HomeMy WebLinkAbout1,170 - June 1, 2021 signedMINUTES OF THE 1,170th PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REGULAR MEETING
HELD BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LIVONIA
On Tuesday, June 1, 2021, the City Planning Commission of the City of Livonia
held its 1,170th Public Hearing and Regular Meeting via Zoom Meeting Software,
Mr. Ian Wilshaw, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.
Members present: David Bongero Sam Caramagno Glen Long
Betsy McCue Carol Smiley Peter Ventura
Ian Wilshaw
Members absent: None
Mr. Mark Taormina, Planning Director, Scott Miller, Planner IV, Jacob Uhazie,
Planning & Economic Development Coordinator, and Stephanie Reece, Program
Supervisor, were also present.
Chairman Wilshaw informed the audience that if a petition on tonight's agenda
involves a rezoning request, this Commission makes a recommendation to the City
Council who, in turn, will hold its own public hearing and make the final
determination as to whether a petition is approved or denied. The Planning
Commission holds the only public hearing on a request for preliminary plat and/or
vacating petition. The Commission's recommendation is forwarded to the City
Council for the final determination as to whether a plat is accepted or rejected. If a
petition requesting a waiver of use or site plan approval is denied tonight, the
petitioner has ten days in which to appeal the decision, in writing, to the City
Council. Resolutions adopted by the City Planning Commission become effective
seven (7) days after the date of adoption. The Planning Commission and the
professional staff have reviewed each of these petitions upon their filing. The staff
has furnished the Commission with both approving and denying resolutions, which
the Commission may, or may not, use depending on the outcome of the
proceedings tonight.
ITEM #1 PETITION 2020-12-06-03 New Zoning Ordinance
Mr. Caramagno, Secretary, announced the first item on the agenda, Petition 2020-
12-06-03 submitted by the City of Livonia Planning Commission to
consider the adoption of an updated and re -formatted LIVONIA
VISION 21 Zoning Ordinance and LIVONIA VISION 21 Zoning
Map. The proposed LIVONIA VISION 21 Zoning Ordinance
provides new definitions, creates several new zoning districts and
deletes several existing districts, updates the list of permitted and
waiver land uses for each zoning district, provides new
June 1, 2021
30010
requirements and regulations for lot sizes, building setbacks, and
lot coverages, off street parking, signs, alternative energy systems,
and other regulations for structures and uses, including a new form -
based development option for the City 's commercial districts.
Mr. Taormina: Tonight's public hearing involves consideration of both the new
zoning ordinance and zoning map. The task of rewriting the
zoning ordinance was authorized by City Council and initiated in
2019, shortly after the official adoption of the Livonia Vision 21
Master Plan. Updating the city's zoning regulations was identified
as the number one priority for implementing the Master Plan. The
Master Plan also outlines a few more specific recommendations
related to updating the zoning ordinance and zoning map,
including consolidating and simplifying the city's zoning districts,
incorporating form -based regulations for the city's special
planning areas and mixed development centers, and providing
incentives and standards that will encourage sustainable use of
land, materials, energy, and resources. The proposed new
zoning ordinance and map are officially being referred to as
Livonia Vision 21 Zoning Ordinance and Livonia Vision 21 Zoning
Map. The Livonia Vision 21 Zoning Ordinance has been
completely reformatted and recodified. By consolidating the
zoning districts and reorganizing the other parts of the ordinance,
the number of articles has been reduced from 31 to 14.
Additionally, hyperlinks, cross-references, tables, and graphics
have been added to make the ordinance much easier and
efficient to navigate. A good example is Section 3.03, permitted
uses by district. This is a single table that provides a
comprehensive list of the land uses and how each is treated
within the 16 different zoning classifications. The 14 articles that
make up the new ordinance are as follows. Article I is basically
the preamble, and is devoted to the Title, Purpose, and Scope of
the ordinance. Article II provides definitions for the various words
and terms used throughout the ordinance. Article III establishes
the zoning districts and map. The big change here is that the total
number of zoning districts is being reduced from 26 to 16,
resulting in a much better alignment with the 9 land use
classifications identified in the Livonia Vision 21 Future Land Use
map. In general, the district changes include consolidating the
six (6) current single-family districts into three (3) new single-
family districts and renaming them: Neighborhood-1,
Neighborhood-2 and RUF. Consolidating the six (6) multi -family
districts into three (3) new multi -family districts that will be called
Neighborhood Multifamily-1, Neighborhood Multifamily-2, and
Neighborhood Multifamily-3. Consolidating the six (6) commercial
districts into four (4) existing districts: C-1, C-21 C-3, and C-4. The
OS (Office Services), PO (Professional Office), AG (Agricultural),
June 1, 2021
30011
and RE (Research Engineering) districts would all be eliminated.
And the PL (Public Land), ML (Manufacturing Limited), M-1 (Light
Manufacturing), M-2 (General Manufacturing), P (Parking), and
NP (Nature Preserves) districts would be retained. Article IV
includes the Schedule of Regulations, another all-inclusive and
easy -to -read table that provides the height, area, bulk, and
placement standard for every zoning district. Article V,
Supplemental Zoning District Standards, establishes and
provides regulations with respect to four unique sections of the
zoning ordinance which are not specific to any zoning district.
These include Section 5.01, Special Area Development Control,
Section 5.02, Special Waiver -Use Standards for Planned
Residential Developments and Planned General Developments,
Section 5.03, Single-family Clustering, and 5.04, Form -based
Development Option in Commercial Districts. The last one,
Form -based Regulations, is probably the most significant
change: The form -based section is designed to encourage
development that is consistent with the recommended design
principles of the Livonia Vision 21 Master Plan. It focuses on
three special planning areas: City Center, the former Livonia Mall
area (Seven Mile and Middlebelt), and the east Plymouth Road
corridor. The form -based rules can also be applied to any
commercial zoning district. Section 5.04 includes design
objectives for the location and spacing of buildings, as well as
their height, area, bulk, and appearance. Mixed -use and high -
density housing is encouraged. In addition, the review procedure
would differ depending on the scale of the project and whether it
conforms to the form -based development standards. If it does, a
typical site -plan review procedure will be followed and conversely
if the project does not conform to the recommended form -based
standards, then the special waiver -use standards of Section 5.02
would be used, which requires a public hearing. Article VI,
Standard Applicable to Specific Uses, provides standards and
regulations for 60 different land uses, ranging from Adult
Entertainment to Wireless Communication Facilities. The special
rules that apply to many of these uses are listed in Section 3.03,
Permitted Uses by District, and are included in Article VI and
cross-referenced with hyperlinks to assist the user. Article VI
eliminates significant redundancy because the rules are housed
in one location but may apply to uses in multiple districts. Article
VII is the General Provisions. Article Vill are the Environmental
Performance Standards designed to place all the regulations
pertaining to environmentally -related uses and issues under a
single division, including waste and rubbish facilities, noise and
odors, soil removal and dumping, as well as the City's flood
hazard areas. Article IX is specific to Parking, Loading and
Access Management. Article X is Landscaping and Screening.
June 1, 2021
30012
And Article XI is devoted to Signs. The last three (3) articles
mentioned consolidate and put all of the city's rules for these
items in separate, easy -to -find chapters, since in one way or
another, they affect nearly all developments and redevelopment
projects. Next is Article XII, Nonconformities. This was created
due to the unique nature of the subject matter and the fact that
several subsections are needed to fully address all of the
complexities that surround this issue. Next is Article XIII,
Administrative Procedures and Article XIV, Violations. These are
provisions common to all zoning ordinances and typically reside
separately as articles or divisions for ease of reference. Also, for
your consideration this evening is the Livonia Vision 21 Zoning
Map, which divides the city into 16 districts, including six (6)
residential classifications, four (4) commercial districts, three (3)
industrial classifications, one (1) for parking, one (1) for public
lands, and one (1) for the city's nature preserves. I am now going
to turn the presentation over to Paul Lippens, the consultant from
McKenna, that was hired to help with both the Phase I, Master
Plan, and Phase 11, new Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map.
Paul Lippens, 235 East Main Street, Suite 105, Northville, MI. Good evening,
Commissioners and members of the public that have come this
evening for the public hearing. I am going to quickly share my
screen here. I have a short presentation. It is going to cover a
few things that most planning commissioners are aware of, but
for the benefit of the public I am going to cover a little bit about
our process and what our next steps are. The Michigan Zoning
and Enabling Act is the act that governs the adoption of zoning
ordinances. It requires the Planning Commission to hold a public
hearing that we are holding this evening and to do a notice 15
days in advance of the meeting and they did. When more than
11 properties are affected, the city is not required to send out
notifications to individual property owners. As Mark said, we are
adopting a new zoning map and ordinance that is really for the
entire city. This provision of the Michigan Zoning and Enabling
Act essentially protects the city from having to endure that cost of
sending out individual notices to every property in the city. We
have had an extensive public engagement throughout the Master
Plan process, and we have been working on this for more than a
year and half at this point. We have had plenty of meetings and
really, we have gotten some great feedback. We have certainly
been able to engage with the Planning Commission, the Zoning
Board of Appeals, the City Council... we are very confident in the
draft that we are presenting this evening. Where we are now is
the Planning Commission is charged with making a
recommendation on the zoning ordinance to the City Council.
The City Council is the adopting body. When City Council
June 1, 2021
30013
chooses to act, and should they entertain a motion to adopt, the
city then is required to publish a notice, similar to the public
hearing, and publish a notice that an amendment has taken
place. The ordinance would then take effect seven days after that
publication. Mark covered a lot of what our accomplishments are,
but I think it really starts here with the Master Plan. The Livonia
Vision 21 Master Plan identifies seven priority projects for the city
to achieve in regard to its planning and zoning. The zoning
ordinance was number one. This is the highest priority planning
activity that the city has had going on since the adoption of the
zoning ordinance in 2018. 1 am very happy to say that through a
thorough process, we are at a point this evening where the
Planning Commission can consider making a recommendation
following public comment on the ordinance to City Council. It is
exciting. This has been a really big effort for the city. I definitely
want to thank everyone on the Planning Commission for your
feedback and participation throughout this process. One of the
other main things that I want to point out is that we, at the
beginning of the zoning ordinance process, conducted a thorough
diagnostic analysis. That analysis formed the basis of work that
we engaged with a technical group committee that included
member of the Planning Commission, members of the Zoning
Board of Appeals, the City Attorney's staff, Code Enforcement,
Inspection, and the Planning Department. One of the things that
I like to remind people of is that what the major course of action
for relief from the zoning ordinance is variances. The Zoning
Board of Appeals is in charge of hearing those variances. The
sum of that work that we did was to go back and evaluate all of
the ordinances... recent variances that the city has granted and
make sure that the variances that were granted are appropriately
handled through the variance procedure and not the type of thing
that would be better handled by amending the ordinance. This
kind of attests to something that we have consistently gone
through. Determining what items we feel are appropriate for the
Zoning Board of Appeals to handle through a variance that would
be a unique hardship or meet the test for providing a variance
versus what things are better acts for Planning Commission
and/or City Council discretion. For those items we created a
process for consideration and amended the ordinance to handle.
A part of that was assessing every part of the ordinance... what
the purpose and function of that was and how the city utilized
these procedures to ensure a fair and equitable planning zoning
process. The way I summarize this is ... what works was
preserved and what didn't was updated. We know that the city is
dedicated to providing high quality services to residents and
business owners. We wanted to understand those procedures
and ensure that this ordinance process wasn't disrupting
June 11 2021
30014
procedures that work. Essentially, where we are now ... the
Planning Department was ready to hit the ground running with the
new ordinance. This time that we have taken, in particular... since
we first started talking about this again in December... this last six
months we have been doing a lot of going through each individual
section, having multiple people, having multiple departments go
through and review it and also having individual conversations
with planning commissioners, Zoning Board of Appeals, and
council members that have those questions so you would be
prepared when this ordinance came into effect to do your job and
understand how the new ordinance will affect the cases that you
hear. Thank you for participating in that process as well. More
on our accomplishments, Mark described in detail some of the
district consolidation and how that affects the map, but what we
really have done there is clean up the regulatory procedures in
the city. When I say we have assessed the purpose, with each
district we went through and asked ourselves what is the
purpose? Is this a district that could be combined?
Consolidated? Are the dimensional requirements for each of
these lots making sense that we can actually distinguish them
from another district? What resulted was a substantive and
meaningful consolidation of regulations that I believe result in a
more usable framework. Also, we have switched to using more
tables, hyperlinks. We did a thorough analysis on non -
conformities, which we have discussed at planning commission
in the past, and we know we have substantially reduced non -
conformities with these new regulations, meaning that more
people can develop the types of uses that they want to develop
by right without having to seek a variance or seek to be a legal
non -conforming use as part of the process. Mark also talked
about the form -based development option, but I would just
highlight that this form -based development option is a direct
implementation process from the master plan to help implement
specific sub -area plans that were developed through the master
plan process. Again, we are utilizing well established city
procedures. Again, a little bit more about the district
consolidation. 150% reduction in districts, and 250% reduction in
non -conforming lots. More opportunities for housing. In creating
that form -based development option, we have created an
opportunity to also include a appropriate housing in the
commercial districts as well. That is a major move to implement
the State of Michigan's Redevelopment Ready Priority
Community Program and to help create missing middle housing
opportunities in the City of Livonia. When we started this process
back when we started the master plan, we knew that it was
important and it has only gotten increasingly more important as
we have gone through... essentially, increased housing demand
June 1, 2021
30015
in southeast Michigan. There is demand for more housing if we
can create it and we can create those opportunities. Some
maps...these maps show the red ... the existing non -conforming,
the green is what will be non -conforming with the new regulations
in place. See, the new regulations, the green... less non -
conformities. Mark already showed the zoning map. I really like
how this map helps to implement the master plan. If you look at
the future land use plan for the city you can visually see a direct
correlation between the city's land use planning directive and the
zoning ordinance. Something that I am really excited on and this
is a really interesting map and I think those of you that know
me...I am really interested in the City of Livonia's neighborhoods,
the industrial district, the commercial district, the community
really functions from a planning perspective in a way that I would
say is logical and also speaks to a history of excellent planning.
That is something that we have tried to keep going throughout
this entire process to honor the city's planning history with this
process. The form -based development option... it is a carrot not
a stick. What we have created is more ways and more tools for
people to develop in ways they couldn't otherwise develop. What
we are hoping... by creating this new option that includes with it a
lot of value. These are valuable types of properties and valuable
types of developments that this incentive will create the types of
new active vital walkable developments that the city wants to see.
We are hoping that even people outside these area -planned
districts see this as a usable option that brings economic vitality
to their properties. I am interested in seeing how this gets picked
up. It is a really exciting approach to form -based coding. It is, I
would say, something that the city can expand on, should it be
successful, but also, I think it is the appropriate tool for this time.
We spent a lot of time thinking about the right way to do this and
the mechanism we chose to advance the form -based
development option, I think, are rightly timed and rightly sized for
the City of Livonia in this current planning cycle. The form -based
development procedure... Mark showed this when he was flipping
through the ordinance, but what this shows is really a simple flow
chart, right? If you are in an area that is planned for special areas,
what we call the special area plans, you can be fast -tracked
essentially to approval. It is a simple site plan approval process.
If you have a PUD process, you may also end up in the special
waiver just for PUD. Not every site that wants to use the form -
based development option will need a PUD. Recognizing that
there is some other procedures that could be involved in
approval, certainly what we have created is the option to do a site
plan process with the form -based development option when there
is a special area plan in place. I think that is unique and I think
that is what makes this an incentive because we have simplified
June 1, 2021
30016
the procedure on how to use these form -based options with the
right plan in place. Now, if there is not a special area plan, I think
that is okay too. You can still use the form -based development
option in any of the C districts using the special waiver -use
standards. I think that makes these options also accessible to
the entire city for anyone that has a business and is interested in
doing this type of development. We want this option to be
available. This is an example of the special area plan for City
Center. You can see this is a large area and the type of special
area planning, when you start talking about creating city blocks
and talking in particular... this is also incorporating a future plan
for the City Center and the Civic campus for the City of Livonia.
A lot of exciting things and I think the form -based development
option is something that makes this now something that could
happen should the city attract one developer or multiple
developers should any of the private landowners in this area
wanted to develop in accordance with this special area plan for
City Center. This option is out there now and can be pursued.
This is an example of the building types that really are created as
options through the form -based development options. Building
row houses, building live work units, mixed use buildings,
integrating commercial office retail with housing. Building
apartments and building these types of uses in close proximity to
each other as a traditional neighborhood. These are the types of
things created by the form -based development option. I wanted
to mention briefly some of the other things that we have done.
We have updated the sign ordinance to be consistent with the
U.S. Supreme Court ruling of Reed vs. Town of Gilbert.
Essentially what we are doing here is we are removing content to
comply with the Supreme Courts ruling. Content based
regulations are no longer acceptable in ordinances. What does
this mean for residents? I think that we are moving toward a total
of square footage rather than defining certain sign types. There
is more flexibility in the content, but it is time, place, and manner
regulations that we are still focused on. We have tried to keep
the time, place, and manner requirements consistent between the
last version of the ordinance and the version you are considering.
Other updates.... specifically, some work that we have done with
staff in the past several months. Mark, I know you have included
this in the report, so I am going to just quickly cover some of the
newer updates. The city is very excited about the Vision 21
name, so we are including it as the Vision 21 ordinances, which I
believe was the intent from the beginning. We wanted to make
sure that it was codified as part of the process. We have looked
at state regulations specifically with respect to liquor license. We
want to make sure that those are defined appropriately. We have
done some work with the Zoning Board of Appeals to understand
June 1, 2021
30017
some of the things that the Zoning Board of Appeals has dealt
with in the past to make sure that those issues are dealt with in
other ways. We have created this exotic vehicle regulation
section. Now this is something that will be considered as a
permitted use in M-1 and M-2 districts. It will no longer have to
go to the Zoning Board of Appeals for consideration. We looked
at vehicle tow yards. We looked back at state regulations for the
Medical Marijuana Act and how the city is permitted to create
separation between the caregivers. We added that to the
ordinance to be consistent with what we are allowed to do via
Medical Marijuana Act in respect to zoning and limiting the impact
of caregivers of the city. We have done some more review of the
ordinance to make sure that other sections are consistent with
the form -based development requirements. There are sections
that have limits. The building heights we wanted to make sure
the form -based development option was specifically excluded
from those limitations. We looked at fencing and again, some of
the newer uses, such as EV charging stations. We wanted to
make sure those were permitted and called out. Our findings, I
believe, were that they would be permitted but we wanted to
specifically list them to encourage these types of uses.
Sometimes using the right language helps to encourage,
especially innovative uses like EV charging stations. So, again,
in summary for next steps, the Planning Commission can hear
from any members of the public tonight during this public hearing.
Following the public hearing, you can certainly discuss with staff
and myself about anything you hear here that you would like us
to address by questions. You are able this evening to make a
recommendation to Council, and you are able to table and come
back if there is something you hear from the public tonight that
you would like to give us something to investigate, and we can
come back at an upcoming meeting with an answer for you on
anything we hear tonight as well. This is a substantive meeting
and we do want to hear from residents tonight. We do want to
make sure that the comments that we hear do have some thought
and are addressed. Upon making a recommendation, and as I
mentioned at the start of my presentation, to Council we would
forward this ordinance to Council for their consideration with your
recommendation. At that time Council may have additional
questions. They certainly have the ability to act with the Planning
Commissions recommendation and they could also send back an
ordinance with questions for the Planning Commission. They
could also act to address questions as well. We want to make
sure the Planning Commission is comfortable with the ordinance,
that we have heard from the public and that we have addressed
any questions that have been raised. When all of that is done,
which I think we are well prepared for this evening, City Council
June 1, 2021
30018
can take a vote with Planning Commission's recommendation to
adopt the ordinance. If they do, we publish the notice and seven
days after that, we have a new ordinance in effect. Thank you
again forgiving me time to present. I did want to cover two things
for the benefit of any public that hasn't attended a prior meeting
on this, so they understand the process and all the work that has
gone into creating the ordinance that is under consideration this
evening. Thank you and I will turn the floor back over to the
Chairman.
Mr. Wilshaw: Thank you, Mr. Lippens, for your presentation. It was really
informative, and it is something that we discussed a few times
here in the past, but it is at this public hearing that we the
opportunity for some people who have not heard the presentation
before to be able to understand what is going on and why we are
making these changes. I also want to thank Mr. Taormina for his
background that he presented as well. They were both very
excellent presentations. With that, we have heard the
presentations about this ordinance. We have had numerous
meetings previously to review this ordinance and discuss it. We
have had a special meeting that was facilitated by our Mayor so
that the Planning Commission could work with the City Council to
have the opportunity for them to hear what is coming down the
pipe that they are going to have to vote on and see at some point
once we approve our recommendation. There have been a
number of meetings leading up to this. We do definitely want to
have another opportunity here for both the public and for any of
our commissioners to ask questions and make comments and so
on. This is going to be a very open meeting. A very free form
discussion and there will be a bit of give and take which we don't
normally want debates between people, but I don't expect any
debate but if there are any questions, we want to make sure that
we can get your questions answered right away. We will make
sure that our experts and people here are able to answer those
questions can do so. Before I go to the commission to see if there
are any questions, Mark, were there any comments that you
received via email? You or your staff? From any of the public?
Mr. Taormina: We did not receive any written comments.
Or.
Wilshaw: Okay, so there is nothing to read into the record in regard to that.
I want to make sure we had that noted. Now I will go to the
commission and see if anyone on the commission wishing to
speak about this ordinance change and this plan. Anyone from
the commission?
June 1, 2021
30019
Ms. Smiley: Only to say how much I appreciate them consolidating this and
simplifying this and I am sure the Zoning Board of Appeals
appreciates all the things that ended up being acceptable from
the start without all the hassle. I am sure the builders and all the
other contractors appreciate it too. What a lot of work. Thank
you.
Mr. Wilshaw: That is a great comment. You are right. This is not something
that just affects us in the Planning Commission and the City
Council, but it is also going to affect the Zoning Board of Appeals,
Inspection Department, Building Department, and a number of
departments throughout the city. Hopefully it will make
everyone's job a bit easier. That is a great comment to make.
Any other questions or comments from any of the
commissioners? If not, we will give you an opportunity here after
we hear from the public as well. Is there anyone in the public
wishing to speak to this zoning ordinance change? If you are, we
are going to ask that you please click the raise hand button and
that way we can recognize you and give you an opportunity to
speak and we will get your comments on our record. I am looking
to see if anybody in the audience would like to raise their hand.
Here we go. We have one person. Let me recognize them. This
is Matt Verbaan. Good evening, sir. We ask that you unmute
yourself when you are ready, and you can introduce yourself with
your name and address for our record.
Matt Verbaan, 28911 West Seven Mile Road, Livonia, MI. I am not a Livonia
resident, but I am a realtor who is representing a property in
Livonia. I am not sure who I talked to last week, but that's fine. I
am watching this to learn. I appreciate you taking the time. I was
told that there was a discussion about eliminating the Office
Specialty zoning and going to C-1. I was curious as to how that
would affect the breadth of what kind of businesses can go into
that new zoning from the old zoning.
Mr. Wilshaw: Great question. Mr. Taormina or Mr. Lippens, did you want to
speak to that.
Mr. Taormina: I will speak to that and answer Mr. Verbaan's question. It was me
that you spoke to last week, Matt. Matt represents a property and
owner on Seven Mile Road. If you drive past this building, your
first impression would be that it is a retail shopping plaza, but it is
actually zoned OS (Office Services). With the changes proposed
and the elimination of the OS zoning district, the zoning of that
property would change to C-1 (Local Business). The main
difference is that instead of limiting the uses under the OS district
primarily to general and medical office uses, C-1 zoning will allow
June 1, 2021
30020
both office uses as well as local retail uses. With the change,
general retail would be treated as a permitted use. However, C-1
zoning is not intended to allow highway service uses, such as
automotive repair or full -service restaurants. Carry -out and
limited service restaurants would be allowed, and in some cases,
subject to the waiver -use process. But general retail would be
treated as a use by right. To that extent it will expand the
opportunities for the plaza. Does that answer your question?
Mr. Verbaan: Yes. Significantly. I have been tasked with trying to rent this ten -
unit place. There are three openings and there is like 14 uses
legal right now. I already have seven of them in and it really limits
it to who we can rent to. We were trying to find out if we could
get some exclusions but now that you are talking about this and
if this passes, we wouldn't have to ask for so many exclusions or
exceptions. Sorry.
Mr. Wilshaw: Exactly, and I think it has been one of the goals of the ordinance
rewrite is to try to broaden, in many cases, each of these areas
to some extent so that we have more conforming uses and less
special waivers and non -conforming properties throughout the
city. This certainly would help and work for the property that you
are representing. We appreciate your comments. Is there
anything else, Mr. Verbaan, that you wanted to mention.
Mr. Verbaan: Thank you for saying my name right. It is like 50/50 with most
people at
best.
So,
if what I was listening to with the prior
gentleman
giving
the
presentation, and this passes you what?
You put a
seven-day
notice unless someone wants to say no,
stop the presses,
and
then it becomes rule or law after that. Is
that how it
works?
Mr. Wilshaw: Right. So, assuming that we make a resolution tonight, which we
will see what the outcome is, we have the option to either table
this or discuss this further, or we could make an approving
resolution to send this to City Council with a recommendation that
it be approved. It would then go to City Council and City Council
could... would have an opportunity to go through a study and
regular meeting to review this. Sometimes they may send it to
committee. They kind of go through their whole process and then
once it is eventually finalized by City Council, then is when the
seven-day period will occur and it really for publication and it is
an opportunity also for the Mayor to veto the Council's action if
she chooses to. That is kind of the same process that most of
our petitions go through.
Mr. Verbaan: Thank you.
June 1, 2021
30021
Mr. Wilshaw: Your welcome, sir. Thank you for coming tonight. We are going
to let you go back into our audience and continue to watch this
meeting as it plays out. Thank you for coming. Is there anyone
else in the audience wishing to speak for or against this item? Or
speak to it and ask questions? If so, you are welcome to click
raise hand. I don't see anyone else raising their hand. Again, I
am going to go back to our commissioners and see if there is
anybody on the commission wishing to ask any questions or
speak to this item.
Mr. Ventura: Mr. Taormina, under the new zoning ordinance, is a form of
residential permissible in the C-1 district? It might be another
option for Mr. Verbaan,
Mr. Taormina: It is a relatively small property, so the practicality of developing
any type of residential use would be very limited. However, your
question is a good one as it potentially affects other C-1 or C-2
properties. The answer is yes. With the form -based regulations
that Paul went over in some detail, mixed -use developments
consisting of such things as live/work units would be allowed
under special requirements. For example, say there is a
commercially -zoned property that is not located within a special
planning area and the owner wanted to take advantage of the
form -based regulations and develop a mixed -use project, they
could do that. It just would not be through an expedited site plan
review process that was mentioned by Paul. It would have to
undergo a special waiver -use review process. A mix of uses
would be allowed in the commercial zoning districts under the
new ordinance. Something we have seen in the past ... just a little
bit different treatment here with much better guidelines in terms
of how those uses could be developed. Does that help?
Mr. Ventura: That is a good explanation, Mr. Taormina. Thank you.
Mr. Wilshaw: Thank you, Mr. Ventura. Any other questions or comments from
any of our commissioners?
Mr. Taormina: If I may, just to make sure everyone understands, should the
Planning Commission adopt an approving resolution this
evening, the City Council office would then schedule a public
hearing. After holding the public hearing, the matter would then
be placed on a regular meeting agenda for direction. If the
direction is approving, then the Law Department would be
instructed to prepare the necessary documents for a First
Reading. There are two more steps following that. The next
would be a Second Reading and Roll Call at a subsequent
June 1, 2021
30022
Regular Meeting. Then finally, publication of the new ordinance.
Even under a best -case scenario, we are still looking at probably
a couple months of review left in this process. I know this
interests Mr. Verbaan, but this is a very deliberate process that is
intended to get as much public input as possible.
Mr. Wilshaw: That is a great comment, Mr. Taormina. It is very important that
we have that process because it is, as you said, very deliberate
and has many steps as it goes forward. There will be many more
opportunities for Mr. Verbaan, or anybody else watching this
meeting or learning about it through media publications and so
on who want to add their comments and to attend those council
meetings or any of the other processes to get their input
incorporated or questions answered. That is very good. Do we
have any other questions or comments from anybody on the
commission?
Mr. Caramagno: I think this question is for Mark or Paul. The form -based
development program, where else has that been tried. Is there
anyone local that someone else has tried that that you can point
to?
Mr. Wilshaw: Mr. Lippens, did you want to comment on that?
Mr. Lippens: Sure. I would actually say including form -based development is
the norm. It is a best -practice for any modern ordinance. Some
of the ordinances that we looked at and my firm has developed in
the past several years were the Tecumseh ordinance that has the
form -based section that is based on the Smart Code. The Smart
Code is a model code that is put out by the Congress for New
Urbanism. It's a good model. It is widely respected. The
Tecumseh version or the code is more smart code. We went in
another direction which is a buildings type code. It is similar to
the form -based development option in the Van Buren code. We
also looked at the code that I was a manager for developing a
downtown form -based code for the City of Sioux St, Marie. I
worked on a form -based development option for the City of Battle
Creek. Recently, we have been working through the adoption
process with the City of Holland on the west side of the state. We
have been doing zoning overhaul with them over the last several
years. Those are kind of current projects, and they are projects
that I am actually working on. Those are the easiest one for me
to tell you about. I am sure there are several that I am not working
on also that include the form -base development option. I would
say that one of the things we are doing in the State of Michigan
is the whole industry and all of our communities are working on
redevelopment ready communities. This is one of the major
June 1, 2021
30023
planning initiatives that the State of Michigan been undergoing
now for several years. Including a form -based development
option is particularly looking at innovative ways to incorporate
housing into codes and it is a recommended best -practice from
redevelopment ready communities as well. Just to give you a bit
of comfort commissioner for where we are going here, this is
really a standard practice and the way we have done it for Livonia
is tailored for this community and an understanding of your
procedures.
Mr. Caramagno: Thank you.
Mr. Wilshaw: Any other questions or comments from any of our
commissioners? One more time I am going to go to our audience
and make sure there is no one else in our audience wishing to
speak on this item. If so, you can click the raise hand. I just want
to make sure you have an opportunity to speak here. I don't see
anyone else clicking raise hand. With that, I believe we can close
the public hearing at this point and a motion would be in order.
Mr. Wilshaw:
On a motion by Ventura, seconded by McCue, and unanimously adopted, it was
#06-27-2021 RESOLVED, That having conducted a Public Hearing with regard
to Petition 2020-12-06-03, submitted by the City Planning
Commission pursuant to Council Resolution #09-19, in
connection with Phase 2 of the Livonia Vision 21 contract
involving the preparation of a comprehensive update to the City
of Livonia Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Commission does
hereby recommend approval of the Livonia Vision 21 Zoning
Ordinance, Version 6.0, dated June 1, 2021, prepared by
McKenna, and the Livonia Vision 21 Zoning Map, dated June
1, 2021, as prepared by the City of Livonia Planning Commission,
for the following reasons:
1. That this comprehensive rewrite of the City's zoning
regulations is the culmination of over two (2) years of hard work
by the Zoning Ordinance Technical Committee, including several
Special Study Meetings of the Planning Commission and a Joint
Work Session with City Council and members of the Zoning
Board of Appeals.
2. That the Livonia Vision 21 Zoning Ordinance and Livonia
Vision 21 Zoning Map are in full compliance with the requirements
of the Michigan Zoning Enabling Act, P.A. 110 of 2006, as
amended.
June 11 2021
30024
3. That the overall organization, recodification, and functionality
of the Livonia Vision 21 Zoning Ordinance represents a
substantial improvement over the existing ordinance and
streamlines all of the City's zoning regulations in a more efficient,
effective and user-friendly format.
4. Adoption of the Livonia Vision 21 Zoning Ordinance achieves
the #1 priority project as identified in the Three -Year Priority
Project List in Book 4, Strategic Development, of the Livonia
Vision 21 Master Plan, which recommends updating the Zoning
Ordinance to jump start Livonia Vision 21 implementation.
5. Adoption of the Livonia Vision 21 Zoning Ordinance and
Livonia Vision 21 Zoning Map is consistent with the
recommended Revisions to the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning
Map as outlined in Book 4, Strategic Development, of the Livonia
Vision 21 Master Plan, including:
a. Consolidating and simplifying the City's one -family
residential zoning districts to reduce the number of non-
conforming lots;
b. Consolidating and simplifying the City's multiple -family
residential zoning districts, and providing new incentives
and standards to encourage infill housing and neighborhood
investment;
c. Consolidating and simplifying the City's commercial
zoning districts by eliminating the office districts and
incorporating the eligible uses and standards into the
corresponding corridor and regional districts;
d. Incorporating form -based regulations for the City's
Special Planning Areas, Mixed Development Centers, and
commercial districts; and
e. Providing incentives and standards that will encourage
sustainable use of land, materials, energy, and resources.
Mr. Wilshaw: Is there any discussion? If there is no discussion, I just wanted
to make a quick comment that this has been a long process,
obviously, as Mr. Taormina and Mr. Lippens have mentioned, and
the commission is very aware of. It has taken years of work
between the Master Plan and this ordinance revision to get to this
point. It is not the most exciting stuff in the world to read. We all
know that, but it is very important because this is a part of our
ordinances that have not been changed... they have been
modified throughout the years, but this is a complete beginning
from scratch. This is taking everything that we have as Mr.
Lippens pointed out, keeping the best of what we have, updating
June 1, 2021
30025
what we need to update so that it is easier and user friendly to
the community and to developers and to residents. This has been
a lot of work by Mr. Taormina, his staff, Mr. Lippens from
McKenna, and his associates that have helped him and many
many people throughout the city. We are not going to necessarily
get to talk about this a whole heck of a lot more as it goes on to
Council. I just wanted to thank everybody that has worked on this
and put blood, sweat and tears into getting us to this point. Thank
you to everybody for that work. I think this is probably the most
exciting and significant thing that we are going to be doing this
year. Not only as a commission, but also as a city as it proceeds.
Even though it isn't super exciting looking it is super exciting and
important change that we are making today as we make this
recommendation. Thank you to everyone for that.
Mr. Wilshaw, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution
adopted. It will go on to City Council with an approving resolution.
ITEM #6 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1,169th Public Hearings and
Regular Meeting
Mr. Caramagno, Secretary, announced the next item on the agenda, Approval of
the Minutes of the 1,169th Public Hearings and Regular Meeting
held on May 18, 2021.
On a motion by Caramagno, seconded by Long ,and unanimously adopted, it was
#06-28-2021 RESOLVED, That the Minutes of 1,169ih Public Hearings and
Regular Meeting held by the Planning Commission on May 18,
2021, are hereby approved.
A roll call vote on the foregoing resolution resulted in the following:
AYES: Long, McCue, Bongern , Smiley, Ventura,
Caramagno, Wilshaw
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Mr. Wilshaw, Chairman, declared the motion is carried and the foregoing resolution
adopted.
On a motion duly made, seconded and unanimously adopted, the 1,170ih Public
Hearings and Regular Meeting held on June 1, 2021, was adjourned at 8:02 p.m.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
1
S
l
ATTEST:
Ian Wilshaw. Chairman