dixon, 29204 3retton objected to lots being smaller thTn 75' . Mr. Harsha informed lIr. Dixon that the size of the lots ran from 65' to 74' in width and 125' to 190' in depth; stated also that this area had been rezoned to R1A which has a minimum lot size of 7200 Sq. ft. and that these lots fill these requirements . Mr. Letourneau, 29150 3retton inquired as to how many lots of the 5 would face :3retton. Mr. Harsha stated 4 lots face 3retton with 1 on Middlebelt. Mr. Harsha asked Er. Dixon and Er. Letourneau if they would like to come up front and examine the proposed plat. After examining plat, Mr. Dixon, stated he had no objection. Mr. Anderson arrived at $:30 p.m. Mr. Peacock stated he felt that Lots 2 and. 3 should be made to face Middlebelt also. Mr. Harsha stated it was felt by the Plat Committee that it would make it more undesirable having the houses face iliddlebelt because of the traffic on Middlebelt and also it would make Lot 4 have three back yards facing the side of it. Upon a motion duly made by iir. Robinson, supported by Mr. Kane, it was x;11-33-58 RLSOIVED that , pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on Tuesday, November 11, 195$ the City Planning Commission does hereby give approval . to the preliminary plat of the Lillian Hocking Subdivision located on the Southeast corner of Pliddlebelt and Bretton Roads in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 1, and FURTHIR RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing .as sent to the abutting property owners, proprietor, City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service and copies of the Plat together with notice having been sent to the Building Dept. , Superintendent of Schools, Fire Department , Police Department, Parks & Recreation Department and members of the Plat Committee . A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES : Peacock, Kane, Walker, Anderson, Robinson and Harsha NAYS : None I: The Chairman declared the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Mc Cullough announced the next item on the agenda was the pro- 225$ posed Livonia Meadows Subdivision No. 2 located on the South side of Curtis approximately 450 ft. west of Inkster in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 12 submitted by Ed. Rose & Son, Mr. Jacobson, representing developer, Ed Rose & Son, was present. Mr. Mc Cullough submitted letter dated november 11, 1958 from the Department of Parks & Recreation which designated area in proposed subdivision as a park site. A letter dated November 7, 195$ was submitted from the Bureau of Inspection and alsoa letter dated November 7, 195$ from the Fire Department. It was determined that there was a school site presently located adjacent to the proposed subdivision. There was no one in the audience who wish to speak in favor or opposed to subdivision. Mr. Jacobson stated he had anticipated the question of the park site being designated on the area for the proposed subdivision, At the time that the Livonia Meadows Subdivision had been platted in 1955 the Planning Commission had attempted to be ofan assistance in helping the school and park commissions to accuire the sites in this area. In 1956 not having been able to come to an agreement a plat was submitted over platting both the school and park site. Later another plat was submitted for approval, providing for a school and park site. Mr. Kropf, Ass't. City attorney, was excused to see if the council, who were holding a meeting in the Council Chambers, could verify if this park site was still needed. Mr. Jacobson read an excerpt from a copy of City Planning Commission' s minutes for the meeting held in Lay, 1956. Mr. Robinson stated he wished to object to delaying the meeting by reading minutes that were on record and wish to state this for the record. Stated further that the City Planning Commission has no jurisdiction on the matter of purchasing the park site, and that he was in favor of tabling this item until the Mr. Kropf, Assistant Attorney returns from the Council Chambers with the Council' s decision. Mr. Jacobson asked if he could continue for one more page. Mr. FIarsha stated he would be allowed to if he would cut it down. Mr. Jacobson stated that it had been the feeling of the commission that a three months period of waiting was adequate for a decision in May, 1956, and that action should be taken now since nothing has been done in rel^tion to purchasing said site for a park. Mr. l:.alker inquiredas to the ingress and egress of this proposed plat because Curtis is not cut through. Mr. Jacobson stated that some 'arrangement would be made to gravel Curtis i„:ithin the subdivision lines, so as to come in from Arcola and Cavell Streets. Mr. J. Salvadore , Councilman, arrived and stated that at present the city did not have the money to purchase proposed park sites 2259 but that a new proposal was being prepared for an election in February in order to designate and purchase park sites, including the proposed park site in the area of the proposed Livonia Meadows Subdivision , 2. Mr. Jacobson stated ti-.at they had made every effort to negotiate the selling of this property for a park site since it had been designated in 1954 and because of this they hadn't been able to plat for almost five years. Mr. Salvadore stated he could only speak for the Council and that they have indicated that it be designated as a park until February. Mr. Jacobson objected to this parcel being designated forsn long a period without action being; taken. Mr. Robinson stated he objected to this delay, that this discussion had no relation to the subject on the agenda. Mr. Anderson stated that the Cul-de-sac was too long under the requirements of the subdivision regulations. Mr. Harsha stated this item would be taken under advisement. Mr. Jacobson stated he wished to ask for the record when this item will be taken care of since the only objection to the proposed plat was the designated park site . Mr. Harsha stated another objection was the long cul-de-sac as mentioned before which could be a reasonfor denial but that it would be taken under advisement for discussion at a study meeting. Mr. Kropf informed ill-. Jacobson that the City Planning Commission would have to take action within the 60 days. Mr. Mc Cullough announced the next item on the agenda was the pro- posed Pearson' s Industrial Subdivision located west of Stark Road approximately 250 feet north of the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway in the Northeast and Northwest 1/4 of Section 2$, submitted by Fred P. Pearson, Mr. Fred Pearson was present. Mr. Mc Cullough submitted letters dated November 7, 195$ from the Fire Department, dated November 10, 195$ from the Bureau of Inspect- ion. Mr. Harsha, Chairman of the Plat Committee stated there were several questions pertaining to the proposed plat. No area plan and no contours of the property had been submitted; on a dead end street, the block should not be longer than 400 ft. ; the turn-around should I: be temporarily moved closer to Gtark Road until industry is in; a dedication of a lot will be necessary for a future north-south sty reet to the proposed industrial road; the street should have a name and also the subdivision; not sufficient room to park since the side yards of the proposed lots can not be used for parking; 2260 Section 4.06 of Subdivision Regulations states that industrial blocks should be no less than 2$0 feet in width. Mr. Harsha also stated that the cuestion arises as to perculation tests in this area, since the sewers are not available and septic tanks will have to be used and that perculation tests were not available at this time; questioned also whether there was sufficient room on the 60 ft. lot to put in any paved area for parking at the rear of the plants and would there be sufficient room for drainage field for the septic tanks. Mr. Talker stated he concurred with Mr. Harsha andalso stated that on the Master Pattern this area is designated M-2 and cuestioned the size of the lots _for M-2 businesses. Statedthat with all the questions raised toni -ht in reltion to the subdivision, felt that action could not be taken until plat was changed. Mr. Mc Cullough asked if it would. be necessary for Mr. Pearson to dedicate a full 60 ft. for a street inasmuch as the property owner north of him would use it too. Stated also that the Fire Department had requested a 60 ft. width street. Mr. Anderson asked if this subdivision canbe subdivided with a half street. Mr. Robinson stated it could. The lots are narrow but that two lots could be purchased. Felt that most important was the dis- posal of the water, that it was the obligation of the Commission to see there is adecuate drainage. Mr. Pearson stated there were two drains on his property for drain- age, and that when approval is given to plat his engineers would draw up the plans showing the grade and contours. Mr. Harsha asked Er. Robinson to read Section 4.06 of the Subdivision Rules and Regulations. Mr. Mc Cullough asked ir. Pearson if he would be willing to put the dead end street closer to Stark Road rather than the full length of the property as shown on plat. Mr. Anderson asked why not plat just ten lots for the present time. Mr. Harsha temporarily left the meeting at 9.00 p.m. Mr. ',Talker assurqed the Chair as Chairman. Mr. Walker asked Er. Pearson if he wouldamend his plat for approval with only ten lots. Mr. Harsha returned at 9;05 p.m. and continued as Chairman. Mr. Anderson stated he ',ould prefer that plat comply with ordinance before action is taken. Mr. Cullough asked Ir. Pearson if he would be willing to plat approximately 400 ft. of the proposed plat and then some time later return for the remainder of the plat. Mr. Pearson stated he would. 2261 Mr. Harsha asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak. Mr. Beverly Pool, 12837 Stark Road, stated he had no objection to this plat but felt that there should be sufficient off-street park- ing. Mr. Harsha stated that under the ordinance they would have to pro- vide off-street parking before a building permit would be issued. Mr. J. Vanzo, 12066 Boston Post Road objected to any waste water from the proposed industrial subdivision being disposed of through the county drain. Er. Robinson stated only storm water tould flow into the drain. Er. Harsha stated they could not run waste into an open ditch. Mr. Vanzo stated he objected to the drain not being tiled,that it was very dangerous to Children in the springg when it becomes filled up. Stated they have been trying for some time to get the ditch tiled by the County but the County states the City of Livonia should tile it . Mr. "alker stated that he felt this item should be taken under advise- ment because of the many questions unanswered. Mr. Harsha stated this item would be taken under advisement for further study. Mr. Talker was excused at 9;15 p.m. Upon a motion duly made by hr. Kane, supported by hr. Robinson, it was ,'=11-334-5$ RE OLVED that this Public Hearing is hereby duly ad- journed at approximately 9:16 p.m. AYES: Peacock, Kane, Anderson, Robinson and Harsha NAYS: None NOT VOTING: ''alker(Excused earlier) The chairman declared the motion is carried and public hearing is hereby adjourned. Mr. Harsha declared a ten minute recess at 9: 17 p.m. The Chairman called the 98th Special Meeting to order at approx- imately 9:25 p.m. with all those present at the Public Hearing present now. Mr. Mc Cullough announced the next item on the agenda was a letter from Slavik Builders , Inc. , requesting an extension of six months of the preliminary approval granted December 3 , 1957 on Burton Hollows Subdivision No. 3 located on the South side of Six Mile Road an,proximately 2,975 ft. rest of Farmington Road in the North- west 1/4 of Section 16. Mr. S. Slavik was present. 2262 I I Hr. Mc Cullough asked 1_r. Slavik if he would amend his re^uest for one year instead of six months. Mr. Slavik stated he would. Upon a motion duly made by FIr. lobinson, supported by Mr. Kane and unanimously adopted, it was ;;11-335-58 R: SOLV D that requedt t.ted November 3 , 1958 from Slavik builders for an extension of six months on the preliminary approval granted December 3, 1957 on Burton Hollows Subdivision No. 3 in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 16 be verbally amended to request for a one year extension and to grant said recuest. Mr. Harsha declared the motion is carried and recuest is granted for a one year extension. Mr. Mc Cullough announced the next item on the agenda was a letter dated October 28, 1958 from Frazer & Popkin requesting an extension of time of the preliminary approval granted November 5 , 1957 for the Glenbrook Colony Subdivision located approximately 300 ft. -4 ,st of Fitzgerald Avenue between Pembrooke Avenue and Seven mile Road in the South 1/2 of Section 5. Ho one present from Frazer & Popkin. I: Upon a motion duly made by r. ' lker, supported by Mr. Peacock and unanimously adopted, it was X11-336-58 RESOLVED that, recuest of October 28, 1958 for a one year extension on preliminary approval granted for the Glenbrook Colony Subdivision in the South 1/2 of Section 5, is hereby granted. Mr. Marsha declared the motion is carried and recuest is granted for a one year extension. lir. Mc Cullough announced the next item on the agenda was the pro- posed Midas Subdivision submitted by Nat Rosenberg, located South of Five Mile Road approximately 1000 ft. west of Ashurst Road in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 21. Public hearing June 3 , 1958, item taken under advisement until revisedplans are submitted. Two 90 day waivers signed, expiration date January 21, 1959. No one present representing petitioner. The Commission examined the revised plat. Mr. gym. Barlow, 14875 Fairlane objected to the revised plat. Stated at the public hearing for the first plat submitted, a road had been shown running next to his property. I: This plat designate four lots backing up to his property. Objected to the change because his picture window vo uld face the back yards of the four lots. 2263 Mr. iic Cullou�h stated that the blocks in the subdivision were over 1 r 800' in width; no contours were shown, the direction of the house on Lot 1 was not shown; the lengths of Lots 11 and 12 were not shown; Koloff' s plat adjoining proposed Midas Subdivision has siding on Henry, those proposed on Midas face Henry; Lots 53 , 54, and 59 and 60 might face unnamed street , also Lots 36, 37, 38, and 39; plat does not include names of street and the street running from Five Mile to Lyndon may encourage through traffic. Mr. Robinson stated that Lots 55 and 57 should front on Fairlane. Mr. 'Walker stated that since the approval of the plat as it is presented tonight would prove a hardship on Mr. & irs. Barlow, thought it might be wise to study this at a study meeting and to invite Mr. & Mrs. Barlow to the meeting for the discussion. Also suggested that a set back be established for the new homes so that they will conform with the set back of the existing residents. Mir. Harsha stated this item would be taken under further advisement . Mr. Mc Cullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition V-38 by ':William P. Lindhout on behalf of the Livonia hethodist Church asking to vacate alley located between Woodring and Loveland, running east and west , approximately 100 ft. South of Seven Mile Road in the Northwest 1/4 of section 10. Public hearing October 21, 1958, item taken under advisement. Mr. I.Ic Cullough submitted a letter dated November 3 , 1958 from the Department of Public ''orks stating that the east 129.57 feet of alley will not require an easement but that they recommend that the estab- lishment of a 20 foot easement for the west 141.0 feet of the va- cating alley will be necessary. A letter dated October 23 , 1958 was also submitted, from property owners of Lots 370-373 inclusive and Lot 374 which stated their favoring the proposed vacating of alley. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Kane, it was # 11-337-58 RESOLVTO that , pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on October 21, 1958, on Petition V-38 as submitted by llilliam P. Lindhout on behalf of Livonia Methodist Church for the vacating of alley located between ', 00d- ring and Loveland, running east and west, approximate- ly 100 ft. South of Seven Mile Road in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 10, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition V-38 be granted and that an easement be created in the area as indicated by the Department of Public ',orks and the Detroit Edison Company, and .. - • :� r. .1 .. ~•. ` t. i t. I. + , it 2264 FURTHER RL_OLVLD, notice of the above hearing was pub- lished in the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of October 2, 195$ and notice of which hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Company, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. , Michigan Bell Telephone Co. , The Consumers Power Co. , City Departments, petitioner and abutting property owners as listed in the Proof of Service. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted inthe follow- ing: AYES: Peacock, Kane, -alker, Anderson, Robinson and Harsha NAYS: None The Chairman declared the foregoing resolution is adopted. Mr. Mc Cullough announced the next item on the agenda was the pro- posed Carey Homes Estates Subdivision submitted by George Karabenick of Carey Homes, Inc. , located on the Southwest corner of Brookfield Road and Perth Street in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22. Public Hearing October 2$, 1958, item taken under advisement. Nr. Karabenick present. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Walker, it was :11-338-58 RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on October 2$, 1958, the City Planning Commission does hereby deny approval to preliminary plat of the Carey Homes Estates Subdivision located on the South- west corner of Brookfield Road and Perth Street in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22 for the reason that the petitioner has failed to follow the Subdivision Rules and Regulations of the City of Livonia, and FURTHER Rd,SOLV�D, notice of the above hearing was sent to the abutting property owners, proprietor, City De- partments as listed in the Proof of Service and copies of the plat together with notice having been sent to the Building Department, Superintendent of Schools, Fire Department, Police Department, Parks & Recreation Department and members of the Plat Committee. Mr. Karabenick asked in what respect did the plat not comply with the subdivision regulations, Mr. P-ic Cullough stated that the plat does not show contours and that a plat with a dead end street in excess of 427 ft. could not be approved. I: A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the follow- ing: AYES: Peacock, `:'alker, Anderson, Robinson and Harsha NAYS: Kane 2265 The Chairman declared the foregoing resolution is adopted and Carey Homes Estates Plat has been denied. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson supported by Mr. "alker, it was 41-339-58 R'.,SOLVLD that , the statement from Er. Albe kriunson in the amount of s 77.00 is hereby approved and will be forwarded to the proper department for payment. AYJS: Peacock , Kane, Talker, Anderson, Robinson and Harsha NAYS : None The Chairman declared the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Mc Cullough announced the next item on the agenda was Petition Z-319 by the City Planning Commission on its own motion to hold a public hearing to determine whether or not to amend Sections 10.02 and 11.02 of the Ordinance No. 60, as amended, entitled, "Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia". Public Hearing October 28, 1958, item taken under advisement. Study meeting November 4, 1958. Upon a motion duly made by Kane, it was X111- -58 R!SOLVED that, the City Planning Commission on its own motion to hold a public hearing to determine whether or not to amend Petition Z-319 with the following amend- ments: (a) a gasoline service station shall not be located nearer than 500 feet to a school, church, public park or auditorium, (b) sub-section 3 of ordinance shall be renumbered and the words "five-units" contained therein shall be amended to read "six-units" , (c) sub-section 3 shall have appended thereto the following clause: "And it shall be so arranged that there is sufficient area to park automobiles which cannot be serviced immediately" , (d) that sub-section 4 be renumbered and the words twenty (20) feet be amended to read twenty-five (25) feet. Mr. Peacock stated that in sub-section 3 he felt that the words "to park automobiles, etc" should be changed to "to park vehicles etc. ° 2266 I: Mr. Kane stated he accepted the change in his resolution. Mr. Peacock supported Mr. Kane' s resolution. Mr. Kropf stated that the Law Department has submitted other amend- ments to ordinances which will be discussed at tonight's meeting later in the evening. Felt that it might be wise to hold this motion up until the other amendments were studied in order that there would not be a duplication in work. Mr. Kane stated he withdrew his previous motion. ir.Peacock stated he would withdraw his support to Mr. Kane' s motion. lir. Harsha stated that this item and the next item on the agenda which refers to Petitions Z-319 would be taken under advisement until later in the evening. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. T calker and unanimously adopted, it was ,`11-340-5$ RLSOLVID that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on October 21, 1958 on Petition Z-315 as submitted by Nelson Dembs d/b/a Nelson Homes, Inc. , for a change of zoning in the Northwest i/4 of section 11 from RUFB to R1A, the City Planning Commission does hereby recom- mend to the City Council that Petition Z-315 be granted and FURTfiJR RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was pub- lished in the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of October 2, 195$ and notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit Edison Co. , Chesapeake & Ohio Rail- way Co. , Michigan Bell Telephone Co. , The Consumers Power Co. , City Departments and petitioner as listed in the Proof of Service. The Chairman declared the foregoing resolution is adopted. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Peacock, supported by Mr. Kane and unanimously adopted, it was #11-341-5$ RESOLV3D that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on October 28, 195$ on Petition Z-295 as submitted by the City Planning Commission pursuant to City Councils Resolution ;,`349-5$, the city Planning Commission by un- animous vote does hereby deny the request of the Council to amend Article 17.00 which provides for Council in- fringement of the planning function for the reason that the State of Michigan in setting up the laws governing the planning procedures has taken great care to deter- mine that insofar as possible such commission shall be free of political influence, thus enabling the Planning 2267 I: Commission members to make their decisions unin- fluenced by the pressure of obvious minority groups; the present Zoning Ordinance governing the Planning Commission of the City of Livonia follows the in- tent of the State statute in this regard and while itmay be that the Council may have some good reason for desiring that the Council have final decision in certain planning matters, such reason has not been conveyed or submitted to the Planning Commis- sion for its consideration. In view of the reasons hereinabove set forth, it is believed that the powers of the Planning Commission should not be curtailed and the proposed amendment to the ordinance should be reconsidered. FURTH.]R RESOLVED , notice of the above hearing was published in the official newspaper, The Livonian, under date of October 9, 195$ and notice of which hearing was sent to the Detroit Edison Co. , Ches- apeake & Ohio Railway Co. , Michigan Bell Telephone Co. , Consumers Power Co. , City Departments as list- ed in the Proof of Service. I: Mr. ` alker stated he agreed that an am,,ndment should be made to the ordinance. Mr. Harsha stated that the motion is carried and Petition Z 295 is denied. Upon a motion duly made by Er. Peacock, supported by Mr. Robinson and unanimously adopted, it was 11-342-5$ RLJOLVLD that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held On Tuesday, October 7, 195$ on Petition Z-317 as submitted by the City Planning Commission to rezone portions of Sections 9, 10, and 11 in accordance with the zoning indicated on the Proposed Master Pattern of the Re-evaluation of Zoning Study, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that the Master Pattern proposals relating to Sections 9, 10 and 11 be adopted as the revised zoning for those sections, with the following exceptions: (a) that a 160 foot strip of RUF zoning be established along both sides of Laurel Road in Section 9 from Curtis Avenue northward to Seven Mile Road; I: (b) that the two C-1 areas on Curtis in Section 9 be deleted; (c) that the C-2 areas in Section 9 be replaced with the existing commercial zoning surrounded by 150 foot belt of R1T; (d) that Green Briar Estates Subdivision in Section 10 be retained as an RUF zone ; 226 (e) that 120 foot strip of RL zoning be established along both sides of Loveland in Section 10 northward to Clarita Avenue ; (f) that beginning at a point on the north line of . ' Six pile Road in Section 10, said point being 360 feet west of the centerline of Merriman Road, a 260 foot strip of RUF zoning be created which will extend westerly as far as the east line of Hubbard Road; (g) that a 270 foot strip of RUF zoning be created along the north side of Six Mile Road from the west side of Hubbard westerly to Farmington Road; (h) that all lots in Thomas F. O'Connor' s Merriman Park Subdivision in Section 10 shall be zoned RU; ( i) that all the lots in Howe Gardens Subdivision in Section 10 shall be zoned RUF ; ( j ) that all the lots in Marvin Robin Hood Subdivision in Section 10 be zoned RUF ; (k) that Parcels LLa, LLlb, and LL1c in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 10 be zones RUF : (1) that the C-2 areas designated in Section 10 be deleted r.nd replaced with the existing commercial zoning surrounded by a 150 foot belt of R1T zoning; (m) that a 200 ft. strip of RU zoning be established along tie east side of Merriman Road in Section 11 beginning at a point 360 feet north of the Center line of Six Tile Road and running northerly to the Nort-. line of Parcel V in the northwest 1/4 of Section 11; (n) that Lots L through 54 in O'Connor and Porter' s Subdivision in Section 11 be zoned RUF: (o)that beginning at a point on the north line of Six Road in Section 11, said point being 360 feet east of the center line of Merriman Road, a 270 ft. belt of RUF zoning be created along the north side of Six Mile Road easterly to Parcel Zlc in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11 and, FURTHER R3,3OLVED , notice of the above hearing was pub- lished in the official newspaper The Livonian, under date of September 1$, 1958 and notice of which hearing was sent to The Detroit Ldison Co. , Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. , Michigan Bell Tele- phone Co. , The Consumers Power Co. , City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service. /: Mr. Robinson stated he personnally felt that the areas designated to be RUF should be RU but would agree on the RUF. I` r. Harsha stated the foregoing resolution is adopted. 2269 Upon a motion duly made by rr. alker, supported by Nr. Robinson and I unanimously adopted, it was „`11-343-5$ RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby table Item 17, in relation to making a motion to hold a public hearing to determine whether or not to amend Section 4.07 of Article 4.00, Sections 7.05, 7.0$ and 710 of .Artiele_'7:00 and ad ding' eettion`7.11 theteto:.or' Ordin- ance , No.60.as amended,.. (•R-3• Rec uirementst,: in. order that a' further study 'can•.be' made by the :.Commission. Mr. Harsha stated that the foregoing resolution is adopted. Upon a motion duly made by lir. Robinson, supported by Mr. Anderson, it was ,/l1-344-5$ RESOLVED that the City Planning Commission does hereby table Item 1/18, in relation to making a motion to hold a public hearing to determine whether or not to amend Article 5 .00 by adding Section 5.10 amending Section 5.61 of Article 5 .50 and Section 7.61 of Article 7.50 of Ordinance i,'o. 60. (Re : Permitting both RUF and AG uses in R1, R1 and RU districts) , in order that a further study can be made by the Commission. A roll Call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the follow- ing AYES: Peacock, Talker, Anderson, Robinson and Harsha NAYS : Kane The Chairman declared the foregoing resolution is adopted. After a brief discussionas to the recuired lot size in RU districts, Mr. Peacock made a motion which was supported by Mr. Kane and unani- mously adopted, and #11-345-5$ RESOLVED that, pursuant to Section 20.01 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, Zoning Ordinance No. 60 as amended, the City Planning Commission at this time on its own motion does hereby provide for a Public Hearing to be held to determine whether or not to amend Section 7.52 of Article 7.50 of Ordinance No. 60, as amended, as follows : AN ORDINANCE ' MENDING SECTION 7.52 OF ARTICLE 7.50 ofORDINANCE NO. 60, AS AMENDED, ENTITILE F"ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LIVONIA. " THE CITY OF LIVONIA ORDAINS : Section 1. Section 7.52 of Article 7.50 of Ordinance 2270 No. 60, as amended, entitled 'Zoning Ordinance of the City of Li- vonia, i' is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 7.52 Uses Permitted. In all R-U Districts no building or land, except as otherwise pro- vided in this ordinance, shall be erected or used except for one or more of the following specified uses: (a) All uses in R-1 Districts as specified in Article 5.00, Section 5.02 ; provided, how- ever, that notwithstanding any other provision of this ordinance contrary hereto or in con- flict herewith every residential lot or parcel in an R-U District shall have the minimum lot area set forth in Section 7.54 of this article. (b) All uses permitted under Article 6.00 and Article 7.00 of this ordinance, that is R-2 and R-3 uses, are specifically excluded from and prohibited in the R-U District. ( c) Professional offices and customary home occupations such as dentists and physicians offices, dance and music schools or dressmaking may be allowed by approval of the City Planning Commission with limitations so that the occupa- tion is clearly an accessory to the permissive use, and the residential character of the ex- terior of the dwelling is not changed. (d), Display- Display of signs limited to inform- ation rather than advertising shall be not more than one (1) square foot placed not less than thirty (30) feet from the street right-of-way line. ( e) Employment- Each home occupation and office shall have not more than one ( 1) employee other than members of the immediate family. Section 2. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in con- flict herewith are hereby repealed only to the extent necessary to give this ordinance full force and effect. Section 3 . If any part or parts of this ordinance are for any reason held to be invalid, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. that a hearing be held and that notice be given as pro- vided in Section 20.01 of the Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No. 60 of the City of Livonia and that there shall be submitted a report and recommendation thereon to the City Council. 2271 The Chairman declared the motion is carried and resolution is adopted. Upon a motion duly made by ir. Peacock, supported by Mr. Kane and unanimously adopted, it was 111-346-58 RGSOLV1D that, the City Planning Commission after care- " .. fully reviewing Part V of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia entitled, "Master School and Park Plan", which plan was adopted by the City Planning Commission on December 15, 1953 , and thereafter certified to the City Council and filed with the Wayne County Register of Deeds in accordance with law and it appearing that certain property hereinafter described should be designated on such plan for future public purposes in order to promote the health, safety and general welfare of the community, the City Planning Commission on its own motion does hereby order and establish a public hearing to be held onap„ar 20, , 1951, at $.00 p.m. in the City Hall of the City of Livonia to determine whether or not Part V of the Master Plan on the City of Livonia should be amended so as to designate for future public purposes the following described property: 07A- The East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 7, containing approxi- mately 79.91 acres more or less; 0$G- The ,:'est 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section $, containing approxi- mately 79.71 acres more or less; and 16F-The ';gest 25 acres of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 16, containing approximately 25 acres more or less ; 17R-The East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of section 17, containing approxi- mately 7$.14 acres more or less ; and IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that notice of the time and place of said public hearing be published in a news- paper of general circulation in the City of Livonia and that proper notice by registered mail be sent to each public utility company and railroad company owning or operating any public utility or railroad within the City of Livonia in accordance with the provisions of Act 285 of the Public Acts of 1931, as amended. The Chairman declared the foregoing motion is carried and a public hearing will be held to designate Idlewild and Northville Golf Courses on the Civic Center Master Plan. 2272 Mr.M� Cullough stated the next item on the agenda was a motion by the City Planning Commission to hold a public hearing to deter- mine whether or not to amend Subdivision Rules and Regulation in relPtion to crosswalks. Upon a motion duly made by Mir. Peacock, supported by Mr. Kane, it was Ill- -5E RESOLVED that, pursuant to Section 14 of Act 285 of the Public Acts of 1931, as amended, the City Planning Com- mission on its own motion does hereby determine that there shall be a Public Hearing to determine whether or not Section 4.06 of Article IV of the Subdivision Rules and Regulations adopted by the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia on January 9, 1952, should be amended as follows: Section 4.06 Blocks Residential blocks shall not be less than two hundred ( 200) feet wide, and they shall not be less than six hundred (600) feet long nor more than 1/4 mile in length; provided, however, that where unusual conditions exist, the Commission may allow a block to be less than six hundred (600) feet in length where they find such deviation will serve the best in- terest of the City. In those blocks which are more than eight hundred ($00) feet long, a ten (10) foot pedestrian lane shall be provided near the center of the block where necessary to provide direct circulation to schools , parks, churches or public transportation sites; provided, ho.sever, tha t this recuirement may, in the 'ud•ment of the commission be waived when •lannin; considerations justify such waiver. Business, com- mercial and industrial blocks shall not be less than two hundred eighty (2$0) feet in width and in length; provided, however, that where such blocks are more than two hundred eighty (2$0) feet long, a ten (10) foot crosswalk shall be provided in the center of the block. Mr. Robinson stated he felt that the Commission should amend that portion of the Subdivision Regulations that controls the length of dead end streets. It is currently 400 ft. A provision should be made for hardship cases and su-gests that it be included in the above resolution. Mr. Kropf stated that the resolution could be amended. Mr. Harsha stated that the commissioner who made the resolution would have to agree to amend his resolution to include amending sub-section (g) of Section 4.02 Mr. Mc Cullough stated that the amendment to Mr. Peacock's re- solution could read " at the discretion of the City Planning Commission.' • 2273 Mr. Anderson stated he objected to the proposed amendment. Mr. Harsha asked lir. Peacock if he wanted to include sir. Robinson's suggestion of adding an amendment to Mr. Peacock's resolution to amend Section 4.02 Sub-section ( g)' (dead end streets) . Mr. Peacock stated he felt that it should be a separate item. Mr. ualker asked about crosswalks next to school and park sites. Mr. Robinson suggested that the amendment read " it is required but it may be waived" . Mr. Harsha asked Mr. Robinson if he wanted to make an amendment to the motion previously made. Mr. Robinson asked if a poll could be taken to determine whether the members of the Commi :. Aon wants to grant any dead end street longer than 400 ft. and should there be any exception to over 600 ft. AYES: Kane, talker and Robinson NAYS: Peacock, Anderson and Harsha The Chairman declared the vote is tied and therefore resolution is not adopted. Mr. Harsha stated that action should now be taken on the first resolution made by Mr. Peacock. Mr. Kropf stated that Mr. Peacock could emend his motion to read, " in the sole discretion of the commission" rather than 'f in the judgment of the commission: Mr. Peacock stated he would agree to amending his motion; I4r. Kane stated he would support the change. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Peacock, supported by Mr. Kane, it was 0.1-347-5$ RESOLVED that, pursuant to Section 14 of Act 2$5 of the Public Acts of 1931, as amended, the City Planning Commission on its own motion does hereby determine that there shall be a Public Hearing to determine whether or not Section 4.06 of Article IV of the Subdivision Rules and Regulations adopted by the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia on January E 9, 1952, should be amended as follows: Section 4.06 Blocks Residential blocks shall not be less than two hundred (200) feet wide, and they shall not be less than six hundred (600) feet long nor more than 1/4 mile in length; provided, however, that where , - ' _ . 2274 unusual conditions exist, the Commission may allow a block to be less than six hundred (600) feet in length where they find such deviation will serve the ',lest interest of the City. In those blocks which are more than ei ht hundred $00) feet long a ten LLU) root pedestrian ane s a .e provi.e. near e cen er of the block where necessary to provide direct circulation to schools parks, churches or public transportation sites ; provided, however, that this requirement may, in the sole discretion of the Planning Commission, be waived when planning considerations justiry such waiver. 3usiness, commercial and industrial blocks shall not be less than two hundred eighty (2$0) feet in width and in length; provided, however, that where such blocks are more than two hundred eighty (2$0) feet long, a ten (10) foot crosswalk shall be provided in the center of the block. AYES: Peacock, Kane, Valker, Anderson and Harsha NAY`): Robinson The Chairman declared the motion is carried and a public hearing will be held. Mr. Mc Cullough announced the next item on the agenda is Application TA-39 by Hugh Caverly rec!uesting permission to remove topsoil located on the North side of Five Mile Road immediately East of Newburgh Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 17. Public Hearing September 2, 1958, item taken under advisement until further investigation. Special Ieeting October 2$, 195$ item taken under further advisement. Study meeting November 4, 1958. Mr. Hamill and Mr. Caverly present. Mr. Mc Cullough submitted letter from Engineering Department dated November 6, 195$ in which they clarified their previous letter dated August 6, 195g. Mr. Hamill presented a topo to the Commissioners who examined it at this time. Mr. Caverly, in answer to PMIr. Kropf f s question, stated that if petition is granted, the weeds would be burned in the Fall and not the Spring. Mr. Walker stated he could not change his previous objections to petition, but since the Engineering Department have changed their position he would agree to approve petition. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Kane, supported by Mr. Walker, s it was t 11- -58 RESOLVED that , pursuant to a Public Hearing having 2275 b' en held the City Planuing,Commission does here- by grant Application TA39 by Hugh Caverly requesting permission to remove top8oil on Parcel located on the North Side of Five Mile Road immediately East of New- burgh Road in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 17 and FURTHPR REOLVLD, that a performance bond be fixed on the above application at .;; 500 per acre for 60 acres and it is recommended that the Bureau of In- spection issue a permit to this effect, and FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was sent to the property owners within 500 feet, petitioner, City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service and recommendations having been obtained from the Department of Public T''orks under date of August 6, and November 6, 195$ and from the Police Department under date of August 6, 1958. A roll call vote on the above resolution resulted in the follow- ing: AYES : Kane, ',Talker, and Harsha NAYS: Peacock, Anderson and Robinson Mr. Harsha stated that the foregoing vote resulted in a tie vote. Mr. Robinson suggested that petition be tabled until the next regular meeting. Mr. Hamill stated if it was tabled another month it would be too late to remove topsoil this year. Mr. Harsha asked those members who voted not to grant application what suggestions they had in order that a decision could be made, such as restrictions. Mr. Peacock stated he would rather see it stockpiled until the Engineering Department informs the Commission that it is up to grade level. Mr. Harsha asked Mr. Caverly when he planned on removing the topsoil. Mr. Caverly stated it would be impossible to remove the topsoil after the frost was in the ground. Mr. Harsha suggested that this itembe tabled until more members were present in order to break the tie vote. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Kane and unanimously adopted it was 2276 111-348-58 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby table TA-39 by Hugh Caverly recuesting per- mission to remove topsoil in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 17, Mr. McCullough announced the next item on the agenda was the pro- posed Sunset Manor Sub-division submitted by Spalding, DeDecker & Associates on behalf of Jupitor Construction Company, located on the North side of Six Mile, East of Merriman approximately 2,000 ft. t:rest of ididdlebelt in the Southeast and Southwest 1/4 of Section 11. Public Hearing October 28, 1958, item taken under advisement until revised plans are submitted. Ir. Hartman and Mr. Spaulding were present . Mr. Mc Cullough submitted the following objections to the revised plat. Stated that Stamwich is a dead end street; subdivision has only one outlet; no dimensions showing on tapering lots 171 and 69; Bobrich Street not continued as an access street and also not lined up with its continuation in other parts of the city; Lots 221 and 222 side into Lot 220, as Lots 235 and 236; no contours showing; Lots 29 through 50 end at bottom of Tarabusi Drain and were to be 80 ft. wide; questioned how far west does Purlingbrook run (1/2 mile road) ; and the City wants a 40 ft. easement to have access to drain. Mr. McCullough stated that this plat can be denied because it does not comply with the subdivision rules and regulations. Mr. Harsha informed the subdividers they would be allowed five minutes to speak. Mr. Spaulding stated that they realize that the proposed subdivision had only one entrance. The original plat had had Merriman as another outlet but when the School Board had acquired the 43 acres needed for the school site, their purchase had eliminated the outlet from this plat. The only Solution they had was to designate Stamwich as a 861 Boulevard and stated further that the FHA had approved this. Mr. Harsha stated that before this plat could be granted that the MasterThoroughfare Plan would have to be amended inrelation to Purlingbrook Avenue which is designated as a 1/2 mile road. Mr. Kane stated that he felt that all the homes on the drain should have 80 ft. frontage as stated at a previous meeting. Mr. Peacock stated he felt that plat should be denied because it did not comply with the subdivision rules and regulations. Mr. Robinson stated there had been several reasons for denying the plat. Mr. ?Talker suggested that the nuestion of Purling- brook be referred to the City Planner to ascertain his feelings as to whether or not it should remain or be removed from the Master Thoroughfare Plan. 2277 Mr. Anderson stated that the subdivider should come in with an en- tirely new plat. Mr. Peacock stated that he recalls that the Commission made certain recommendations which have not been complied with, before the revised plat, before the Commission toni-ht, had been re- vised, and which are not shown on the present plat. Upon a motion duly made by Ur. Peacock, supported by Mr P,.nderson, it was ,`ll-349-5$ RESOLVED that, pursuant to a Public Hearing having been held on Tuesday, October 2$, 195$, the City Planning Commission does hereby deny approval to pre- liminary plat of the proposed Sunset Manor Subdivision located in the Southwest and Southeast 1/4 of Section 11, because it does not comply with the Subdivision Rules and Regulations, and FURTHER RESOLVED, notice of the above hearing was sent to the abutting property owners, proprietor, City Departments as listed in the Proof of Service and copies of plat together with notice having been sent to the Building Department, Superintendent of Schools, Fire Department, Police Department, Parks & Recreation Department and Members of the Plat Committee. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYE'S : Peacock, Kane, Anderson, Robinson and Marsha Ni Y "alker Mr. Marsha declared the foregoing resolution is adopted. Mr. Spaulding inquired as to whether or not they would receive a copy of the recommendations made by Mr. Mc Cullough. Mr. Marsha stated this will be forwarded to the subdivider. Upon a motion duly made by Hr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Peacock and unanimously adopted, it was #11-350-5$ RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby request that the City Planner study the Master Thoroughfare Plan of the City of Livonia and make any recommendation of certain changes to the Commission at some future meeting. Mr. Marsha declared the resolution is adopted. 227$ Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Peacock, supported by Mr. Kane and unanimously adopted, it was t'11-351-5$ RESOLVED that, pursuant to Section 20.01 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, Zoning Ordinance No. • 60, as amended, the City Planning Commission at this time on its own motion does hereby provide for a Public Hearing to be held to determine whether or not to amend Section 19.11 of Article 19.00 of Ordinance No. 60 as amended, entitled, "Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia" , as follows: AN ORDINANCE jd2 DING SECTION 19.11 of ARTICLE 19.00 OF ORDINANCE NO. 60, AS '':NEADDED, ENTITLED "ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LIVONIA" THE CITY OF LIVONIA ORDJ,INS : Section 1. Section 19.11 of Article 19.00 of Ordinance No. 60 as amended, entitled, 'Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, " is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 19.11 Filipg Fees. Each application for appeal shall be given a number and shall be ac- companied by a filing fee of Thirty-five Dollars (y35.O0) . In the event an applicant desires a special hearing on his appeal then the filing fee shall be One Hundred Dollars (40100.00) . Section 2. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed only to the extent necessary to give this ordinance full force and effect. Section 3. If any part or parts of this ordinance are for any reason held to be invalid, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. that a hearing be held and that notice be given as provided in Section 20.01 of the Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No. 60 of the City of Livonia and that there shall be submitted a report and recommendation thereon to the City Council Mr. Harsha declared the foregoing resolution is adopted. Upon a motion made by Mr. Peacock, supported by Mr. Kane and unanimously adopted, it was ;111-352-5$ RESOLVED that, pursuant to Section 20.01 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, Zoning Ordinance No. 60 as amended, the City Planning 2279 Commission at this time on its own motion, pursu nt tothe Councils Resolution ;;'701-5$, does hereby provide for a Public Hearing to be held to determine whether or not to amend Section 4.12 of Article 4.00 of Ordinance No. 60. , as amended, entitled, "Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livoniai7, as follows AN ORDIi'AIdCL hA ENDING SECTION 4.12 OF ARTICL , 4.00 OF ORDINANCE NO. 60, AS AP =LADED, ENTITL- D "ZONING ORDINANCE OF THr CITY OF LIVONIA. THS CITY OF LIVONIA ORDAINS : Section 1. Section 4.12 of Article 4.00 or Ordinance No.60, as amended, entitled "Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, " is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 4.12 'Taste and Rubbish. No garbage, sewage, filth refuse, waste, trash, debris, including cans, bottles, waste paper, cartons, boxes, and crates, or other offensive or obnoxious matter, shall be kept in open con- tainers, or piled, placed, stored, or dumped on any land within the City of Livonia; provided, however, that nothing contained in this ordinance shall prevent the City of Livonia from establishing or maintaining a city dump for the exclusive use of the residents of such city. All waste material, trash and rubbish must be disposed of at least once in each month; and, provided further, that nothing contained herein shall prevent the reasonable use of garbage, fertilizers, or manure for the improvement of land situated within any R-U-F or A-G district, or the reasonable use of any commercial fertilizer in any dist- rict, where such use is not carried on in an unhealthy or unsanitary manner or does not constitute a menace to the health and welfare of the public or a nuisance to the surrounding area. The storing, placing, piling, or dumping of sewage, septic tank clean-out waste, or other human refuse shall be prohibited on any land with- in the City of Livonia, and the same is hereby declared to be against the health, safety and welfare, and it deemed to constitute a public nuisance. Section 2. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in con- flict herewith are hereby repealed only to the extent nec- essary to give this ordinance full force and effect. Section 3. Should any portion of this ordinance be held in- valid for any reason, such holding shall not be construed as affecting the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. 2280 that a hearing be held and that notice be riven as provided in Section 20.01 of the Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No. 60 of the City of Livonia and that there shall be submitted a report and recommendation thereon to the City Council, cr. Harsha declared the foregoing resolution is adopted. Upon a motion duly made by Nr. Peacock, supported by hr. Kane and unanimously adopted, it ',as #11-353-58 R;.SOLV' D that, pursuant to Section 20.01 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, Zoning Ordinance No. ?'O as amended, the City Planning Commission V this time on its own motion does hereby provide for a Public Hearing to be held to determine whether or not to amend Article 10.00 & Article 11.00 and add thereto Article 11.50 of Ordinance No. 60 as amended, entitled, "Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia'", and that a hearing be held and that notice be riven as provided in Section 20.01 of the Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No. 60 of the City of Livonia and that there shall be submitted a report and recommendation thereon to the City Council. Mr. Harsha declared the resolution is adopted. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Peacock and unanimously adopted, it was j11-354-58 RESOLVZD that, minutes of meetings March 11, I�'arch 18, •• April 1, April 15, .6, 'May 20, June 3, and June °17, • 1958 be approvdd as presented except for-'such meetings member'.was.not' present he abstain from voting. Mr.* Harsha declared the 7 foregoing resolution.adopted. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Robinson, supported by Mr. Kane and unanimously adopted, this 98 th Special Meeting is hereby adjourned at 11:45 p.m. , Fovember 11, 1958. ATTESTED: William IL Robinson au ar , ee.` irr an Sec.