Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING MINUTES 2009-08-11MINUTES OF THE 985TH REGULAR MEETING HELD BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LIVONIA On Tuesday, August 11, 2009, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia held its 9W Regular Meeting in the Livonia City Hall, 33000 Civic Center Drive, Livonia, Michigan. Mr. Lee Morrow, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members present: Deborah McDermott R. Lee Morrow Lynda Scheel Ashley Vartoogian Carol A. Smiley Joe Taylor Ian Wilshaw Members absent: None Messrs. Mark Taormina, Planning Director, and Scott Miller, Planner III, were also present. Chairman Morrow informed the audience that if a petition on tonighfs agenda involves a rezoning request, this Commission makes a recommendation to the City Council who, in tum, will hold its own public hearing and make the final determination as to whether a pefifion is approved or denied. The Planning Commission holds the only public hearing on a request for preliminary plat and/or vacating petition. The Commission's recommendation is forwarded to the City Council for the final determination as to whether a plat is accepted or rejected. If a petition requesting a waiver of use or site plan approval is denied tonight, the petitioner has len days in which to appeal the decision, in writing, to the City Council. Resolutions adopted by the City Planning Commission become effective seven (7) days after the date of adoption. The Planning Commission and the professional staff have reviewed each of these pefifions upon their fling. The staff has furnished the Commission with both approving and denying resolutions, which the Commission may, or may not, use depending on the outcome of the proceedings tonight. ITEM #1 PETITION 2005-03-08-05 EDCO REAL ESTATE Ms. Smiley, Secretary, announced the first item on the agenda, Petition 2005-03- 08-05 submitted by EDCO Real Estate Ventures, L.L.C. requesting approval of all plans required by Section 18.58 of the Zoning Ordinance in connection with a proposal to construct an addition and renovate the exterior of the service station located at 34901 Ann Arbor Trail, on the southwest comer of Wayne Road and Ann Arbor Trail in the Southwest % of Section 33. August 11, 2009 25090 Mr. Miller: This is a request to reactivate a site plan petition, which seeks approval to construct an addition and renovate the exterior of the existing gas station located on the southwest corner of Wayne Road and Ann Arbor Trail. In connection with a previous review of this petition, the Planning Commission had recommended approval of the plans proposing to construct an addition that would have increased the size of the building from 884 square feel to an expanded size of 2,296 square feel. After its own review of this petition, the City Council determined to refer this item to the Committee of the Whole. Following its discharge from the Committee of the Whole, the City Council adopted a resolution at its Regular Meeting of August 14, 2005, referring this petition back to the Planning Commission for further discussion and review. After the Council's referral back to the Planning Commission, the petitioner decided not to immediately proceed with this petition. However, the gas station facility recently sustained substantial damage when a vehicle collided with the building and, as a result, had to close. Because of the considerable amount of repair work that would be needed to reopen the facility, the petitioner now wishes to continue on with the request to expand the building. The new plans show an expanded building that would be somewhat smaller than previously proposed. The petitioner is now proposing to expand the building to a total of 2,044 square feel. The building would be expanded 13.5 feel to the north and 17 feet to the east. The building is not proposed to be expanded to the south because the existing underground gasoline storage tanks are located in that area. The gasoline station would continue to have four gas pumps as currently exist on the site. Because the proposed building expansion would bring the north building wall to a distance of 10 feel from the pumps located between the building and the north property line, the two pumps north of the building would be modified to service cars only on one side, the north side. The two gas pumps in the area south of the building would continue to service vehicles from both sides. The existing pump island canopy, which extends over the building, and both fuel dispenser areas would remain, and the plans indicate that the existing support columns would be finished with brick. The expanded convenience store/gas station building as proposed would have deficient setbacks from both Wayne Road and Ann Arbor Trail. They are required to have 75 feel from any right-of-way. The proposed front yard nghtof-way from Ann Arbor Trail would be only 48 feet. This is a deficiency of 27 feel. The required side yard from a major thoroughfare is 75 feel. The proposed side yard, which would be on Wayne Road, is only 58 feel, so that's a deficiency of 17 feel. Because of the deficient setbacks from both streets, variances would be required from the Zoning Board of Appeals. Parking for a gas August 11, 2009 25091 station is based on the square footage of the floor space devoted to retail sales and one space per employee. The floor plan is showing 1,000 square feet of retail space within the building, and the petitioner is showing only one employee. The total parking requirement for the convenience store is eight parking spaces. The site plan provides 11 spaces with parking along the south property line and a handicap space to the east of the building. Landscaping shown on the site plan constitutes 12 percent of the total site area, which is 3 percent less than the required 15 percent. The plan shows that new plant materials would be installed in the existing landscaped areas, which are adjacent to Wayne Road and Ann Arbor Trail, and a portion of the parcel along the south and west properly lines. The new installed plants would consist of dogwood shrubs. The architecture of the exterior of the building shown on the revised building elevation plans is very similar to the previous plan submitted for the proposed building expansion. The existing walls that would remain and the new walls for the expanded areas of the building would be finished with the same exterior materials on all four sides of the building. The walls would be a combination of split face block, brick and Dryvit. At the base of the walls would be a 3 fool wainscot of split face block. The middle section of the walls would be brick. Along the lop one- third of the building would be Dryvil with a decorative cornice. That is the extent of the proposal. Mr. Morrow: Thank you very much. Before we get to the correspondence, do we have any questions relative to the site plan and/or the elevation plans? Ms. Smiley: Mark, were we going to check to see if the pumps were too close to the building or if that's a legal limit? Didn't the pumps seem a litfle close to the building? Mr. Taormina: Actually, the first item of correspondence addresses that issue. That's a letter by the Fire Marshal and they provide those minimum standards. I believe they are being complied with, although there will be some additional review necessary at the time of the plan review process to make sure there is full compliance. But as the plan is presented to you this evening, does not look like ilwould be a problem. Ms. Smiley: Okay. Thank you. Mr. Taylor: If I could follow-up on that, Mark. The letter says it needs to be 20 feel from any fixed source of ignition. I don't know exactly what that means. August 11, 2009 25092 Mr. Taormina: That's referring to a hot water heater or something with a pilot light, those types of things, within the interior of the building. I'm not sure where the mechanical is shown. Maybe Scott can go back to the floor plan if it shows the mechanical for the building. I'm guessing it's going to be in the southwest corner. The utility room appears to be in excess of 20 feet from that location, but those measurements will be undertaken at the time of plan review. If there are some adjustments needed, they would be required within the interior of the building. Mr. Taylor: Did I hear you say the pumps are 10 feel from the building? Mr. Taormina: The plan is now showing the pumps 10 feel from the building, so as long as the hoses aren't in excess 5 feel. Mr. Taylor: They are supposed to be 5 feet according to the letter. Mr. Taormina: That's correct. Mr. Taylor: Thank you. Mr. Morrow: And with that, if there are no further questions, we will now go to the correspondence. Mr. Taormina: There are four items of correspondence. The first item is from the Engineering Division, dated August 6, 2009, which reads as follows: "The Engineering Division has completed its review of the BP Filling Station project at the above -referenced location. The work consists of a small building expansion, and it appears that there is no work contemplated in the right-of-way or easements that would require a permit from the Engineering Division. Note that should it be determined by the architect that any work involving new sewer or water leads or drive approach work is needed, a permit will be required from the Engineering Division." The letter is signed by Kevin G. Roney, P.E., Assistant City Engineer. The second letter is from the Livonia Fire & Rescue Division, dated August 5, 2009, which reads as follows: "This office has reviewed the site plan submitted in connection with a request to construct an addition and renovate the exterior of the gas station located at the above -referenced address We have no objections to this proposal with the following stipulations: (1) The pumps need to be 20 feet from any fixed sources of ignition. (2) When the hose is fully extended, the nozzle shall not reach within 5 feet of building openings. (3) Adequate hydrants shall be provided and located with spacing consistent with the use group. (4) Access around building shall be provided for emergency vehicles with a minimum vertical clearance of thirteen feet six inches, a turning August 11, 2009 25093 radius of fifty-three feet wall to wall and an inside turning radius of twenty-nine feet six inches." The letter is signed by Donald F. Donnelley, Fire Marshal. The third letter is from the Division of Police, dated August 6, 2009, which reads as follows: "We have reviewed the plans connection with Wayne/Ann Arbor Trail Gas Station located at 34901 Ann Arbor Trail. We have no objections or recommendations to the plans as submitted." The letter is signed by David W. Shirt(, Sergeant, Traffic Bureau. The fourth letter is from the Inspection Department, dated August 7, which reads as follows: "Pursuant to your request of July 29, 2009, the above -referenced petition has been reviewed. The following is noted. (1) Based on the revised plans submitted on August 5, 2009, the front yard setback is proposed at 48 feet where 75 feet is required. The side yard setback is proposed at 58 feet where 75 is required. A variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals would be required to maintain these deficiencies. (2) All parking spaces are required to be double striped. (3) The barrier free parking space is required to be van accessible and property sized, signed and striped. An accessible mute will be required from the barrier free parking space proposed at the entrance of the building, (4) The existing parking lot shall be repaired and sealed as necessary. (5) Currently, this station is required to provide free air to the public per Zoning Board of Appeals Case #8585-73. The Commission and/or Council may wish to address this item and add the statement. That free air shall be provided at all times this station is open for business. The free air shall be dispensed at the point of service without having to enter the station or the performance of any extra action in order to obtain the air without charge. (6) The existing dumpster enclosure and gates need to be repaired or replaced. The woven material in the chain link gate is not permitted. This Department has no further objections to this petition." The letter is signed by Jerome Hanna, Assistant Director of Inspection. That is the extent of the correspondence. Mr. Morrow: Are there any questions relative to the correspondence? Seeing none, would the petitioner please come forward and add his remarks to what we've seen so far? We will need your name and address? Tahnk Alcodray, 330 River Lane, Dearborn, Michigan 48124. Good evening. Mr. Morrow: Good evening. Would you like to add anything to the presentation? Mr. Alcodray: I just would like to add regarding the landscaping, I believe it was noted by the architect, but we do plan on completely revamping the existing landscaping in the existing form that you August 11, 2009 25094 see it in, along with insuring that all sprinkler systems are fully operational, resodding the grassed area along Wayne and Ann Arbor Trail for the city. Mr. Morrow: That sounds like good news, and what you're saying is its going to be a call back item once the landscape artist has developed a plan? Mr. Alcodray: Yes. Exactly. Mr. Morrow: Are there anyqueslions ofthe petitioner bylhe Commission? Ms. Scheel: Do you plan on keeping the same sign or replacing the sign? Mr. Alcodray: We're planning on keeping the existing sign. Ms. Scheel: Keeping the existing sign? Okay. Is there any outside lighting that is going to be added? Mr. Alcodray: Currently, we've got pole lights, I believe at every entrance and exit. I'm not 100 percent sure. I believe that we do. So as of right now, no, we're not planning any additional, but I mean as the building sits today, I think the ceiling height is 8 feel. The new building, I think calls a 12 fool ceiling height. So the building itself will appear much more illuminated, much more lit up, a much more appealing atmosphere. I think the whole corner will appear to be much more lit with this new layout. Ms. Scheel: Okay. Thank you. That's it for me. Ms. Vartoogian: Did you gel a copy of the correspondence from the Inspection Department with the items that were listed? Mr. Alcodray: It may have went to the facility and the mail is being forwarded now. So I may not have gotten it. I don't know. Ms. Vartoogian: Did you hear the items thalwere listed? Mr. Alcodray: Yes. Ms. Vartoogian: Do you believe that you can comply with all the things that were listed, including the free air? Mr. Alcodray: Yes. I think we've even marked on the plan that there will be free air. And actually, we give free air today but there's a switch that we have to activate inside. We will remove that switch and rewire it and just make it free permanently. Mr. Alcodray: August 11, 2009 Mr. Taylor: 25095 Ms. Vartoogian: Okay. Also, last week, we asked you to bring some building material samples. Mr. Alcodray: Yes. Ms. Vartoogian: Did you bang those with you? Mr. Alcodray: I did not bring them with me but I have asked to gel them. I can Mr. Taylor: make them available for your review, probably within a week or so. Ms. Vartoogian: Okay. Thank you. Mr. Morrow: Along that line, R would probably be productive because we will be taking action tonight to make sure when you go before City Council, either with an approval or an appeal, that you provide them with the building malenals and the color scheme. Ms. Smiley: Do you have just one employee at a time there? Mr. Alcodray: Yes. During the course of business, there's one employee, but during the shift change, you may have more than one as they come and go, but typically it's one employee. Ms. Smiley: Is that typical of most gas stations? I'm thinking security or safely -wise. Mr. Alcodray: Yes. Typically, most have got one cashier. You have, maybe a couple hours of day, someone else there helping to clean up, but typically during normal business hours, it's one employee. Ms. Smiley: Thank you. Mr. Taylor: Do I remember you're going to keep the same canopy that you have now? Mr. Alcodray: Yes. Mr. Taylor: How are your lights located underneath the canopy? Are they extended out, because what we're asking for, and I dont know whether you've done it this way or not, they're flush so that they dont illuminate a lot of light. Mr. Alcodray: I have to go look, but I'm almost positive that the bottom of the lights do not protrude beneath the metal awning themselves. Mr. Taylor: I'm sure Mark can tell you exactly what we need. August 11, 2009 25096 Mr. Alcodray: But they're not flush per se. The ballasts themselves do come down below the roof of the canopy but they are not visible from the road. In other words, the perimeter of the canopy itself kind of conceals the lights. I'm not sure what the requirement is. Mr. Taylor: With the newer stations, we had them more or less flush, didn't we, Mark? Mr. Taormina: Yes. We like to see them flush, but I think to the extent that the canopy, the fascia, kind of acts as a skirl, and if its low enough, then it achieves the same fad in terms of shielding those lights, preventing the glare that is so problematic with a lot of gas stations where the lights extend maybe a fool below the canopy. We'll take a look at this and see whether or not they can be modified. Mr. Taylor: And the parking spaces on the south side of the building, are they 10 feel by 20 feel? Are they long ways or are they parallel? I can't tell by your plan. Mr. Taormina: This plan shows them as being perpendicular to the property line, if that's the question. They are 10 feel by 20 feet. Mr. Taylor: So they don't have to be double striped then? Mr. Taormina: Yes, they would still have to be double striped. Mr. Taylor: They will be double striped? Mr. Taormina: Yes. Mr. Taylor: Okay. Thank you. Mr. Morrow: Arethere any otherquestions? Mr. Wilshaw: Are you planning any outdoor storage of merchandise or ice containers or any oflhal type of thing? Mr. Alcodray: We do have one ice freezer that is normally on the outside of the building, but as far as stocking any loose inventory, no. Mr. Wilshaw: I believe our approving resolution, if it's given tonight, is going to ask that the ice be stored inside the building. Is that a problem? Mr. Alcodray: No. With this proposal, it would not be. We'll have an indoor freezer now, and that should not be a problem. Mr. Wilshaw: Okay. What are your hours of operation? August 11, 2009 25097 Mr. Alcodray: 6:00 a.m. to midnight, I believe. Mr. Wilshaw: Okay. So you're not a 24-hour station? Mr. Alcodray: No. Mr. Wilshaw: Okay. Thank you very much. Mr. Morrow: Seeing no further questions, I'll ask if there is anybody in the audience that wishes to speak for or against the granting of this petition? Seeing no one coming forward, a motion would be in order. On a motion by McDermott, seconded by Scheel, and unanimously adopted, it was #0833-2009 RESOLVED, that the City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Petition 2005-03-08-05 submitted by EDCO Real Estate Ventures, L.L.C. requesting approval of all plans required by Section 18.58 of the Zoning Ordinance in connection with a proposal to construct an addition and renovate the exterior of the service station located at 34901 Ann Arbor Trail, on the southwest corner of Wayne Road and Ann Arbor Trail in the Southwest % of Section 33, be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the Site Plan marked Sheet No. A-01 dated July 27, 2009, as revised, prepared by Engineering Services, Inc., is hereby approved and shall be adhered to; 2. That a fully detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for approval to the Planning Commission and City Council within sixty (60) days following approval of this petition by the City Council; 3. That the Exterior Building Elevation Plan marked Sheet No. A-03 dated July 27, 2009, as revised, prepared by Engineering Services, Inc., is hereby approved and shall be adhered to; 4. That the brick used in the construction shall be full face four (4") inch brick; 5. That the three walls of the trash dumpsler area shall be constructed out of the same brick used in the construction of the building or in the event a poured wall is substituted, the wall's design, texture and color shall match that of the August 11, 2009 25098 building, and the enclosure gates shall be of solid panel steel construction or durable, long-lasting solid panel fiberglass. The enclosure gates shall be maintained and when not in use closed at all times; 6. That all rooftop mechanical equipment shall be concealed from public view on all sides by screening that shall be of a compatible character, material and color to other exterior materials on the building; 7. That the gas pump island canopy shall not exceed eighteen (18') feel in height and its support columns shall be covered with the same brick used in the construction of the building; 8. That the leading edge of the pump island canopy shall not be any closer than len (10') feet from any property line; 9. That the lights of the pump island canopy shall be recessed in such a way that the intensity of the illumination is decreased; 10. That this site shall meet either the City of Livonia or the Wayne County Storm Water Management Ordinance, whichever applies, and shall secure any required permits, including storm water management permits, wetlands permits and soil erosion and sedimentation control permits, from Wayne County, the City of Livonia, and/or the Slate of Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, 11. That all light fixtures shall not exceed twenty (20') feet in height and shall be aimed and shielded so as to minimize stray light trespassing across property lines and glaring into adjacent roadway; 12. That the petitioner shall correct to the Fire Department's satisfaction the items outlined in the correspondence dated August 5, 2009; 13. That the petitioner shall correct to the Inspection Department's satisfaction the following items outlined in the correspondence dated August 7, 2009: - That the parking spaces shall be double striped and shall be 10 feel by 20 feel; - That the existing parking lot shall be repaired and sealed as necessary; August 11, 2009 25099 14. No outside storage, placement or display of merchandise shall be permitted at any time on this site; however, the foregoing prohibition shall not apply to the display, on the pump islands only, of oil based products as permitted in Section 11.04(a) oflhe Zoning Ordinance; 15. That free air shall be provided at all times this station is open for business. The free air shall be dispensed at the point of service without having to enter the station or the performance of any extra action in order to obtain the air without charge; 16. That no vehicle vacuum equipment or the outdoor placement of propane cylinder storage units shall be permitted on the site; 17. That the sale of ice shall be restricted to the inside of the building; 18. That this approval is subject to the petitioner being granted a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals for deficient building setbacks and any conditions related thereto; 19. That only conforming signage is approved with this petition, and any additional signage shall be separately submitted for review and approval by the Zoning Board of Appeals; 20. That no part of the pump island canopy fascia, with the exception of the embossed logos, shall be illuminated; 21. That no LED lighlband or exposed neon shall be permitted on this site including, but not limited to, the pump island canopy, building or around the windows; 22. That the specific plans referenced in this approving resolution shall be submitted to the Inspection Department at the time the building permits are applied for; and, 23. pursuant to Section 19.10 of Ordinance #543, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Livonia, this approval is valid for a period of one year only from the date of approval by City Council, and unless a building permit is obtained, this approval shall be null and void at the expiration of said period. Mr. Morrow: Is there any discussion? Just a point of information, because I think the petitioner had not received the Inspection Department August 11, 2009 25100 letter and there were a couple of items in there that I want to make sure you're aware of. One is the parking spaces will be double striped and conform to 10 feet by 20 feet. And secondly, the parking lot shall be resealed and repaired wherever necessary. Mr. Taormina, should that be included in the resolution or should we just make that a part of the record? Mr. Taormina: Right now, it is included by reference, but we can include those condifions directly in the resolution. Mr. Morrow. How does the Commission feel about that? Is it all right with the mofion maker and supporter? Ms. McDermott: It's fine with me. Ms. Scheel: Okay. Mr. Morrow: Then we will include it. Is there any other discussion? Mr. Taylor: Mark, do they need a seven day waiver on this? I know they were in a hurrylogelgoing on it. Mr. Taormina: I'll have to look at the calendar because I don't know the answer to that. We did not discuss that previously. It probably wouldn't hurt. Mr. Taylor: I would offerthat, Mr. Chairman. That station is not in very good shape right now. Mr. Morrow: We will handle that as a separate motion once we call the roll. If that's the end of the discussion, I'll ask for a roll call. The mofion is carried and the foregoing resoluton adopted. It will go on to City Council with an approving resolution. Mr. Taylor: I will offer the seven day waiver. Mr. Taormina: If I may, Mr. Chairman? Mr. Morrow: Yes. Mr. Taormina: What that would do is allow the petitioner possibly to gel on the August 31 agenda of the City Council and not have to wail until mid-September for the hearing. Mr. Taylor: I knew they were anxious to gel going, and I'm assuming that the President of the Council will agree with it. Mr. Morrow: Al least you Will have the opportunity to ask her. August 11, 2009 25101 On a motion by Taylor, seconded by Scheel, and unanimously approved, it was #0834-2009 RESOLVED, that the City Planning Commission does hereby determine to waive the provisions of Section 10 of Article VI of the Planning Commission Rules of Procedure, regarding the effective dale of a resolution after the seven-day period from the dale of adoption by the Planning Commission, in connection with Petition 2005-03-08-05 submitted by EDCO Real Estate Ventures, L.L.C. requesting approval of all plans required by Section 18.58 of the Zoning Ordinance in connection with a proposal to construct an addition and renovate the exterior of the service station located at 34901 Ann Arbor Trail, on the southwest corner of Wayne Road and Ann Arbor Trail in the Southwest % of Section 33. Mr. Morrow, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. It will go on to City Council with an approving resolution. ITEM#2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 980 Regular Meeting Ms. Smiley, Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda, Approval of the Minutes of the 980 Regular Meeting held on July 28, 2009. On a motion by Scheel, seconded by McDermott, and adopted, it was #0835-2009 RESOLVED, that the Minutes of 984s' Regular Meeting held by the Planning Commission on July 28, 2009, are hereby approved. A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following: AYES: Scheel, McDermott, Wilshaw, Taylor, Smiley, Walsh NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Varloogian ABSENT: None Mr. Morrow, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution adopted. Mr. Taylor: Before we adjourn, I'd like to congratulate the new officers we have. Yourself, as Chairman, Ian Wilshaw as the Vice Chairman, and Carol Smiley as Secretary. We recently had an August 11, 2009 25102 election and those persons were serving before and are doing a grealjob and agreed to do that again. Mr. Morrow: Thank you, Commissioner Taylor. We appreciate those remarks. Ms. Smiley: Thank you very much. On a motion duty made, seconded and unanimously adopted, the 985" Regular Meeting held on August 11, 2009, was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Carol A. Smiley, Secretary ATTEST: R. Lee Morrow, Chairman