HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1993-07-13 12898
MINUTES OF THE 667th REGULAR MEETING
HELD BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
LIVONIA
Cup,
On Tuesday, July 13, 1993, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia held
its 667th Regular Meeting in the Livonia City Hall, 33000 Civic Center Drive,
Livonia, Michigan.
Mr. Jack Engebretson, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
Members present: Jack Engebretson James C. McCann Raymond W. Tent
Robert Alanskas William LaPine
Members absent: Brenda Lee Fandrei R. Lee Morrow
Messrs. John J. Nagy, Planning Director; H. G. Shane, Assistant Planning Director,
and Scott Miller, Planner I, were also present.
Mr. Engebretson informed the audience that if a petition on tonight's agenda
involves a rezoning request, this Commission only makes a recommendation to the
City Council who, in turn, will hold its own public hearing and decide the
question. If a petition involves a waiver of use request and the request is
denied, the petitioner has ten days in which to appeal the decision to the City
Council; otherwise the petition is terminated. The Planning Commission holds the
only public hearing on a preliminary plat and/or a vacating petition. Planning
Commission resolutions become effective seven days after the resolutions are
adopted. The Planning Commission has reviewed the petitions upon their filing and
have been furnished by the staff with approving and denying resolutions. The
`rr Commission may use them or not use them depending upon the outcome of the hearing
tonight.
Mr. McCann, Secretary, announced the first item on the agenda is Motion by the City
Planning Commission, pursuant to Council Resolution #446-93, to hold a
public hearing on the question of whether or not property located on the
north side of Seven Mile Road between Bicentennial Drive and Fitzgerald
Avenue in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5 should be rezoned from RUFC and
PL to the R-3 zoning classification.
Mr. Engebretson: Mr. Nagy, this is a petition that is a result of a City Council
resolution directing us to hold a public hearing. Could you just
give us a brief synopsis of what the proposal is and what the
underlying logic was for initiating this action and then we will
look to set a public hearing.
Mr. Nagy: As a result of certain properties that the City has in the subject
area, which are contiguous to some private property that is located
somewhat central to the City property, that is that area between
Fitzgerald Avenue on the west and formerly the Cagle Farm Market on
the east on the north side of Seven Mile Road, the intervening
property owner had filed sometime ago for a zoning change, and in
connection with that zoning change, approached the City to see if
the City would be interested in disposing of its surplus property
r..
12899
in that area so that as a result of the property that they
privately own plus the City's property, they would have a larger
development area for a possible subdivision. In connection with
that request the City Council referred the entire matter back to
the Planning Commission to see whether or not the City's property
fir.. along with the petitioner's private property should or should not
be rezoned to the R-3 single family residential classification.
R-3 is an 80' x 120' lot size, 8,600 square feet lot area.
Mr. Engebretson: Thank you very much Mr. Nagy. With that I will look for a motion
to set a public hearing.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Tent, seconded by Mr. Alanskas and unanimously
approved, it was
#7-137-93 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission pursuant to Council
Resolution #446-93, and pursuant to Section 23.01(a) of Ordinance #543,
the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, as amended, does hereby
establish and order that a public hearing be held to determine whether
or not to rezone property located on the north side of Seven Mile Road
between Bicentennial Drive and Fitzgerald Avenue in the Southwest 1/4 of
Section 5 from RUFC and PL to R-3; and
FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of such hearing be given as provided in
Section 23.05 of Ordinance #543, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Livonia, as amended, and that thereafter there shall be a report and
recommendation submitted to the City Council.
Mr. Engebretson, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing
resolution adopted.
'4Irr
Mr. McCann, Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is Motion by the City
Planning Commission to hold a public hearing to determine whether or not
to amend Part VI of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia, entitled the
Master Fire Station Plan so as to delete an existing site and relocate
it to a new area.
Mr. Engebretson: This is our petition to, correct me if I am wrong John, we are
simply looking to consider changing the Master Plan to relocate the
fire station on Seven Mile Road approximately at the Levan
intersection by one lot and this is adjacent to the property that
we just talked about.
Mr. Nagy: Precisely.
Mr. Engebretson: We need a motion to set a public hearing.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Alanskas, seconded by Mr. Tent and unanimously
approved, it was
#7-138-93 RESOLVED that, pursuant to the provisions of Act 285 of the Public Acts
of Michigan, 1931, as amended, the City Planning Commission of the City
of Livonia does hereby establish and order that a public hearing be held
in the City Hall of the City of Livonia, to determine whether or not to
amend Part VI of the Master Plan of the City of Livonia, entitled the
`�.. Master Fire Station Plan, so as to delete an existing proposed fire
station site and designate a new location; and
12900
FURTHER RESOLVED that, notice of time and place of said public hearing
shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of
Livonia and a notice by registered United States mail shall be sent to
each public utility or railroad company owning or operating any public
utility or railroad within the City of Livonia in accordance with the
�.. provisions of Act 285 of the Public Acts of Michigan of 1931, as
amended.
Mr. Engebretson, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing
resolution adopted.
Mr. McCann, Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is Final Plat approval
for Orangelawn Woods Subdivision proposed to be located north of
Orangelawn Avenue between Stark Road and Farmington Road in the
Northeast 1/4 of Section 33.
Mr. Engebretson: Mr. Nagy, has everything been accomplished here that would allow
final approval?
Mr. Nagy: Correct. The proprietor has submitted the final mylar to our
office and it has been reviewed by Engineering to make sure it
incorporates all the requirements that their office is interested
in and we have a letter from the City Engineer, Mr. Galindo,
recommending approval of the final plat. We have also received a
letter from the City Clerk's office. Mrs. McCotter has advised us
that all financial obligations have been satisfied and everything
is in order for your consideration.
Mr. Engebretson: Thank you Mr. Nagy. I am looking for a motion.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Alanskas, seconded by Mr. McCann and unanimously
approved, it was
#7-139-93 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby approve the
Final Plat for Orangelawn Woods Subdivision proposed to be located north
of Orangelawn Avenue between Stark Road and Farmington Road in the
Northeast 1/4 of Section 33 for the following reasons:
1) That the Final Plat is consistent with the Preliminary Plat;
2) That the City Engineer recommends approval of the Final Plat;
3) That all financial obligations imposed upon the proprietor of the
subdivision by the City have been satisfied.
Mr. Engebretson, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing
resolution adopted.
Mr. McCann, Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is approval of the
minutes of the 666th Regular Meeting & Public Hearings held on June 22,
1993.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Alanskas, seconded by Mr. Tent and unanimously
approved, it was
12901
#7-140-93 RESOLVED that, the minutes of the 666th Regular Meeting & Public
Hearings held on June 22, 1993 are hereby approved.
Mr. Engebretson, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing
resolution adopted.
Mr. McCann, Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 93-6-8-9
by Curtis L. Fetch, R.A. , on behalf of Discount Tire Company, requesting
approval of all plans required by Section 18.47 of Zoning Ordinance #543
in connection with a proposal to paint the exterior of a building
located at 18975 Middlebelt Road in Section 11.
Mr. Miller: This is the Discount Tire that is located on the northwest corner
of Middlebelt and Clarita Avenue between Six and Seven Mile Road.
This is more of an elevation change because when this business was
approved to go in this building the elevation showed that two of
the walls would be painted white and two would stay natural brick.
The natural brick walls are the two that face Clarita and
Middlebelt and they are proposing now to paint those white to make
the building more uniform. That is what the petitioners want to
do.
Mr. Engebretson: Thank you Mr. Miller. Would the petitioner please come forward
and add any comments that you feel are appropriate.
Curtis Felch, Fetch Architecture, 1942 West Liberty, Suite 2, Ann Arbor, Michigan:
Basically that is it in a nutshell. We would like to paint those
two walls basically to make it more uniform. The basic two reasons
are to make it more uniform because the other two walls are white
and to fit in more with the corporate image of the company.
New
Mr. Alanskas: Would that be a latex paint?
Mr. Fetch: Yes.
Mr. Alanskas: We discussed at the study meeting that if by chance you left there,
you would take steam and put it back to its natural state.
Mr. Felch: Yes, in fact I have spoken to the owners and they have agreed to
that. That would be no problem. An agreement like that they would
write it up however you want to word it.
Mr. Alanskas: Is that going to be a white or an off white?
Mr. Fetch: It is going to be a white to match the other two sides. I guess it
is kind of an off white. It is not stark white.
Mr. Alanskas: It would be a flat and not a glossy?
Mr. Felch: Correct.
Mr. Tent: Question to Mr. Nagy. The only reason the petition is here before
us is because of the paint on the building. Correct? That is the
only change.
12902
Mr. Nagy: Correct. That is the only change.
Mr. Tent: I want to compliment the petitioner. I feel real comfortable with
them coming into the community because they like to play by the
rules and they are doing things that should be done right. I want
``.• to thank you. I am going to support this petition because I think
you have done it in good spirit. Mr. Nagy, the Arby place directly
across from this establishment, the bricks have been painted white,
they have been painted red, the facade has been painted. Did they
come before us? Was it necessary? They have changed the complete
facade of that building and I was shocked to see that done. That
is an established building. Was that an error or what happened?
Mr. Nagy: Mr. Shane of our department has looked into the matter and is
prepared to supply you with some information.
Mr. Shane: The answer to that Mr. Tent is I think there are a number of
businesses around town who aren't aware of your policies with
respect to control areas. They did this without requesting
approval from this body probably because they didn't realize they
had to. It is no different than you or I deciding to paint our
house, and we paint it. I think they probably had the same thing
in mind. They decided they wanted to paint their building and they
painted it. We did look at a picture back in 1981 and the Arby's
building in 1981 was, in fact, all white so it has probably changed
colors more than once. I think it is a question of them not
realizing what the rules are. If they don't come in and ask for
something, they simply paint it, then it is done before anyone
really realizes what happened. That is the case here.
`r. Mr. Tent: It seems that way with so many things happening in the City and
nothing is done to chastise or let these people know that something
is wrong. This could go on with almost any establishment within
the City as you have indicated and all they will say is I'm sorry.
That is why I want to compliment these people because I feel
comfortable with them playing by the rules and I wouldn't want to
jeopardize them in any way. In the resolution which we have
discussed they have indicated that if the building would ever go
back to some other source, they would go ahead and strip it. What
can we do about the other buildings? Can any notices or any
letters be sent to those people in that area? Those are control
areas. Something has to be done to notify these people that they
have to do something. I don't know. I am at a loss for words but
what can we do to rectify that situation? I am speaking as one
Commissioner. I know the other Commissioners are dancing around
here and they are concerned because I am pulling something out of
the woodwork but it bothers me. It is not a long agenda today.
They had this flood plain land over here at Charlevoix. The guy
put the building on it and they stepped up to their responsibility
and said that is wrong you are not supposed to build on a flood
plain and he said I already have it up and they said tear it down.
You know what, they won't do those things any more when they find
someone will stop them.
12903
Mr. McCann: Mr. Chairman, can we please move on.
Mr. Tent: This is my nickel and I am going to go on.
Mr. McCann: It has nothing to do with the issue.
Mr. Tent: The Chairman recognized me and I am going to finish up my
conversation.
Mr. Engebretson: Let me make a respectful request Mr. Tent that the issue that you
bring up is a valid one, I would want to recognize that at the
opening here, but I think it is more appropriate that we discuss it
at another meeting when it can be on the agenda and I would be
prepared to ask at this point to ask that this be the first item on
our agenda at our next study meeting. In all fairness to this
petitioner, it has nothing to do with him.
Mr. Tent: As long as you put it on the agenda.
Mr. Engebretson: It is done. Sir, you agreed at our study meeting to supply the
location of two other buildings, two that were painted these colors
and two that were not. That information didn't reach me. Did you
supply it to the staff?
Mr. Miller: It was in your packets.
Mr. Engebretson: I guess if it was, I missed it. I will review that. I went
there tonight because I was concerned about that. I cruised
through another time, and while I agree with Mr. Tent that you are
going about this the right way, I personally have a concern that
'r► that "rendering" up there doesn't begin to show the reality of what
we are dealing with at that location. I personally think that
board should be modified to be very red and very white. It is a
very loud combination of colors and I understand why you do that,
but we make references from time to time to the original Tremor's
and the bank at Six Mile and Newburgh and if we think they were
loud, this one is going to be extra loud. I personally think that
while you are going through the right steps here, that your
business will thrive and prosper with the earth tone colors that
face the neighboring street and the main street there, which would
make it compatible with all the other businesses on Middlebelt
between Six and Seven Mile Roads with the possible exception of the
Seven/Eleven store across the street down at the Six Mile Road end
of the strip. This proposal, when it was brought forward, in my
opinion, should have made clear exactly what the intent was with
respect to the color of that building. A lot of us had concerns
about the type of business being located immediately adjacent to a
residential neighborhood but now in addition to the traffic, the
noise and air hammers and the various kinds of tools they use in
that kind of business, now they are going to light it up with
bright white paint and bright red paint and with a very large
measure of red to make that just a very loud screaming building as
you come down Middlebelt Road. I realize it is a subjective point
of view but I guess I want you to know why I am not going to
support this petition.
12904
Mr. Felch: The red is there already.
Mr. Engebretson: It is really red, not like the rendering.
Mr. Felch: I will agree with that. I am sorry if I misled you at all. The
'tesp' red is there and that was approved. The real issue is the white
and I don't see how white is a big deal quite frankly. We know
Discount Tire will do well at that location. Basically, they want
to make sure that somebody from Livonia sees a Discount Tire Store
red and white and they go to the next town and see one just like it
or similar to it and they identify with it just like they would
with McDonald's, or Burger King or Pizza Hut or any other kind of
chain.
Mr. Engebretson: We understand that logic sir but we also understand that in some
communities, there are many as a matter of fact, they do not allow
an open throttle on color choices and use of awnings, and lights
and strobes and what have you. I am overstating it a bit just to
make a point that those businesses can indeed thrive and prosper
and still be compatible with the tone of the community. I wish you
well. I wish your client well at this location. I would just
prefer that they do it in a more quiet and subdued manner. I think
the presentation I recall coming through previously really
underplayed and downplayed to the point where it slipped by
completely the type of presentation this was going to make. It is
quite clear now. You don't need to spend more than 15 seconds in
that parking lot to understand what we are going to have, and
again, I acknowledge that is a subjective point of view and it is
only one point of view. We are not going to come to an agreement
on that but I do appreciate the fact that we agree that the
`` presentation given does not begin to represent reality.
Mr. Felch: I apologize.
Mr. Engebretson: No apology needed. It is just a statement of fact.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Tent and seconded by Mr. Alanskas, it was
#7-141-93 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the
City Council that Petition 93-6-8-9 by Curtis L. Felch, R.A. , on behalf
of Discount Tire Company, requesting approval of all plans required by
Section 18.47 of Zoning Ordinance #543 in connection with a proposal to
paint the exterior of a building located at 18975 Middlebelt Road in
Section 11, be approved subject to the following conditions:
1) That the Elevation Plan, defined as Sheet A.3 dated 6/17/93 by
Felch Architecture, is hereby approved and shall be adhered to;
2) That the exterior elevations of this building shall be continuously
maintained so that this site will not cause a visual blight that
could jeopardize the property values in the area;
3) That this approval is for this petitioner, and this petitioner
only, as well as for this use, and this use only. Further, this
paint is to be removed in the event of an occupancy change;
12905
4) That this approval by the Planning Commission is subject to the
approval of the City Council.
Mr. Tent: Mr. Chairman, I originally felt like you did about this petition
but considering what I said earlier, I can't penalize this
petitioner for playing by the rules. He could have gone right
ahead and painted it without coming before us and it would have
been there and we would have said here is another case where they
didn't realize it is a control zone. Based on this, I feel this
petition should go forth and I would certainly hope that the rest
of the Commission would feel as I do and not penalize this person
for doing what is right.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Tent, Alanskas, McCann
NAYS: LaPine, Engebretson
ABSENT: Morrow, Fandrei
Mr. Engebretson, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing
resolution adopted.
Mr. McCann, Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 93-6-8-10
by Michigan National Bank requesting approval of all plans required by
Section 18.58 of Zoning Ordinance #543 in connection with a proposal to
construct a building addition to the bank branch located at 34930 Ann
Arbor Trail in Section 33.
Mr. Miller: This bank is located on the northwest corner of Ann Arbor Trail and
Wayne Road. They are proposing to add an 800 square foot addition
"41111. to the rear of the bank. The addition would be mostly office use
and some other type of uses but mostly offices. Because of this
use they would also like to modify their parking lot to make it
more flowing around the new addition. The landscaping and parking
meet the requirements of the ordinance. They are also proposing a
new wall sign for the building. They are allowed a monument sign
and a wall sign. There is already an existing monument sign that
is conforming to the ordinance. They are allowed a wall sign of 52
square feet. They are proposing one at 27 square feet so it is
smaller than what they are allowed so it is conforming. The
petitioner, I have been told just recently, has brought in some
colored renderings of the boards to make his presentation.
Mr. Engebretson: Thank you Scott. We will ask the petitioner to come forward to
make that presentation.
Joe Hodeley: I am standing in for Dave Mielock, Architect, today because he is
out of town. We are out of Northville. What I brought is some
color renderings. I don't know if we need to make a presentation
of the entire project. It has been stated that it is an 800 square
foot addition and the parking and things match. (He presented a
colored rendering to the Commission) Some of the landscaping is
being replaced and upgraded so there is an additional 100 square
feet of landscaping being added to the site plan. The flow is
`..
12906
really a minor difference and I think there is one more parking
space making 32 when we are required to have 19. The elevation of
the building is an extension of the existing materials in terms of
the brick. I have a sample of the brick, which it matches exactly.
The existing building has a fascia that is a brown metal that is
faded and has holes in it so it is being removed and in its place
there is a stucco material being placed on it and this is a sample
of the color. (He went on to describe the materials) The sign
will not be lit internally. It will be lit from a ground
floodlight in front of the building. I have photographs of the
building if you would like to see them.
Mr. Alanskas: On your new rendering sir, where is new low profile air conditioner
going to be?
(He pointed it out on the plan)
Mr. Alanskas: It is not going to be screened?
Mr. Hodeley: From that one direction it is not going to be screened. It is
screened from all other directions.
Mr. Alanskas: Could we screen the rest of it so you wouldn't see it?
Mr. Hodeley: I suppose. The reason it is not screened is because this is a shed
roof that moves from the far side, single slope down to that side
with a metal gutter here that drains the roof so a parapet wall is
not an appropriate screening for that unit because it wrecks the
drainage of the roof of the existing building. I suspect if we
were to look at some paint colors, we could begin to paint that out
'Nor so it would begin to change that but again it is not viewed from a
public angle at all.
Mr. Alanskas: How high is it going to be?
Mr. Hodeley: A couple, maybe three feet. It is behind all the other parapet
walls so from the street it will not be viewed.
Mr. Tent: I have a question for the staff. On the shielding of the
mechanical equipment on the roof, it has been our policy when a
developer comes in we always like to shield the mechanical
equipment because in the past throughout the City it has been
pretty terrible looking and when anybody has come before us we have
always asked them to improve it. What is your feeling about this
particular situation? Do you feel we are compromising ourselves by
not going for the complete shielding or do you think there is
enough protection from the roof over there where it is positioned
that shielding wouldn't be necessary here?
Mr. Nagy: I think the petitioner has done an adequate job from the public
point of view from the mile roads, Ann Arbor Trail and Wayne Road,
that the public exposure is more than properly screened. The
little bit of that unit that is exposed is to the interior and
adjacent to an existing commercial site and therefore I don't think
it is visually offensive to the general public.
12907
Mr. Tent: Then this wouldn't compromise our position.
Mr. Nagy: Not at all.
Mr. Engebretson: Would you think your client would be agreeable to painting it
out?
Mr. Hobeley: I am sure they would be.
Mr. Engebretson: I think that would be a good compromise.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Alanskas, seconded by Mr. LaPine and unanimously
approved, it was
#7-142-93 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby approve Petition
93-6-8-10 by Michigan National Bank requesting approval of all plans
required by Section 18.58 of Zoning Ordinance #543 in connection with a
proposal to construct a building addition to the bank branch located at
34930 Ann Arbor Trail in Section 33, subject to the following
conditions:
1) That the Site and Landscape Plan, defined as Sheet A-1 dated
7/14/93 by Michigan National Bank, is hereby approved and shall be
adhered to;
2) That the Elevation Plan, defined as Sheet A-3 dated 7/14/93 by
Michigan National Bank, is hereby approved and shall be adhered to;
3) That the Sign Plan by Michigan National Bank, received by the
Livonia Planning Commission on 7/6/93, is hereby approved and shall
\r be adhered to;
4) That an adequate irrigation system, that would permanently maintain
all plants in a healthy condition, shall be installed prior to
final inspection;
5) That the petitioner agrees to paint the roof top mechanical
equipment a color to blend in with the overall color of the
building.
Mr. Engebretson, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing
resolution adopted.
Mr. McCann, Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 93-6-8-12
by Giffels Hoyem Basso, Inc. , on behalf of Comerica Bank requesting
approval of all plans required by Section 18.47 of Zoning Ordinance #543
in connection with a proposal to construct an automated teller machine,
extend the existing drive-through canopy and add a new by-pass lane for
the bank branch located at 17111 Laurel park Drive in Section 7.
Mr. Miller: This is located on the north side of Six Mile Road between 1-275
and the Laurel Park Drive. This bank is proposing to put an ATM
machine, automatic teller machine, out in the front of the bank
along Laurel Park Drive. It will be located between the two drives
in the parking lot. This teller machine is about 10 feet high and
\..
12908
8 feet wide and it will have a lane to drive up to it. It will be
the type you drive up to in your car, get your money out and then
drive away. The bank feels this is the best location for safety
reasons and also it is exposed where people know it is available.
Also they are proposing to add 4 feet to their existing
`r. drive-through canopy. This will allow another drive-through tube
to handle transactions with the bank. Because this extends out 4
feet they are also going to add a new by-pass lane around the
canopy.
Mr. Engebretson: Thank you Mr. Miller. Would the petitioner please come forward
and fill in whatever details you feel are appropriate.
Bill Warner: I am with Comerica Bank. I work out of the Auburn Hills
Operations Center and I brought with me my architect, Doug
McFerren of Giffels Hoyem Basso. Actually I think your planner
has given you a good idea of what it is. It is a simple project
to put the ATM pod out in a secure area of the parking and make
it visible for people to be able to find it but also highly
visible for security. The idea is to set it out there where
traffic from Six Mile Road can see it at night if there are
passers by going down Six Mile Road so that any activity around
there would be seen. It helps to detour any kind of activities
that you don't want. That is the idea of the location of the
pod. The extra island out there without a drive-to unit on it
was always shown on the original building package. We just
hadn't put the last unit on it so when we put the last unit on
it, we wanted to extend the canopy to keep it under cover a
little more and by putting the canopy there the fire department
needs to get around it so we need that bypass lane plus customers
'tor that get in the wrong lane use that bypass lane to get around
and to get back into the front of the building so it is really a
requirement of both the City and the Fire Department to have a
by-pass lane. Those three pieces are what we are showing here.
Any questions?
Mr. Alanskas: I have one. The entire bank facility is very, very nice but your
ATM sign is that going to be on a metal pole?
Mr. Warner: The ATM signage actually we had reviewed at the Board of Appeals
a little more thoroughly. What they had allowed us for ATM
signage on that pod is two places to have signage. Number one on
the north side we can have our standard sign that says ComeriCard
on the fascia of that ATM pod and then signage right alongside the
machine a little strip that gives you the logos of all the cards
that work in it. That is the only signage that we are going to add
to this project.
Mr. Alanskas: How big is that sign going to be
Mr. Warner: It is part of the fascia of the pod.
On a motion duly made by Mr. Tent, seconded by Mr. LaPine and unanimously approved,
it was
12909
117-143-93 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the
City Council that Petition 93-6-8-12 by Giffels Hoyem Basso, Inc. , on
behalf of Comerica Bank requesting approval of all plans required by
Section 18.47 of Zoning Ordinance 11543 in connection with a proposal to
construct an automated teller machine, extend the existing drive-through
canopy and add a new by-pass lane for the bank branch located at 17111
Laurel Park Drive in Section 7, be approved subject to the following
conditions:
1) That the Site and Elevation Plan, defined as Sheet A.1 dated
6/24/93 by Giffels Hoyem Basso, Inc. , is hereby approved and shall
be adhered to;
2) That this approval by the Planning Commission is subject to the
approval of the City Council.
Mr. Engebretson, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing
resolution adopted.
On a motion duly made, seconded and unanimously adopted, the 667th Regular Meeting
held on July 13, 1993 was adjourned at 8:10 p.m.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
647
"--
J. Hes C. McCann, Secretary
'4..
ATTEST: ( ' 'til, .,4n,
Jac Engebre,son, Chairman
jg