Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 1994-10-18 13708 MINUTES OF THE 692nd REGULAR MEETING HELD BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LIVONIA On Tuesday, October 18, 1994, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia held its 692nd Regular Meeting in the Livonia City Hall, 33000 Civic Center Drive, Livonia, Michigan. Mr. Jack Engebretson, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Members present: Jack Engebretson James C. McCann Robert Alanskas Patricia Blomberg William TaPine Daniel Piercecchi Members absent: R. Lee Morrow Mr. Engebretson informed the audience that if a petition on tonight's agenda involves a rezoning request, this Commission only makes a recommendation to the City Council who, in turn, will hold its awn public hearing and decide the question. If a petition involves a waiver of use request and the request is denied, the petitioner has ten days in which to appeal the decision to the City Council; otherwise the petition is terminated. The Planning Commission holds the only public hearing on a preliminary plat and/or a vacating petition. Planning Commission resolutions become effective seven days after the resolutions are adopted. The Planning Commission has reviewed the petitions upon their filing and have been furnished by the staff with approving and denying resolutions. The Commission may use them or not use them depending upon the outcome of the hearing tonight. In the absence of Mr. Morrow, Mr. McCann was Acting Secretary. Mr. McCann, Acting Secretary, announced the first item on the agenda is the Six Year Capital Improvement Program 1995-2000. Mr. Engebretson: John, would you please explain for the audience here and at home what this is all about. Mr. Nagy: The Capital Improvement Program is a plan that is part and parcel to the comprehensive plan of the City of Livonia. It is a plan of capital expenditures required so the City has a plan for implementing the Master Plan. It tries to identify the needed public improvement projects in concert with the overall Master Plan so that we have the right amount of money available at the right time that is needed for the process of implementing our Future Land Use Plan recommendations such as fire station sites, parks or right-of-way extensions, etc. Mr. Engebretson: Thank you Mr. Nagy. I might mention that each of us has had a week to absorb the content of the recommendation and if there is any discussion, this would be the appropriate time to address any items you have a question on. If there is no discussion, a motion would be in order. 13709 On a motion duly made by Mr. IaPine, seconded by Mr. Alanskas and unanimously approved, it was #10-176-94 RESOLVED that, the City of Livonia Planning Commission hereby authorizes the Planning Department to transmit the document titled "Capital Improvement Program, City of Livonia, 1995-2000" to the Mayor and Council as a realistic program to aid in the determination of a complete fiscal planning strategy for the City of Livonia, and FURTHER RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission stands ready to do all things necessary to cooperate with the Mayor and Council in maintaining a functioning program of capital improvements and capital budgeting for the City of Livonia. Mr. Engebretson, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. McCann, Acting Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is Subdivision Entrance Marker proposed for Camborne Estates Subdivision located on the Past side of Hubbard Road between Five and Six Mile Roads in the East 1/2 of Section 15. Mr. Miller: This is the Camborne Estates Subdivision. It is located south of Six Mile Road just west of Hubbard Road. It is a developed subdivision. They are proposing an Entrance Marker to be located on the left hand side as you drive in off Hubbard. They are allowed 20 square feet. What the petitioner is proposing is a 20 square foot sign, five feet in height with a ten foot setback from the right-of-way, so it is a conforming Entrance Marker. The Landscape Plan shows that they are proposing to plant spruce trees behind the signage and spreading juniper trees along the front. On a motion duly made by Mr. Piercecchi, seconded by Mrs. Blomberg and unanimously approved, it was #10-177-94 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby approve the Subdivision Entrance Marker proposed for Camborne Estates Subdivision located on the Past side of Hubbard Road between Five and Six Mile Roads in the East 1/2 of Section 15, subject to the following condition: 1) That the Entrance Marker and Landscape Plan received by the Planning Commission on Sept. 10, 1994 by Basney and Smith, Inc. , is hereby approved and shall be adhered to. Mr. Engehretson, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. McCann, Acting Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is Subdivision Entrance Marker proposed for Camborne Pines Subdivision 13710 located south of Six Mile Road between Harrison Avenue and Savoie in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 13. Mr. Miller: This is the Camborne Pines Subdivision that is located on the 4rw south side of Six Mile Road just east of Harrison. They are proposing basically the same sign for this subdivision as for the previous one. It is 20 square feet, five feet in height. The setback is ten feet with the same type of landscaping with spruce trees behind the sign with junipers in front. On a motion duly made by Mr. Alanskas, seconded by Mr. Piercecchi and unanimously approved, it was #10-178-94 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby approve the Subdivision Entrance Marker proposed for Camborne Pines Subdivision located south of Six Mile Road between Harrison Avenue and Savoie in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 13 subject to the following condition: 1) That the Entrance Marker and Landscape Plan received by the Planning Commission on Sept. 10, 1994 by Basney and Smith, Inc. , is hereby approved and shall be adhered to. Mr. Engebretson, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. McCann, Acting Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is the approval of the minutes of the 691st Regular Meeting & Public Hearings held on October 4, 1994. On a motion duly made by Mr. TaPine and seconded by Mrs. Blomberg, it was #10-179-94 RESOLVED that, the minutes of the 691st Regular Meeting & Public Hearinys held by the City Planning Commission on October 4, 1994 are hereby approved. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Alanskas, Blomberg, TaPine, McCann, Piercecchi NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Engebretson ABSENT: Morrow Mr. Engebretson, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. McCann, Acting Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 94-10-8-23 by Albert Kahn Associates requesting approval of all plans required by Section 18.58 of Zoning Ordinance #543 in connection with a proposal to expand St. Mary Hospital located at 36475 Five Mile Road in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 20. 13711 Mr. Miller: This is St. Mary Hospital located on the southwest corner of Five Mile and Levan. They are proposing to add two additions to their existing hospital. The first addition will be 55,000 square feet in size and two stories. It will be on the west *low elevation on what is )mown as the Marian Professional Building. It will be used for surgical services and maternity center. The other addition will be located on the Past elevation of the building and will face out toward Levan Road. This will be three stories in height and will allow the emergency center to relocate into that area. There is also a canopy shown on the site plan which will offer protection from the circular drive patient drop off in that area. Also, a structural canopy will be added to the south elevation of the professional building and will provide protection for the south entrance. Because these additions are built over the existing parking, the whole parking lot will have to be redesigned and in doing so, they will be short on parking. They are supposed to have 2,306 parking spaces and they will be 867 short, so they had to go to the Zoning Board prior to coming before the Planning Commission to receive a variance for the parking deficiency, which they did receive. They also had a parking deficiency because this addition here is only two stories in height and the zoning district PO I requires buildings to be over two stories and under six. They had to get a variance for not having enough floors on their building. So they got that and the parking variance. Mr. Engebretson: Would the petitioner please come forward and make your presentation. fir. Paul Maxwell: I am with Albert Kahn Associates. We reside at 7430 Second Avenue, Detroit, 48202. As Scott mentioned we have two primary additions. One is a maternity center on the west elevation, which is approximately 90,000 square feet, a basement and two floors, and the overhang on the east side, we are enclosing that portion of the building and moving the emergency center to that side of Levan Road. The site plan was reorganized in order to provide a ring road concept so that traffic that would come into the hospital campus could feed into the different areas of the hospital site from the ring road. It also reduces the number of entrances from Levan Road from four to two and provides a much smoother traffic flow for the overall goals of the campus. (He presented a color rendering of the plan) On the south elevation we are indicating a new canopy area because in the site planning concept the idea was to move the primary entrance to the hospital to the south. There has been some additional parking added after extensive studies by the hospital as to what their future needs will be for parking. This site plan is intended to be three to five years before it is fully developed. Construction is intended to begin on the buildings this year, probably mid to late November is the current plan with the total project being concluded at approximately the end of 1996. `O. 13712 Mr. Engebretson: How many spaces were added to accommodate all of these new facilities? Mr. Maxwell: The existing count is 1229 spaces and we will end up with `, about 1439, so there were 210 spaces added. Mr. Engebretson: I understood you to say a moment ago Mr. Maxwell, and perhaps I misunderstood you, I understood you to say 90,000 square feet on the two floors in the maternity area at the rear of the building. Mr. Maxwell: That is including the basement area. I believe the building footprint is about 30,000 square feet. Mr. Engebretson: Our notes indicated 55,000 square feet so 90,000 came as somewhat of a shock. I guess what I am wondering, when we calculated parking requirements, would we have used 55,000 square feet or what now appears to be 98,000 square feet, including the emergency area and 90,000 in the maternity area? Mr. Maxwell: Actually the zoning ordinance doesn't rely upon square footage of building for parking calculations for hospitals. For the existing professional building it does rely on the square footage but with the existing hospital they rely on the quantity of beds, projective staff and employee count including volunteers, so the parking area itself wouldn't be dependent upon the building area for this facility. Mr. Engebretson: So it is the professional opinion of yourself and the hospital Nom. that 210 additional parking spaces will offset any additional needs arising from the additional space being there? Mr. Maxwell: Yes we are confident that 210 additional spaces will accommodate any additional load. I think it is important to note that the primary purpose of these building additions is not to add hospital beds or hospital functions. It is to update what they have already, so even though there is significant building area added, the actual quantity of beds licensed by the state will not be increased so the overall count of employe and staff and patients is expected to go up some but rather nominal compared to the building addition. Mr. Engebretson: I understand they have a waiver on this and it is not really an issue here tonight. You have approval and therefore everything you are asking for in this respect is permitted. It is more a matter of curiosity. I am a regular visitor to that facility and I have found that the parking is usually fairly tight. There is always parking available but it is fairly tight, and I am reassured by your comment that this is not necessarily going to put an additional load on the parking lot but you have provided some additional spaces for that. I hope it doesn't get much tighter than it is because it will soon become a problem. 13713 Mr. Piercecchi: Mr. Nagy, will any of these additions add anything to the tax rolls? Mr. Nagy: No. Mr. T.Pine: Can you tell me how many employe you have on the day shift? That includes volunteers, paid employe, doctors. What is the total number? Mr. Maxwell: I did not bring that information with me. That was available and it was part of the parking calculations but I apologize for not having it. Mr. LaPine: I wanted to have that information, but anyway the other question I have, you are telling me this addition you are going to put on, which is either between 47,000 or 90,000 square feet, that is a big addition in my opinion, but you are telling me that is not going to add any beds. What is all of this going to be used for? Are the rooms going to be bigger or are you taking rooms that you have now and developing that into something else? Mr. Maxwell: What it is going to be for is the basement area of the west addition is primarily equipment rooms, mechanical equipment and that type of thing to service the building. The first floor will be 20 LDRP rooms, which will be labor, delivery, postpartum recovery rooms for new mothers, and the second floor will have eight operating rooms so that will be the ,,`, surgical area with supporting recovery beds and that type of thing. Mr. Tapine: Let me ask you this, the new area you said was for the delivery rooms for the mothers. You must have one of those at the hospital now. Is that correct? Mr. Maxwell: Yes. Mr. LaPine: Are you eliminating that where it is now and moving it to this new area? Mr. Maxwell: Yes. Mr. LaPine: What is going into that area that you are eliminating? Mr. Maxwell: Presently that space has not been assigned for any function. Mr. LaPine: You are going to have a new operating room. You have an operating room now. What is going to happen to that operating room? Why would you build something new and have something empty? You have to have some plans of what that area is going to be used for. Is it going to be used for more beds? What is it going to be used for? 13714 Dick Kerzic, 6851 Castle Drive, Bloomfield Hills: I am with St. Mary Hospital. Maybe more of an administrative answer would help you out here. Hospitals are very specialized buildings, particularly 'Nur the facilities we are talking about for surgery and labor and delivery recovery. Like automobiles, they grow old and they wear out and they becomes too small or inproficient in being able to serve their function for which they were intended. Technology changes, the delivery of health care changes. As an example, the LDRPs right now in our existing area we have standard delivery rooms, which are similar to operating rooms and they are set up for a traditional delivery service where a mother comes in and labors, goes to a delivery room, goes to a recovery room, goes to a postpartum room and then goes home. We will be going to the single room concept which will allow us in our 13 LDRP rooms to have the mother and members of the family come in, labor, delivery, recovery, postpartum all in the same room. It requires a totally different staffing pattern. It requires totally different support spaces, totally different room sizes and different requirements from the Michigan Department of Public Health in order to engage in those kinds of services. Our surgeries, for example, those are about 35 years old now. The technology was different when they were built. They just don't have the infrastructure to support the technology of today. Also, surgery is becoming much more equipment intensive today in order to provide the kind of services we need to provide. The rooms, as originally built, did not contemplate the amount of equipment that goes into a room during the procedure. You have the patient, you '041110, have the team and you have the equipment. Our rooms simply are not competitive in the sense we can't put the type of equipment that we need to put in there with the rest of the things that are needed for the procedure to accomplish that. Also, the supporting space with all the different equipment required for different types of procedures, we have no place to store it because we don't have equipment rooms large enough in the vicinity to do that. All of these areas because of their highly technical nature are very difficult, if not impossible, to remodel in place while you are providing the service. To remodel our surgery in place and continue operations would be impossible, so typically the way it is done in the hospital field, you build a new service and then you either have something for the old area or you don't. There are many, many, many hospitals around the country with surgical services and LDRP services that are outmoded and sit empty. An example, those licensed beds that were in the old maternity area will be transferred down to the new maternity area so those beds will be taken off-line as far as the state is concerned as licensed beds, so they cannot be used for beds for bed growth. The OR rooms will be de-licensed and the new ones will then have the license to operate. Mr. TaPine: At a later date you can go back to the state and request additional rooms. Is that correct? 13715 Mr. Kerzic: We could but the state just is not adding rooms and beds. In fact, those rooms and beds would be substandard by anybody's calculations to be used as patient rooms or OR rooms in the future, and we contemplate not re-using those for medical `�.. purposes. Mr. LaPine: I can accept your explanation and it makes sense, but it also doesn't seem like good business. If you have rooms in a hospital and they are empty and they are not being utilized, you are losing money because you have space there. It is like a business. If you have a machine and it is not working, you are losing money. It is the same thing in a hospital. If you have mons that are not being utilized, it has to be costing you money. I am just curious. Thank you for your explanation. Mr. Engebretson: Did you ever say sir whether or not there would be plans to use that empty space for some other purpose? Mr. Kerzic: No I can't envision it being used right now. The only thing you could ever use it for would be some sort of office function, and actually those kind of facilities and support services we are decreasing, not increasing, to be competitive. Mr. Alanskas: In regard to the 210 additional parking spaces, what percent of those will go to the emergency area for parking because that is always a problem. Mr. Maxwell: I am not sure we can give you an exact count. My recollection is they go from around 40 to 60 spaces. Mr. Engebretson: I would like to thank Sister Renetta for getting that barbed wire removed. While I was at the facility yesterday I cruised around the entire property. I did find a little in front of the hospice but it looked like it was in the process of being removed, and I would trust that you have some activity under way to deal with those signs that were discussed. I would like to prevail upon your good will for possibly one additional step regarding that process. I noticed that the bracket part of the upper post that supported the barbed wire are still in place and as you drive down the street it gives the appearance that it still has that kind of structure there, and I stopped and looked at them and it looks like there are two bolts that simply need to be removed very, very quickly. I think the appearance of your facility would be greatly enhanced. I suspect your professional advisers here would agree with that, that going out there removing several hundred bolts would really enhance the appearance. While I don't want to ask you to commit to doing that, I would think it would be easy to get some volunteers to do that if your contractors aren't planning on going back and doing that. Since I live in the neighborhood I would even be willing to help you do that. r.. 13716 The purpose, as we said earlier is not to be difficult, but to try to have the facility comply with various codes and ordinances and to make the best possible impression that we 41101. can. Please take that under consideration. Thank you for the cooperation. You were able to accomplish some things in very short order, and we compliment you for that. On a motion duly made by Mrs. Blomberg and seconded by Alanskas, it was #10-180-94 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 94-10-8-23 by Albert Kahn Associates requesting approval of all plans required by Section 18.58 of Zoning Ordinance #543 in connection with a proposal to expand St. Mary Hospital located at 36475 Five Mile Road in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 20, be approved subject to the following conditions: 1) That the Site Plan, defined as Sheet SRA-1 dated 8/8/94 by Albert Kahn Associates, is hereby approved and shall be adhered to; 2) That the Elevation Plans, defined as Sheet SRA-5 & SRA-6 dated 8/8/94 by Albert Kahn Associates, is hereby approved and shall be adhered to; 3) That the following shall be removed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy permit: - the barbed wire and support arms located on top of the chain-link fencing that surrounds the entire Felician Sisters property; - all nonconforming signage for the Angela Hospice and the Marywood Center 4) That all parking spaces shall be double striped. Mr. LaPine: I am going to be voting against this proposal tonight. Not that I have any objection to the addition to the hospital but it seems to me asking for a waiver of 800 parking spaces, and also asking for a waiver of the width of the parking spaces, to me that is asking a little too much. I read the minutes of the Zoning Board of Appeals and my good friends on the Zoning Board of Appeals must have their reasons for granting the variance but I don't see anything in their minutes stating why there was a hardship. There really is no hardship. They have the land and they could put the parking in. I am not saying they shouldn't have gotten a waiver on some parking, but asking for that much parking waiver i, in good conscience, I just can't compromise the ordinance that much. Mr. Engebretson: It would have been helpful to have had a better understanding, but I do understand it is a one year variance and if it does prove to be inadequate then I do think the Zoning Board has 13717 kept some control over the situation and I would think you would self monitor in any case. It is a substantial variance and it is the most significant variance that we have had in vft. the six to seven years that I have been here. Mr. Piercecchi: Do I understand it is 1439 spaces plus 210 now? Mr. Maxwell: No it is 1439 total. Mr. Engebretson: Then Mr. Piercecchi, to make things more interesting, what you have to keep in mind, as Mr. Maxwell pointed out, the ordinance doesn't really require additional space for the hospital facility per se but while they have provided an additional 210 spaces there must be some additional activity planned there. I think if you were to look at this as a normal office facility, then the deficiency would just be amazingly large, the worst in the City probably, plus the nine feet wide, which is also a rare, rare thing. I don't understand why the nine feet wide. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Alanskas, Blomberg, McCann, Engebretson NAYS: LaPine, Piercecchi ABSENT: Morrow Mr. Engebretson, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. McCann, Acting Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda is Petition 94-10-8-24 by Dorchen/Martin Associates requesting approval of all plans required by Section 18.47 of Zoning Ordinance #543 in connection with a proposal to construct an addition to the McDonald's Restaurant located at 19311 Farmington Road in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 4. Mr. Miller: This is the McDonald's Restaurant that is located on the west side of Farmington Road just north of Seven Mile at the K-Mart Center. They are proposing to add a 1,000 square foot playspace addition to the front of their restaurant. This playspace addition will house a play area with tubular slides and tunnels kids can crawl through. Because this addition is built over existing parking, it rendered the site deficient in parking by five spaces. They went to the Zoning Board prior to coming before the Planning Commission and were granted a variance for parking. Based on the variance they meet the parking requirements for the site. The landscape plan shows that new landscaping will be planted around the new addition and the entire site has 38% landscaping where they are required to have 15%, so they are over what they are required to have. The elevation shows the new addition will be constructed out of insulated glass and brick that matches the 13718 existing restaurant. The addition will be 22 feet high, which is about five feet higher than the existing building. Also, because the addition will be put on the front of the building, ‘1411. the sign that is there now will be taken down and a new sign put in its place on the new addition. This facility is allowed a 36 square foot sign and they are proposing a 32 square foot sign so the sign is conforming. Mr. Engebretson: Would the petitioner please come down and tell us what you have in mind. Paul Hammer: I own the McDonald's at 19311 Farmington Road, Livonia. As Scott mentioned the design that McDonald's has come out with, it is a basic design developed over a few years now. I got feedback from children and from their parents and from other sources, and I wanted to do this four years ago and couldn't because I couldn't afford it. My debt ratio was too much. McDonald's is now allowing me to do this. I took ten days and went out and got 650 signatures of customers that would like to have the playspace. For four years I have been hounded with four to five calls a day with "Do you have playland?", "No", "Why do we have to go to another location?" My customers are very excited about it and it is a standard design that we are putting up. It is found to be very, very popular. Mr. Engebretson: Mr. Hammer, we understand from the notes that it will be 22 ft. high and I think Scott mentioned that last week and while ,,`, I wasn't at the meeting last week because I was on vacation, I understand there was a similar proposal for another McDonald's and it was proposed to be 30 feet high and if so, I understood you to say this is a McDonald's plan that is used across the country, do they have varying heights from store to store and varying characteristics? Mr. Hammer: Mr. Martin is here from the architect firm Dorchen/Martin. Frank Martin, Dorchen/Martin Associates, 29895 Greenfield, Suite 107, Southfield, 48076: I am surprised at the 30 foot height of a potential playland. I know our office is involved with six or seven in the metropolitan area and all of them are under the height of 21'8" and this is about 21'8". I don't know of any that we are involved with right now that are any higher than that right now. Unless someone was talking about a pitched roof unit that we are not involved with where they thought the peak might be higher, but I don't know of any. Your question of different heights, McDonald's in their recommended plans that they progress with and develop, this particular height is one that has been established by McDonald's. Play equipment sits underneath this so that it is not too tight up to the roof. Mr. EngPhretson: This was the store at Five Mile and Middlebelt. 13719 Mr. Martin: I am involved with that store and I can tell you that the height of that is 21 feet 8 inches. Mr. Engebretson: I may have misunderstood the information that was given to me but thank you for clarifying that sir. Mr. Alanskas: Is there only one entrance for the children to get into playscape? Mr. Hammer: What we want to do is keep the playscape separate from the restaurant so it is quiet in the restaurant, so you would enter the playscape from the restaurant through a door which will close. There is one emergency exit. Mr. Alanskas: But not to go into the street but to go into the playscape. Mr. Hammier: Correct. Mr. LaPine: Do you think that Major Magic has drawn any business from you because you don't have the playspace? Mr. Hammer: It is difficult to tell right now because I have had road construction in front of the store in June, July, August and part of September. I am down $70,000 so I can't tell what is going on right now. I do get a computer printout every day of my sales versus last year but there is like a monkey wrench that has been thrown into it right now. '4111. Mr. rapine: I can understand. I just wondered if Major Magic had any impact on your business there. ON a motion duly made by Mrs. Blomberg, seconded by Mr. Piercecchi and unanimously approved, it was #10-181-94 RESOLVED that, the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 94-10-8-24 by Dorchen/Martin Associates requesting approval of all plans required by Section 18.47 of Zoning Ordinance #543 in connection with a proposal to construct an addition to the McDonald's Restaurant located at 19311 Farmington Road in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 4, be approved subject to the following conditions: 1) That the Site Plan, defined as SP-1 dated 9/30/94, as revised, by Dorchen/Martin Associates, Inc. , is hereby approved and shall be adhered to; 2) That the Landscape Plan, defined as Sheet LS-1 dated 6/21/94 by Dorchen/Martin Associates, Inc. , is hereby approved and shall be adhered to; 13720 3) That the Elevation Plan defined as Sheet A-i dated 9/30/94, as revised, by Dorchen/Martin Associates, Inc. , is hereby approved and shall be adhered to; 14111, 4) That the wall sign shown on the approved Elevation Plan is hereby approved and shall be adhered to. Mr. Engebretson, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. On a motion duly made, seconded and unanimously adopted, the 692nd Regular Meeting held on October 18, 1994 was adjourned at 8:20 p.m. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION J-. C. McCann, Acting Secretary ATT'ES'T: (14 ��i.46JaEngebrei on, Chairman *40 jg